About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Biomathematics
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 912835, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/912835
Research Article

Optimal Antiviral Treatment Strategies of HBV Infection Model with Logistic Hepatocyte Growth

1Département de Mathématiques et Informatique, Faculté des Sciences Ben M’Sik, Université Hassan II Mohammadia, Casablanca, Morocco
2Département de Mathématiques et Informatique, Faculté des Sciences, Université Chouaib Doukkali, El Jadida, Morocco

Received 1 May 2013; Accepted 19 June 2013

Academic Editors: M. Brumen and J. R. C. Piqueira

Copyright © 2013 Hassan Laarabi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This study considers an optimal therapy strategy for HBV infection by incorporating two controls laws into a previous hepatitis B viral infection model with logistic hepatocyte growth. Our goal is to maximize the number of healthy cells and to minimize the cost of the therapy. In this context, the existence of an optimal control is proved. The optimal control is obtained by solving the optimality system which was composed of three nonlinear ODEs with initial conditions and three nonlinear adjoint ODEs with transversality conditions. The results were analysed and interpreted numerically using MATLAB.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global public-health problem. Of the approximately 2 billion people who have been infected worldwide, more than 350 million are chronic carriers of HBV. Approximately 15–40% of infected patients will develop cirrhosis, liver failure, or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) which is the fifth most frequent cancer, killing 300 000–500 000 people each year. The treatment of chronic infection may be necessary to reduce the risk of cirrhosis and liver cancer. Chronically, infected individuals with persistently elevated serum alanine aminotransferase, a marker of liver damage, and HBV DNA levels are candidates for therapy. Although none of the available drugs can clear the infection, they can stop the virus from replicating and prevent liver damage such as cirrhosis and liver cancer. Treatments include antiviral drugs such as lamivudine, adefovir, tenofovir, telbivudine, and entecavir and immune system modulators such as interferon alpha. However, some individuals are much more likely to respond than others; this might be because of the genotype of the infecting virus or the patient’s heredity. The treatment works by reducing the viral load (the amount of virus particles as measured in the blood), which in turn reduces viral replication in the liver.

Mathematical modelling and analysis of hepatitis B infections have been explored extensively over the last decade. One of the earliest models was proposed by Nowak et al. [1] who modeled the infection of healthy hepatocytes by free virions as a mass action process. This makes the viral basic reproduction number dependent on the homeostatic liver size. Gourley et al. [2], Min et al. [3], Eikenberry et al. [4], Ciupe et al. [5, 6], and Hews et al. [7] all replace this mass-action process with a standard incidence function to increase the richness of the dynamics.

Optimal control theory has found wide-ranging applications in biological and ecological problems [8]. In biomedical problems, techniques from control theory are of great use in developing optimal therapeutic strategies. The treatment regimen is usually taken to be the control variable, with the aim of minimizing the detrimental effects of the medical condition.

We consider the mathematical model for HBV developed by Hews et al. [7], who modeled the constant infusion of healthy hepatocytes with a logistic growth term and the mass action infection term by a standard incidence function. The dynamics of this model are governed by the following equations: with where is the mass of healthy hepatocytes, is the mass of infected hepatocytes, and is the mass of free virions. Healthy hepatocytes grow at a rate that depends on the homeostatic liver size, , at a maximum per capita proliferation rate . Hepatocytes become infected at maximum rate and die at rate . Free virions are created by infected hepatocytes at per capita rate , and virions either disintegrate or are destroyed by the immune system at rate . All parameters in the mathematical model are strictly positive.

2. The Optimal Control Problem

We introduce a control to the previously mentioned model simulating the antiviral therapy. Hence, the previous model becomes The control functions and are bounded Lebesgue integrable functions. The control represents the efficiency of drug therapy in blocking new infection, and the control represents the efficiency of drug therapy in inhibiting viral production.

If , the inhibition is effective, whereas if , there is no inhibition.

The problem is to maximize the objective functional where the parameters and are based on the benefits and costs of the treatment. Our target is to maximize the objective functional defined in (4) by increasing the number of the uninfected cells, decreasing the viral load, and minimizing the cost of treatment. In other words, we are seeking an optimal control pair such that where is the control set defined by

2.1. Existence of an Optimal Control Pair

The existence of the optimal control pair can be obtained using a result by Fleming and Rishel [9] and by Lukes [10].

Theorem 1. Consider the control problem with system equations (3). There exists an optimal control such that

Proof. To use an existence result, Theorem III.4.1 from [9], we must check the following properties.(1)The set of controls and corresponding state variables is nonempty. (2)The control set is convex and closed.(3)The RHS of the state system is bounded by a linear function in the state and control variables.(4)The integrand of the objective functional is concave on .(5)There exist constants , , and such that the integrand of the objective functional satisfies In order to verify these conditions, we use a result by Lukes [10, Theorem , page 182] to give the existence of solutions of ODEs (3) with bounded coefficients, which gives condition 1. We note that the solutions are bounded. Our control set satisfies condition 2. Since our state system is bilinear in and , the RHS of (3) satisfies condition 3, using the boundedness of the solutions. Note that the integrand of our objective functional is concave. Also, we have the last condition needed where depends on the upper bound on and since , . We conclude that there exists an optimal control pair.

2.2. Characterization of the Optimal Control

Pontryagin’s maximum principle [11] provides the necessary conditions for an optimal control problem. This principle converts (3), (4), and (5) into a problem of maximizing a Hamiltonian, , pointwise with respect to and : where , , are the adjoint functions to be determined suitably.

Theorem 2. Given optimal controls , and solutions , , and of the corresponding state system (3), there exist adjoint variables , , and satisfying Furthermore, the optimal control is given by

Proof. We use the Hamiltonian (10) in order to determine the adjoint equations and the transversality conditions. By putting ,  and   and differentiating the Hamiltonian with respect to , , and , we obtain and by using the optimality conditions, we find By analyzing the bounds on the controls and the representation in the interior of the set, we obtain and in the form of (13).

2.3. The Optimality System

The optimality system consists of the state system coupled with the adjoint system with the initial conditions, the transversality conditions, and the characterization of the optimal control.

Consider

3. Numerical Simulations

3.1. The Improved GSS1 Method

The resolution of the optimality system is created by improving the Gauss-Seidel-like implicit finite-difference method developed by Gumel et al. [12], presented in [1315], and denoted by the GSS1 method. It consists of discretizing the interval by the points , where is the time step. Next, we define the state and adjoint variables , , , , , and and the controls and in terms of nodal points , , , , , , , and with , , , , , , and as the state and adjoint variables and the controls at initial time . , , , , , , , and are the state and adjoint variables and the controls at final time .

As it is well known, the approximation of the time derivative by its first-order forward difference is given, for the first state variable , by We use the GSS1 method to adapt it to our case as follows: we examine the variables one by one by blocking all other values to the most recently calculated By applying an analogous technology, we approximate the time derivative of the adjoint variables by their first-order backward difference, and we use the appropriated scheme as follows:

3.2. Numerical Results

By making some parameter value choices, computer simulation experiments are done to verify the effectiveness of our new model by comparing the disease progression before and after introducing the two optimal control variables and . We use the following parameters and initial values: In Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the control individuals are marked by solid blue curves, while the individual without control is marked by dashed black curves.

912835.fig.001
Figure 1: Shows a significant difference in the mass of healthy hepatocytes with and without control from the very beginning of treatment (in the first three days), and after that, it begins go to the stable state.
912835.fig.002
Figure 2: We see that the mass of infected hepatocytes, with control, decreases rapidly from the beginning days of treatment.
912835.fig.003
Figure 3: We see that the mass of free virions decreases rapidly from the first week of the treatment.
912835.fig.004
Figure 4: Represents the controls and .
912835.fig.005
Figure 5: Represents the controls and .

4. Conclusion

In this paper, we have proposed an HBV model with control variables.

Our goal was to maximize the mass of healthy hepatocytes and to minimize the cost of therapy, and effectively we can clearly notice the benefit of putting a control on the decreasing kinetic of infected hepatocytes. We believe that the analysis presented in this paper, combined with pharmacokinetics studies, could play an important role in developing improved HBV treatment regimen.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments. Some of this work was funded by the network of systems theory affiliated to Hassan II Academy of Science and Technology.

References

  1. M. A. Nowak, S. Bonhoeffer, A. M. Hill, R. Boehme, H. C. Thomas, and H. Mcdade, “Viral dynamics in hepatitis B virus infection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 4398–4402, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. A. Gourley, Y. Kuang, and J. D. Nagy, “Dynamics of a delay differential model of hepatitis B virus,” Journal of Biological Dynamics, vol. 2, pp. 140–153, 2008.
  3. L. Min, Y. Su, and Y. Kuang, “Mathematical analysis of a basic virus infection model with application to HBV infection,” Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1573–1585, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Eikenberry, S. Hews, J. D. Nagy, and Y. Kuang, “The dynamics of a delay model of hepatitis B virus infection with logistic hepatocyte growth,” Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 283–299, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. M. Ciupe, R. M. Ribeiro, P. W. Nelson, and A. S. Perelson, “Modeling the mechanisms of acute hepatitis B virus infection,” Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 247, no. 1, pp. 23–35, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. M. Ciupe, R. M. Ribeiro, P. W. Nelson, G. Dusheiko, and A. S. Perelson, “The role of cells refractory to productive infection in acute hepatitis B viral dynamics,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 12, pp. 5050–5055, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Hews, S. Eikenberry, J. D. Nagy, and Y. Kuang, “Rich dynamics of a hepatitis B viral infection model with logistic hepatocyte growth,” Journal of Mathematical Biology, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 573–590, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Lenhart and J. T. Workman, Optimal Control Applied to Biological Models, Mathematical and Computational Biology Series, Chapman & Hall/CRC, London, UK, 2007.
  9. W. H. Fleming and R. W. Rishel, Deterministic and Stochastic Optimal Control, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1975.
  10. D. L. Lukes, Differential Equations: Classical To Controlled, vol. 162 of Math, Science and Engineering, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  11. L. S. Pontryagin, V. G. Boltyanskii, R. V. Gamkrelize, and E. F. Mishchenko, The Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1962.
  12. A. B. Gumel, P. N. Shivakumar, and B. M. Sahai, “A mathematical model for the dynamics of HIV-1 during the typical course of infection,” Nonlinear Analysis, Theory, Methods and Applications, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1773–1783, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. Hattaf, M. Rachik, S. Saadi, and N. Yousfi, “Optimal control of treatment in a basic virus infection model,” Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 3, no. 17–20, pp. 949–958, 2009. View at Scopus
  14. J. Karrakchou, M. Rachik, and S. Gourari, “Optimal control and infectiology: application to an HIV/AIDS model,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 807–818, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Laarabi, E. Labriji, M. Rachik, and A. Kaddar, “Optimal control of an epidemic model with a saturated incidence rate,” Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 448–459, 2012.