About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Urology
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 752174, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/752174
Research Article

Nonscalpel Vasectomy as Family Planning Method: A Battle Yet to Be Conquered

1Department of Surgery, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi 110095, India
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, University of Delhi, Delhi 110095, India

Received 6 February 2013; Accepted 7 March 2013

Academic Editors: P.-L. Chang and F. Staerman

Copyright © 2013 Pankaj Kumar Garg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. R. Sheynkin, “History of vasectomy,” Urologic Clinics of North America, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 285–294, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. C. M. Kaza, “No scalpel vasectomy—an overview,” Journal of the Indian Medical Association, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 129–141, 2006. View at Scopus
  3. V. Kumar, R. M. Kaza, I. Singh, S. Singhal, and V. Kumaran, “An evaluation of the no-scalpel vasectomy technique,” BJU International, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 283–284, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. “National Fact Sheet India 2005-2006 National Family Health Survey 3 (NFHS-3) Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. International Institute for Population Studies, Mumbai,” http://www.rchiips.org/NFHS/pdf/India.pdf.
  5. D. Mishra and H. P. Singh, “Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic status scale—a revision,” Indian Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 273–274, 2003. View at Scopus
  6. “Size, growth rate and distribution of population. Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India,” http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-prov-results/data_files/india/Final_PPT_2011_chapter3.pdf.
  7. A. Bunce, G. Guest, H. Searing et al., “Factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Tanzania,” International Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Dibaba, “Rural men and their attitude towards vasectomy as means of contraception in Ethiopia,” Tropical Doctor, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 100–102, 2001. View at Scopus
  9. S. R. Schuler and M. C. Goldstein, “Family planning in Nepal from the user's and nonuser's perspectives,” Studies in Family Planning, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 66–77, 1986. View at Scopus
  10. “The RESPOND project study series: contributions to global knowledge. Factors affectimg the acceptability of vasectomy in Uttar Pradesh: Insight from community based participatory qualitative research. USAID. New York 2011,” http://www.respond-project.org/pages/files/6_pubs/research-reports/Study3-PEER-NSV-Report-May2011-FINAL.pdf.
  11. The ACQUIRE Project, “Factors affecting the vasectomy acceptability in the Kingoma region of Tanzania. New York,” 2006, http://www.acquireproject.org/archive/files/3.0_program_effectively/3.2_resources/3.2.2_studies/er_study_5.pdf.
  12. The ACQUIRE Project, “Get a “permanent smile”—Increasing awareness of, access to, and utilization of vasectomy servise in Ghana,” 2006, http://www.acquireproject.org/archive/files/5.0_community_engagement_marketing_and_communications/5.2_resources/5.2.1_project_briefs_and_working_papers/acquire_knowledge_ghana_final.pdf.