Table 3: Results on natural images in Figure 1 by three methods (SR = 21.59%, 𝑠 = 8 , 𝑝 = 2 ).

Image no.MethodExp. result
SNRRel. err.Iter

Figure 1(a)FPC [10]18.52575.51%53
TVCMRI [11]21.13910.71%62
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟏 . 𝟔 𝟒 𝟏 𝟑 𝟎 . 𝟕 𝟏 % 65
Figure 1(b)FPC [10]20.09023.14%53
TVCMRI [11]22.32890.60%65
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟑 . 𝟖 𝟏 𝟔 𝟖 𝟎 . 𝟒 𝟓 % 64
Figure 1(c)FPC [10]16.59734.89%53
TVCMRI [11]18.36770.73%62
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟎 . 𝟕 𝟗 𝟒 𝟔 𝟎 . 𝟒 𝟖 % 65
Figure 1(d)FPC [10]13.89527.54%53
TVCMRI [11]15.46211.74%67
HQRCSparET 𝟏 𝟖 . 𝟒 𝟕 𝟑 𝟏 𝟏 . 𝟎 𝟓 % 64
Figure 1(e)FPC [10]17.69304.88%53
TVCMRI [11]20.50170.64%64
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟒 . 𝟖 𝟔 𝟑 𝟑 𝟎 . 𝟒 𝟔 % 64
Figure 1(f)FPC [10]19.86303.38%53
TVCMRI [11]22.29370.98%67
HQRCSparET 𝟑 𝟗 . 𝟖 𝟖 𝟖 𝟒 𝟎 . 𝟏 𝟖 % 62