About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Oncology
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 192493, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/192493
Research Article

Frequency and Spectrum of KRAS Mutations in Moroccan Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma

1Medical Oncology Department, National Institute of Oncology, Allal Elfassi Street, 62000 Rabat, Morocco
2Pathology Department, Nations-Unies Pathology Center, Rabat, Morocco
3Pathology Department, Hassan Pathology Center, Rabat, Morocco
4Pathology Department, Agdal Pathology Center, Rabat, Morocco
5Pathology Department, Casapath Pathology Center, Casablanca, Morocco

Received 23 December 2013; Accepted 4 February 2014; Published 5 March 2014

Academic Editors: G. Chen, S. Holdenrieder, H. Mo, and H. Zhang

Copyright © 2014 Ibrahim Elghissassi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. In lung adenocarcinoma, the frequency of KRAS mutations is ethnicity dependent with a higher proportion in African Americans and white Caucasians than in Asians. The prevalence of these mutations among North Africans patients is unknown. The objective of this study was to report the frequency and spectrum of KRAS mutations in a group of Moroccan lung adenocarcinoma patients. Methods. Tumor specimens from 117 Moroccan patients with lung adenocarcinoma were selected to determine frequency and spectrum of KRAS mutations. KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 of exon 2 were analyzed using conventional DNA sequencing. Results. The overall frequency of the KRAS mutations was 9% (11/117). In the population with KRAS mutations, there was a trend towards more male ( ) and more smokers ( ) compared to patients with wild type KRAS. KRAS mutations were located at codon 12 in 10 out of 11 patients (91%). The G12C mutation was the most frequent KRAS mutation (73%). Conclusion. This is the first study to date examining the frequency and spectrum of KRAS mutations in lung adenocarcinomas in North African and Arab populations. KRAS mutation frequency in Moroccan patients was comparable with the frequency observed in East-Asian population. KRAS mutations are more likely observed in males and smokers and to be transversions. Further studies, in larger numbers of patients, are needed to confirm these findings.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer is one of the most common cancers in Morocco and in the world and is the leading cause of cancer mortality in both males and females [1, 2]. During the last few years, improvement in the knowledge of lung cancer molecular biology led to identification of several biological events crucial for tumor cell survival.

In nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), one of the most commonly genetic aberrations is conversion of the protooncogene KRAS to its activated oncogenic form. KRAS encodes low molecular weight GTPase binding proteins that regulate cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. Mutations of KRAS are associated with impaired GTPase activity, causing increased mitogenic RAS signaling [3].

Mutations in KRAS gene occur more frequently (20–30%) in adenocarcinoma and less frequently (about 7%) in squamous-cell carcinoma and are usually associated with a history of smoking [4]. The incidence of KRAS mutation is ethnicity dependent with a higher proportion in African Americans and white Caucasians (20–30%) than in Asians (5–20%) [57]. However, such information is still lacking in some other races, such as North African patients.

Typically, KRAS mutations are a point mutation in the gene replacing an amino acid at positions 12, 13, or 61 [8]. Somatic KRAS mutations predominantly involve codons 12 and 13. Together, these two mutations account for nearly 95% of all KRAS mutations in lung cancer. The G12C mutation in codon 12 is by far the most frequent mutation in NSCLC [810].

The main goal of this study was to report the frequency and spectrum of KRAS mutations in unselected group of Moroccan lung adenocarcinoma patients. In addition, we have examined the relationship between the mutations and some parameters, including gender and smoking status.

2. Methods

2.1. Patients and Tumor Samples

Data of all lung adenocarcinoma samples were collected from four pathology laboratories in Morocco between November 2010 and August 2012. The participating laboratories were Nations-Unies Pathology Center, Rabat; Hassan Pathology Center, Rabat; Agdal Pathology Center, Rabat; Casapath Pathology Center, Casablanca.

All of these laboratories outsource KRAS mutation testing (Molecular Biology Laboratory in Paris, France) and perform more than 90% of all tests requested in Morocco.

Only Moroccan metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients were included. The histological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was verified using the pathology report provided by participating laboratories.

Never smokers were defined as individuals who reported smoking fewer than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime.

2.2. KRAS Mutation Analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from tumors tissues according to standard procedures. KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13 of exon 2 were analyzed using conventional DNA sequencing.

2.3. Ethics Statement

The ethics committee approval was not necessary for this study, since all mutation tests were part of the routine diagnostic procedure and all patient and tumor characteristics were collected anonymously.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The potential associations of KRAS mutation with age, gender, and smoking status were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test. Means of age were compared using the T test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SPSS Version 20.

3. Results

One hundred and seventeen lung adenocarcinomas from Moroccan patients were collected. The study population consisted of 77 men (66%) and 40 women (34%), with a median age of 59 years (range: 37 to 87 years). The demographic characteristics of the patients are provided in Table 1.

tab1
Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the study population.

A total of 11 KRAS mutations were found in this series of 117 patients (9%). KRAS mutations were identified in 13% of smokers (9/68) and 4% of never smokers (2/49). There were 13% of male (10/77) and 2% of female (1/40) with KRAS mutations.

In the population with KRAS mutations, there was a trend towards more male than female compared to patients with wild type KRAS (91% versus 63%, ) but this did not reach statistical significance. The frequency of smokers in patients with tumors having KRAS mutations was higher than that observed in patients without mutations (82% versus 56%, ) but also this did not reach statistical significance. The mean age did not differ between the two groups (Table 2).

tab2
Table 2: Patient characteristics by KRAS mutation status.

All KRAS mutations were located at codon 12, with the exception of a single patient in which KRAS was mutated at codon 13. The G12C mutation was the most frequent KRAS mutation (73%) in this series (Table 3).

tab3
Table 3: Frequency of KRAS mutation type.

4. Discussion

In the present series, KRAS mutations were identified in 11 of 117 Moroccan patients (9%). To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first study to date reporting KRAS mutation rate in North African and Arabs populations.

Some previous studies have demonstrated a genetic divergence of KRAS mutation rates according to ethnicity [1118]. Indeed, KRAS mutations rate in Caucasian (26–37%) and African-American (17–37%) patients is much higher than that in East-Asian population (6–11%). KRAS mutation frequency in Moroccan patients, as reported in this study, was comparable with the frequency observed in East-Asian population (Table 4).

tab4
Table 4: The frequency of KRAS mutations by race.

In the population with KRAS mutations, we found a trend towards more male than female compared to patients with wild type KRAS (91% versus 63%, ). This did not reach statistical significance, probably due to the low number of patients with KRAS mutations in the present study. However, these results are in keeping with some published reports showing a trend towards more mutations in males [19, 20].

In this study, the higher frequency of KRAS mutations among smokers (82%) supports data from some previous studies. For example, Ahrendt et al. reported a strong positive association between presence of KRAS mutations and smoking [21]. A meta-analysis of KRAS mutations in NSCLC reported a frequency of 26% in tumors of current/former smokers and 6% in tumors of never smokers [22]. On the other hand, KRAS mutations have been detected in a significant proportion of never smoker lung adenocarcinoma patients, with an incidence up to 15% [7], and thus remain not rare in this subpopulation.

In lung adenocarcinomas, the majority of KRAS mutations have been identified in codons 12 and 13. In our subjects, the distribution of mutations of KRAS at codons 12 (10/11 (91%)) and 13 (1/11 (9%)) appear to be comparable with the frequency of the other studies [23, 24]. Furthermore, the G12C mutation was the most frequent KRAS mutation (73%) confirming previous results [810].

Transversions (substituting a pyrimidine base for a purine base or vice versa) are more common than transitions (substituting purine for purine or pyrimidine for pyrimidine). KRAS mutations observed in smokers are more likely to be transversions unlike the transitions more common in patients with no history of cigarette smoking [7]. Indeed, the etiology of G → T transversion in lung cancer has been attributed to the exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) present in tobacco smoke [25]. In the present study, 89% of smokers (8/9) had a transversion mutation supporting these data.

Till date, the clinical applicability of the KRAS mutation is limited. Firstly, there is no specific treatment currently available for NSCLC with KRAS mutations. Secondly, the prognostic and predictive role of KRAS mutations in NSCLC remains controversial. While some studies suggested that mutant KRAS may have a potential negative prognostic effect and could be predictive of lack of response to chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, other studies failed to confirm this result [6, 26]. However, previous studies have shown that EGFR and KRAS mutations are mutually exclusive [5, 19]. KRAS may therefore have a role as part of an efficient testing algorithm.

In Summary, the present study revealed that KRAS mutation frequency in Moroccan patients was comparable with the frequency observed in East-Asian population. In keeping with the literature, KRAS mutations are more likely observed in males and smokers and to be transversions. Further studies, in larger numbers of patients, are needed to confirm these findings.

Conflict of Interests

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Ibrahim Elghissassi drafted the paper; Hanane Inrhaoun helped to draft the paper; Anwar Boukir, Fouad Kettani, Lamia Gamra, Amina Mestari, and Lamia Jabri participated in acquisition of data; Youssef Bensouda, Hind Mrabti, and Hassan Errihani have been involved in revising the paper. All authors read and approved the final paper.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Research and Investigation in Medical Oncology Moroccan Group.

References

  1. R. Siegel, D. Naishadham, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2013,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 63, pp. 11–30, 2012. View at Scopus
  2. The Grand Casablanca cancer registry, 2007.
  3. S. L. Campbell, R. Khosravi-Far, K. L. Rossman, G. J. Clark, and C. J. Der, “Increasing complexity of Ras signaling,” Oncogene, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1395–1413, 1998. View at Scopus
  4. S. Forbes, J. Clements, E. Dawson et al., “Cosmic 2005,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 318–322, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Suzuki, H. Shigematsu, T. Iizasa et al., “Exclusive mutation in epidermal growth factor receptor gene, HER-2, and KRAS, and synchronous methylation of nonsmall cell lung cancer,” Cancer, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 2200–2207, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. Califano, L. Landi, and F. Cappuzzo, “Prognostic and predictive value of K-RAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer,” Drugs, vol. 72, no. 1 supplement, pp. 28–36, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. G. J. Riely, M. G. Kris, D. Rosenbaum et al., “Frequency and distinctive spectrum of KRAS mutations in never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 18, pp. 5731–5734, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. L. Bos, “Ras oncogenes in human cancer: a review,” Cancer Research, vol. 49, no. 17, pp. 4682–4689, 1989. View at Scopus
  9. L. Ding, G. Getz, D. A. Wheeler et al., “Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma,” Nature, vol. 455, no. 7216, pp. 1069–1075, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. S. Schubbert, K. Shannon, and G. Bollag, “Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 295–308, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. J. Smits, J. A. Kummer, J. W. Hinrichs et al., “EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung carcinomas in the Dutch population: increased EGFR mutation frequency in malignant pleural effusion of lung adenocarcinoma,” Cellular Oncology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 189–196, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. C. Boch, J. Kollmeier, A. Roth et al., “The frequency of EGFR and KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): routine screening data for central Europe from a cohort study,” BMJ Open, vol. 3, no. 4, Article ID e002560, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. M. Reinersman, M. L. Johnson, G. J. Riely et al., “Frequency of EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung adenocarcinomas in African Americans,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 28–31, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. D. Hunt, A. Strimas, J. E. Martin et al., “Differences in KRAS mutation spectrum in lung cancer cases between African Americans and Caucasians after occupational or environmental exposure to known carcinogens,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1405–1412, 2002. View at Scopus
  15. R. S. Leidner, P. Fu, B. Clifford et al., “Genetic abnormalities of the EGFR pathway in African American patients with non-small-cell lung cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 33, pp. 5620–5626, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Sasaki, K. Okuda, O. Kawano et al., “Nras and Kras mutation in Japanese lung cancer patients: genotyping analysis using LightCycler,” Oncology Reports, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 623–628, 2007. View at Scopus
  17. Y. T. Kim, T.-Y. Kim, D. S. Lee et al., “Molecular changes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and KRAS and their impact on the clinical outcomes in surgically resected adenocarcinoma of the lung,” Lung Cancer, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 111–118, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Akamatsu, K. Kaira, H. Murakami et al., “The impact of clinical outcomes according to EGFR mutation status in patients with locally advanced lung adenocarcinoma who recieved concurrent chemoradiotherapy,” American Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Y. Lee, M. J. Kim, G. Jin et al., “Somatic mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway genes in non-small cell lung cancers,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1734–1740, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. Takamochi, S. Oh, and K. Suzuki, “Differences in EGFR and KRAS mutation spectra in lung adenocarcinoma of never and heavy smokers,” Oncology Letters, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1207–1212, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. S. A. Ahrendt, P. A. Decker, E. A. Alawi et al., “Cigarette smoking is strongly associated with mutation of the K-ras gene in patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the lung,” Cancer, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1525–1530, 2001.
  22. C. Mao, L.-X. Qiu, R.-Y. Liao et al., “KRAS mutations and resistance to EGFR-TKIs treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 22 studies,” Lung Cancer, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 272–278, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. T. S. Mok, Y.-L. Wu, S. Thongprasert et al., “Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 10, pp. 947–957, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. M. Siegfried, A. T. Gillespie, R. Mera et al., “Prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations in lung adenocarcinomas,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 841–847, 1997. View at Scopus
  25. S. S. Hecht, “Tobacco smoke carcinogens and lung cancer,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 91, no. 14, pp. 1194–1210, 1999. View at Scopus
  26. P. Martin, N. B. Leighl, M. S. Tsao, and F. A. Shepherd, “KRAS mutations as prognostic and predictive markers in non-small cell lung cancer,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 530–542, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar