About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Oncology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 912642, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/912642
Clinical Study

Safe Removal of the Urethral Catheter 2 Days Following Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Brimingham B15 2TH, UK

Received 31 March 2012; Accepted 14 June 2012

Academic Editors: H. Al-Ali, J. Bentel, and A. Berner

Copyright © 2012 Philip James et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. W. Schuessler, P. G. Schulam, R. V. Clayman, and L. R. Kavoussi, “Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience,” Urology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 854–857, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Guillonneau, X. Cathelineau, E. Barret, F. Rozet, and G. Vallancien, “Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technical and early oncological assessment of 40 operations,” European Urology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Hoznek, Y. Menard, L. Salomon, and C. C. Abbou, “Update on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy,” Current Opinion in Urology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 173–180, 2005. View at Scopus
  4. A. M. Omar and N. Townell, “Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy a review of the literature and comparison with open techniques,” Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 295–301, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Nadu, L. Salomon, A. Hoznek, et al., “Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy,” Journal of Urology, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 1662–1664, 2001. View at Scopus
  6. M. R. Humphreys, M. T. Gettman, G. K. Chow, H. Zincke, and M. L. Blute, “Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 79, no. 9, pp. 1169–1180, 2004. View at Scopus
  7. F. Rocco, L. Carmignani, P. Acquati et al., “Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy,” Journal of Urology, vol. 175, no. 6, pp. 2201–2206, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. B. Bhayani, C. P. Pavlovich, T. S. Hsu, W. Sullivan, and L. M. Su, “Prospective comparison of short-term convalescence: laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy,” Urology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 612–616, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Tauzin-Fin, M. Sesay, L. Svartz, M. C. Krol-Houdek, and P. Maurette, “Sublingual oxybutynin reduces postoperative pain related to indwelling bladder catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 572–575, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. E. Andersson, “Advances in the pharmacological control of the bladder,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 195–213, 1999. View at Scopus
  11. A. R. Mundy and D. E. Andrich, “Urethral strictures,” BJU International, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 6–26, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Robinson, “Removing indwelling catheters: trial without catheter in the community,” British Journal of Community Nursing, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 553–557, 2005. View at Scopus
  13. K. On Lau and C. Cheng, “Feasibility of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy,” Techniques in Urology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 38–40, 2001. View at Scopus