About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Oncology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 493283, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/493283
Review Article

Integrin Signaling in Mammary Epithelial Cells and Breast Cancer

Molecular Medicine Program, Biomedical Genetics Section, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, L320, Boston, MA 02118, USA

Received 9 October 2011; Accepted 30 October 2011

Academic Editors: A. Sapino, Y. Yamamoto, and Y. Yu

Copyright © 2012 Arthur W. Lambert et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Cells sense and respond to the extracellular matrix (ECM) by way of integrin receptors, which facilitate cell adhesion and intracellular signaling. Advances in understanding the mammary epithelial cell hierarchy are converging with new developments that reveal how integrins regulate the normal mammary gland. But in breast cancer, integrin signaling contributes to the development and progression of tumors. This paper highlights recent studies which examine the role of integrin signaling in mammary epithelial cells and their malignant counterparts.

1. Introduction

The extracellular matrix (ECM)—composed of numerous insoluble proteins secreted locally by epithelial and stromal cells—provides physical support to organize neighboring cells within a tissue and serves as a reservoir of growth factors. In the mammary gland, ECM interactions can control epithelial cell proliferation, survival, migration, and differentiation to regulate processes such as branching morphogenesis, polarization of mammary ducts and the alveolar outgrowth, and involution that occurs with pregnancy [1]. However, the matrix, which constitutes one component of the diverse tumor microenvironment, changes dramatically during the process of breast tumorigenesis and can strongly affect disease progression [2]. Therefore, the ECM can exert a strong influence on both normal and tumor cells.

In either case, cells sense and respond to the ECM by way of transmembrane integrin receptors, which recognize and bind to various ECM proteins and thereby facilitate cell adhesion and intracellular signaling. Integrins function as a heterodimer, consisting of one α subunit and one β subunit that associate noncovalently. Mammals have 24 distinct integrin receptors, formed from a total of 18 α subunits and 8 β subunits [3]. Integrins couple recognition of ECM ligands to the assembly of the actin cytoskeleton and the activation of various intracellular kinases [4]. Here, we review recent studies that have deepened our understanding of the dynamics and coordination of integrin signaling and of the role that these signals play in mammary epithelial cells and their malignant counterparts.

2. Integrins in Normal Mammary Epithelial Cells

With a disease as diverse as breast cancer—in its histology, genetic lesions, proliferation, response to treatment, and propensity to metastasize—it is crucial to examine how the cell type that is initially transformed impacts the tumor that is subsequently formed, a concept which emphasizes the cell of origin for a particular cancer [5]. In this regard, new developments in the field of mammary stem cells and advances in understanding the mammary epithelial cell hierarchy have paved inroads for those examining this concept in breast cancer. And, perhaps not surprisingly, integrins have already played a prominent role.

The epithelium of the mammary gland is composed of luminal cells, which line the ducts and alveoli, and myoepithelial cells which form the basal cell layer that surrounds luminal cells and contacts the basement membrane, a specialized form of ECM rich in collagen IV and laminins [6]. Integrin expression in the mammary epithelial cells is complicated as it is regulated spatially and temporally as the gland develops and through pregnancy, lactation, and involution [7]. However, a few points regarding integrin expression in the mammary gland are useful here. First, mammary epithelial cells are anchorage dependent and require cell-cell interactions or integrin-mediated attachment to the ECM; in the absence of such adhesion, a cell will not proliferate in response to growth factors [8] and will succumb to a specialized form of apoptosis—anoikis—that occurs as a result of detachment from the ECM [9].

Second, although integrin expression and activation can vary within the gland, a somewhat limited set of integrins are expressed—as assessed by immunohistochemistry—with certain integrins restricted to either the luminal or myoepithelial cells (Figure 1). In general though, as myoepithelial cells make more extensive contact with the ECM, integrin levels tend to be higher in this lineage [7]. The major α subunits expressed include α1, α2, α3, α5, αv and α6; the expression of α1, α5, and αv appears to be restricted to myoepithelial cells [7, 10]. The β1 and β4 integrin subunits are expressed in both epithelial lineages of the gland, while the β3 subunit exhibits a more restricted expression pattern [7, 10, 11]. Thus, epithelial cells of the mammary gland are capable of assembling at least eight functional integrin receptors including two collagen receptors (α1β1, and α2β1), three laminin receptors (α3β1, α6β1, and α6β4) and three integrins (α5β1, αvβ1, and αvβ3) which recognize RGD sequences present in certain ECM molecules such as fibronectin and vitronectin [3]. However, the relative expression level of each complex, their potential interactions with the ECM, and their ability to activate intracellular signaling—in short, their functional status—are not reflected in the basic survey of integrin expression presented above. This information must be derived empirically, as some studies discussed below demonstrate.

493283.fig.001
Figure 1: Integrin expression in the normal mammary gland. The α and β integrin subunits expressed in the mammary gland are listed with the CD alias in parentheses. Their lineage expression pattern is indicated as L (luminal), M (myoepithelial), and L/M (luminal and myoepithelial). *indicates a relatively low-level or restricted expression pattern. The lineage expression of the β3 integrin is not clear. The functional integrin receptors and their ligand class are shown below. See [7, 1012] for more information.

Finally, integrin expression is often polarized, with complexes being localized to distinct membrane surfaces. The best example here is the α6β4 integrin, which is found predominantly on the basal surface of myoepithelial cells [10]. The β4 integrin is unique in that it has a much longer cytoplasmic tail and connects with intermediate filaments in place of the actin cytoskeleton [3]. The localization of the α6β4 complex—a laminin receptor—to the basal surface allows myoepithelial cells to adhere to the laminin rich basement membrane through specialized adhesive complexes referred to as hemidesmosomes [10]. Nevertheless, simple examination of integrin expression patterns has been of only limited use in understanding their function in the epithelial cells of the mammary gland. And, as our knowledge of the epithelial hierarchy has progressed, a more detailed view of integrin signaling in the mammary gland has come into focus.

Early experiments involving serial transplantation of mammary epithelial fragments strongly supported the idea that self-renewing stem cells existed in the mammary gland [13]. A significant milestone was reached in 2006 when two reports used cell surface markers to isolate populations enriched for mouse mammary stem cells, in which a single stem cell could reconstitute a functional gland [14, 15]. Two integrins, β1 (CD29) and α6 (CD49f), were used to purify mammary stem cell populations with a cell surface phenotype of C D 2 9 h i g h C D 2 4 + and C D 4 9 f h i g h C D 2 4 m e d , respectively. Analogous studies have since been performed using human cells and a humanized mammary fat pad transplantation assay and, here too, high expression of α6 integrin (along with the absence of EpCAM expression) was used to purify a mammary stem cell enriched population [16]. The scope of these studies was not to address the role of integrins in mammary stem cells, but the results almost certainly indicate that mammary stem cells possess a characteristic set of integrins and suggest that these integrins, and therefore distinct cell-ECM interactions, might have a functional role in regulating the mammary epithelial cell hierarchy.

This notion has received some support in recent years, mainly through the use of mammary-specific deletion of integrins. But prior to the development of these more refined models, knockout mice had been generated for all of the α and β subunits present in the mammary gland [3]. Of these mice, the α5 [17] and the αv [18] are embryonic lethal, restricting their applicability to mammary gland development. Mice with deletion of the α1 [19], α3 [20], and α6 [21] subunits display no apparent mammary phenotype [3, 7], but animals deficient in the α2 subunit have impaired mammary gland branching morphogenesis [22]. Knockout of the β subunits present in the mammary gland give rise to variable phenotypes ranging from embryonic lethality for β1 integrin [23], hemorrhaging and defects in platelet aggregation for β3 integrin [24], and severe skin blistering and early death for β4 integrin [25] but no overt mammary gland defects. It is likely, though, that the lack of any mammary-specific findings in most of the models described above is masked by the dramatic phenotypes observed during development or in other organ systems, and thus does not discount the relevance of these receptors to the epithelial cells of the mammary gland.

Early efforts to uncover the function of integrins in the mammary gland utilized function-blocking antibodies directed at β1 and α6 integrins as well as an antilaminin antibody [26]. These studies found that blocking both laminin and the β1 subunit, but not α6, impaired ductal morphogenesis, which was in line with a previous study that used a dominant negative β1 integrin to demonstrate a role for this subunit in alveolar differentiation [27]. It was surprising then, when rudimentary glands isolated from α3, α6, or β4 knockout mice were able to undergo normal ductal morphogenesis when transplanted into syngeneic recipients [28].

But with the advent of techniques that allow genetic disruptions to be targeted to specific tissues at defined times during development, it has been possible to more closely examine integrin function in the mammary gland. This is especially true for β1 integrin (Table 1), which serves as a subunit for numerous integrin receptors found in the mammary gland. Although conditional mammary deletion of β1 integrin—created by crossing mice floxed for β1 with transgenic mice that express Cre recombinase from the MMTV promoter—develops normal mammary glands [29], two reports published in 2005 were able to disrupt the β1 subunit in a similar fashion, but instead crossed the floxed mice with transgenic mice that express Cre recombinase from either the β lactoglobulin (Blg) or whey acidic protein (WAP) promoter [30, 31]. This strategy allowed for conditional deletion of β1 integrin in defined epithelial compartments and at certain stages of development; Blg-Cre gives rise to β1 deletion in the ductal epithelium in nulliparous mice after puberty, while WAP-Cre generates deletions in luminal alveolar cells during mid-pregnancy. In both cases, deletion of the β1 subunit impaired lobuloalveolar development and lactation, which was attributed to inhibition of luminal cell proliferation as a result of increased p 2 1 C i p 1 [30] and failure to differentiate in response to prolactin [31].

tab1
Table 1: Targeted deletions of β1 integrin in the mammary gland.

β1 integrin has also been deleted from the basal cell population of the mammary epithelia by expressing Cre from the keratin 5 (K5) promoter [32]. Interestingly, this resulted in a depletion of mammary stem cells and produced glands that lacked regenerative potential. Furthermore, dividing basal cells lacking β1 integrin aberrantly gave rise to luminal cells. These results expand upon the functions of this integrin subunit in the mammary gland and strongly support the idea that β1 integrin expression, and more generally distinct cell-ECM interactions, play a crucial role in regulating the epithelial cell hierarchy of the mammary gland.

While no conditional β4 knockout has been reported, mice with targeted deletion of the C-terminal domain, which allows for prolonged survival and reproduction, appear to develop normally with no mammary gland defects reported [33]. As β4 dimerizes with α6 integrin, this is in line with studies, discussed above, that found no requirement for α6 using function-blocking antibodies or mammary gland transplants from α6 knockout mice [26, 28].

No conditional knockout in the mammary epithelium exists for β3 integrin either, although this is likely because the role of this subunit in the gland has only recently been appreciated. A subpopulation of luminal progenitors—with the capacity to differentiate into either ductal or alveolar luminal epithelial cells—has been identified on the basis of β3 integrin expression [11]. In this study, the authors found that a subset of luminal cells, which are enriched in the C D 2 9 l o w C D 2 4 + population [14], express high levels of the β3 integrin, form exclusively luminal colonies, and proliferate extensively when grown in Matrigel. The percentage of β3 expressing cells decreases with pregnancy, ostensibly as a result of luminal differentiation [11]. This integrin appears to be a reliable and useful marker of luminal progenitors, but similar to the integrins used to purify mammary stem cells, whether these receptors and their downstream signaling pathways confer any distinct functions upon these subpopulations is still an open question.

3. Integrin Signaling in Breast Tumorigenesis

3.1. Basic Integrin Signaling Mechanisms

Integrin recognition of ECM proteins induces allosteric changes that allow the receptor to transduce this signal across the membrane, a process referred to as outside-in signaling [3]. As integrins possess no enzymatic function, activation of integrin receptors results in the association of multiple protein complexes with the short cytoplasmic tails of the integrins. This allows integrins to transmit mechanical signals to the actin cytoskeleton (and in the case of β4 integrin, to intermediate filaments) through proteins such as α-actinin, tensin, paxillin, and vinculin as well as biochemical signals by way of tyrosine kinases such as focal adhesion kinase (FAK) or Src [34]. Tyrosine kinase signaling leads to the recruitment of numerous adaptor proteins including p130Cas, Crk, and the IPP complex, which further propagate the signal within the cell [35]. While the effects of integrin signaling are varied and dependent on both the ECM ligand and specific integrin receptor engaged, these receptors function essentially to control cell migration, proliferation, and survival.

Integrin signaling occurs in cooperation and coordination with growth factor signaling that is initiated from soluble factors in the extracellular environment. This makes sense as epithelial cells are anchorage dependent and require adhesion, mediated by integrins, in order to proliferate in response to growth factors [8]. Crosstalk between integrin and growth factor signaling occurs at many different levels. For one, integrins and growth factor receptors can activate similar downstream signaling pathways such as tyrosine kinases and the MAP kinase pathway, and this combined activation can further amplify the signal [36]. Upon activation, integrins and growth factors receptors cluster together in the membrane and appear to physically interact with each other, which may also help to coordinate signaling [37]. For example, α6β4 and α6β1 integrins have been found in association with ErbB2 (HER2), and this interaction may help to potentiate signaling [38]. There is also evidence that integrins can activate growth factor receptors by promoting phosphorylation of the receptor [39] or by stimulating the production and secretion of the growth factor itself [40]. Finally, expression of integrins and growth factor receptors can be coordinated; as an example, α6β4 can enhance ErbB2 translation [41]. Although many of the mechanisms described here have been elucidated in tumor cells, or cells overexpressing the integrin or growth factor receptor, the coordination of integrin and growth factor signaling is well established. And while the dynamics of these signaling networks that operate in normal mammary epithelial cells are less clear, the integrin and growth factor pathways are inextricably linked as is evident from morphological and functional studies of the mammary gland [10, 42].

Integrin receptors are unique in that they can also transmit signals emanating within the cell to the extracellular environment in what is known as inside-out signaling [3]. In this mode of signal transduction, interactions from the cytoplasmic tail are conveyed to the extracellular domain through conformational changes. This type of signaling is especially important when integrin activation must be strictly regulated, as in the case of platelets [3]. In epithelial cells, however, this bidirectional communication allows integrins to control remodeling of the ECM [43]. Furthermore, since the matrix proteins bind numerous growth factors and regulate their availability, reorganization of the ECM by integrins can liberate occult soluble signals [44].

3.2. Deregulation of Integrins in Breast Cancer

Integrins are not considered to be bona fide oncogenes or tumor suppressors but their expression levels are affected by transformation [45] and breast cancer cells exhibit altered levels of integrin expression [46]. No characteristic integrin expression pattern can be ascribed to all breast tumors, and it is likely that different subtypes of breast cancer [47] may generate tumors with distinct integrins. Some support for this idea comes from recent studies [16, 48, 49] that have identified luminal progenitors—defined in part by their expression level of α6 integrin [16]—as the transformed cell of origin which gives rise to basal-like tumors. Nevertheless, certain integrins are commonly deregulated in breast cancer. On one hand, the α6 [50], β4 [51], and αv [52] integrins are generally overexpressed in aggressive breast cancer cells. On the other hand, expression of α2β1 can be suppressed during the process of transformation [53]. Ultimately though, it is the function of integrins in tumors cells that is most relevant. Below, we highlight some recent advances pertaining to integrin function in breast cancer cells.

3.3. Integrin Signaling in Tumor Initiation

Integrins have begun to emerge as key players in breast tumor initiation. Based in part on the cooperatively of integrin and growth factor signaling described above, a mammary specific deletion of β1 integrin was generated in a transgenic mouse model of breast cancer in which the polyomavirus middle T antigen (PyVmT) oncogene, an activator of many of the same signaling pathways downstream of growth factor receptors [54], is expressed from the MMTV promoter [29]. Here, loss of β1 integrin severely impaired tumorigenesis indicating a crucial role for this integrin in cell transformation and the initiation of mammary tumors that arise in this model. In line with this, deletion of β1 impaired cell proliferation and FAK phosphorylation, which was shown to mark hyperplastic regions of the gland [29] and is known to regulate entry into the cell cycle [55].

