Table 4: Results on MR images in Figure 4 by three methods (SR = 38.56%, 𝑠 = 8 , 𝑝 = 2 ).

Image no.MethodExp. result
SNRRel. err.Iter

Figure 4(a)CTVCS [6]33.09150.32%58
TVCMRI [11]33.39620.31%81
HQRCSparET 𝟒 𝟖 . 𝟖 𝟔 𝟖 𝟕 𝟎 . 𝟕 𝟐 62
Figure 4(b)CTVCS [6]36.56600.27%56
TVCMRI [11]38.51210.22%84
HQRCSparET 𝟓 𝟑 . 𝟏 𝟔 𝟔 𝟕 𝟎 . 𝟓 𝟐 63
Figure 4(c)CTVCS [6]33.94070.40%57
TVCMRI [11]35.05280.36%80
HQRCSparET 𝟓 𝟒 . 𝟑 𝟑 𝟏 𝟗 𝟎 . 𝟑 𝟕 62
Figure 4(d)CTVCS [6]33.77180.38%58
TVCMRI [11]34.31570.35%79
HQRCSparET 𝟑 𝟕 . 𝟏 𝟑 𝟕 𝟕 𝟎 . 𝟐 𝟕 % 62
Figure 4(e)CTVCS [6]27.58380.91%55
TVCMRI [11]28.42530.79%81
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟗 . 𝟖 𝟒 𝟏 𝟓 𝟎 . 𝟕 𝟖 % 64
Figure 4(f)CTVCS [6]30.86220.74%54
TVCMRI [11]32.57620.61%76
HQRCSparET 𝟑 𝟓 . 𝟑 𝟑 𝟔 𝟕 𝟎 . 𝟓 𝟑 % 64