About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Oncology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 159049, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/159049
Research Article

Association of Mammographic Breast Density with Dairy Product Consumption, Sun Exposure, and Daily Activity

1Surgery Department, Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Radiology Department, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Radiology Department, Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5Research Development Center, Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Received 12 December 2013; Accepted 22 January 2014; Published 4 March 2014

Academic Editors: G. Gatti and M. Loizidou

Copyright © 2014 Sadaf Alipour et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Mammographic density is a risk factor, for breast cancer and its association with various factors is under investigation; we carried out a study to assess its relationship with daily dairy intake, sun exposure, and physical activities. Patients and Methods. Women ≥40 years of age were interviewed about habits of dairy product consumption, daily sun exposure and physical activity. Exclusion criteria consisted of history of breast cancer, consumption of calcium and vitamin D supplements, hormone replacement therapy, or renal disease. Mammographic densities were classified according to the classification system of the American College of Radiologists into 4 classes. Results. Overall 703 cases were entered in the study. The mean age was years. The most common and least frequent classes of mammographic density were classes 2 and 4, respectively. There was no significant association between mammographic density and rate of dairy consumption, amount of sunlight exposure, and daily physical activity. Conclusion. Relation of sunlight exposure and intake of milk products with mammographic density need further study, while the subject of physical activity can be evaluated by a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature.

1. Introduction

Density of breast parenchyma in mammography is presently a feature recognized as one of the risk factors for breast cancer [13]. Relative risk for breast cancer in high density mammograms is 2- to 6-fold higher than in low density ones [1, 2, 4].

Among factors recognized as potentially capable of influencing mammographic density (MD), hormonal related issues [5, 6], body mass index [7, 8], age [9], and some dietary factors have been implicated [1012]. As well, other likely related topics, including anthropometric characteristics [13], smoking [14, 15], metabolic syndromes [16], sun exposure [17], and physical activity [18, 19], have been investigated.

We conducted a study to determine the association of mammographic breast density with habits of dairy intake, daily sun exposure, and rate of daily activities.

2. Methods

This is a cross-sectional study completed as component of a large study being carried out in the Breast Clinic of Arash Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Women aged 40 years or above who were candidates for breast cancer screening were entered in the study and those who were practicing sports or had a personal history of breast cancer, recent consumption of calcium supplements, vitamin D, or hormone replacement therapy (HRT), or any kind of renal disease were excluded. A questionnaire about habitual daily sun exposure, patterns of consumption of dairy products, and amount of daily activity of participants was filled out by a trained interviewer. Following clinical breast examination, all of them underwent screening mammography by standard bilateral mediolateral-oblique and craniocaudal views. Two expert radiologists classified the density of mammograms according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BIRAD) of parenchymal mammographic classification system of the American College of Radiologists (ACR) into class 1: almost entirely fatty (<25% glandular), class 2: scattered fibroglandular densities (approximately 25–50% glandular), class 3: heterogeneously dense (approximately 51–75% glandular), and class 4: extremely dense [8, 20].

Daily dairy product consumption was identified as number of servings per day. Due to the lack of a defined food-composition table for Iran [21], equivalent amounts of milk products making one serving were described in agreement with Canada and the United States’ food guide [22, 23] as well as habitual Iranian dietary patterns of eating. Each serving was assumed equal to one glass (250 cc) of milk, 40–50 grams of cheese (the size of one box of matches in Iranian cheese products), one cup (175–200 cc) of yogurt, one glass of doogh (Iranian yogurt drink composed of yogurt and water with the same consistency as milk in terms of constituents and proportions), or one glass of ice cream [24, 25]. Rate of daily consumption was classified as less than one, 1 to 3, or more than 3 servings per day.

The lifestyle of most urban Iranian women is such that they stay indoors through a great proportion of the day. Therefore, we classified the time of sun exposure to less or more than half an hour in daylight each day.

Women in Iran are rather active in house work, and the small proportion which are employed or have a business outdoors accomplish their household duties to the same extent as housewives. Accordingly, daily activity was classified as mild, moderate, or severe as follows. Mild activity constituted of only house work in a small or moderate-size house or house work with help and support from others in a large house. Moderate activity was defined as house work with the same description of the mild group in addition to outdoors work or nonsupported house work in a large house. Severe activity was depicted as any amount of work more than the above.

Association between MD and the three investigated parameters was analyzed by SPSS version 16. For statistical significance, test was used and was regarded as statistically significant. The study was approved by the Ethics Institutional Review Board of Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

3. Results

After excluding 135 of the participants according to the exclusion criteria, 703 cases were entered in the study. The mean age was years. Table 1 demonstrates the frequency of different classes of MD in each category of investigated variables.

tab1
Table 1: Frequency of classes of mammographic density in each group of dairy product intake, sunlight exposure, and daily activities. The bold fonts are figures that have been specifically pointed in Section 3.

Among all classes of MD, the most frequent in all participants and in each studied group was class 2 and the second most common was class 3. As well, in all groups, the least frequently detected MD was class 4, except for those who consumed more than 3 servings per day of milk products; class 1 MD was the least frequent in this group. Moreover, the only participants with a high gap between class 4 and 1 were women with mild daily physical activity.

Analysis showed no significant association between MD and milk product intake whether the participants consumed less than one, one to 3, or more than 3 servings of the products per day ( ). Likewise, the distribution of classes of MD was comparable in low and high amounts of exposure to sunlight and the difference was nonsignificant in the two groups ( ). Mild, moderate, or high levels of daily physical activities also did not have any statistically significant effect on MD ( ).

4. Discussion

The high likelihood of getting involved with breast cancer in women with dense mammograms [26] has motivated the completion of numerous researches regarding factors contributing to higher densities in the breast image. Association of MD and eating patterns has been the subject of several researches. In 1999, Knight et al. investigated the effects of ingested fat on the risk of breast cancer by assessing changes of MD after 2 years of consuming low-fat, high-carbohydrate foods. They detected a significant amount of reduction in MD after the regimen; this effect was magnified in those going through menopause in that period of time [27]. Qureshi et al. roughly confirmed these results in their study but showed no relationship between MD and ingestion of foods containing vitamins and calcium or levels of protein and carbohydrate intake [28]. Nevertheless this was not validated by Sala et al. who had previously observed increased MD in women eating more protein and carbohydrate and no association of MD with fat and vitamin intake [29]. Soy-containing foods have also been recognized as probably influencing MD [12, 30].

Among studies investigating the subject of food and MD, few have considered the relationship between MD and the rate of milk and milk products consumption; so far the issue is left unsolved although the bulk of existing literature might be mildly in favor of an inverse association. Some of the relevant studies are summarized in Table 2. The highest proportion of our study population either used low or moderate amounts of dairy products and only about 10% consumed an acceptable or high level of this group of nutrients. Nevertheless, nearly half of the latter group had class 2 MD, while less than one-third had class 3 and only about 10% proved to have very dense breasts on mammogram. These figures approximate those of the 2 other groups, establishing the lack of association between the two variables.

tab2
Table 2: Studies about association of MD with dairy product intake, sunlight exposure, or physical activity.

The relation of vitamin D levels and MD has been considered in several works; nevertheless the effect of sunlight exposure has rarely been investigated because of the complexity of its quantitative and qualitative estimation, and the results have been controversial (Table 2). In our study, MD did not differ significantly between the low- and high-sun-exposed groups. However, although Tehran is located at 35° latitude, has a temperate climate [44], and benefits from good sunlight, the majority of female residents in Tehran live indoors for the best part of the day. Consequently, even though our classification consisted of a minimum of 30 minutes per day as the threshold for high sun-exposure, less than one quartile of the study population were categorized in this group. The lack of association of MD with this parameter may be due to the low rate of exposure even in the latter group.

Physical activity is defined as any energy spending movement of the bodyand is composed of different everyday activities as recreational, occupational, or household activity [45]. This term is not the equivalent of exercise, described as a structured and rhythmic activity performed with the purpose of achieving physical fitness. The link connecting physical activity with MD has been investigated in some studies as demonstrated in Table 2, and the majority could not come across any significant association. Although the quantity of physical activity was largely different among the 3 groups in our study, it did not influence MD, confirming previous studies.

5. Conclusion

Our study shows no association between mammographic density and rate of dairy consumption, amount of sunlight exposure, and daily physical activity. We believe that the last issue deserves to be investigated by systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing data in the literature. Sunlight exposure and intake of calcium-containing food in regards to MD needs to be further studied.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. V. A. McCormack and I. dos Santos Silva, “Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1159–1169, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. M. Vachon, V. S. Pankratz, C. G. Scott et al., “Longitudinal trends in mammographic percent density and breast cancer risk,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 921–928, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Alipour, L. Bayani, A. Saberi, A. Alikhassi, L. Hosseini, and B. Eslami, “Imperfect correlation of mammographic and clinical breast tissue density,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 3685–3688, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Galukande and E. Kiguli-Malwadde, “Mammographic breast density patterns among a group of women in sub Saharan Africa,” African Health Sciences, vol. 12, pp. 422–425, 2012.
  5. C. S. Wong, G. H. Lim, F. Gao et al., “Mammographic density and its interaction with other breast cancer risk factors in an Asian population,” The British Journal of Cancer, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 871–874, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Yaghjyan, G. A. Colditz, B. Rosner, and R. M. Tamimi, “Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk by menopausal status, postmenopausal hormone use and a family history of breast cancer,” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 785–790, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. E. Kelemen, V. S. Pankratz, T. A. Sellers et al., “Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota breast cancer family study,” The American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 167, no. 9, pp. 1027–1036, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. L. Titus-Ernstoff, A. N. A. Tosteson, C. Kasales et al., “Breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density (United States),” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 1281–1290, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. M. Checka, J. E. Chun, F. R. Schnabel, J. Lee, and H. Toth, “The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening,” The American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. W292–W295, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. A. Thomson, L. A. Arendell, R. L. Bruhn et al., “Pilot study of dietary influences on mammographic density in pre- and postmenopausal Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women,” Menopause, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 243–250, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. O. Voevodina, C. Billich, B. Arand, and G. Nagel, “Association of Mediterranean diet, dietary supplements and alcohol consumption with breast density among women in South Germany: a cross-sectional study,” BMC Public Health, vol. 13, article 203, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. N. S. M. F. Voon and K. K. Chelliah, “Is there an influence of dietary habits on breast density as seen on digital mammograms?” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1969–1972, 2011. View at Scopus
  13. E. Riza, D. Remoundos, E. Bakali, E. Karadedou-Zafiriadou, D. Linos, and A. Linos, “Anthropometric characteristics and mammographic parenchymal patterns in post-menopausal women: a population-based study in Northern Greece,” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 181–191, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. M. Butler, E. B. Gold, S. M. Conroy et al., “Active, but not passive cigarette smoking was inversely associated with mammographic density,” Cancer Causes and Control, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 301–311, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Bremnes, G. Ursin, N. Bjurstam, and I. T. Gram, “Different measures of smoking exposure and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women: a cross-sectional study,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 5, article R73, 2007. View at Scopus
  16. S. M. Conroy, L. M. Butler, D. Harvey et al., “Metabolic syndrome and mammographic density: the study of women's health across the nation,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 1699–1707, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. H. Wu, S. C. Ho, E. So et al., “Sunlight exposure and breast density: a population-based study,” Journal of Breast Cancer, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 171–177, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. M. Conroy, L. M. Butler, D. Harvey et al., “Physical activity and change in mammographic density,” The American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 171, no. 9, pp. 960–968, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. P. López, L. van Horni, L. A. Colangelo, J. A. Wolfman, R. E. Hendrick, and S. M. Gapsturi, “Physical inactivity and percent breast density among hispanic women,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 1012–1016, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Garcia-Manso, C. J. Garcia-Orellana, H. M. Gonzalez-Velasco, R. Gallardo-Caballero, and M. Macias-Macias, “Study of the effect of breast tissue density on detection of masses in mammograms,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 213794, 10 pages, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. P. Mirmiran, F. Hosseini-Esfahani, M. Jessri, L. K. Mahan, N. Shiva, and F. Azizi, “Does dietary intake by Tehranian adults align with the 2005 dietary guidelines for Americans? Observations from the Tehran lipid and glucose study,” Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2011. View at Scopus
  22. D. Garriguet, “Diet quality in Canada,” Health Reports, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 41–52, 2009. View at Scopus
  23. J. T. Dwyer, “Nutrition guidelines and education of the public,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 131, no. 11, pp. 3074S–3077S, 2001. View at Scopus
  24. Z. Maghsoudi, G. Askari, R. Ghiasvand et al., “Dairy consumption and stroke risk,” International Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 4, pp. S294–S299, 2013.
  25. C. S. Berkey, G. A. Colditz, H. R. H. Rockett, A. L. Frazier, and W. C. Willett, “Dairy consumption and female height growth: prospective cohort study,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1881–1887, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. F. Boyd, “Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer,” in American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, pp. 57–62, 2013.
  27. J. A. Knight, L. J. Martin, C. V. Greenberg et al., “Macronutrient intake and change in mammographic density at menopause: results from a randomized trial,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 123–128, 1999. View at Scopus
  28. S. A. Qureshi, E. Couto, M. Hilsen, S. Hofvind, A. H. Wu, and G. Ursin, “Mammographic density and intake of selected nutrients and vitamins in Norwegian women,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1011–1020, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. E. Sala, R. Warren, S. Duffy, A. Welch, R. Luben, and N. Day, “High risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and diet: a case-control study,” The British Journal of Cancer, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 121–126, 2000. View at Scopus
  30. G. Ursin, C. Sun, W. Koh et al., “Associations between soy, diet, reproductive factors, and mammographic density in Singapore Chinese women,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 128–135, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Bérubé, C. Diorio, W. Verhoek-Oftedahl, and J. Brisson, “Vitamin D, calcium, and mammographic breast densities,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 1466–1472, 2004. View at Scopus
  32. S. Bérubé, C. Diorio, B. Mâsse et al., “Vitamin D and calcium intakes from food or supplements and mammographic breast density,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1653–1659, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. G. Masala, D. Ambrogetti, M. Assedi, D. Giorgi, M. R. Del Turco, and D. Palli, “Dietary and lifestyle determinants of mammographic breast density. A longitudinal study in a Mediterranean population,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 1782–1789, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Y. Takata, G. Maskarinec, S. Park, S. P. Murphy, L. R. Wilkens, and L. N. Kolonel, “Mammographic density and dietary patterns: the multiethnic cohort,” European Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 409–414, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. G. Mishra, V. McCormack, D. Kuh, R. Hardy, A. Stephen, and I. dos Santos Silva, “Dietary calcium and vitamin D intakes in childhood and throughout adulthood and mammographic density in a British birth cohort,” The British Journal of Cancer, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1539–1543, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. B. Peplonska, A. Bukowska, W. Sobala et al., “Rotating night shift work and mammographic density,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1028–1037, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. K. P. M. Suijkerbuijk, F. J. B. van Duijnhoven, C. H. van Gils et al., “Physical activity in relation to mammographic density in the Dutch prospect-European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 456–460, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. C. Siozon, H. Ma, M. Hilsen, L. Bernstein, and G. Ursin, “The association between recreational physical activity and mammographic density,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 119, no. 7, pp. 1695–1701, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. Samimi, G. A. Colditz, H. J. Baer, and R. M. Tamimi, “Measures of energy balance and mammographic density in the Nurses' health study,” Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 113–122, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. N. Oestreicher, A. Capra, J. Bromberger et al., “Physical activity and mammographic density in a cohort of midlife women,” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 451–456, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. C. G. Woolcott, K. S. Courneya, N. F. Boyd et al., “Mammographic density change with 1 year of aerobic exercise among postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1112–1121, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. E. A. Marmara, X. N. Papacharalambous, V. E. Kouloulias, D. M. Maridaki, and J. P. Baltopoulos, “Physical activity and mammographic parenchymal patterns among Greek postmenopausal women,” Maturitas, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 74–80, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. A. Qureshi, M. Ellingjord-Dale, S. Hofvind, A. H. Wu, and G. Ursin, “Physical activity and mammographic density in a cohort of postmenopausal Norwegian women, a cross-sectional study,” SpringerPlus, vol. 1, article 75, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. H. Dahifar, A. Faraji, A. Ghorbani, and S. Yassobi, “Impact of dietary and lifestyle on vitamin D in healthy student girls aged 11–15 years,” Journal of Medical Investigation, vol. 53, no. 3-4, pp. 204–208, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. J. Caspersen, K. E. Powell, and G. M. Christenson, “Physical activity, exercise and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research,” Public Health Reports, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 126–131, 1985. View at Scopus