Similar findings have been described for β4 integrin in an ErbB2 overexpressing mouse model of breast cancer [56]. In this case, deletion of the β4 cytoplasmic domain, which suppresses intracellular signaling, resulted in an increased latency and reduced aggressiveness of ErbB2-induced tumors. A protein complex containing both ErbB2 and α6β4 integrin could be detected, and this amplified downstream activation of the transcription factors c-Jun and STAT3 to facilitate cell proliferation and suppression of apoptosis. Further, β4 integrin signaling enhanced resistance to the ErbB2 inhibitor Iressa, presumably as a consequence of enhanced oncogenic signaling [56].

The results of these studies support two key points: (1) integrin and growth factor signaling collaborate in vivo during tumorigenesis and (2) integrins actively participate in the process of tumor initiation. It is worth noting, that several factors downstream of integrins have also been deleted in the context of the MMTV-PyVmT model of mammary tumorigenesis. Although ablation of FAK decreased proliferation of tumor cells, it only moderately increased the latency of tumor development, and FAK was not required for the generation of mammary tumors [57]. However, it does seem to have a role in tumor progression as cancer cells lacking FAK were not able to metastasize [57]. Deletion of Src in the same tumor model has similar effects including delayed tumor onset, proliferation and cell cycle defects, and impaired tumor progression [58]. The discrepancy between these studies and the β1 and β4 deletions suggests that integrins may use distinct signaling pathways at different times during tumorigenesis to regulate both tumor initiation and tumor progression.

3.4. Integrin Signaling in Cancer Stem Cells

An exciting area of breast cancer research is the study of cancer stem cells. The cancer stem cell hypothesis predicts that a certain subpopulation of tumor cells—first identified for breast cancer in 2003 [59]—drives tumor growth, progression and recurrence [60]. This theory has strong implications for the treatment of cancer, and so there has been a concerted effort to understand the signals which maintain this population in hopes of developing strategies to therapeutically target this tumorigenic population [61]. Recent work has suggested that integrin signaling may have a functional role in the cancer stem cells [12].

In 2008, a study of various mouse mammary tumor models found that MMTV-Wnt1 mice exhibited aberrant regulation of mammary epithelial cell populations—as defined by CD29 (β1 integrin) and CD24 [14]—prior to tumorigenesis with expansion of the C D 2 9 h i g h C D 2 4 + population of mammary stem cells [62]. Importantly, β3 integrin expression marked a population of cancer stem cells that was highly tumorigenic. These results imply that Wnt1-induced tumorigenesis arises from an altered pool of luminal progenitors [62], but similar to normal luminal progenitors [11], it remains to be seen whether signaling from β3 integrin is relevant in this context.

Interestingly, FAK has also been implicated in the control of mammary and cancer stem cells. In a separate study where FAK was deleted in MMTV-PyVmT mice, the authors found a reduced pool of mammary stem cells that exhibited defects in self-renewal that were associated with impaired tumorigenesis [63]. This finding is especially interesting in the light of the fact that β1 integrin is also involved in mammary stem cell regulation [32] and seems to indicate a key role for integrin signaling in stem cells, which may be coopted during tumorigenesis [64]. It would be interesting then to test the role of β1 integrin and FAK in the MMTV-Wnt1 model, where a defined cancer stem cell population has been identified [62].

4. Integrins and Breast Cancer Progression

4.1. Integrins Signaling in Migration and Invasion

In cancer, integrins are perhaps best known for their role in cell migration and tissue invasion [65]. Migration and invasion are a prerequisite for the complex process of metastasis which is thought to occur through a series of steps involving local tissue invasion, intravasation, survival in the circulation, extravasation, and colonization [66]. The ECM of the mammary gland serves as an inherent barrier to tumorigenesis and metastasis, so tumor cells must find ways to circumvent this suppressive force [67]. As integrins interact directly with the ECM and can control remodeling of the matrix, tumor cells can benefit from altered integrin expression and signaling in the context of metastasis. To metastasize, tumor cells must first be able to migrate. Integrins surely play a role in the process of cell migration and likely function at two different levels. First, integrins must coordinate and stabilize adhesion to the ECM in such a way that allows for cell movement, forming strong adhesive complexes at the leading edge of the cell while releasing previous points of contact at the trailing end [68]. At another level, integrins couple actin reorganization to cellular signals that regulate motility through activation of PI3-kinase and small GTPases such as Cdc42 and Rac [69]. Other integrin signaling pathways are important as well; for instance, FAK is required for epidermal growth factor-induced cell motility [70].

In addition to their central role in cell motility, integrins have recently been shown to actively participate in the transition of a nonmotile tumor cell to an invasive, malignant cell. Through a process referred to as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), tumor cells can gain access to signaling programs, normally reserved for development, that allow epithelial cells to migrate and invade the surrounding tissue [71]. EMT can be induced in susceptible breast cancer by the cytokine TGF-β [72], but studies have shown that β3 integrin signaling and Src activation are required for this occurrence in mammary epithelial cells [73]. Other integrins, with a less established role in breast cancer, such as αvβ6 integrin, have been shown to regulate the release of active TGF-β from the ECM [44], but the relevance of this to breast cancer might be limited.

The induction of EMT is associated with the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that can degrade and remodel the ECM [74]. The αvβ3 integrin, which is overexpressed in certain breast cancers [52], can interact with and enhance the activation MMP-2 in melanoma cells to promote invasion [75], and a similar mechanism could benefit breast cancer cells which express the same combination of proteins. Alternatively, αvβ3 may enhance the expression of MMP-2 [76]. The association of αvβ3 with the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) provides yet another example of how integrins can modulate degradation of the ECM to facilitate breast cancer invasion [77].

4.2. Integrins and Metastasis

An association between the expression of certain integrins and the metastatic spread of breast cancer has been suspected for some time. Of note here is the association between high αvβ3 expression and bone metastasis [78], the reduced expression of α2β1 observed in poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas [79] and the correlation of high α6 expression with reduced survival [50]. However, recently, new mechanisms by which integrins regulate metastasis have been elucidated.

Early efforts to explain the connection between αvβ3 expression and metastasis found that activation of this integrin could help breast cancer cells adhere to platelets, an interaction which may help disseminated cancer cells arrest in the circulation prior to extravasation [80]. However, this integrin receptor may exert a more direct effect on tumor cells by activating intracellular signals, in the absence of cell adhesion, that promote tumor progression [81]. In line with previous studies, the authors observed that expression of this integrin was higher in lymph node metastases and found evidence to suggest that this was a result of enhanced tumor cell survival [81]. Most surprising though, they found that unligated αvβ3 promoted anchorage-independent growth, and presumably tumor progression, through a mechanism that involves recruitment of Src and phosphorylation of CAS. This finding is especially interesting as it suggests that tumor cells utilize integrin signaling independent of cell adhesion and it has clinical relevance as many αvβ3 inhibitors target the ligand binding, which is apparently dispensable here [81]. However, neither of these studies explain why αvβ3 expression is preferentially retained in breast cancer cells that metastasize to the bone.

New information also highlights the extensive crosstalk between integrins and other oncogenic proteins that are active in tumor cells. A recent report described a new mechanism by which mutant p53 can contribute to cancer cell invasion and metastasis [82]. This study found that mutant p53 promotes increased endocytic trafficking of EGFR and α5β1 integrin to the plasma membrane through Rab-coupling protein (RCP), which leads to enhanced integrin and growth factor signaling that is required for cell migration and invasion. These results support the recent finding that RCP is oncogenic in mammary epithelial cells [83] and suggest that integrin signaling might be required for RCP to function in this manner.

Integrins can also collaborate with inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) proteins to promote breast cancer metastasis [84]. While IAPs are typically thought of as antiapoptotic proteins it appears that their functions are more varied than originally thought [85]. Building upon this, is the recent finding that an XIAP-survivin complex can also regulate tumor cell invasion and metastasis, independent of its antiapoptotic effects [84]. IAPs are able to do this by activating NF-κB, which induces the production of fibronectin. Secreted fibronectin can then act in an autocrine or paracrine to stimulate β1 integrin signaling through FAK and Src [84].

It is important to note that not all integrins promote tumor progression and metastasis. For instance, a recent report has clearly established that the α2β1 integrin is a metastasis suppressor in breast cancer [86]. Deletion of α2β1 integrin in the MMTV-ErbB2 mouse significantly increased the incidence of metastasis without affecting growth of the primary tumor. This seems to occur at the level of cancer cell intravasation as tumors devoid of α2β1 produced increased numbers of circulating tumor cells while tail vein injection—a test of tumor cell extravasation and colonization—of the same cells did not affect metastasis [86]. Using clinical databases of gene expression, reduced α2β1 expression was strongly correlated to metastasis and decreased survival [86], but the molecular basis underlying this effect remains to be established.

5. Concluding Remarks

Integrins have a long and storied history in the breast cancer literature and clearly their central role as sensors and transducers of ECM signals is without question. But it has taken some time—with the diverse array of integrins and ECM ligands—to fully appreciate their function. This paper has touched only upon the cell-autonomous functions of integrins in epithelial cells of the mammary gland and during breast cancer progression (Figure 2), but their expression in other cell types such as endothelial cells, fibroblasts and lymphocytes also contributes to tumorigenesis [87]. Given their role in breast cancer and the availability of integrin antagonists, preclinical studies and clinical trials are currently underway to test the efficacy and tolerability of these agents [88]. However, important questions regarding integrin signaling still remain. How the ECM changes that occur with cancer development and disease progression affect integrin signaling in tumor cells is an important area of focus. This would seem to be especially true in the context of metastatic colonization [89], where tumor cells encounter an entirely new ECM and are still able to thrive; surely integrins must have a crucial function here. The relevance of integrin signaling in normal mammary stem cells, luminal progenitors, and other mammary epithelial cell populations is still largely unknown, but it is likely that integrins are involved in regulation of this hierarchy and therefore, perturbed integrin signaling may have distinct effects in different subtypes of breast cancer. For it is only by defining the precise role of integrin signaling in the normal mammary gland that we will be able to appreciate the true extent of its contribution to breast cancer.

493283.fig.002
Figure 2: Roles of integrin signaling in mammary epithelial cells and breast cancer progression.

Acknowledgments

The authors apologize to those whose publications could not be cited in this short paper. This work was supported by a Susan G. Komen for the Cure Investigator-Initiated Research Award (KG081435) to S. Thiagalingam. A. W. Lambert is supported by the Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program (W81XWH-11-1-0060).

References

  1. J. Muschler and C. H. Streuli, “Cell-matrix interactions in mammary gland development and breast cancer,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 2, no. 10, p. a003202, 2010.
  2. M. J. Bissell and D. Radisky, “Putting tumours in context,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2001. View at Scopus
  3. R. O. Hynes, “Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines,” Cell, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 673–687, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. G. Giancotti and E. Ruoslahti, “Integrin signaling,” Science, vol. 285, no. 5430, pp. 1028–1032, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. E. Visvader, “Cells of origin in cancer,” Nature, vol. 469, no. 7330, pp. 314–322, 2011.
  6. C. M. Nelson and M. J. Bissell, “Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 22, pp. 287–309, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. Taddei, M. M. Faraldo, J. Teulière, M. A. Deugnier, J. P. Thiery, and M. A. Glukhova, “Integrins in mammary gland development and differentiation of mammary epithelium,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 383–394, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. A. Schwartz and R. K. Assoian, “Integrins and cell proliferation: regulation of cyclin-dependent kinases via cytoplasmic signaling pathways,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 114, no. 14, pp. 2553–2560, 2001. View at Scopus
  9. S. M. Frisch and E. Ruoslahti, “Integrins and anoikis,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 701–706, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. M. Shaw, “Integrin function in breast carcinoma progression,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 367–376, 1999. View at Scopus
  11. M. L. Asselin-Labat, K. D. Sutherland, H. Barker et al., “Gata-3 is an essential regulator of mammary-gland morphogenesis and luminal-cell differentiation,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 201–209, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. M. Pontier and W. J. Muller, “Integrins in mammary-stem-cell biology and breast-cancer progression—a role in cancer stem cells?” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 207–214, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. C. Kordon and G. H. Smith, “An entire functional mammary gland may comprise the progeny from a single cell,” Development, vol. 125, no. 10, pp. 1921–1930, 1998. View at Scopus
  14. M. Shackleton, F. Vaillant, K. J. Simpson et al., “Generation of a functional mammary gland from a single stem cell,” Nature, vol. 439, no. 7072, pp. 84–88, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Stingl, P. Eirew, I. Ricketson et al., “Purification and unique properties of mammary epithelial stem cells,” Nature, vol. 439, no. 7079, pp. 993–997, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. E. Lim, F. Vaillant, D. Wu et al., “Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 907–913, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. T. Yang, H. Rayburn, and R. O. Hynes, “Embryonic mesodermal defects in α 5 integrin-deficient mice,” Development, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 1093–1105, 1993. View at Scopus
  18. B. L. Bader, H. Rayburn, D. Crowley, and R. O. Hynes, “Extensive vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and organogenesis precede lethality in mice lacking all αv integrins,” Cell, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 507–519, 1998. View at Scopus
  19. H. Gardner, J. Kreidberg, V. Koteliansky, and R. Jaenisch, “Deletion of integrin α 1 by homologous recombination permits normal murine development but gives rise to a specific deficit in cell adhesion,” Developmental Biology, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 301–313, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. A. Kreidberg, M. J. Donovan, S. L. Goldstein et al., “α 3 β 1 integrin has a crucial role in kidney and lung organogenesis,” Development, vol. 122, no. 11, pp. 3537–3547, 1996. View at Scopus
  21. E. Georges-Labouesse, N. Messaddeq, G. Yehia, L. Cadalbert, A. Dierich, and M. le Meur, “Absence of integrin α 6 leads to epidermolysis bullosa and neonatal death in mice,” Nature Genetics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 370–373, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. Chen, T. G. Diacovo, D. G. Grenache, S. A. Santoro, and M. M. Zutter, “The α 2 integrin subunit-deficient mouse: a multifaceted phenotype including defects of branching morphogenesis and hemostasis,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 161, no. 1, pp. 337–344, 2002. View at Scopus
  23. L. E. Stephens, A. E. Sutherland, I. V. Klimanskaya et al., “Deletion of β 1 integrins in mice results in inner cell mass failure and peri-implantation lethality,” Genes and Development, vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 1883–1895, 1995. View at Scopus
  24. K. M. Hodivala-Dilke, K. P. McHugh, D. A. Tsakiris et al., “β3-integrin-deficient mice are a model for Glanzmann thrombasthenia showing placental defects and reduced survival,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 1999. View at Scopus
  25. J. Dowling, Q. C. Yu, and E. Fuchs, “β4 Integrin is required for hemidesmosome formation, cell adhesion and cell survival,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 559–572, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. C. Klinowska, J. V. Soriano, G. M. Edwards et al., “Laminin and β 1 integrins are crucial for normal mammary gland development in the mouse,” Developmental Biology, vol. 215, no. 1, pp. 13–32, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. M. Faraldo, M. A. Deugnier, M. Lukashev, J. P. Thiery, and M. A. Glukhova, “Perturbation of β1-integrin function alters the development of murine mammary gland,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 2139–2147, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. T. C. M. Klinowska, C. M. Alexander, E. Georges-Labouesse et al., “Epithelial development and differentiation in the mammary gland is not dependent on α 3 or α 6 integrin subunits,” Developmental Biology, vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 449–467, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. E. White, N. A. Kurpios, D. Zuo et al., “Targeted disruption of β1-integrin in a transgenic mouse model of human breast cancer reveals an essential role in mammary tumor induction,” Cancer Cell, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 159–170, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. N. Li, Y. Zhang, M. J. Naylor et al., “β1 integrins regulate mammary gland proliferation and maintain the integrity of mammary alveoli,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1942–1953, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. M. J. Naylor, N. Li, J. Cheung et al., “Ablation of β1 integrin in mammary epithelium reveals a key role for integrin in glandular morphogenesis and differentiation,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 171, no. 4, pp. 717–728, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. I. Taddei, M. A. Deugnier, M. M. Faraldo et al., “β1 Integrin deletion from the basal compartment of the mammary epithelium affects stem cells,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 716–722, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. N. Nikolopoulos, P. Blaikie, T. Yoshioka, W. Guo, and F. G. Giancotti, “Integrin β4 signaling promotes tumor angiogenesis,” Cancer Cell, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 471–483, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. K. Miranti and J. S. Brugge, “Sensing the environment: a historical perspective on integrin signal transduction,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. E83–E90, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. S. Cabodi, M. Camacho-Leal, P. di Stefano, and P. Defilippi, “Integrin signalling adaptors: not only figurants in the cancer story,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 858–870, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. Miyamoto, H. Teramoto, J. S. Gutkind, and K. M. Yamada, “Integrins can collaborate with growth factors for phosphorylation of receptor tyrosine kinases and MAP kinase activation: roles of integrin aggregation and occupancy of receptors,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 135, no. 6, part 1, pp. 1633–1642, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Y. H. Soung, J. L. Clifford, and J. Chung, “Crosstalk between integrin and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in breast carcinoma progression,” BMB Reports, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 311–318, 2010. View at Scopus
  38. R. Falcioni, A. Antonini, P. Nisticò et al., “α 6 β 4 and α 6 β 1 integrins associate with ErbB-2 in human carcinoma cell lines,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 76–85, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. L. Moro, M. Venturino, C. Bozzo et al., “Integrins induce activation of EGF receptor: role in MAP kinase induction and adhesion-dependent cell survival,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 17, no. 22, pp. 6622–6632, 1998. View at Scopus
  40. S. De, O. Razorenova, N. P. McCabe, T. O'Toole, J. Qin, and T. V. Byzova, “VEGF-Integrin interplay controls tumor growth and vascularization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 21, pp. 7589–7594, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. S. O. Yoon, S. Shin, and E. A. Lipscomb, “A novel mechanism for integrin-mediated ras activation in breast carcinoma cells: the α6β4 integrin regulates ErbB2 translation and transactivates epidermal growth factor receptor/ErbB2 signaling,” Cancer Research, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2732–2739, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. N. Boudreau and M. J. Bissell, “Extracellular matrix signaling: integration of form and function in normal and malignant cells,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 640–646, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. K. E. Kadler, A. Hill, and E. G. Canty-Laird, “Collagen fibrillogenesis: fibronectin, integrins, and minor collagens as organizers and nucleators,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 495–501, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. O. Hynes, “The extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils,” Science, vol. 326, no. 5957, pp. 1216–1219, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. C. Plantefaber and R. O. Hynes, “Changes in integrin receptors on oncogenically transformed cells,” Cell, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 281–290, 1989. View at Scopus
  46. M. Pignatelli, M. R. Cardillo, A. Hanby, and G. W. H. Stamp, “Integrins and their accessory adhesion molecules in mammary carcinomas: loss of polarization in poorly differentiated tumors,” Human Pathology, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1159–1166, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C. M. Perou, T. Sørile, M. B. Eisen et al., “Molecular portraits of human breast tumours,” Nature, vol. 406, no. 6797, pp. 747–752, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. G. Molyneux, F. C. Geyer, F. A. Magnay et al., “BRCA1 basal-like breast cancers originate from luminal epithelial progenitors and not from basal stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 403–417, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. T. A. Proia, P. J. Keller, P. B. Gupta et al., “Genetic predisposition directs breast cancer phenotype by dictating progenitor cell fate,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 149–163, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. K. Friedrichs, P. Ruiz, F. Franke, I. Gille, H. J. Terpe, and B. A. Imhof, “High expression level of α 6 integrin in human breast carcinoma is correlated with reduced survival,” Cancer Research, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 901–906, 1995. View at Scopus
  51. L. K. Diaz, M. Cristofanilli, X. Zhou et al., “β4 Integrin subunit gene expression correlates with tumor size and nuclear grade in early breast cancer,” Modern Pathology, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1165–1175, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. T. Meyer, J. F. Marshall, and I. R. Hart, “Expression of αv integrins and vitronectin receptor identity in breast cancer cells,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 530–536, 1998. View at Scopus
  53. M. M. Zutter, S. A. Santoro, W. D. Staatz, and Y. L. Tsung, “Re-expression of the α 2 β 1 integrin abrogates the malignant phenotype of breast carcinoma cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 16, pp. 7411–7415, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. N. Ichaso and S. M. Dilworth, “Cell transformation by the middle T-antigen of polyoma virus,” Oncogene, vol. 20, no. 54, pp. 7908–7916, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Oktay, K. K. Wary, M. Dans, R. B. Birge, and F. G. Giancotti, “Integrin-mediated activation of focal adhesion kinase is required for signaling to Jun NH2-terminal kinase and progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 145, no. 7, pp. 1461–1469, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. W. Guo, Y. Pylayeva, A. Pepe et al., “β 4 integrin amplifies ErbB2 signaling to promote mammary tumorigenesis,” Cell, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 489–502, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. H. Lahlou, V. Sanguin-Gendreau, D. Zuo et al., “Mammary epithelial-specific disruption of the focal adhesion kinase blocks mammary tumor progression,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 51, pp. 20302–20307, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. R. Marcotte, H. W. Smith, V. Sanguin-Gendreau, R. V. McDonough, and W. J. Muller, “Breast cancer special feature: mammary epithelial-specific disruption of c-Src impairs cell cycle progression and tumorigenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. M. Al-Hajj, M. S. Wicha, A. Benito-Hernandez, S. J. Morrison, and M. F. Clarke, “Prospective identification of tumorigenic breast cancer cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 3983–3988, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. M. Shackleton, E. Quintana, E. R. Fearon, and S. J. Morrison, “Heterogeneity in cancer: cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution,” Cell, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 822–829, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. P. McDermott and M. S. Wicha, “Targeting breast cancer stem cells,” Molecular Oncology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 404–419, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. F. Vaillant, M. L. Asselin-Labat, M. Shackleton, N. C. Forrest, G. J. Lindeman, and J. E. Visvader, “The mammary progenitor marker CD61/β3 integrin identifies cancer stem cells in mouse models of mammary tumorigenesis,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 19, pp. 7711–7717, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. Luo, H. Fan, T. Nagy et al., “Mammary epithelial-specific ablation of the focal adhesion kinase suppresses mammary tumorigenesis by affecting mammary cancer stem/progenitor cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 466–474, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. J. L. Guan, “Integrin signaling through FAK in the regulation of mammary stem cells and breast cancer,” IUBMB Life, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 268–276, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. W. Guo and F. G. Giancotti, “Integrin signalling during tumour progression,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 816–826, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. I. J. Fidler, “The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: the “seed and soil” hypothesis revisited,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 453–458, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. M. J. Bissell and W. C. Hines, “Why don't we get more cancer? a proposed role of the microenvironment in restraining cancer progression,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 320–329, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. D. J. Webb, J. T. Parsons, and A. F. Horwitz, “Adhesion assembly, disassembly and turnover in migrating cells—over and over and over again,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. E97–E100, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. P. J. Keely, J. K. Westwick, I. P. Whitehead, C. J. Der, and L. V. Parise, “Cdc42 and Rac1 induce integrin-mediated cell motility and invasiveness through PI(3)K,” Nature, vol. 390, no. 6660, pp. 632–636, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. D. J. Sieg, C. R. Hauck, D. Ilic et al., “FAK integrates growth-factor and integrin signals to promote cell migration,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 249–256, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. J. P. Thiery, H. Acloque, R. Y. J. Huang, and M. A. Nieto, “Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease,” Cell, vol. 139, no. 5, pp. 871–890, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. Massague, “TGFβ in Cancer,” Cell, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 215–230, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. A. J. Galliher and W. P. Schiemann, “β3 Integrin and Src facilitate transforming growth factor-β mediated induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in mammary epithelial cells,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 4, article R42, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. E. S. Radisky and D. C. Radisky, “Matrix metalloproteinase-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 201–212, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. P. C. Brooks, S. Strömblad, L. C. Sanders et al., “Localization of matrix metalloproteinase MMP-2 to the surface of invasive cells by interaction with integrin αvβ 3,” Cell, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 683–693, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. O. Baum, R. Hlushchuk, A. Forster et al., “Increased invasive potential and up-regulation of MMP-2 in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells expressing the β 3 integrin subunit,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 325–332, 2007. View at Scopus
  77. D. E. White and W. J. Muller, “Multifaceted roles of integrins in breast cancer metastasis,” Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia, vol. 12, no. 2-3, pp. 135–142, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. H. Liapis, A. Flath, and S. Kitazawa, “Integrin α V β 3 expression by bone-residing breast cancer metastases,” Diagnostic Molecular Pathology B, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 127–135, 1996.
  79. M. M. Zutter, G. Mazoujian, and S. A. Santoro, “Decreased expression of integrin adhesive protein receptors in adenocarcinoma of the breast,” The American journal of pathology, vol. 137, no. 4, pp. 863–870, 1990. View at Scopus
  80. B. Felding-Habermann, T. E. O'Toole, J. W. Smith et al., “Integrin activation controls metastasis in human breast cancer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 1853–1858, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. J. S. Desgrosellier, L. A. Barnes, D. J. Shields et al., “An integrin αvβ3-c-Src oncogenic unit promotes anchorage-independence and tumor progression,” Nature Medicine, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1163–1169, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. P. A. Muller, P. T. Caswell, B. Doyle et al., “Mutant p53 drives invasion by promoting integrin recycling,” Cell, vol. 139, no. 7, pp. 1327–1341, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. J. Zhang, X. Liu, A. Datta et al., “RCP is a human breast cancer-promoting gene with Ras-activating function,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 2171–2183, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. Mehrotra, “IAP regulation of metastasis,” Cancer Cell, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 53–64, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. S. M. Srinivasula and J. D. Ashwell, “IAPs: what's in a name?” Molecular Cell, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. N. E. Ramirez, Z. Zhang, A. Madamanchi et al., “The α2β1 integrin is a metastasis suppressor in mouse models and human cancer,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 226–237, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. C. J. Avraamides, B. Garmy-Susini, and J. A. Varner, “Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 604–617, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. J. S. Desgrosellier and D. A. Cheresh, “Integrins in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 9–22, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. C. L. Chaffer and R. A. Weinberg, “A perspective on cancer cell metastasis,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6024, pp. 1559–1564, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar