Table 1: Summary of prevalence of patients with different dental anomalies according to gender (number and percentage).

Males ( 𝑛 = 4 3 0 ) Females ( 𝑛 = 4 4 8 ) Both ( 𝑛 = 8 7 8 )
No. (%)No. (%)No. (%)

Congenitally missing teeth107 (24.9)119 (26.6%)226 (25.7%)
 (i) Third molars86 (20.0)99 (22.1%)185 (21.1%)
  (ii) Lower premolars7 (1.6)6 (1.3)13 (1.5)
  (iii) Upper canines3 (0.7)2 (0.4)5 (0.6)
  (iv) Other11 (2.6)12 (2.7)23 (2.6)

Impactions10 (23.3)86 (19.2)186 (21.2)
  (i) Third molars74 (17.2)66 (14.7)140 (15.9)
  (ii) Upper canines16 (3.7)13 (2.9)29 (3.3)
  (iii) Lower premolars1 (0.2)4 (0.9)5 (0.6)
  (iv) Others9 (2.1)3 (0.7)12 (1.4)

Ectopic eruption1 (0.5)1 (0.2)2 (0.3)
  (i) Third molars1 (0.2)1 (0.2)2 (0.2)
  (ii) Lower premolars1 (0.2)0 (0.0)1 (0.1)

Other anomalies6 (1.4)6 (1.3)12 (1.4)
  (i) Dilaceration6 (1.4)4 (0.9)10 (1.1)
  (ii) Supernumerary2 (0.5)1 (0.2)3 (0.3)
  (iii) Odontoma0 (0.0)1 (0.2)1 (0.1)
  (iv) Taurodontism0 (0.0)1 (0.2)1 (0.1)