About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Pathology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 267145, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/267145
Research Article

Transmucosal Fine Needle Aspiration of Oral and Pharyngeal Lesions

1Department of Pathology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA
2Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA

Received 21 March 2011; Accepted 24 April 2011

Academic Editor: J. A. Jimenez-Heffernan

Copyright © 2011 Fang-Ming Deng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Fine Needle aspiration (FNA) studies of oropharyngeal lesions are few and limited. We retrospectively reviewed cytologic diagnosis and cytohistologic correlation of 28 cases of FNAs of oropharyngeal lesions. Cytologically, 11 cases were diagnosed as malignant/suspicious and 17 cases as benign. Ten of these cases diagnosed as malignant/suspicious correlated with the subsequent histological diagnosis or were compatible with previous histological diagnoses. One case categorized as suspicious for malignancy revealed pleomorphic adenoma with extensive squamous metaplasia. Of the 17 cases diagnosed as benign by cytology, 11 correlated with the subsequent histological diagnosis. The remaining 6 cytologically benign cases were considered clinically benign, and there was no histological followup. Clinical followup on these 6 patients did not reveal any evidence of disease. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of malignant diagnosis were 100%, 95%, and 97%. FNA biopsy may be used as the first line of investigation in evaluation of oropharyngeal lesions.

1. Introduction

Superficial or image-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy has been used extensively in superficial and various deep-seated tissues. It is simple, safe, economical, and proven to have high sensitivity and specificity. It is minimally invasive and well-tolerated by the patients, so that repeat sampling may be performed if required. The use of quick staining methods allows a rapid provisional diagnosis to be achieved in most cases, guiding further management [1, 2]. There are a wide variety of benign or malignant neoplasms originating from the squamous mucosa, salivary glands, mesenchymal structures, and lymphoid tissues within the oral cavity and oropharynx, in addition to inflammation and benign cysts. These lesions are traditionally evaluated by surgical biopsy, and transmucosal needle aspiration studies of oral cavity and pharyngeal lesions are few and limited [39]. The oral cavity and oropharynx are readily accessible to FNA biopsy. FNA biopsy may be as good as or better than surgical biopsy in the preliminary assessment and definitive pathological diagnosis of submucosal oral or pharyngeal lesions.

Here, we present our experience with FNA cases of oral and oropharyngeal lesions performed in our institution, with particular attention to cytologic features of specific tumors, diagnostic accuracy, and cytohistologic correlation.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Patient Demographics

A search of the cytology files of the Department of Pathology at SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY USA between January 1996 and February 2009 was conducted. Twenty-eight patients with oral cavity or pharyngeal lesions underwent transoral FNA at our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the cytologic and the histologic diagnosis and the clinical followup when indicated.

2.2. Fine Needle Aspiration and Histology Study

All FNA procedures were performed by pathologists. In most of the cases, we did not use any anesthesia during the FNA procedure. A local ethyl chloride spray was applied in a few selected patients. All FNAs were performed using 25- or 23-gauge (0.25 or 0.23 mm) needles attached to 20-ml syringe in a cameco aspiration device [6]. In some cases, resident assistant used tongue depressor to enable better visualization of the lesion. Similar maneuvers were used in children less than 6 years old. However, procedure was performed under sedation administered by the anesthesiologist. No compression was needed after the procedure other than that provided by natural closing of the mouth.

In all the cases, the material obtained was smeared onto uncoated glass slides and either air-dried or fixed in ethanol for Diff Quick or Papanicolaou stain, respectively. During the procedure, each specimen was checked for adequacy; as soon as diagnostic material was secured, the procedure was discontinued. The material procured for a cell block was fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 4 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The latter methods were also applied to the histologic samples.

3. Results

Table 1 provides the summary of cases in the current study including the cytologic and final histologic diagnosis or clinical followup. The age of the patients ranged from 3 to 91 years (mean 50), with 17 males and 11 females. The biopsy sites included cheek (6), hard and soft palate (9), floor of mouth (2), mandible (1), and pharynx (10).

tab1
Table 1: Patient Demographics and Pathological Diagnosis.

Cytologically, 11 patients (cases 18–28) were diagnosed as malignant/suspicious and 17 were diagnosed as benign. Cases with a diagnosis of malignant/suspicious, included: squamous cell carcinoma (n = 2), adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 2), polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (n = 2), lymphoma (n = 1), chondrosarcoma (n = 1), metastatic adenocarcinoma (n = 1), metastatic poorly differentiated carcinoma (n = 1), and pleomorphic adenoma with squamous metaplasia (n = 1).

Of the 11 malignant/suspicious cases, 10 cases correlated with the histologic diagnosis (8 cases correlated with subsequent histological diagnosis, and 2 cases of metastatic tumor were compatible with previous histological diagnosis. Flow cytometry enabled a correct diagnosis of B-cell lymphoma on one of the cytologic samples. One case diagnosed as atypical squamous cell proliferation, cannot exclude squamous cell carcinoma by cytology, was later diagnosed as pleomorphic adenoma with extensive squamous metaplasia by histology.

Cases with cytologic diagnosis of benign (Cases  1–17) included benign neoplasms (n = 4), inflammatory lesions (n = 5) and cyst (n = 4) and negative for malignancy/descriptive (n = 4). Four benign neoplasms included: pleomorphic adenoma (n = 3) and Warthin’s tumors (n = 1). Of the 17 benign cases, 11 cases (including 4 cases of tumor) correlated with the histologic diagnosis. Six cases were considered clinically benign and did not require histological followup; however, clinical followup (2-3 years) showed no evidence of malignancy.

3.1. Pathologic Findings
3.1.1. Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Smears from cases with cytologic diagnoses of squamous cell carcinoma were cellular and had solid sheets of neoplastic cells. Individual cells had dense keratinized cytoplasm, marked nuclear pleomorphism, occasional prominent nucleoli, nuclear hyperchromasia, and irregular nuclear membranes. Necrotic debris and inflammatory background were also identified in 3 cases. Cell block preparation revealed sheets of malignant squamous cells with similar cytologic features.

3.1.2. Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma

Aspirate smears revealed metachromatic hyaline globules and small basaloid uniform tumor cells with minimal cytoplasm forming clusters and glands. Occasional single cells were also seen (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)).

fig1
Figure 1: (a) Basaloid cells with mild to moderate pleomorphism and hyaline matrix spheres (Diff Quick stain ×200). Cell block neoplastic glands in a cribriform pattern (insert: H & E stain ×200). (b) Follow-up histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma (H & E stain ×200).
3.1.3. Polymorphous Low-grade Adenocarcinoma

The FNA smears revealed uniform small blue tumor cells (basaloid cells) with uniform round to oval nuclei with granular chromatin: inconspicuous nucleoli and scant to moderate cytoplasm (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)).

fig2
Figure 2: (a) Sheets and single basaloid cells with mild pleomorphism (Diff Quick stain ×200). Cell block showed similar features (insert, H & E stain ×200). (b) Follow-up histopathology showed polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma (H & E stain ×200).
3.1.4. Chondrosarcoma

The FNA smears comprised of abundant hypercellular chondroid material with many atypical binucleated and occasional trinucleated cells. Follow-up histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)).

fig3
Figure 3: (a) Abundant hypercellular chondroid material (Diff Quick stain ×200) with many binucleated and occasional trinucleated cells (insert, Pap stain ×200). (b) Follow-up histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma (H & E stain ×200).
3.1.5. Lymphoma

The FNA smears showed a monotonous population of large lymphoid cells. Flow cytometry and histologic findings were consistent with Follicular B-cell lymphoma.

3.1.6. Metastatic Adenocarcinoma and Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma

The aspirate smears consisted of tumor cells with moderate to abundant cytoplasm, increased nuclear cytoplasmic ratio, overlapping and hyperchromatic nuclei, and increased mitotic figures. Glandular configuration was prominent in case of metastatic adenocarcinoma. Cytologic features of tumor were compatible with those of previously resected primary tumors of head and neck.

3.1.7. Pleomorphic Adenoma with Extensive Squamous Metaplasia

The FNA smears revealed predominantly squamous cells with some nuclear atypia. No chondromyxoid stroma or hyaline cells were identified. Histologic followup revealed pleomorphic adenoma with squamous metaplasia with reactive changes (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)).

fig4
Figure 4: (a) Mature single and clusters of squamous epithelial cells with occasional enlarged atypical cells (Pap stain ×200). The cell block showed similar features (insert, H & E stain ×200). (b) Follow-up histopathology showed pleomorphic adenoma with extensive squamous metaplasia (H & E stain ×200).
3.1.8. Pleomorphic Adenoma

The FNA smears revealed chondromyxoid stroma admixed with hyaline cells and mesenchymal cells. Histologic followup confirmed the cytologic diagnosis. (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)).

fig5
Figure 5: (a) Bland epithelial cells, some with plasmacytoid appearance (Diff Quick stain ×200) intermixed with a chondromyxoid stroma (insert, Diff Quick stain ×200). (b) Follow-up histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma (H & E stain ×200).
3.1.9. Warthin’s Tumor

Aspirate smears revealed sheets and clusters of oncocytes and scattered lymphocytes. Cell block showed oncocytic epithelium with a lymphocyte rich stroma. Follow-up histology confirmed the diagnosis of Warthin’s tumor (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)).

fig6
Figure 6: (a) Bland oncocytic cells in a background of lymphocytes (Pap stain ×200). The cell block showed oncocytic epithelium with a lymphocyte-rich stroma (insert, H & E stain ×200). (b) Follow-up histology confirmed the diagnosis of Warthin’s tumor (H & E stain ×200).
3.1.10. Other Benign Lesions

Cytologic findings in cases of cysts revealed histiocytes and benign epithelial cells or squamous cells. Although possibility of contamination from normal oral cavity cannot be excluded in presence of benign squamous cells, identification of histiocytes confirms the cystic nature of the lesion. Inflammatory lesions were characterized by acute or chronic inflammation. In four cases with no cytologic evidence of malignancy, benign squamous cells, adipose tissue, and minor salivary glands were noted. In cases where histologic followup was not available, clinical followup showed regression of these swellings.

The overall diagnostic accuracy of transmucosal FNA for oral and pharyngeal lesions was 96.6%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of malignant diagnosis were 100%, 95%, and 97%.

4. Discussion

FNA is a quick, minimally invasive procedure that can be performed in an outpatient setting with few complications. It has gained popularity in the initial diagnostic investigation of masses in the head and neck regions.

Currently, the bulk of literature on intraoral lesions is based on surgical specimens with much less reported on FNA diagnosis of these lesions [39]. This may be due to patient anxiety, discomfort, and difficulty in localizing these lesions during the procedure. In our series, the lesions were well localized, and FNA enabled us to obtain sufficient material in all cases after 1–3 passes. Patient discomfort, including mild pain and gag reflex was minimal. We did not encounter any significant complications.

The main goal of this study was to determine the usefulness of intraoral FNA in accurately diagnosing lesions and to correlate with histologic diagnosis or clinical followup. Of the 28 cases in our series, there was only one false positive case, and the remaining cases were accurately classified as benign versus malignant/suspicious. The false positive case was of pleomorphic adenoma with extensive squamous metaplasia. The aspirate smears and cell block in this case showed mature single cells and clusters of squamous epithelial cells with nuclear atypia making it difficult to differentiate reactive squamous cells with atypia from squamous cell carcinoma. Follow-up histopathology showing pleomorphic adenoma with extensive squamous metaplasia. Only a few areas showed classic pleomorphic adenoma features were identified. Retrospective review of cytological smears did not find any area suggestive of pleomorphic adenoma. The atypical squamous cells represented reactive changes involving areas of squamous metaplasia. The cytologic discrepancy in this case may be attributed to limitation of sampling and cytologic interpretation of squamous atypia. Squamous metaplasia in benign salivary gland tumor as a source of potential diagnostic pitfall has been previously reported [10]. Hence, caution is warranted in interpretation of such tumors.

