About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Pharmacology
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 910743, 13 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/910743
Review Article

Heparin and Related Drugs: Beyond Anticoagulant Activity

Sackler Institute of Pulmonary Pharmacology, Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, 5th Floor, Franklin-Wilkins Building, Waterloo Campus, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK

Received 11 February 2013; Accepted 7 March 2013

Academic Editors: R. Fantozzi, G. Gervasini, T. Kumai, F. J. Miranda, R. Villalobos-Molina, and T. B. Vree

Copyright © 2013 Clive Page. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Heparin has been widely used as an anticoagulant for more than 80 years. However, there is now considerable evidence that heparin also possesses anti-inflammatory activity, both experimentally and clinically. Importantly in many instances, the anti-inflammatory actions of heparin are independent of anticoagulant activity raising the possibility of developing novel drugs based on heparin that retain the anti-inflammatory activity. Heparin exhibits anti-inflammatory activities via a variety of mechanisms including neutralization of cationic mediators, inhibition of adhesion molecules, and the inhibition of heparanase, all involved in leukocyte recruitment into tissues. It is anticipated that furthering our understanding of the anti-inflammatory actions of heparin will lead to the development of novel anti-inflammatory drugs for a variety of clinical indications.

1. Introduction

Heparin has been used for over eighty years as an anticoagulant. Despite its widespread use, the exact mechanism for the anticoagulant activity of heparin was not elucidated until the 1960s and the specific polysaccharide sequence within the heparin molecule required for this interaction was not defined until nearly twenty years later [1]. The inherent nature of heparin being a polydisperse heterogeneous molecule continues to make this a complex material to work with. In addition to the well described anticoagulant effect of heparin, a range of polysaccharides, some derived from heparin, and some from related structures, have been found to interact with a wide variety of biological pathways and systems, raising the possibility that such drugs may have wider therapeutic uses than inhibiting coagulation. These other activities of heparin and related drugs are less well understood than anticoagulant activity, but such drugs are now under investigation for a wide range of clinical indications, particularly for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.

Heparin is a polysaccharide, and heparin has several unusual characteristics. Firstly, it is polydisperse in nature; that is, it does not possess a defined single structure in the manner of a simple low-molecular-weight drug such as aspirin. Rather, heparin contains a range of saccharide chains of variable lengths and structural diversity and will typically have an average molecular weight of 14 to 18 kDa, but can contain polysaccharides from 10 to over 100 monosaccharide units [1]. The second feature is that heparin is a highly sulphated molecule, and due to this property has a very high negative charge which allows it to bind to a very wide array of positively charged biological materials (see [2] for a review). Heparin belongs to the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) family of polysaccharides which are characterised by alternating hexuronic acid and hexosamine disaccharides as the backbone structure (see Figure 1), although there are a number of other molecules that fall into the GAG family (see Table 1).

tab1
Table 1: Examples of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and their main backbone components.
fig1
Figure 1: Generic disaccharide backbone structure of glycosaminoglycans with (a) 1–4 linkage, common to heparin and heparan sulphate and (b) 1–3 linkage, common to chondroitin and dermatan sulphates. Numbers on the rings relate to the carbon position, hydroxyl, and amine groups can be sulphated and alternatively orientated.

Unfractioned heparin and low-molecular-weight heparins (formed from fractionation or degradation of heparin by different chemical methods, e.g., tinzaparin—(by enzymatic digestion, dalteparin—by nitrous acid depolymerisation, enoxaparin—alkaline β-elimination, and parnaparin—oxidative depolymerisation)) are widely used as anticoagulants in a range of different clinical indications. However, in mammals, heparin is uniquely found in mast cells, which reside within mucosal and connective tissues suggesting that physiologically heparin may be involved in the regulation of inflammatory responses. Indeed, I suggested in 1991 that endogenous heparin may well serve as an endogenous regulator of the inflammatory response in much the same way as various mechanisms have been shown to homeostatically regulate the actions of neurotransmitters and hormones [3]. Mast cells contain an array of inflammatory mediators packed in to their granules which are released on stimulation, and heparin has been found packed in conjunction with a range of cationic molecules, for example, chymase and tryptase. Due to the high negative charge of heparin, a widely held view has been that heparin serves as a packing agent, allowing the containment and storage of large quantities of these various positivity charged mediators in very close proximity [4]. However, it is now recognized that many different proteins involved in the inflammatory cascade have heparin-binding domains in their structure allowing them to recognise and bind heparin, and in many cases heparin is able to inhibit the action of these proteins (see [2]). Thus, endogenous heparin may have an important role in helping control the localised inflammatory response, rather than the coagulation system and indeed heparin has been shown to be released by mast cells [5, 6] and circulating heparin like material has been identified in patients with allergy [7], presumably due to the repeated mast cell degranulation that occurs in such patients.

In addition to endogenous heparin being an anti-inflammatory agent, there are now many experimental and clinical studies demonstrating positive anti-inflammatory activities of heparin (see below), suggesting that such activities could be exploited for therapeutic use. However, the use of heparin itself as an anti-inflammatory drug is currently limited by the anticoagulant activity of the molecule, notwithstanding the observations that when heparin is applied by alternative topical routes of administration, for example, inhalation, and even at higher than conventional anticoagulant doses, no significant anticoagulant effects have been noted systemically [8, 9]. However, the observations, by a number of laboratories, that the anti-inflammatory actions of heparin are independent of its anticoagulant activity [1013] have spurred the field into investigating novel molecules that mimic the anti-inflammatory activities of heparin, whilst lacking anticoagulant activity and these will be discussed in further detail below.

2. Nonanticoagulant Effects of Heparin

2.1. Effects on Inflammatory Mediators

Heparin can inhibit the activation of a range of inflammatory cells [1425], an effect that is due in part to the binding and neutralisation of inflammatory mediators and enzymes released during an inflammatory response (reviewed by [2]) that would otherwise go on to activate such cells. Likewise, certain enzymes and cytotoxic mediators released from these cells, involved in propagation of the inflammatory response and subsequent tissue damage and remodelling, have also been shown to be inhibited by heparin, including elastase [26, 27], cathepsin G [26], eosinophil peroxidase [28], eosinophil cationic protein [29], major basic protein [30], certain cytokines (reviewed by [31]), and chemokines (reviewed in [32]).

Many growth factors, including basic fibroblast growth factor [33] and transforming growth factor-beta [34, 35], both of which are involved in the regulation of smooth muscle proliferation, (a feature of the tissue remodelling seen in diseases including asthma, atherosclerosis, and coronary stenosis), are bound by heparin. A long established property of heparin is that of inhibition of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation [36], an effect which is known to be independent of the anticoagulant actions of heparin [6], and which extends to airway smooth muscle [35, 37, 38].

Heparin is also known to inhibit the degranulation of isolated human mast cells in response to a variety of stimuli, and hence inhibit the release of histamine [20, 39]. This effect is considered to be due to inhibition of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate- (IP3-) dependent calcium release by heparin. The action of IP3 on the endoplasmic reticulum is potently and competitively blocked by heparin applied to permeabilised mast cells in vitro [40]. IgE-mediated degranulation of mast cells in vitro was found to be inhibited by two fractions of heparin, one which lacked anticoagulant activity and was actually the more potent preparation in this respect, evidence that this effect also does not depend upon the anticoagulant effects of heparin [16]. The cytotoxic effects of TNF-α-activated eosinophils on endothelial cells are also markedly inhibited by heparin [24], as is the homotypic aggregation and chemotaxis of eosinophils in response to complement factor C5a, another inflammatory mediator bound by heparin [25, 41]. Furthermore, unfractionated heparin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of endothelial cells via inhibition of p38 MAPK and NF-KB [42].

Heparin has been shown to bind to the surface of neutrophils [43] and can inhibit their degranulation [18, 21], homotypic aggregation [17, 18, 44, 45], the production of superoxide anions, the activity of lysosomal enzymes [17], and the ability of neutrophils to activate platelets [17, 19], again in a manner that is not dependent upon anticoagulant activity. Furthermore, heparin is able to inhibit neutrophil activation in response to thrombin-stimulated platelet products, in addition to inhibiting thrombin-induced platelet aggregation [22], and at high concentrations, platelet α-granule secretion is inhibited [23].

2.2. Effects on Cellular Adhesion

An important component of the inflammatory response is the adherence of inflammatory cells to the vascular endothelium and their subsequent diapedesis into tissues. This is now a well-characterized process, and heparin has been shown to inhibit each of the different stages involved in inflammatory cell recruitment into tissues (reviewed in [2]). Thus, heparin has been shown to inhibit leucocyte-endothelial adhesion, both in vitro (reviewed in [2, 17, 46, 47]) and in vivo [13, 4853], as well as to limit the ultimate accumulation of cells in inflamed tissues, in response to both allergic [11, 5456] and nonallergic [13, 48, 50, 57, 58] stimuli.

Heparin is known to bind directly to several adhesion molecules expressed during inflammation and the structural requirements for these interactions are becoming increasingly well characterised (e.g., reviewed by [59]). On leucocytes, L-selectin, a molecule involved in early adhesive interactions between inflammatory cells and the vessel wall, is bound by heparin [60], and endothelial heparan sulphate is able to act as an endothelial ligand for this molecule during cell rolling [61]. The β2-integrin adhesion molecule mac-1 (macrophage-1; CD11b/CD18), important for the firm adhesion of leucocytes to endothelium, is also bound by heparin [62, 63] to an extent that surface immobilised heparin is able to support mac-1-dependent neutrophil adhesion under flow conditions in vitro [62]. Therefore, soluble heparin may inhibit mac-1-dependent interactions between leucocytes and the endothelium; the effects of heparin on leucocyte adhesion in vivo have been found to be dependent on such an interaction with mac-1 [51]. On endothelial cells, heparin binds to P-selectin [64], a selectin adhesion molecule involved in the early sequestration of neutrophils during inflammation. Indeed, the antimetastatic effects of heparin can be ascribed, at least in part, to inhibition of P- and L-selectin function [65, 66]. The selectins are a family of glycoprotein adhesion molecules comprising an epidermal growth factor (EGF) like moiety, repeating sequences mimicking those found on complement binding proteins and an NH2-terminal lectin domain. It is via the lectin domain that these molecules Ca2+-dependently bind to carbohydrate structures on the surfaces of interacting cells. Selectins are concerned predominantly with the rolling stages of adhesion, without which firm adhesion and transmigration cannot proceed [67]. However, despite structural congruencies between the selectins, it has been demonstrated that heparin is unable to bind to E-selectin [60]. This difference is known to rely upon two specific amino-acid residues in the EGF-like domain of the selectins, in that if these residues are altered, E-selectin can be made to bind heparin, and the ability of P-selectin to bind heparin diminished [68]. This differential effect may possess physiological significance with respect to the role of endogenous heparin and, possibly, heparan sulphate in the inflammatory process. Indeed, a similar selectivity of binding can be observed amongst key members of the immunoglobulin superfamily adhesion proteins. Heparin has been shown to bind PECAM-1 (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 [69]), an IgSF-adhesion molecule thought to be involved in leucocyte transmigration due to its location at intercellular junctions on the endothelium. The homotypic aggregation of PECAM-1-transfected fibroblasts was found to be inhibited by heparin in a manner dependent upon interaction with the second immunoglobulin domain [70]. Similarly, heparin is able to bind directly to neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), through a heparin-binding region located on the second immunoglobulin domain [71], as well as through a further heparin-binding region on the first immunoglobulin domain [72]; such interactions with heparan sulphate are important for the physiological functioning of this protein in neuronal development [73]. However, the IgSF-adhesion molecules intercellular adhesion molecule- (ICAM-) 1 and ICAM-2, expressed on vascular endothelium and ligands for leucocyte β2-integrins, do not appear to be bound by heparin. However, given that heparin can affect the functioning of ICAM-1 indirectly, by binding of mac-1, it is plausible that the cell trafficking associated with physiological immune surveillance, facilitated by, for example, interactions between lymphocyte function-related antigen (LFA-1; CD11a/CD18) and ICAM-1/2 may be spared while those associated with excessive cell recruitment during inflammation may be inhibited.

2.3. Inhibition of Heparanase

The ubiquitous distribution of heparan sulphate proteoglycans (HSPGs) in mammalian systems provides a clear indication of the physiological importance of these molecules, which are thought to contribute to growth and development, are key structural components of extracellular matrices, and are involved in the localisation and bioactivity of a wide array of mediators, including enzymes, growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines (reviewed by [74, 75]). The endo-β glucuronidase heparanase (HPSE1) is responsible for the site-selective cleavage of heparan sulphate chains, thus regulating the activity of the wide range of proteins that is functionally dependent upon HSPG. HPSE1 has now been sequenced and cloned [7679] and HPSE1 exists as a 50 kDa and 8 kDa heterodimer processed from a single, inactive 65 kDa proenzyme ([76] reviewed by [80]). The catalytic sites on the enzyme have also now been characterized [81].

HPSE1 activity has been demonstrated in spleen, lymph nodes, leucocytes and platelets, as well as in endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Moreover, the well-accepted role of HPSE1 in cancer (reviewed by [82]) is underscored by the fact that in human tumours, mRNA for HPSE1 is markedly increased with respect to corresponding normal tissues and that HPSE1 activity in tumour cells has been found to correlate positively with metastatic potential [83]. There are many similarities between leucocyte diapedesis and tumour cell metastasis, and given the evidence that in HPSE1 is involved the latter, it is perhaps not surprising that this enzyme has also been reported as a potential target for novel anti-inflammatory drugs [82].

The potential importance of heparanase activity is illustrated by the fact that in tissue sections from inflammatory bowel disease patients, when compared to healthy tissues, areas of extensive GAG disruption are visible on vascular endothelium and basement membrane, which correlate with localised areas of inflammation [84] and increased levels of GAG degradation products have been found in the urine of patients with asthma, which is thought to reflect the breakdown of extracellular matrices as a result of the inflammatory processes in the airway [85].

It is, therefore, of interest that heparin has long been known to be an inhibitor of HPSE1 activity [86], and it is also well established that heparan-degrading enzymes are released by certain leucocytes during the process of diapedesis [87, 88]. Indeed, when heparin is used at low doses in lymphocyte-driven inflammatory processes such as allergic encephalomyelitis [89, 90], delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) [10] and graft-versus-host reactions [91, 92], leucocyte infiltration into tissues is markedly inhibited, and it has been suggested that this effect is via inhibition by heparin of HPSE1. However, recent data with selective inhibitors of HPSE1 have not confirmed anti-inflammatory activity with such drugs in nonallergic inflammatory models, perhaps questioning a central role for this enzyme in leucocyte infiltration (D. Spina, Personal Communication). It has further been demonstrated that vascular endothelial cells also secrete heparanase and that exposure of endothelial cells to proinflammatory cytokines upregulates this secretion [93, 94], further suggesting an important role for this enzyme in inflammation. Moreover, the development of DTH reactions has been found to correlate with endothelial heparanase expression in mice [94].

2.4. Effects on Acute Inflammatory Responses

In animal studies, pretreatment with heparin has been shown to inhibit eosinophil infiltration into the inflamed lung [54, 55, 95] and skin [57], neutrophil accumulation in the inflamed peritoneal cavity [13, 50], independently of anticoagulant activity [11, 13], and to inhibit vascular permeability induced by certain autacoids [96, 97] or the bacterial formyl peptide [97]. Additionally, platelet-activating factor-induced bronchial hyperresponsiveness was inhibited by heparin administration in rabbits [54] and similar effects have been reported in an allergic sheep model, whereby inhaled heparin was found to inhibit the acute airway responses to inhaled allergen [15], an effect that was shared by very low-molecular-weight and nonanticoagulant heparins [16], and in guinea pigs, whereby the protective effect of heparin against bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine was suggested to be due to preservation of nitric oxide signalling in the airway [98].

Heparin has been found, in a number of preclinical models, to protect against ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Thus, in a hamster dorsal skin chamber model, leucocyte-endothelial adhesion induced by ischaemia-reperfusion is inhibited by heparin pretreatment [99], as is cardiac muscle damage [100]. Furthermore, administration of heparin subsequent to transient focal cerebral ischaemia in rats was found to reduce the degree of brain injury by inhibiting reperfusion-induced leucocyte accumulation [58]. Heparin has also recently been suggested as a plausible agent for limitation of the delayed neurological injury that follows subarachnoid haemorrhage [101], by virtue of its broad anti-inflammatory effects. Clearly, the potential to promote further haemorrhage in this setting is a legitimate concern, but it has been suggested that systemic, subanticoagulant doses of heparin may be sufficient to elicit beneficial effects in this condition [101], and, moreover, intracisternal administration of heparin has been found to be protective following experimental subarachnoid haemorrhage in rats [102]. However, given that the anti-inflammatory properties of heparin appear largely to be separable from its effects on coagulation, nonanticoagulant heparin-like molecules may provide a safer approach to treating this important clinical problem in the future.

It has long been appreciated that the anti-inflammatory effects of heparin observed preclinically have also been extended into a number of clinical settings. Heparin has potential use in human inflammatory disease and was first assessed for this purpose in the 1960s, in small, subjectively assessed trials [103, 104]. More recently, in controlled studies, heparin has shown potential in the management of clinical asthma [8, 14, 105, 106] and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [107, 108]. In patients with allergic rhinitis, topical heparin has been observed to reduce eosinophil recruitment into the nose [56] following allergen exposure and to be of value in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease ([109111]; reviewed by [112]), although meta-analyses of these trials have concluded that there is currently insufficient evidence to support the use of heparin for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis [113, 114].

Importantly, however, in none of these clinical studies was heparin treatment found to elicit significant haemorrhagic side effects, either when administered systemically or locally. Indeed, in a study performed specifically to address the effects of inhaled heparin on coagulation parameters [9], it was found that almost 40% of a single inhaled dose of heparin is detectable in the lung 24 h later, with no significant effects on blood coagulation. However, given that the anticoagulant actions of heparin appear not to be necessary for the majority of beneficial effects seen in models of inflammation, it seems likely that novel drugs which retain the anti-inflammatory effects of the parent heparin molecule, without the anticoagulant effects will be useful in the management of inflammatory diseases that have been found to respond positively to the administration of heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin; for example, selectively 2,3-O-desulphated heparin, which is currently in clinical trials for COPD, is one such approach [12].

3. Effects of Heparin in Cancer

Due to the common use of heparins for the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients, a sizeable body of evidence exists to suggest that heparin confers benefit in the treatment of cancer that is additional to the direct effects of this drug on blood coagulation (see [115122]). Analysis of trials of heparin treatment in cancer patients indicates an improved rate of survival [117] and meta-analyses performed specifically to assess the effects of heparin and LMW heparin treatment on survival in cancer patients have indicated positive effects [123, 124].

As discussed previously, the accumulation of metastatic tumour cells into tissues, like leucocytes, is dependent upon adhesion to the vascular endothelium and subsequent diapedesis and many similarities exist between the processes utilised by inflammatory cells and tumour cells in this respect (reviewed by [125]), including a dependency on platelet activation [126, 127]. However, the involvement of anticoagulant mechanisms in these effects is less clear than is perhaps the case for many of the anti-inflammatory properties of heparin. Heparin has been demonstrated repeatedly to reduce metastasis of carcinoma cells in animal models (e.g., [80, 128131]). However, with respect to the contribution of the anticoagulant effects of the drug, it has been suggested that the basis of the antimetastatic effects of unfractionated heparin lies in the inhibition of fibrin deposition around tumour cells, a factor considered to protect the cells from immune attack [128]. Nonetheless, many studies have found that fractions of heparin with much reduced anticoagulant activity, or none at all, also inhibit metastasis (e.g., [129, 131]). Specific mechanisms thought to be involved in this effect include inhibition of heparanase activity [116], selectin function [126] and the tissue factor pathway [132]. Tissue factor can promote angiogenesis and metastasis via mechanisms both related and unrelated to plasma coagulation [118]. It has been suggested that the effects of heparin and related molecules in models of tumour growth and metastasis rely, at least in part, on the promotion of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) release from endothelial cells [132]. Regarding selectin function, clinically relevant levels of LMW heparin, with respect to anticoagulation, have been shown to inhibit experimental metastasis in a manner that correlates with the ability to inhibit P- and L-selectin function; the pentasaccharide fondaparinux, which lacks this ability, was found to be without effect in the same assays, at levels normalised for anticoagulant activity [65], suggesting that it is not the anticoagulant effects per se of heparin that contribute most significantly to effects on tumour cell metastasis. Moreover, mice deficient in both P- and L-selectin were found to be protected against experimental metastasis and, importantly, in these mice, treatment with heparin conferred no further protection [66], in contrast to the marked effects seen in wild-type animals in a range of studies. Protective effects of heparin in cancer models extend beyond the inhibition of metastasis to include those on tumour growth and angiogenesis. Heparin has long been known to be antiangiogenic and its inhibitory effects on heparanase are again well established to be involved in this effect (reviewed by [133]). Growth-factor-induced endothelial cell proliferation is inhibited by unfractionated and LMW heparins [134136]. Whilst standard LMW heparins in this respect were found to be more potent than unfractionated heparin [135, 136], ultralow-molecular-weight species, including the anticoagulant pentasaccharide fondaparinux, were without effect [136]. Moreover, antiangiogenic and antimetastatic effects may further be mediated through interference with the chemokine system, which is known to be involved in these phenomena (reviewed by [137]).

Therefore, it is likely that heparins inhibit angiogenesis and metastasis via an array of mechanisms, including but by no means limited to heparanase inhibition.

4. Effects of Heparin on Wound Healing and Tissue Repair

Administration of heparin by inhalation has been found to be a viable option for the management of smoke inhalation injury in survivors of fire (reviewed by [138, 139]), which reduces the acute lung injury that contributes significantly to morbidity and mortality in these patients, both alone and in combination with N-acetylcysteine [140].

Indeed, there are a number of reports of heparin being used, topically or systemically, to treat burns, although there are a lack of effectively controlled studies in this area for clear conclusions to be drawn as to the efficacy of this approach (reviewed by [141]). However, isolated case reports continue to emerge, suggesting that heparin is able to promote tissue repair and inhibit inflammation in burns patients (e.g., [142]). Whilst controlled, randomised studies are required to assess the potential utility of heparin in this setting, the demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects in other experimental systems do indicate the potential for a useful effect. Furthermore, in animal models, application of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor (HB-EGF), which is known to be upregulated both in human burn tissue and during healing of experimental burn tissue [143], has been shown to promote healing of partial-thickness burn injuries specifically through potentiation of the expression of transforming growth factor-α, another member of the EGF family of growth factors involved in wound repair [144], and to promote healing of ileal tissue following experimental reanastomosis surgery [145]. It has recently been reported that tissue localisation of HB-EGF, through binding to HSPG, mediates the function of the growth factor as a juxtacrine inhibitor of cell proliferation and that disruption of this binding allows the released HB-EGF to function as an autocrine mitogen [146]. Therefore, it is possible that soluble heparin at the site of injury could act competitively to release this growth factor from heparin sulphate binding sites and promote its participation in tissue repair. Moreover, topically applied heparin has been found to promote effective tissue repair in rabbit trachea, in a model of tissue healing following airway surgery [147], further suggesting that the immunomodulatory effects of heparin may be useful in the specific situation of tissue repair following localised injury.

5. Other Conditions Benefiting from Heparin Treatment

Heparin [148] and the related molecule, pentosan polysulphate, have been shown to have beneficial activity in the treatment of interstitial cystitis and indeed the latter drug has been approved for such use in a number of countries. Another interesting area is the potential use of heparin(s) to treat and prevent protracted labour. Some clinicians had noted that when pregnant women were administered low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for the prevention of thrombosis, there was a shorter induction time to labour [149151]. It has been suggested that this effect may relate to inhibition of IL-8. Recent phase 2 clinical studies conducted with tafoxiparin sponsored by Dilafor have confirmed that this LMWH is effective in reducing the incidence of extended labour (http://www.dilafor.com/).

Another possible use of heparin in the treatment of cystic fibrosis was presented [152] and early clinical studies have reported that heparin administered by inhalation provides clinical benefit in patients with COPD (http://www.vectura.com/) which may result from the ability of heparin to act as a mucolytic agent [153] and/or via its well documented effect on neutrophil activations (see above), a major inflammatory cell infiltrating the lung of patients with cystic fibrosis.

6. New Approaches to Treatment

There has long been interest in developing heparin-based anticoagulants that do not require parenteral administration and with respect to, for example, the management of chronic inflammatory diseases, the need for convenient and acceptable methods of drug delivery is arguably an even greater issue. In some circumstances, such as inflammatory diseases of the lung, local administration of heparin by inhalation is an option, but where systemic effects are required, an efficient and predictable drug absorption profile becomes necessary. Absorption of unmodified, unfractionated, and LMW heparins has been reported following oral administration in rats [154156], and in rats and humans when administered with the absorption-enhancing delivery agent sodium N-[8(2-hydroxybenzoyl)amino]caprylate (SNAC) [157160]. Similarly, augmentation of heparin absorption via the pulmonary [161167] and nasal [168170] routes has been described, when the drug is coadministered with delivery systems including polyethyleneimines, cyclodextrins, alkylmaltosides, alkanoylsucroses, poly-L-arginine, and within PEGylated nanocarriers. Moreover, heparin has been administered successfully in validation studies of needle-free injection devices [171173], designed to reduce the pain and inconvenience associated with the regular administration of substances such as insulin, presenting a possible alternative to conventional subcutaneous injection of heparins. In all of these studies, measurement of coagulation parameters was used to assess the efficacy of heparin delivery. However, the fact that a robust and well-characterised effect of heparin can be measured, following the administration of standard heparins by nonstandard routes, is promising with respect to the potential delivery of heparin species for nonanticoagulant uses.

A number of new approaches are being investigated to exploit these non-anticoagulant actions of heparin. Heparin and LMWHs are being investigated in a range of diseases (see Table 2) and molecules such as the nonanticoagulant o-desulphated heparin [12]) are in clinical development (Table 2). In addition, a number of polysaccharides of different length and sulphation patterns have been described in the literature [16, 21, 174178] which are undergoing preclinical and clinical investigation for a range of diseases.

tab2
Table 2: Some examples of clinical trials where heparin is used as a treatment beyond anticoagulant activity (taken from the US National Institute of Health online database http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ and EU Clinical Trials Register http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ in Sept., 2012).

Additionally, a number of GAG analogues that bind cytokines are under development as novel anti-inflammatory drugs [48, 179]. There is also considerable interest in novel polysaccharides from marine sources such as fucoidans, as anti-inflammatory drugs (see [180]).

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the help of John Hogwood for the preparation of the table and figures and of Rebecca Lever in preparing this paper.

References

  1. B. Mulloy, E. Gray, and T. W. Barrowcliffe, “Characterization of unfractionated heparin: comparison of materials from the last 50 years,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1052–1056, 2000. View at Scopus
  2. R. Lever and C. P. Page, “Non-anticoagulant effects of heparin: an overview,” in Heparin—A Century of Progress, R. Lever, B. Mulloy, and C. P. Page, Eds., vol. 207 of Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, pp. 281–305, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. C. P. Page, “One explanation of the asthma paradox: inhibition of natural anti-inflammatory mechanism by β2-agonists,” Lancet, vol. 337, no. 8743, pp. 717–720, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. E. Humphries, G. W. Wong, D. S. Friend et al., “Heparin is essential for the storage of specific granule proteases in mast cells,” Nature, vol. 400, no. 6746, pp. 769–772, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. W. F. Green, K. Konnaris, and A. J. Woolcock, “Effect of salbutamol, fenoterol, and sodium cromoglycate on the release of heparin from sensitized human lung fragments challenged with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus allergen,” American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 518–521, 1993. View at Scopus
  6. J. R. Guyton, R. D. Rosenberg, A. W. Clowes, and M. J. Karnovsky, “Inhibition of rat arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation by heparin. in vivo studies with anticoagulant and nonanticoagulant heparin,” Circulation Research, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 625–634, 1980. View at Scopus
  7. E. C. Lasser, R. A. Simon, S. G. Lyon, A. E. Hamblin, and R. Stein, “Heparin-like anticoagulants in asthma,” Allergy, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 619–625, 1987. View at Scopus
  8. Z. Diamant, M. C. Timmers, H. Van Der Veen, C. P. Page, F. J. Van Der Meer, and P. J. Sterk, “Effect of inhaled heparin on allergen-induced early and late asthmatic responses in patients with atopic asthma,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 153, no. 6 I, pp. 1790–1795, 1996. View at Scopus
  9. K. E. Bendstrup, C. B. Chambers, J. I. Jensen, and M. T. Newhouse, “Lung deposition and clearance of inhaled 99mTc-heparin in healthy volunteers,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 160, no. 5 I, pp. 1653–1658, 1999. View at Scopus
  10. M. S. Sy, E. Schneeberger, R. McCluskey, M. I. Greene, R. D. Rosenberg, and B. Benacerraf, “Inhibition of delayed-type hypersensitivity by heparin depleted of anticoagulant activity,” Cellular Immunology, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 23–32, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. E. A. M. Seeds and C. P. Page, “Heparin inhibits allergen-induced eosinophil infiltration into guinea-pig lung via a mechanism unrelated to its anticoagulant activity,” Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 111–119, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Fryer, Y. C. Huang, G. Rao et al., “Selective O-desulfation produces nonanticoagulant heparin that retains pharmacological activity in the lung,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. 208–219, 1997. View at Scopus
  13. R. Lever, A. Smailbegovic, and C. P. Page, “Locally available heparin modulates inflammatory cell recruitment in a manner independent of anticoagulant activity,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 630, no. 1-3, pp. 137–144, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Ahmed, J. Garrigo, and I. Danta, “Preventing bronchoconstriction in exercise-induced asthma with inhaled heparin,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 329, no. 2, pp. 90–95, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Ahmed, T. Syriste, R. Mendelssohn et al., “Heparin prevents antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness: interference with IP3-mediated mast cell degranulation?” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 893–901, 1994. View at Scopus
  16. T. Ahmed, C. Campo, M. K. Abraham et al., “Inhibition of antigen-induced acute bronchoconstriction, airway hyperresponsiveness, and mast cell degranulation by a nonanticoagulant heparin: comparison with a low molecular weight heparin,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 155, no. 6, pp. 1848–1855, 1997. View at Scopus
  17. G. Bazzoni, A. B. Nuñez, G. Mascellani, P. Bianchini, E. Dejana, and A. Del Maschio, “Effect of heparin, dermatan sulfate, and related oligo-derivatives on human polymorphonuclear leukocyte functions,” Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 268–275, 1993. View at Scopus
  18. R. A. Brown, R. Lever, N. A. Jones, and C. P. Page, “Effects of heparin and related molecules upon neutrophil aggregation and elastase release in vitro,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 139, no. 4, pp. 845–853, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. V. Evangelista, P. Piccardoni, N. Maugeri, G. De Gaetano, and C. Cerletti, “Inhibition by heparin of platelet activation induced by neutrophil-derived cathepsin G,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 216, no. 3, pp. 401–405, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. Inase, R. E. Schreck, and S. C. Lazarus, “Heparin inhibits histamine release from canine mast cells,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 264, no. 4, pp. L387–L390, 1993. View at Scopus
  21. R. Lever, W. T. Lo, M. Faraidoun et al., “Size-fractionated heparins have differential effects on human neutrophil function in vitro,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 151, no. 6, pp. 837–843, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. Piccardoni, V. Evangelista, A. Piccoli, G. De Gaetano, A. Walz, and C. Cerletti, “Thrombin-activated human platelets release two NAP-2 variants that stimulate polymorphonuclear leukocytes,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 780–785, 1996. View at Scopus
  23. M. J. Rohrer, A. S. Kestin, P. A. Ellis et al., “High-dose heparin suppresses platelet alpha granule secretion,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1000–1009, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Slungaard, G. M. Vercellotti, G. Walker, R. D. Nelson, and H. S. Jacob, “Tumor necrosis factor α/cachectin stimulates eosinophil oxidant production and toxicity towards human endothelium,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 171, no. 6, pp. 2025–2041, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. M. Teixeira, A. G. Rossi, and P. G. Hellewell, “Adhesion mechanisms involved in C5a-induced eosinophil homotypic aggregation,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 389–396, 1996. View at Scopus
  26. F. Redini, J. M. Tixier, M. Petitou, J. Choay, L. Robert, and W. Hornebeck, “Inhibition of leucocyte elastase by heparin and its derivatives,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 252, no. 2, pp. 515–519, 1988. View at Scopus
  27. R. L. Walsh, T. J. Dillon, R. Scicchitano, and G. McLennan, “Heparin and heparan sulphate are inhibitors of human leucocyte elastase,” Clinical Science, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 341–346, 1991. View at Scopus
  28. S. Pégorier, L. A. Wagner, G. J. Gleich, and M. Pretolani, “Eosinophil-derived cationic proteins activate the synthesis of remodeling factors by airway epithelial cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, pp. 4861–4869, 2006.
  29. K. Fredens, R. Dahl, and P. Venge, “In vitro studies of the interaction between heparin and eosinophil cationic protein,” Allergy, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 27–29, 1991. View at Scopus
  30. G. J. Swaminathan, D. G. Myszka, P. S. Katsamba, L. E. Ohnuki, G. J. Gleich, and K. R. Acharya, “Eosinophil-granule major basic protein, a C-type lectin, binds heparin,” Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 43, pp. 14152–14158, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Muramatsu and H. Muramatsu, “Glycosaminoglycan-binding cytokines as tumor markers,” Proteomics, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 3350–3359, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Shute, “Glycosaminoglycan and chemokine/growth factor interactions,” in Heparin—A Century of Progress, R. Lever, B. Mulloy, and C. P. Page, Eds., vol. 207 of Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, pp. 307–324, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. F. Bono, P. Rigon, I. Lamarche, P. Savi, V. Salel, and J. M. Herbert, “Heparin inhibits the binding of basic fibroblast growth factor to cultured human aortic smooth-muscle cells,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 326, part 3, pp. 661–668, 1997. View at Scopus
  34. T. A. McCaffrey, D. J. Falcone, C. F. Brayton, L. A. Agarwal, F. G. Welt, and B. B. Weksler, “Transforming growth factor-b activity is potentiated by heparin via dislocation of the transforming growth factor-b/a2-macroglobulin inactive complex,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 441–448, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. K. B. Okona-Mensah, E. Shittu, C. Page, J. Costello, and S. A. Kilfeather, “Inhibition of serum and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β1)-induced DNA synthesis in confluent airway smooth muscle by heparin,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 599–606, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. A. W. Clowes and M. J. Karnowsky, “Suppression by heparin of smooth muscle cell proliferation in injured arteries,” Nature, vol. 265, no. 5595, pp. 625–626, 1977. View at Scopus
  37. V. Kanabar, S. J. Hirst, B. J. O'Connor, and C. P. Page, “Some structural determinants of the antiproliferative effect of heparin-like molecules on human airway smooth muscle,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 370–377, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. A. Kilfeather, S. Tagoe, A. C. Perez, K. Okona-Mensa, R. Matin, and C. P. Page, “Inhibition of serum-induced proliferation of bovine tracheal smooth muscle cells in culture by heparin and related glycosaminoglycans,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 114, no. 7, pp. 1442–1446, 1995. View at Scopus
  39. C. A. Dragstedt, J. A. Wells, E. Rocha, and M. Silva, “Inhibitory effect of heparin upon histamine release by trypsin, antigen, and protease,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 51, pp. 191–192, 1942.
  40. T. K. Ghosh, P. S. Eis, J. M. Mullaney, C. L. Ebert, and D. L. Gill, “Competitive, reversible, and potent antagonism of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate-activated calcium release by heparin,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 263, no. 23, pp. 11075–11079, 1988. View at Scopus
  41. Y. Matzner, G. Marx, R. Drexler, and A. Eldor, “The Inhibitory effect of heparin and related glycosaminoglycans on neutrophil chemotaxis,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 52, pp. 134–137, 1984.
  42. S. Li, Z. Zheng, X. Li, and M. Xiochun, “Unfractionated heparin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced response through blocking p38 MAPK and NF-KB activation on endothgelial cells,” Cytokine, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 114–121, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. C. Leculier, O. Benzerara, N. Couprie et al., “Specific binding between human neutrophils and heparin,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 81–85, 1992. View at Scopus
  44. J. A. Freischlag, M. D. Colburn, W. J. Quiñones-Baldrich, and W. S. Moore, “Heparin, urokinase, and ancrod alter neutrophil function,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 565–574, 1992. View at Scopus
  45. F. L. Pasini, A. L. Pasqui, and L. Ceccatelli, “Heparin inhibition of polymorphonuclear leukocyte activation in vitro. A possible pharmacological approach to granulocyte-mediated vascular damage,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 527–537, 1984. View at Scopus
  46. L. Silvestro, I. Viano, M. Macario et al., “Effects of heparin and its desulfated derivatives on leukocyte-endothelial adhesion,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 254–258, 1994. View at Scopus
  47. A. Smailbegovic, R. Lever, and C. P. Page, “The effects of heparin on the adhesion of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells to human stimulated umbilical vein endothelial cells,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 827–836, 2001. View at Scopus
  48. Z. Johnson, M. H. Kosco-Vilbois, S. Herren et al., “Interference with heparin binding and oligomerization creates a novel anti-inflammatory strategy targeting the chemokine system,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 9, pp. 5776–5785, 2004. View at Scopus
  49. K. Ley, M. Cerrito, and K. E. Arfors, “Sulfated polysaccharides inhibit leukocyte rolling in rabbit mesentery venules,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 260, no. 5, pp. H1667–H1673, 1991. View at Scopus
  50. R. M. Nelson, O. Cecconi, W. G. Roberts, A. Aruffo, R. J. Linhardt, and M. P. Bevilacqua, “Heparin oligosaccharides bind L- and P-selectin and inhibit acute inflammation,” Blood, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 3253–3258, 1993. View at Scopus
  51. A. Salas, M. Sans, A. Soriano et al., “Heparin attenuates TNF-alpha induced inflammatory response through a CD11b dependent mechanism,” Gut, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 88–96, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. G. J. Tangelder and K. E. Arfors, “Inhibition of leukocyte rolling in venules by protamine and sulfated polysaccharides,” Blood, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 1565–1571, 1991.
  53. X. Xie, H. Thorlacius, J. Raud, P. Hedqvist, and L. Lindbom, “Inhibitory effect of locally administered heparin on leukocyte rolling and chemoattractant-induced firm adhesion in rat mesenteric venules in vivo,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. 906–910, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. M. Sasaki, C. M. Herd, and C. P. Page, “Effect of heparin and low-molecular weight heparinoid on PAF-induced airway responses in neonatally immunized rabbits,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 107–112, 1993. View at Scopus
  55. E. A. M. Seeds, A. P. Horne, D. J. Tyrrell, and C. P. Page, “The effect of inhaled heparin and related glycosaminoglycans on allergen-induced eosinophil infiltration in guinea-pigs,” Pulmonary Pharmacology, vol. 8, no. 2-3, pp. 97–105, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. C. Vancheri, C. Mastruzzo, F. Armato et al., “Intranasal heparin reduces eosinophil recruitment after nasal allergen challenge in patients with allergic rhinitis,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 703–708, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. M. M. Teixeira and P. G. Hellewell, “Suppression by intradermal administration of heparin of eosinophil accumulation but not oedema formation in inflammatory reactions in guinea-pig skin,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 1496–1500, 1993. View at Scopus
  58. K. Yanaka, T. Nose, and B. J. Hindman, “Heparin ameliorates brain injury by inhibiting leukocyte accumulation,” Stroke, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2146–2147, 1996. View at Scopus
  59. J. Fritzsche, S. Alban, R. J. Ludwig et al., “The influence of various structural parameters of semisynthetic sulfated polysaccharides on the P-selectin inhibitory capacity,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 474–485, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. Koenig, K. Norgard-Sumnicht, R. Linhardt, and A. Varki, “Differential interactions of heparin and heparan sulfate glycosaminoglycans with the selectins: implications for the use of unfractionated and low molecular weight heparins as therapeutic agents,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 877–889, 1998. View at Scopus
  61. L. Giuffrè, A. S. Cordey, N. Monai, Y. Tardy, M. Schapira, and O. Spertini, “Monocyte adhesion to activated aortic endothelium: role of L-selectin and heparan sulfate proteoglycans,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 945–956, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. M. S. Diamond, R. Alon, C. A. Parkos, M. T. Quinn, and T. A. Springer, “Heparin is an adhesive ligand for the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18),” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 1473–1482, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. K. Peter, M. Schwarz, C. Conradt et al., “Heparin inhibits ligand binding to the leukocyte integrin Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18),” Circulation, vol. 100, no. 14, pp. 1533–1539, 1999. View at Scopus
  64. M. P. Skinner, C. M. Lucas, G. F. Burns, C. N. Chesterman, and M. C. Berndt, “GMP-140 binding to neutrophils is inhibited by sulfated glycans,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 266, no. 9, pp. 5371–5374, 1991. View at Scopus
  65. J. L. Stevenson, S. H. Choi, and A. Varki, “Differential metastasis inhibition by clinically relevant levels of heparins—correlation with selectin inhibition, not antithrombotic activity,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 7003–7011, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. L. Stevenson, A. Varki, and L. Borsig, “Heparin attenuates metastasis mainly due to inhibition of P- and L-selectin, but non-anticoagulant heparins can have additional effects,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. S107–S111, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. M. B. Lawrence and T. A. Springer, “Leukocytes roll on a selectin at physiologic flow rates: distinction from and prerequisite for adhesion through integrins,” Cell, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 859–873, 1991. View at Scopus
  68. B. M. Revelle, D. Scott, and P. J. Beck, “Single amino acid residues in the E-and P-selectin epidermal growth factor domains can determine carbohydrate binding specificity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, pp. 16160–16170, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. S. M. Watt, J. Williamson, H. Genevier et al., “The heparin binding PECAM-1 adhesion molecule is expressed by CD34+ hematopoietic precursor cells with early myeloid and B-lymphoid cell phenotypes,” Blood, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 2649–2663, 1993. View at Scopus
  70. H. M. DeLisser, H. C. Yan, P. J. Newman, W. A. Muller, C. A. Buck, and S. M. Albelda, “Platelet/endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (CD31)-mediated cellular aggregation involves cell surface glycosaminoglycans,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 21, pp. 16037–16046, 1993. View at Scopus
  71. G. J. Cole, A. Loewy, and L. Glaser, “Neuronal cell-cell adhesion depends on interactions of N-CAM with heparin-like molecules,” Nature, vol. 320, no. 6061, pp. 445–447, 1986. View at Scopus
  72. V. V. Kiselyov, V. Berezin, T. E. Maar et al., “The first immunoglobulin-like neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) domain is involved in double-reciprocal interaction with the second immunoglobulin-like NCAM domain and in heparin binding,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 15, pp. 10125–10134, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. S. G. Kallapur and R. A. Akeson, “The neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) heparin binding domain binds to cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 538–548, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. A. K. Powell, E. A. Yates, D. G. Fernig, and J. E. Turnbull, “Interactions of heparin/heparan sulfate with proteins: appraisal of structural factors and experimental approaches,” Glycobiology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 17R–30R, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. J. Turnbull, A. Powell, and S. Guimond, “Heparan sulfate: decoding a dynamic multifunctional cell regulator,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 75–82, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. M. B. Fairbanks, A. M. Mildner, J. W. Leone et al., “Processing of the human heparanase precursor and evidence that the active enzyme is a heterodimer,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 42, pp. 29587–29590, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. M. D. Hulett, C. Freeman, B. J. Hamdorf, R. T. Baker, M. J. Harris, and C. R. Parish, “Cloning of mammalian heparanase, an important enzyme in tumor invasion and metastasis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 803–809, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. P. H. Kussie, J. D. Hulmes, D. L. Ludwig et al., “Cloning and functional expression of a human heparanase gene,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 261, no. 1, pp. 183–187, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. I. Vlodavsky, Y. Friedmann, M. Elkin et al., “Mammalian heparanase: gene cloning, expression and function in tumor progression and metastasis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 793–802, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. C. R. Parish, C. Freeman, and M. D. Hulett, “Heparanase: a key enzyme involved in cell invasion,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1471, no. 3, pp. M99–M108, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. M. D. Hulett, J. R. Hornby, S. J. Ohms et al., “Identification of active-site residues of the pro-metastatic endoglycosidase heparanase,” Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 51, pp. 15659–15667, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. E. A. McKenzie, “Heparanase: a target for drug discovery in cancer and inflammation,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. E. McKenzie, K. Tyson, A. Stamps et al., “Cloning and expression profiling of Hpa2, a novel mammalian heparanase family member,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 276, no. 3, pp. 1170–1177, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. S. H. Murch, T. T. MacDonald, J. A. Walker-Smith, M. Levin, P. Lionetti, and N. J. Klein, “Disruption of sulphated glycosaminoglycans in intestinal inflammation,” Lancet, vol. 341, no. 8847, pp. 711–714, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. J. K. Shute, J. Parmar, S. T. Holgate, and P. H. Howarth, “Urinary glycosaminoglycan levels are increased in acute severe asthma—a role for eosinophil-derived gelatinase B?” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 113, no. 1-3, pp. 366–367, 1997. View at Scopus
  86. M. Bar-Ner, A. Eldor, L. Wasserman et al., “Inhibition of heparanase-mediated degradation of extracellular matrix heparan sulfate by non-anticoagulant heparin species,” Blood, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 551–557, 1987. View at Scopus
  87. O. Lider, Y. A. Mekori, T. Miller et al., “Inhibition of T lymphocyte heparanase by heparin prevents T cell migration and T cell-mediated immunity,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 493–499, 1990. View at Scopus
  88. Y. Matzner, I. Vlodavsky, M. Bar-Ner, R. Ishai-Michaeli, and A. I. Tauber, “Subcellular localization of heparanase in human neutrophils,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 519–524, 1992. View at Scopus
  89. O. Lider, E. Baharav, Y. A. Mekori et al., “Suppression of experimental autoimmune diseases and prolongation of allograft survival by treatment of animals with low doses of heparins,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 752–756, 1989. View at Scopus
  90. D. O. Willenborg and C. R. Parish, “Inhibition of allergic encephalomyelitis in rats by treatment with sulfated polysaccharides,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 140, no. 10, pp. 3401–3405, 1988. View at Scopus
  91. A. Gorski, M. Lao, L. Gradowska, M. Nowaczyk, M. Wasik, and Z. Lagodzinski, “New strategies of heparin treatment used to prolong allograft survival,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2251–2252, 1991. View at Scopus
  92. E. Naparstek, S. Slavin, L. Weiss et al., “Low-dose heparin inhibits acute graft versus host disease in mice,” Bone Marrow Transplantation, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 185–189, 1993. View at Scopus
  93. G. Chen, D. Wang, R. Vikramadithyan et al., “Inflammatory cytokines and fatty acids regulate endothelial cell heparanase expression,” Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 17, pp. 4971–4977, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. E. Edovitsky, I. Lerner, E. Zcharia, T. Peretz, I. Vlodavsky, and M. Elkin, “Role of endothelial heparanase in delayed-type hypersensitivity,” Blood, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 3609–3616, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. E. A. M. Seeds, J. Hanss, and C. P. Page, “The effect of heparin and related proteoglycans on allergen and PAF-induced eosinophil infiltration,” Journal of Lipid Mediators, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 269–278, 1993. View at Scopus
  96. J. Carr, “The anti-inflammatory action of heparin: heparin as an antagonist to histamine, bradykinin and prostaglandin E1,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 16, no. 3-4, pp. 507–516, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. H. Jones, W. Paul, and C. P. Page, “The effects of heparin and related molecules on vascular permeability and neutrophil accumulation in rabbit skin,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 469–479, 2002. View at Scopus
  98. H. Maarsingh, J. De Boer, H. F. Kauffman, J. Zaagsma, and H. Meurs, “Heparin normalizes allergen-induced nitric oxide deficiency and airway hyperresponsiveness,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 142, no. 8, pp. 1293–1299, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. M. Becker, M. D. Menger, and H. A. Lehr, “Heparin-released superoxide dismutase inhibits postischemic leukocyte adhesion to venular endothelium,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. H925–H930, 1994. View at Scopus
  100. K. S. Kilgore, E. J. Tanhehco, K. B. Naylor, and B. R. Lucchesi, “Ex vivo reversal of heparin-mediated cardioprotection by heparinase after ischemia and reperfusion,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 290, no. 3, pp. 1041–1047, 1999. View at Scopus
  101. J. M. Simard, D. Schreibman, E. F. Aldrich et al., “Unfractionated heparin: multitargeted therapy for delayed neurological deficits induced by subarachnoid hemorrhage,” Neurocritical Care, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 439–449, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. I. H. Tekkök, S. Tekkök, O. E. Ozcan, T. Erbengi, and A. Erbengi, “Preventive effect of intracisternal heparin for proliferative angiopathy after experimental subarachnoid haemorrhage in rats,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 127, no. 1-2, pp. 112–117, 1994. View at Scopus
  103. D. A. Dolowitz and T. F. Dougherty, “The use of heparin as an anti-inflammatory agent,” Laryngo­Scope, vol. 70, pp. 873–874, 1960.
  104. D. A. Dolowitz and T. F. Dougherty, “The use of heparin in the control of allergies,” Annals of Allergy, vol. 23, pp. 309–313, 1965. View at Scopus
  105. M. Antczak and P. Kuna, “Heparin inhibits allergen induced airway response in asthmatics. Results of a double blind placebo-controlled, crossover study,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 95, p. 386, 1995.
  106. S. D. Bowler, S. M. Smith, and P. S. Laverombe, “Heparin inhibits the immediate response to antigen in the skin and lungs of allergic subjects,” The American Review of Respiratory Disease, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. 160–163, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. P. Venge, B. Pedersen, L. Håkansson, R. Hällgren, G. Lindblad, and R. Dahl, “Subcutaneous administration of hyaluronan reduces the number of infectious exacerbations in patients with chronic bronchitis,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 312–316, 1996. View at Scopus
  108. R. A. Brown, L. Allegra, M. G. Matera, C. P. Page, and M. Cazzola, “Additional clinical benefit of enoxaparin in COPD patients receiving salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in combination,” Pulmonary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 419–424, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. R. C. Evans, V. S. Wong, A. I. Morris, and J. M. Rhodes, “Treatment of corticosteroid-resistant ulcerative colitis with heparin—a report of 16 cases,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1037–1040, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. P. R. Gaffney, J. J. O'Leary, C. T. Doyle et al., “Response to heparin in patients with ulcerative colitis,” Lancet, vol. 337, no. 8735, pp. 238–239, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. P. R. Gaffney, C. T. Doyle, A. Gaffney, J. Hogan, D. P. Hayes, and P. Annis, “Paradoxical response to heparin in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 220–223, 1995. View at Scopus
  112. N. P. Michell, P. Lalor, and M. J. Langman, “Heparin therapy for ulcerative colitis? Effects and mechanisms,” European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 13, pp. 449–456, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. N. Chande, J. W. McDonald, and J. K. Macdonald, “Unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparin for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD006774, 2008. View at Scopus
  114. J. Shen, Z. H. Ran, J. L. Tong, and S. D. Xiao, “Meta-analysis: the utility and safety of heparin in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 653–663, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. L. Borsig, “Antimetastatic activities of heparins and modified heparins. Experimental evidence,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 125, pp. S66–71, 2010. View at Scopus
  116. H. Engelberg, “Actions of heparin that may affect the malignant process,” Cancer, vol. 85, pp. 257–272, 1999.
  117. R. J. K. Hettiarachchi, S. M. Smorenburg, J. Ginsberg, M. Levine, M. H. Prins, and H. R. Buller, “Do heparins do more than just treat thrombosis? The influence of heparins on cancer spread,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 947–952, 1999. View at Scopus
  118. S. A. Mousa, “Heparin and low-molecular weight heparins in thrombosis and beyond,” Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 663, pp. 109–132, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. T. M. H. Niers, C. P. W. Klerk, M. DiNisio et al., “Mechanisms of heparin induced anti-cancer activity in experimental cancer models,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 195–207, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. S. M. Smorenburg and C. J. F. Van Noorden, “The complex effects of heparins on cancer progression and metastasis in experimental studies,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 93–105, 2001. View at Scopus
  121. L. R. Zacharski and D. L. Ornstein, “Heparin and cancer,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 10–23, 1988.
  122. L. R. Zacharski, D. L. Ornstein, and A. C. Mamourian, “Low-molecular-weight heparin and cancer,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 69–77, 2000. View at Scopus
  123. E. A. Akl, F. F. van Doormaal, M. Barba et al., “Parenteral anticoagulation for prolonging survival in patients with cancer who have no other indication for anticoagulation,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 3, Article ID CD006652, 2007. View at Scopus
  124. N. M. Kuderer, A. A. Khorana, G. H. Lyman, and C. W. Francis, “A meta-analysis and systematic review of the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants as cancer treatment: impact on survival and bleeding complications,” Cancer, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 1149–1161, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. I. Vlodavsky and Y. Friedmann, “Molecular properties and involvement of heparanase in cancer metastasis and angiogenesis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 341–347, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. L. Borsig, R. Wong, J. Feramisco, D. R. Nadeau, N. M. Varki, and A. Varki, “Heparin and cancer revisited: mechanistic connections involving platelets, P-selectin, carcinoma mucins, and tumor metastasis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 3352–3357, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. S. C. Pitchford, H. Yano, R. Lever et al., “Platelets are essential for leukocyte recruitment in allergic inflammation,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 109–118, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. D. F. Alonso, G. E. Bertolesi, E. F. Farias, A. M. Eijan, E. B. D. Joffe, and L. L. De Cidre, “Antimetastatic effects associated with anticoagulant properties of heparin and chemically modified heparin species in a mouse mammary tumor model,” Oncology Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 219–222, 1996.
  129. S. A. Mousa, R. Linhardt, J. L. Francis, and A. Amirkhosravi, “Anti-metastatic effect of a non-anticoagulant low-molecular-weight heparin versus the standard low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 816–821, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. M. Nakajima, T. Irimura, and G. L. Nicolson, “Heparanases and tumor metastasis,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 157–167, 1988. View at Scopus
  131. T. Sciumbata, P. Caretto, P. Pirovano et al., “Treatment with modified heparins inhibits experimental metastasis formation and leads, in some animals, to long-term survival,” Invasion and Metastasis, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 132–143, 1996. View at Scopus
  132. A. Amirkhosravi, T. Meyer, M. Amaya et al., “The role of tissue factor pathway inhibitor in tumor growth and metastasis,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 643–652, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. I. Vlodavsky, A. Eldor, A. Haimovitz-Friedman et al., “Expression of heparanase by platelets and circulating cells of the immune system: possible involvement in diapedesis and extravasation,” Invasion and Metastasis, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 112–127, 1992. View at Scopus
  134. H. Takahashi, S. Ebihara, T. Okazaki, M. Asada, H. Sasaki, and M. Yamaya, “A comparison of the effects of unfractionated heparin, dalteparin and danaparoid on vascular endothelial growth factor-induced tumour angiogenesis and heparanase activity,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 333–343, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. A. A. Khorana, A. Sahni, O. D. Altland, and C. W. Francis, “Heparin inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation and organization is dependent on molecular weight,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 23, pp. 2110–2115, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. M. Marchetti, A. Vignoli, L. Russo et al., “Endothelial capillary tube formation and cell proliferation induced by tumor cells are affected by low molecular weight heparins and unfractionated heparin,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 637–645, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. B. Mehrad, M. P. Keane, and R. M. Strieter, “Chemokines as mediators of angiogenesis,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 755–762, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. L. C. Cancio, “Airway management and smoke inhalation injury in the burn patient,” Clinics in Plastic Surgery, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 555–567, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. M. H. Toon, M. O. Maybauer, J. E. Greenwood, D. M. Maybauer, and J. F. Fraser, “Management of acute smoke inhalation injury,” Critical Care and Resuscitation, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2010. View at Scopus
  140. A. C. Miller, A. Rivero, S. Ziad, D. J. Smith, and E. M. Elamin, “Influence of nebulized unfractionated heparin and N-acetylcysteine in acute lung injury after smoke inhalation injury,” Journal of Burn Care and Research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 249–256, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. M. Oremus, M. D. Hanson, R. Whitlock et al., “A systematic review of heparin to treat burn injury,” Journal of Burn Care and Research, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 794–804, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. J. M. F. Chacon, M. L. M. De Andrea, L. Blanes, and L. M. Ferreira, “Effects of topical application of 10,000 IU heparin on patients with perineal dermatitis and second-degree burns treated in a public pediatric hospital,” Journal of Tissue Viability, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 150–158, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. R. K. Cribbs, P. A. Harding, M. H. Luquette, and G. E. Besner, “Endogenous production of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor during murine partial-thickness burn wound healing,” Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2002. View at Scopus
  144. R. K. Cribbs, M. H. Luquette, and G. E. Besner, “Acceleration of partial-thickness burn wound healing with topical application of heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor (HB-EGF),” Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 95–101, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. A. Radulescu, H. Y. Zhang, C. L. Chen et al., “Heparin-binding egf-like growth factor promotes intestinal anastomotic healing,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 540–550, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  146. R. N. Prince, E. R. Schreiter, P. Zou et al., “The heparin-binding domain of HB-EGF mediates localization to sites of cell-cell contact and prevents HB-EGF proteolytic release,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 123, no. 13, pp. 2308–2318, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. S. Sen, I. Meteoglu, M. Ogurlu, S. Sen, O. O. Derinceoz, and S. Barutca, “Topical heparin: a promising agent for the prevention of tracheal stenosis in airway surgery,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. e23–e29, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. J. D. Lilly and C. L. Parsons, “Bladder surface glycosaminoglycans is a human epithelial permeability barrier,” Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 171, no. 6, pp. 493–496, 1990.
  149. M. Hellgren, E. Andersson, B. Bystrom et al., “Dalteparin shortens human labour,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 5, Supplement 2, 2007.
  150. I. Osman, A. Young, M. A. Ledingham et al., “Leukocyte density and pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in human fetal membranes, decidua, cervix and myometrium before and during labour at term,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41–45, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. G. Ekman-Ordeberg, M. Hellgren, A. Kerud et al., “Low molecular weight heparin stimulates myometrial contractility and cervical remodeling in vitro,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 88, no. 9, pp. 984–989, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. D. J. Serisier, J. K. Shute, P. M. Hockey, B. Higgins, J. Conway, and M. P. Carroll, “Inhaled heparin in cystic fibrosis,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 354–358, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. M. King and B. K. Rubin, “Pharmacological approaches to discovery and development of new mucolytic agents,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 1475–1490, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. L. M. Hiebert, “Oral heparins,” Clinical Laboratory, vol. 48, pp. 111–116, 2002.
  155. L. M. Hiebert, T. Ping, and S. M. Wice, “Enhanced antithrombotic effects of unfractionated heparin in rats after repeated oral doses and its relationship to endothelial heparin concentration,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 1177–1184, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. C. Pinel, S. M. Wice, and L. M. Hiebert, “Orally administered heparins prevent arterial thrombosis in a rat model,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 91, no. 5, pp. 919–926, 2004. View at Scopus
  157. R. A. Baughman, S. C. Kapoor, R. K. Agarwal, J. Kisicki, F. Catella-Lawson, and G. A. FitzGerald, “Oral delivery of anticoagulant doses of heparin. A randomized, double- blind, controlled study in humans,” Circulation, vol. 98, no. 16, pp. 1610–1615, 1998. View at Scopus
  158. S. D. Berkowitz, V. J. Marder, G. Kosutic, and R. A. Baughman, “Oral heparin administration with a novel drug delivery agent (SNAC) in healthy volunteers and patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 1, no. 9, pp. 1914–1919, 2003. View at Scopus
  159. M. D. Gonze, K. Salartash, W. C. Sternbergh, R. A. Baughman, A. Leone-Bay, and S. R. Money, “Orally administered unfractionated heparin with carrier agent is therapeutic for deep venous thrombosis,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 22, pp. 2658–2661, 2000. View at Scopus
  160. G. F. Pineo, R. D. Hull, and V. J. Marder, “Orally active heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin,” Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 344–348, 2001. View at Scopus
  161. S. Bai and F. Ahsan, “Synthesis and evaluation of pegylated dendrimeric nanocarrier for pulmonary delivery of low molecular weight heparin,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 539–548, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. S. Bai and F. Ahsan, “Inhalable liposomes of low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of venous thromboembolism,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 99, no. 11, pp. 4554–4564, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  163. S. Bai, V. Gupta, and F. Ahsan, “Inhalable lactose-based dry powder formulations of low molecular weight heparin,” Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  164. Y. Qi, G. Zhao, D. Liu et al., “Delivery of therapeutic levels of heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin through a pulmonary route,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 26, pp. 9867–9872, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  165. A. Rawat, T. Yang, A. Hussain, and F. Ahsan, “Complexation of a poly-L-arginine with low molecular weight heparin enhances pulmonary absorption of the drug,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 936–948, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  166. T. Yang, F. Mustafa, and F. Ahsan, “Alkanoylsucroses in nasal delivery of low molecular weight heparins: in vivo absorption and reversibility studies in rats,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  167. T. Yang, F. Mustafa, S. Bai, and F. Ahsan, “Pulmonary delivery of low molecular weight heparins,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2009–2016, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  168. F. Mustafa, T. Yang, M. A. Khan, and F. Ahsan, “Chain length-dependent effects of alkylmaltosides on nasal absorption of enoxaparin,” Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 675–683, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. T. Yang, A. Hussain, J. Paulson, T. J. Abbruscato, and F. Ahsan, “Cyclodextrins in nasal delivery of low-molecular-weight heparins: in vivo and in vitro studies,” Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1127–1136, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  170. T. Yang, A. Hussain, S. Bai, I. A. Khalil, H. Harashima, and F. Ahsan, “Positively charged polyethylenimines enhance nasal absorption of the negatively charged drug, low molecular weight heparin,” Journal of Controlled Release, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 289–297, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  171. C. L. Baer, W. M. Bennett, D. A. Folwick, and R. S. Erickson, “Effectiveness of a jet injection system in administering morphine and heparin to healthy adults,” American Journal of Critical Care, vol. 5, pp. 42–48, 1996.
  172. S. Wagner, G. Dues, D. Sawitzky, P. Frey, and B. Christ, “Assessment of the biological performance of the needle-free injector INJEX using the isolated porcine forelimb,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 455–461, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  173. S. J. Hollingsworth, K. Hoque, D. Linnard, D. G. Corry, and S. G. Barker, “Delivery of low molecular weight heparin for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis using a novel, needle-less injection device (J-Tip),” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 428–431, 2000.
  174. B. Casu, I. Vlodavsky, and R. D. Sanderson, “Non-anticoagulant heparins and inhibition of cancer,” Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis, vol. 36, no. 3-4, pp. 195–203, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  175. S. A. Mousa, “Heparin, low molecular weight heparin, and derivatives in thrombosis, angiogenesis, and inflammation: emerging links,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 524–533, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  176. M. Baba, R. Snoeck, R. Pauwels, and E. De Clercq, “Sulfated polysaccharides are potent and selective inhibitors of various enveloped viruses, including herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, and human immunodeficiency virus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1742–1745, 1988. View at Scopus
  177. A. D. Sezer, F. Hatipoǧlu, E. Cevher, Z. Oǧurtan, A. L. Baş, and J. Akbuǧa, “Chitosan film containing fucoidan as a wound dressing for dermal burn healing: preparation and in vitro/in vivo evaluation,” AAPS PharmSciTech, vol. 8, no. 2, article no. 39, 2007. View at Scopus
  178. T. Ahmed, G. Smith, I. Vlahov, and W. M. Abraham, “Inhibition of allergic airway responses by heparin derived oligosaccharides: identification of a tetrasaccharide sequence,” Respiratory Research, vol. 13, article 6, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  179. I. C. Severin, A. Soares, J. Hantson et al., “Glycosaminoglycan analogues as a novel anti-inflammatory strategy,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 293, pp. 1–12, 2012.
  180. S. Colliec-Jouault, C. Bavington, and C. Delbarre-Lodrat, “Heparin-like entities from marine organisms,” in Heparin—A Century of Progress, R. Lever, B. Mulloy, and C. P. Page, Eds., vol. 207 of Handbook of Experimetnal Pharmacology, pp. 423–429, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar