About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Materials Science
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 129869, 7 pages
Research Article

Studies on Nanocomposites of Polyaniline and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles with Supporting Matrix of Polycarbonate

1Department of Chemistry, College of Applied Sciences and Science and Technology Unit, Umm Al Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
2Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India

Received 24 April 2012; Accepted 7 June 2012

Academic Editors: S. Grigalevicius and V. K. Thakur

Copyright © 2012 Shahid Pervez Ansari and Faiz Mohammad. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Nanocomposites of polyaniline and zinc oxide nanoparticles using polycarbonate as supporting matrix were prepared by direct mixing process. These nanocomposites were studied for their DC electrical conductivity using four-in-line probe technique. Stability of DC electrical conductivity in terms of electrical conductivity retention was also studied using two slightly different techniques. The nanocomposites were also characterized using FTIR, SEM, TEM, and XRD. It was found that the electrical conductivity of the nanocomposites first increased with the increase in concentration of ZnO nanoparticles content, but then decreased on further increase in its content. Stability studies showed that the loss in electrical conductivity decreased with increase of ZnO content in nanocomposites. TEM and XRD results showed that nanoparticles are uniformly distributed in polymer matrix and also suggest that the direct solution mixing method may be adopted as an easy and efficient route for the preparation of nanocomposites.

1. Introduction

Polymer-inorganic composites were first prepared by Blumstein in 1960s by polymerizing methyl methacrylate in presence of clay and found unusual properties in the composites he prepared. In early 1990s, polymerization of caprolactam in presence of montmorillonite clay by Toyota researchers improved several properties. This report encouraged the research in the field of polymer nanocomposites as reported by Zhang et al. [1]. There are three main approaches to prepare polymer-inorganic nanocomposites which include direct mixing of two or more components in a common solvent, in situ polymerization of monomer units in presence of inorganic nanoparticles and melt mixing of polymer with inorganic nanoparticles, in a mixer as suggested by Wu et al. [2]. Lei and Su [3] report about many studies on conducting polymer nanocomposites in view to find their applications in advanced techniques.

Among the conducting polymers, polyaniline (PANI) is one of the most studied intrinsically conducting polymers. PANI obtained high value in scientific community owing to its easy preparation, better environmental stability, tuneable electrical conductivity, easy acid/base doping/dedoping behavior, and so forth. The preparation of nanocomposites of PANI with inorganic nanoparticles is thought to be a potential route to improve the performance of PANI aiming to obtain the materials with synergetic or complementary behaviour between PANI and inorganic nanoparticles. Among the inorganic nanoparticles, zinc oxide (ZnO) has received great attention because of its unique catalytic, electrical, electronic, and optical properties, as well as their low cost and extensive applications in diverse areas as discussed by He [4]. We believe that incorporation of ZnO nanoparticles in PANI may result in new material with useful properties.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The materials used include acetone, ammonia, aniline, HCl, potassium persulphate, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone,and zinc oxide nanoparticles (avg. particles size 50 nm) that were purchased by the store keeper of the department and provided for the research.

2.2. Preparation of Polyaniline Nanoparticles

Polyaniline (PANI) nanoparticles were obtained by our patented route which simply involves oxidative polymerization of aniline in aqueous acidic solution with little modification (Ansari and Mohammad, [5]). In the typical procedure, the oxidative polymerization of aniline in aqueous HCl was carried out in presence of potassium persulphate (K2S2O8) as oxidant in aqueous HCl. The optimum ratio of aniline, oxidant (2 : 1), was kept constant during the reaction. PANI (emeraldine salt) obtained was filtered and washed with double distilled water till filtrate was neutral to pH paper followed by its dedoping using aqueous ammonia solution. It was again washed with double distilled water to get emeraldine base form of PANI which, after drying at 60°C in air oven for 2 days, was kept in dessicator for further studies.

2.3. Preparation of Nanocomposites

Firstly, zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO) were dispersed in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) in round bottom flasks for 12 h with continuous stirring at room temperature. In other flasks, polycarbonate (PC) and polyaniline (PANI) nanoparticles base form (EB) were dissolved in NMP with continuous stirring. Dispersion of ZnO nanoparticles were then added to PANI:PC solution at a rate of 1 mL/min. The films of the nanocomposites were obtained by solvent evaporation method at 100 in an air oven.

Thus, prepared films were cut into small pieces of rectangular shape and subjected to a pressure of 10 tons using electrically operated hydraulic press machine at 150 to get smooth films. Finally, we prepared films of pure PANI and nanocomposites containing different compositions of PANI, PC, and ZnO (Table 1). These films were then treated with 1M HCl for 24 hrs, washed with double distilled water repeatedly to remove traces of acid, dried at 60 for 12 h, and were used for electrical studies as per our previous reports [5].

Table 1: Preparation of of PANI:PC:ZnO nanocomposites.

3. Characterization

The pure PANI and nanocomposites of different compositions of PANI, PC, and ZnO nanoparticles were characterized by FTIR, electron microscopy (SEM & TEM), DC electrical conductivity, and XRD techniques.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. FTIR Studies

FTIR spectroscopy is a very useful and convenient technique to detect the interaction developed between two or more components of a composite material. FTIR spectra of selected samples are shown in Figure 1. The broad peak ranging between 440 cm−1 and 550 cm−1 (Figure 1(a)) can be assigned to ZnO group [5]. FTIR spectrum of prepared PANI (EB) form is presented in Figure 1(b). The band corresponding to out-of-plane bending vibration of C–H bond of p-disubstituted benzene rings appears at 824 cm−1. The bands corresponding to vibration mode of N=Q=N ring and stretching mode of C–N bond appear at 1150 cm−1 and 1307 cm−1, respectively. Band at 1582 cm−1 and 1496 cm−1 are assigned to C=C stretching of quinoid and benzenoid rings, respectively. FTIR spectrum of polycarbonate is described in Figure 1(c). The peaks at 832, 1018, 1082, 1165, 1236, 1367, 1506, 1775, 2874, and 2973 cm−1 may be assigned to p out-of-plane aromatic CH wagging, p in-plane aromatic CH bending, C–C stretching, carbonate C–O stretching, carbonate aryl-O-aryl C–O stretching, CH3 symmetric deformation, p-aromatic ring semicircle stretching, carbonate C=O stretching, CH3 symmetric stretching and CH3 asymmetric stretching, respectively, as supported by Madkaur [6]. In case of nanocomposite PANI:PC:Z5 (Figure 1(d)) peaks obtained for individual components have been shifted slightly from their original position. For example, the peaks of pure PANI, shifted to lower wave number in nanocomposites.

Figure 1: FTIR spectra of (a) zinc oxide nanoparticles purchased from MKnano (Canada), (b) emeraldine base nanoparticles, (c) polycarbonate, and (d) PANI:PC:Z5 nanocomposite.
4.2. DC Electrical Conductivity Study

The DC electrical conductivity of HCl doped PANI and composite films were measured with increasing temperature (40–150) by using four-in-line probe DC electrical conductivity-measuring instrument (Scientific Equipment, Roorkee, India). DC electrical conductivity (σ) was calculated using the following equations: where G7(W/S) is a correction divisor which is a function of thickness of the sample as well as probe spacing while I, V, W, and S are current (A), voltage (V), thickness of the film (cm), and probe spacing (cm), respectively.

The electrical conductivity behaviour of the doped PANI and nanocomposites are presented in Figure 2. The addition of zinc oxide nanoparticles into polyaniline results into the decrease in electrical conductivity of nanocomposites. The decrease in electrical conductivity at content of inorganic fillers is also supported in case of TiO2 and Fe2O3 as discussed by Ansari [7]. The decrease in the electrical conductivity of doped polyaniline (as-prepared emeraldine salt, σ (40) = 1.3 × 10−1 Scm−1) on mixing with supporting polymer matrix (due to insulating component for imparting mechanical strength to the nanocomposites) is normal and expected behaviour from the nanocomposites. The behaviour on incorporation of different zinc oxide nanoparticles contents into the composite formulations may be explained in the light of following lines.

Figure 2: Schematic diagram of relative electrical conductivity of nanocomposite films containing polyaniline, polycarbonate, and zinc oxide nanoparticles with respect to HCl (1 M) doped polyaniline film.

The decrease in electrical conductivity on incorporation of zinc oxide nanoparticles into the polyaniline (emeraldine salt) may be attributed to the presence of zinc oxide nanoparticles (of relatively lower conductivity) which may also be expected to act as dedoping agent ([7] Ansari 2010) as may be represented by Scheme 1.

Scheme 1

However, the increase in electrical conductivity on further increase in the nanoparticles content may be attributed to the combination of PANI and Zn2+ present in the matrix as a result of Scheme 1 giving a hole-type conduction as represented in Scheme 2.

Scheme 2

At higher zinc oxide contents (in case of 40 mg and 50 mg) in the nanocomposites, again the decrease in electrical conductivity was observed. It seems that there is competition between dedoping shown in Scheme 1 and doping shown in Scheme 2 leading to a maximum followed by the lowering of electrical conductivity.

4.3. DC Electrical Conductivity Stability in Terms of Electrical Conductivity Retention

The stability of electrical conductivity in terms of DC electrical conductivity retention of the nanocomposite samples, along with the polyaniline, was studied with two slightly different techniques. It was found that the electrical conductivity stability increases with the increase in concentration of zinc oxide nanoparticles.

Electrical Conductivity Retention under Cyclic Ageing Conditions
In this process, the sample is subjected to repeated measurement of electrical conductivity in the defined temperature range after a definite period. In the typical procedure, electrical conductivity of all sample films was obtained after an interval of 45 min for 5 cycles in the temperature range 40–150. The sample films in the four-probe instrument were kept undisturbed throughout the experiment. The electrical conductivity behaviours obtained for cyclic study are given in Figure 3. The electrical conductivity data were plotted as log of electrical conductivity (log σ) versus 1000/T (K).

Figure 3: Electrical conductivity retention under cyclic/isothermal conditions of (a1/a2) PANI:PC:Z0, (b1/b2) PANI:PC:Z1, (c1/c2) PANI:PC:Z2, (d1/d2) PANI:PC:Z3, (e1/e2) PANI:PC:Z4, and (f1/f2) PANI:PC:Z5 under cyclic ageing conditions.

Electrical Conductivity Retention under Isothermal Ageing Conditions
The stability of electrical conductivity in term of DC electrical conductivity retention was also studied under isothermal condition by using four-in-line DC electrical conductivity measuring instrument. In simple procedure, the electrical conductivity of all the samples were measured at a constant temperature 50, 70, 90, 110, and 130. Isothermal study of the nanocomposites suggests that the electrical conductivity retention is much better in the nanocomposites having higher content of zinc oxide nanoparticles than those without or having lower content of zinc oxide nanoparticles. The isothermal stability behaviour of electrical conductivity, plots of versus time is given in Figure 3. In general, it may be observed that the electrical conductivity of the polyaniline and nanocomposites containing different polymer matrices and zinc oxide nanoparticles concentration showed good stability in terms of electrical conductivity retention up to 90.

4.4. Electron Microscopy Studies (SEM & TEM)

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of selected samples were obtained using SEM-JEOL 840 A. The SEM images of surface of polyaniline (emeraldine base) and HCl (1 M doped) nanocomposite PANI:PC:Z5 films are given in Figure 4. The surface of undoped polyaniline (PANI) film shows a specific pattern of wave. However, surface morphology of nanocomposite PANI:PC:Z5 totally changed into flaky on doping with HCl (1 M). Transmission electron microscope (TEM) images (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)) of polyaniline (emeraldine base) and PANI:PC:Z5 nanocomposite were obtained using Phillips CM-10. TEM images suggest that the particles of polyaniline (emeraldine base) and that of nanocomposites are in manometer range.

Figure 4: (a) SEM image of surface of undoped polyaniline (emeraldine base) film, (b) SEM image of surface of doped PANI:PC:Z5, (c) TEM image of emeraldine base, and (d) TEM image of PANI:PC:Z5.
4.5. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) Studies

The powder method of X-ray diffraction, basically this method, involves the diffraction of monochromatic X-rays by a powder specimen. X-rays diffractions were carried out using an X′pert Pro XRD X-ray diffractometer and filtered CuKα radiations. The diffraction patterns of the selected sample powders ZnO nanoparticles and PANI:PC:Z5 were obtained by scanning the samples at an interval of 2θ = 0 – 60° at a rate of 2°/min. The average particles size (D) may be calculated for the selected samples by using Scherrer equation given below: where K is the shape factor for the average crystallite (expected shape factor is 0.9), λ is X-ray’s wavelength for Kα, β is full width at half maximum of the diffraction line, and θ is Bragg’s angle.

The XRD patterns of selected samples are given in Figure 5. Peaks obtained in case of pure zinc oxide nanoparticles (2θ = 31.8340, 34.4853, 36.3303, and 47.6017 and 2θ = 56.6575) are also present in PANI:PC:Z5 (2θ = 31.8251, 34.4851, 36.2975, and 47.5955 and 2θ = 56.6283) nanocomposites.

Figure 5: XRD pattern of (a) zinc oxide nanoparticles (purchased sample) and (b) PANI:PC:Z5 nanocomposite particles.

XRD pattern of zinc oxide nanoparticles and that of various nanocomposites showed similar peak patterns; therefore, it may be assumed that presence of polyaniline did not cause any change in crystal structure of zinc oxide or negligible change which may be ignored. These results also indicate that the polyaniline present in nanocomposites is amorphous, supporting the previous reports. Moreover, above discussion also supports that the incorporation of supporting polymer into polyaniline does not affect the crystal structure of zinc oxide nanoparticles as reported in work of Ansari [7].

5. Conclusions

FTIR spectra of the samples support the interaction of PANI chains with ZnO which imparts the thermal stability to the nanocomposites. Electrical conductivity study of the samples favours that PANI is mainly responsible for the electrical conduction; however, a little increase in conductivity was observed with the increase in ZnO content. Cyclic and isothermal study reveals that the electrical conductivity of the nanocomposites is more stabilized with increased ZnO concentration in nanocomposites. The TEM and XRD results suggest the uniform distribution of zinc oxide nanoparticles in the nanocomposites. Therefore, it may be inferred that the solution mixing process to produce nanocomposites has promising future if handled carefully and these nanocomposites may be used for various electrical and electronic applications.


The authors are highly thankful to the assistance provided in their respective capacities by Mr. Mohd. Omaish Ansari and Mr. Tariq Anwer (Research Scholars, Department of Applied Chemistry, AMU). SAIF, Department of Anatomy, AIIMS, New Delhi, and SAIF Punjab University, Chandigarh, for providing TEM and XRD facilities, respectively, are highly acknowledged.


  1. J. Zhang, E. Manias, and C. A. Wilkie, “Polymerically modified layered silicates: an effective route to nanocomposites,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1597–1615, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. S. Wu, Y. J. Huang, T. H. Hsieh et al., “Studies on the conducting nanocomposite prepared by in situ polymerization of aniline monomers in a neat (aqueous) synthetic mica clay,” Journal of Polymer Science, Part A, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1800–1809, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. X. Lei and Z. Su, “Conducting polyaniline-coated nano silica by in situ chemical oxidative grafting polymerization,” Polymers for Advanced Technologies, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 472–476, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. He, “A novel emulsion route to sub-micrometer polyaniline/nano-ZnO composite fibers,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 249, no. 1–4, pp. 1–6, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. P. Ansari and F. Mohammad, “Electrical studies on the composite of polyaniline with Zinc oxide nanoparticles,” The IUP Journal of Chemistry, vol. 4, pp. 7–18, 2010.
  6. T. M. Madkour, “Polycarbonate,” in Polymer Data Handbook, J. E. Mark, Ed., pp. 363–367, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1999.
  7. S. P. Ansari, Preparation, characterization and applications of ZnO nanoparticles based polymer composites [Ph.D. thesis], Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India, 2010.