Two other cases that were accurately classified as suspicious for malignancy were diagnosed as basaloid tumors and were actually cases of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma. These tumors were characterized by proliferation of small uniform, hyperchromatic, basaloid tumor cells with minimal cytoplasm. In addition to the possibility of low-grade polymorphous adenocarcinoma in these cases, differential diagnosis may also include adenoid cystic carcinoma, basal cell adenoma/carcinoma, lymphoma and metastatic basaloid squamous cell carcinoma, or nasopharyngeal carcinoma [1113]. The cytologic findings alone in these cases raise several diagnostic possibilities. Although careful review of clinical history including prior history of malignancy may enable a correct diagnosis in few of these cases, additional excisional biopsy as performed in these cases may be necessary to delineate these lesions further.

Specific diagnosis correlated with all cases with histologic followup except 3 cases in suspicious category as discussed above. In most instances, it is possible to make a specific diagnosis. This is very helpful in patients for surgical or conservative management which may help avoid unnecessary surgery or allow for quicker treatment. FNA is also helpful in distinguishing lymphoma from lymphoid hyperplasia using additional material for flow cytometry as performed in one of our cases. Other molecular studies may also be performed if there is a suspicion for lymphoma.

In our series, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 95%, and 97%, respectively, of intraoral FNA are comparable to that of previously reported series [4, 7, 8]. The diagnosis is usually easy or straightforward for nonneoplastic lesions, including inflammation and benign cysts.

In summary, transmucosal FNA biopsy permits rapid and accurate diagnosis of both benign and malignant lesions of the oral cavity and pharynx. It is easy to do, well tolerated by patients, and has few, minor complications. It may be used as the first line of investigation in evaluation of oral and pharyngeal lesions.

Acknowledgment

This paper was presented in part in poster form at the 57th Annual Scientific Meeting of American Society of Cytopathology held in Denver Colorado in November 2009.

References

  1. C. J. Stewart, K. MacKenzie, G. W. McGarry, and A. Mowat, “Fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland: a review of 341 cases,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 139–146, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Bardales, S. J. Baker, and P. Mukunyadzi, “Fine-needle aspiration cytology findings in 214 cases of nonparotid lesions of the head,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 211–217, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. L. Scher, P. E. Oostingh, P. A. Levine, R. W. Cantrell, and P. S. Feldman, “Role of fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lesions of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and nasopharynx,” Cancer, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 2602–2606, 1988. View at Scopus
  4. M. Castelli, P. Gattuso, C. Reyes, and E. P. Solans, “Fine needle aspiration biopsy of intraoral and pharyngeal lesions,” Acta Cytologica, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 448–450, 1993. View at Scopus
  5. H. Cramer, H. Lamper, and P. Downing, “Intraoral and transoral fine needle aspiration. A review of 25 cases,” Acta Cytologica, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 683–688, 1995. View at Scopus
  6. H. Domanski and M. Akerman, “Fine-needle aspiration cytology of tongue swellings: a study of 75 cases,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 387–392, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. B. Shah, M. I. Singer, E. Liberman, and B. M. Ljung, “Transmucosal fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of intraoral and intrapharyngeal lesions,” Laryngoscope, vol. 109, no. 8, pp. 1232–1237, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  8. H. A. Saleh, L. Clayman, and H. Masri, “Fine needle aspiration biopsy of intraoral and oropharyngeal mass lesions,” CytoJournal, vol. 5, Article ID 4, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. B. R. Oliai, S. Sheth, F. H. Burroughs, and S. Z. Ali, ““Parapharyngeal space” tumors: a cytopathological study of 24 cases on fine-needle aspiration,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. C. C. Su, C. W. Chou, and C. Y. Yiu, “Neck mass with marked squamous metaplasia: a diagnostic pitfall in aspiration cytology,” Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 56–58, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  11. M. W. Stanley, “Selected problems in fine needle aspiration of head and neck masses,” Modern Pathology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 342–350, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  12. M. W. Stanley, C. A. Horwitz, R. H. Bardales, S. J. Stern, and S. Korourian, “Basal cell carcinoma metastatic to the salivary glands: differential diagnosis in fine-needle aspiration cytology,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 247–252, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Gibbons, M. H. Saboorian, F. Vuitch, S. T. Gokaslan, and R. Ashfaq, “Fine-needle aspiration findings in patients with polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma of the salivary glands,” Cancer, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus