About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Nanomaterials
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 971854, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/971854
Research Article

Study of J-E Curve with Hysteresis of Carbon Nanotubes Field Emitters

Department of Physics, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India

Received 7 June 2012; Accepted 15 July 2012

Academic Editors: J. Escrig, G. Jin, and A. Kajbafvala

Copyright © 2012 Shama Parveen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We observe hysteresis in J-E plot during field emission measurement of CNTs grown by LPCVD technique. CNTs are synthesized on Fe-coated Si substrate at 650°C. SEM and Raman study confirm that CNTs are successfully grown on Si substrate by LPCVD technique. In this study, we find that ramp-down curve has higher value of current density than ramp-up curve which indicates that CNTs show positive hysteresis. Our results show that a high current density at low turn-on voltage is obtained in ramp-down step of J-E plot which may be since not all CNTs contribute in ramp-up step process. But in ramp-down step all CNTs contribute as field emitters due to high electric field treatment. We also performed stability analysis of CNTs with current at constant applied voltage for 5 hrs and find that the sample shows long-term stability due to increase in emitting site density since a large number of CNTs participate in field emission.

1. Introduction

Carbon nanotube (CNT) is a very attractive material for researchers due to its fortunate combination of miniature size, high mechanical strength, good electrical and thermal conductivity, and also high thermal stability [1, 2]. Moreover, an important feature of CNTs is their high aspect ratio. Due to this peculiarity, the applied electric field strength in the vicinity of the tip of the CNTs can exceed by thousand times [3]. This property, in turn, manifests CNTs in the possibility of obtaining a quite high current density at a moderate magnitude of applied voltage. A high field enhancement factor (𝛽) allows electrons to overcome the surface potential barrier at low macroscopic electric fields. Hence CNT-based electron field emitter cathodes are superior to other types of electron field emitter in their emission characteristics [4].

These excellent field emission (FE) characteristics have made CNT emitters the center of researcher’s attention for various potential applications. CNTs as electron field emitter source in various fields have been widely studied such as cold cathodes for field emission displays (FEDs) [5], scanning probe for atomic force microscope (AFM) [6], electron source for vacuum microelectronics (VME), X-ray source for computed tomography (CT) scanners. CNT-based vacuum microelectronic and display devices have also been already proposed [714].

In present work, we study the hysteresis loop during FE measurements to enhance the FE characteristics of CNT cathode. It provides us very effective results in order to get the high current density at low turn-on field (𝐸TO), and at the same time it does not require any external special arrangement to remove the amorphous carbon on the CNTs surface. Here, CNTs are synthesized by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) technique which is one of the best techniques for the growth of CNTs with fewer impurities. Iron (Fe) is used as catalyst and helps to make a good adhesion between CNT and the substrate. FE measurements are taken in ramp-up and ramp-down steps. The measurements show positive hysteresis characteristics of as-grown CNTs which implies that FE characteristics have improved due to positive hysteresis. From JE curve, we also find that 𝐸TO decreases with high current density. Furthermore, on application of constant applied voltage, CNTs remain stable as they continue to emit electrons for 5 hrs. Repeatability measurements of the sample show that FE characteristic of CNTs enhances after ramp-down step process.

2. Experimental

CNTs have been synthesized by LPCVD technique on Si substrate. Fe catalyst is deposited on ultrasonically cleaned Si substrate by radio-frequency (RF) sputtering (MODEL: 12” MSPT) at a power of 150 W. For synthesis of CNTs, quartz tube of LPCVD is cleaned first by purging nitrogen (N2) gas. Catalyst-deposited Si substrate is placed in a 150 cm large quartz tube furnace at room temperature and is pumped down to 103 torr using rotary pump. Rough vacuum is necessary for low pressure growth and also to improve the purity of CNTs during growth process. The Fe catalyst-coated Si substrate is heated to achieve synthesis temperature at a rate of 15°C/min while continuously passing the hydrogen (H2) gas which works as carrier gas. After stabilizing the synthesis temperature at 650°C, ammonia (NH3) gas is passed with flow rate 120 sccm for pretreatment which help in nucleation of Fe. Pretreatment reduces the size of catalyst particle up to nanometer level which provides nucleation site for formation of CNTs. A mixture of gases H2/C2H2/NH3 with flow rate 6 : 1 : 6 sccm, respectively, is used, where C2H2 works as a carbon source gas. Growth temperature is kept constant at 650°C. The as-grown CNT film is characterized by Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscope (SEM). FE measurements are carried out using diode configuration with CNTs as cathode. Current density versus electric field (JE) and Fowler Nordheim (FN) plots associated with hysteresis loop is studied. Repeatability and stability are also performed in the same FE chamber. Field enhancement factor is also calculated from FN plot.

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. SEM Morphology

Figure 1(a) depicts surface morphology of as-grown CNTs on Fe catalyst at temperature 650°C. The thickness of the catalyst layer on Si substrate is in the range of 10–25 nm. It is evident from these SEM images that vertically aligned and high densities of CNTs have been successfully grown by LPCVD technique. Both are fundamental requirements for good field emission characteristics of CNTs. The growth morphology of nanotubes depends upon the size, shape, and surface nature of catalyst. The CNTs obtained by this technique also have high aspect ratio with diameter varying from 10 to 30 nm and length of several micrometers. Figure 1(b) is the enlarged view of Figure 1(a). SEM images also reveal that there are no bright spots of catalyst on the tip of as-grown CNTs film; therefore, base-growth mechanism is proposed here. In base-growth method, CNTs are nucleated from Fe catalyst particles in which catalyst particles remain adherent to the Si substrates during growth time. Because iron silicide roots penetrate into the Si substrate at the interface of the catalyst particles and the substrate, it favors strong adhesion of the CNTs onto the substrate. The iron silicide root assists in the attachment of the catalyst particles to the substrate and plays a role in the evolution of the catalyst particle morphology resulting in base-growth mode [7]. Base-growth of CNTs is also favored for high field emission property of CNTs because impurities like metal catalyst are not present on the tip of CNT field emitters.

fig1
Figure 1: (a) SEM image of CNTs grown by LPCVD, (b) SEM image with enlarged view of CNTs grown by LPCVD.
3.2. Raman Spectroscopy Analysis

To investigate the graphitic structure of CNTs, the high-resolution spectrum in the high-frequency region shows two intensive peaks around 1350 cm1 and 1580 cm1. Generally, G-mode (TM—tangential mode) in Raman spectra corresponding to the stretching mode in graphitic plane is located around 1580 cm1. The D mode (disorder band), located between 1330 and 1360 cm1 is generally observed in MWCNTs. Figure 2 shows a typical Raman spectrum obtained by Raman spectrometer (Bruker, RFS 100/s) using Nd:YAG laser with an excitation wavelength of 1064 nm. The spectra depict strong peak at 1590 cm1 (G band), suggesting the formation of graphitized CNTs which is common to all sp2 system. The peak observed at 1355 cm1 (D band) indicates that there is some amorphous carbonaceous and some catalyst particles adhered to the CNTs walls and also few defective pentagons and heptagons exists in the graphitized walls due to low growth temperature. We also observe one additional peak at 2700 cm1 which is attributed to second-order Raman scattering process. Intensity ratio of defective band and graphite band is a signature of quality of CNTs. As seen from Figure 2, 𝐼D/𝐼G of as-grown CNTs is 0.852 which indicates that our sample is less defective.

971854.fig.002
Figure 2: Raman Spectra of as-grown CNTs.
3.3. Field Emission Analysis

Field emission measurements are usually analysed in the framework of the Fowler-Nordheim theory [12], which explains the emission of the electrons from emitter surface as a quantum mechanical tunnelling enhanced by a high electric field. The FN equation can be written as 𝐽=𝐴𝐸2exp𝐵𝜙3/2𝐸,(1) where 𝐴=1.54×106AevV2, 𝐵=6.83×107ev3/2V cm1, 𝐸 electric field at the apex, V cm−1, and 𝜙: work function.

The enhanced electric field at the CNTs tip 𝐸 is related to the applied voltage 𝑉 via 𝐸=𝛽𝐸applied=𝛽𝑉/𝑑, 𝛽 being the field enhancement factor at the sharp tip of the CNTs and 𝑑 is the CNT cathode and anode separation.

Typical FE measurements for as-grown CNTs are depicted in Figure 3. Electric field versus current density, that is, JE plot, is shown in Figure 3. In present work, we study the JE plot in two-step process: one is ramp up and other is ramp down. In ramp-up step, we note down the current density corresponding to increasing applied voltage from 100 V to 1500 V. While in ramp-down step, the current density is taken corresponding to decreasing applied voltage from 1500 V to 100 V. This ramp-up and ramp-down step forms a loop which is known as hysteresis loop. Emission current density which is the function of applied macroscopic electric field reaches its maximum value at 8.1 mA/cm2 and 𝐸TO is achieved at 2.2 V/μm. However, 𝐸TO field is obtained at 1.7 V/μm in ramp-down step. It is worth noting that 𝐸TO decreases in ramp-down step and current density corresponding to applied voltage as compared to ramp-up step increases. These results confirm that CNT cathode has the same hysteresis effect and also suggest that this hysteresis is associated with amorphous carbon and impurities presented on the surface of CNTs cathode [15]. In hysteresis loop, current density improvement may be due to application of applied high electric field. In ramp-up step, increasing voltage at the diode assembly removes amorphous carbon and other impurities that are present on the tip of CNTs.

971854.fig.003
Figure 3: Current density versus electric field curve of ramp-up and ramp-down step.

Figure 4 depicts the FN plots of as-grown CNT cathodes. Almost straight line of FN plot confirms that field emission phenomenon is taking place in our sample. FN plots also show hysteresis loop. According to the FN model, a plot of ln(𝐼/𝑉2) versus 1/𝑉 (known as F-N plot) has a linear behavior with a slope that is also used to calculate 𝛽 by using the following simplified equation derived from FN: 𝛽=𝐵𝜙3/2𝑑𝑚,(2) where 𝑚: slope of FN plot, 𝑑: distance between cathode and anode, and 𝜙=5eV as for carbon. Calculated values of 𝛽 are 3000 and 12500 for ramp up and ramp down, respectively. The high 𝛽 (~4.2) value may also have resulted in improving the current density in hysteresis loop. So, this high-field treatment cleans the surface of the CNTs. This may also be attributed to a reason that amorphous carbon and other impurities might be removed from the surface of CNTs film on applying high electric field. This enhanced field hence, breaks molecules of residual gases into ions and exposes large area of CNTs film contributing to a large 𝛽. Thus it seems that in ramp-down process, large emitting area is available for emitting electrons than in ramp-up process, as a consequence of which current density enhances at low 𝐸TO.

971854.fig.004
Figure 4: F-N plot with ramp-up and ramp-down step.
3.4. Repeatability

We repeated the field emission measurement of JE plot several times and found a good match of ramp-up and ramp-down step. Therefore, this confirms that the emission characteristics show good repeatability shown in Figures 5(a) and 5(b).

fig5
Figure 5: (a), (b): Repeatability of as-grown CNTs of J-E curve.
3.5. Emission Stability

We evaluated the emission current stability of these CNT field emitters. The stability of emission was performed by monitoring the evolution of total emission current at a fixed electric field. The initial emission current density was about 8.1 mA cm2 and the applied voltage was kept constant at 3 V/μm for 5 hrs. A current density of 8.1 mA cm2 is a severe condition to clearly visualize current degradation within a relatively short time. Figure 6 shows a more stable emission current without any noticeable degradation of the emission current density till over 5 hrs. We also confirmed this trend with good repeatability a number of times. The result shows that the greatly enhanced field emission stability is mainly caused by increase of the clean surface of emission sites due to the removal of the absorbents and residual gases on the surface of CNT film [16].

971854.fig.006
Figure 6: Emission current stability of CNTs operated in a dc mode at electric field 3 V/m over 5 hrs.

4. Conclusions

Repeatability of CNT-based field emission devices has been studied by hysteresis loop of JE plot. It is noteworthy that the suggested method enhances the field emission characteristics of CNT field emitters such as the 𝛽,𝐸TO, and 𝐸Th, and even it also improves emission repeatability and stability. Thus the study of hysteresis loop is demonstrated to be an effective way to improve the FE characteristics of CNTs field emitters. It is considered that 𝐸TO at 1.96 V/μm is quite good and is sufficient for real applications. In addition, the electric field of 2.85 V/μm for obtaining maximum emission current density of 8.1 mA  cm2 is high enough for device applications. Therefore, some sacrifice in both the stability and repeatability does not make critical problems for a real operation mode of CNTs field emitters. Thus, our results not only suggest the synthesis of CNTs at low temperature but also offer to enhance field emission parameter of CNT-based field emitters for various potential applications in nanoscale electronic devices.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to DIT, Government of India, for providing financial assistance in form of research project. One of the authors (S. Husain) is also thankful to CSIR, India, for providing financial support as research associateship.

References

  1. A. V. Eletskii, “Carbon nanotube-based electron field emitters,” Physics-Uspekhi, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 863–892, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. P. Raffaelle, B. J. Landi, J. D. Harris, S. G. Bailey, and A. F. Hepp, “Carbon nanotubes for power applications,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 233–243, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. J. Fransen, T. L. van Rooy, and P. Kruit, “Field emission energy distributions from individual multiwalled carbon nanotubes,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 312–327, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Cheng and O. Zhou, “Electron field emission from carbon nanotubes,” Comptes Rendus Physique, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1021–1033, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. M. Bonard, M. Croci, C. Klinke, R. Kurt, O. Noury, and N. Weiss, “Carbon nanotube films as electron field emitters,” Carbon, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1715–1728, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. M. Bonard, F. Maier, T. Stöckli et al., “Field emission properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes,” Ultramicroscopy, vol. 73, no. 1–4, pp. 7–15, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. F. AuBuchon, C. Daraio, L. H. Chen, A. I. Gapin, and S. Jin, “Iron suicide root formation in carbon nanotubes grown by microwave PECVD,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 109, no. 51, pp. 24215–24219, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Khan, K. N. Tripathi, M. Aggarwal, K. Tripathi, M. Husain, and Z. H. Khan, “Field emission properties of Fe70Pt30 catalysed multiwalled carbon nanotubes,” Journal of Experimental Nanoscience, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 215–228, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Ali, A. Kumar, S. Husain, and M. Husain, “Effect of catalyst-deposition methods on the alignment of carbon nanotubes grown by low pressure chemical vapor deposition,” Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 175–178, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. M. Rosolen, C. H. Patrick Poá, S. Tronto, M. S. Marchesin, and S. R. P. Silva, “Electron field emission of carbon nanotubes on carbon felt,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 424, no. 1–3, pp. 151–155, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Khan, Z. H. Khane, K. N. Tripathi, and M. Husain, “Synthesis of carbon nanotubes using Ni95Ti5 nanocrystalline film as a catalyst,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1855–1859, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Parveen, S. Husain, A. Kumar, J. Ali, and M. Husain, “Estimation of effective emitting area of carbon nanotubes based field emitters,” Nanoscience and Nanotechnology Letters, vol. 3, pp. 794–797, 2011.
  13. J. Ali, A. Kumar, S. Husain, M. Kumari, Harsh, and M. Husain, “Characterization and field emission studies of uniformly distributed multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTS) film grown by low-pressure chemical vapour deposition (LPCVD),” Current Nanoscience, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 333–336, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. H. Yang, C. Y. Wang, U. S. Chen, W. J. Hsieh, Y. S. Chang, and H. C. Shih, “Large-area single wall carbon nanotubes: synthesis, characterization, and electron field emission,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 1601–1604, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Li, G. Fang, X. Yang, N. Liu, Y. Liu, and X. Zhao, “Effect of adsorbates on field emission from flame-synthesized carbon nanotubes,” Journal of Physics D, vol. 41, no. 19, Article ID 195401, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. A. Dean and B. R. Chalamala, “The environmental stability of field emission from single-walled carbon nanotubes,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, no. 19, pp. 3017–3019, 1999. View at Scopus