Table 5: Results on MR images in Figure 4 by three methods (SR = 21.59%, 𝑠 = 8 , 𝑝 = 2 ).

Image no.MethodExp. result
SNRRel. err.Iter

Figure 4(a)CTVCS [6]21.38811.23%57
TVCMRI [11]21.90851.05%71
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟒 . 𝟐 𝟎 𝟓 𝟖 𝟎 . 𝟖 𝟓 % 64
Figure 4(b)CTVCS [6]24.49430.91%56
TVCMRI [11]25.15570.81%70
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟖 . 𝟓 𝟐 𝟑 𝟎 𝟎 . 𝟔 𝟕 % 66
Figure 4(c)CTVCS [6]23.62541.20%57
TVCMRI [11]23.97601.16%71
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟗 . 𝟒 𝟏 𝟎 𝟔 𝟎 . 𝟔 𝟕 % 65
Figure 4(d)CTVCS [6]19.50021.64%57
TVCMRI [11]19.95291.57%70
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟐 . 𝟓 𝟑 𝟐 𝟖 𝟏 . 𝟎 𝟖 % 64
Figure 4(e)CTVCS [6]17.89112.76%55
TVCMRI [11]18.04972.57%57
HQRCSparET 𝟏 𝟗 . 𝟓 𝟔 𝟎 𝟓 𝟐 . 𝟎 𝟏 % 65
Figure 4(f)CTVCS [6]19.03262.60%54
TVCMRI [11]20.01302.49%56
HQRCSparET 𝟐 𝟏 . 𝟒 𝟖 𝟑 𝟑 𝟐 . 𝟎 𝟓 % 66