About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Nanotechnology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 163168, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/163168
Research Article

Effect of Silicon Crystal Size on Photoluminescence Appearance in Porous Silicon

Physik der Kondensierten Materie, TU Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany

Received 31 March 2011; Accepted 16 May 2011

Academic Editor: M. Tommasini

Copyright © 2011 Pushpendra Kumar. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The photoluminescence (PL) study in porous silicon (PS) with decreasing Si crystallites size among the pores was reported. The PL appearance is attributed to electronic confinement in columnar-like (or dotlike) structures of porous silicon. Three different pore diameter PS samples were prepared by electrochemical etching in HF-based solutions. Changes in porous silicon and Si crystallite size were studied by observing an asymmetric broadening and shift of the optical silicon phonons in Raman scattering. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to study the role of siloxene or other molecular species, for example, SiHx in the luminescence mechanism. This mechanism was further studied by thermal annealing of PS at different temperatures. The PL of PS sample annealed at ≥300°C for 1 hr shows that trap electronic states appear in the energy gap of the smaller nano-crystal when Si–O–Si bonds are formed. From the observation of PL, Raman, and FTIR spectroscopy, the origin of PL in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic properties of nanocrystalline silicon was discussed.

1. Introduction

The discovery of photoluminescence in porous silicon (PS) by Canham in 1990 has triggered a large-scale investigation of its use in technological applications, for example, light-emitting diodes [1], light testing equipment [2], photoelectric solar batteries [3], gas testing devices [4], microdevices [5] and biological testing equipment [6]. The physical properties of porous silicon are fundamentally determined by the shape, diameter of pores, porosity, and the thickness of the formed porous layer. Depending on the etching parameters, for example, current density, HF concentration, or substrate doping type and level, the physical properties of PS can be varied [7]. In addition, when the feature size of the pores of PS is less than a few nanometers, various quantum-size effects occur, which make PS even more fascinating. The well-studied PS morphology can range from spongy microporous (pore size <10 nm) and branchy mesoporous silicon (pore size 10–50 nm) to the classical macroporous silicon (pore size 50 nm–20 μm). Several theories on the formation mechanisms of PS have been reported since its discovery [8, 9].

Different models have been reported to explain PL in PS. Quantum confinement is the first model proposed to explain visible photoluminescence from porous silicon [10]. Later, many other alternative models were proposed based on hydrogenated amorphous silicon, surface hydrides, defects, siloxene, and surface states [11, 12]. Except for the quantum confinement model, all the others assume an extrinsic origin of PS luminescence. Brandt et al. [13] have studied PS and siloxene by using Fourier and Raman spectroscopy and shown that the room temperature PL in PS is not an intrinsic property of crystalline silicon (quantum confinement effect) but depends on specific chemical reactions of silicon with hydrogen and oxygen. These observations have further been supported by Fuchs et al. [14]. Gorbach et al. [15] supported the view that chemical passivation in PS, in particular by oxygen, is the major factor which controls the origin of PL by using the simultaneous investigation of PL, FTIR absorption, and SEM observation of PS. Many theoretical [16] and experimental [17, 18] reports suggest that quantum confinement is most effective to explain PL in PS. However, there is still an important challenge to understand the optical properties of a PS material in terms of its fundamental physics. To discriminate the different approaches (i.e., quantum confinement or siloxene or some other species in PS) to explain PL in PS various methods can be used. One of them is the study of the behavior of PL spectrum under variation of Si crystallites sizes. To further explore the physics behind the origin of PL in PS, we have studied systematically the appearance of PL in PS with decreasing (or increasing the pore diameter) the Si nanocrystallites size among the pores by using Raman, PL, and FTIR spectroscopy.

2. Experimental Details

PS layers were prepared by electrochemical anodic etching of a highly doped 𝑝-type 100-oriented silicon substrate with a resistivity of 0.01–0.02 Ω cm. The electrochemical cell was made of Teflon and the base plate was made of aluminum. A silicon wafer was mounted at the base plate by using an 𝑂-ring that allowed 7.0 cm2 of the Si surface to be exposed to the electrolytes. The later consist of three different concentration of 3 : 7, 4 : 6, and 6 : 4 by volume 48% hydrofluoric acid (HF): 98% ethanol, respectively. Prior to each experiment, the Si wafers were ultrasonically cleaned in propanol and acetone. The etching current density 14.5 mA/cm2 was applied for 30 min. The thicknesses of the porous layers determined with an optical microscope were in the range of 20–25 μm. The physical properties (i.e., pore diameter (𝐷𝑃) and the porosity (Φ)) of PS samples were determined by recording a volumetric nitrogen sorption isotherms at 𝑇=77 K in a home-made all-metal gas handling system that is equipped with a membrane pressure gauge of 1000 mbar full scale [19]. The PL measurements were done using a Hamamatsu TG-SWNIR, C9405CA spectrometer and a laser diode exciting the sample at a wavelength of 405 nm. Raman scattering experiments were performed using the excitation line 𝜆=532 nm of a semiconductor laser in quasibackscattering geometry. The laser power of 5 mW was focused to a 0.1 mm diameter spot on the PS surface. The scattered spectra were collected by a DILOR-XY triple spectrometer and a nitrogen-cooled charge-coupled device detector. For the measurements, the samples were placed in a sample chamber which was evacuated or, alternatively, filled with helium gas in order to suppress the low frequency Raman scattering by air and to prevent possible laser-induced oxidation of the PS layers. Since the PS provides a large surface area [20], therefore it has been extensively studied by FTIR to study surface species [21]. A FTIR (Perkin Elmer, system 2000 FT-IR) spectroscopy was used to measure molecular vibrational excitations in PS. To improve the statistics, data of 51 spectra were averaged with a resolution of 4 cm−1. For the FTIR study, free-standing PS layers were used to study the chemical species, as the highly doped bulk silicon wafers are not transparent for the IR light. After etching of silicon for 30 min, the porous layers were detached from the silicon substrate by a sudden increase in applied current for 60 s.

3. Results and Discussion

The physical properties of PS can be varied by changing the etching parameters, for example current density, HF concentration, or substrate doping type and level [7]. In the present case, we have varied the HF concentration to change the pore diameter and porosity. The three different HF concentration, that is, 30% HF: 70% ethanol, 40% HF: 60% ethanol and 60% HF: 40% ethanol during etching of Si were used to prepare the PS sample a, b, and c respectively. The pore diameter and porosity of PS was found to decrease with an increase of the HF concentration in the used etching electrolyte at constant applied current density. Theoretical and experimental details concerning this effect have been reported by some groups [22, 23]. In our work, we report that the photoluminescence appearance in PS with increase in pore diameter (i.e., decrease in Si crystallite size among the pores) is due to quantum confinement by using aforementioned techniques.

3.1. Si Nanocrystallites Size Determination and Phonon Dynamics in PS

Raman spectroscopy, which is a sensitive probe to the local atomic arrangements and vibrations, has been used to characterize PS [24] and Si nanostructures [25]. The shift and half-width of the one-phonon Raman peak in c-Si has often been used to obtain an estimate of the characteristic dimensions of the Si crystallites. To characterize and interpret the Raman spectra of semiconductor nanostructures, a phenomenological phonon confinement model [26, 27] has been widely used. This model, originally proposed by Richter, Wang, and Ley (RWL model) [26], has been found to be useful for accounting for the peak-position shift, broadening, and asymmetry of bands observed in nanocrystalline Si, [25] Ge [28], and GaAs [29]. The Raman shift due to the confinement can be described by a phenomenological approach that is based on the negative dispersion of optical phonons with finite momentum and the averaging and folding of phonon frequencies in small particles. An analytic form of this approach to describe the Raman frequency shift as also used by Paillard et al. [30] is 𝑎Δ𝜔=𝐴𝐿𝛾,(1) where 𝑎=0.543 nm is the lattice constant of Si, 𝐿 is the crystallites size, the parameters 𝐴=52.3, and 𝛾=1.586 are used to describe the vibrational confinement due to the finite size in a nanocrystal and depend on the investigated system. By using this equation we have calculated the crystallites size of Si among the pores. In Figure 1 we show the phonon frequency of porous silicon samples a, b, and c. A peak shift was observed from 519 to 516 cm−1 and a broadening of the peak width full width at half maximum (FWHM) from 4.2 (symmetric) to 8.3 cm−1 (asymmetric) with an increase in pore diameter (𝐷𝑃) from 3 nm to 10 nm, respectively. The shift of the phonon peak towards lower wavenumber and broadening of the peak width with increase in pore diameter and porosity are attributed to the confinement of optical phonons in nanodimensional Si crystals among the pores [27, 31]. The shift of the phonon peak was used to calculate the crystallites size of Si in sample a, b, and c by using above equation. The calculated crystallites size of Si and other physical properties of PS samples are listed in Table 1. With increase in pore diameter from 3 nm to 10 nm the nanocrystallites size of Si among the pores decreases from 6.6 nm to 2.8 nm respectively. When the crystallites size of Si approaches the dimension of a free exciton (i.e., 5 nm) of bulk Si the photoluminescence starts to appear which is discussed in next section.

tab1
Table 1: Variation of physical properties as a function of HF concentration and corresponding Si crystallites size of sample a, b, and c.
163168.fig.001
Figure 1: Raman spectra of bulk Si and PS samples a, b, and c. 𝐷𝑃 is pore diameter and 𝐿 is the crystallites size of Si among the pores.
3.2. Photoluminescence Appearance in PS

Photoluminescence and Raman spectra of porous silicon give the information of a cross-sectional view of the silicon nanocrystallites which remains among the pores, because of the large optical penetration depth. Photoluminescence is directly related to the electronic structure and transitions. The characteristic change of the band gap with decrease in size of the nanostructures can be studied by the observation of the blue shift in the photoluminescence peak position [32]. Thus, photoluminescence is useful in the study of quantum confinement of electrons in low-dimensional materials [33]. In Figures 2(a)–2(c) we show PL spectra of sample a, b, and c. It can be seen from Figure 2 that with decrease in Si nanocrystallites size the photoluminescence starts to appear and increases in intensity. In Figure 2(b) we can see a small intensity of PL peak while in sample a as shown in Figure 2(a) we see a strong PL peak around at 735 nm. Bulk silicon has an indirect band gap and does not show any photoluminescence peak while porous silicon shows a photoluminescence peak at around 750 nm. When the Si crystallites size is reduced to 2.8 nm, much smaller than the dimension of free excitons, a strong quantum confinement in Si nanostructure starts to occur leading to the appearance of photoluminescence. Several mechanisms have been suggested to explain the appearance of this luminescence signal, such as defects that localize carriers at extrinsic centers or surface states providing radiative recombination centers, surface hydrides (SiHx groups) or the formation of siloxane (a Si–O–H based polymer), or quantum-confinement effects of the excitons caused by their spatial confinement within Si-nanocrystallites. The latter mechanism was proven to be the origin of the observed luminescence. There is still the discussion open on the mechanism of PL in PS. The absence of PL from sample c indicates that porous silicon with the Si crystallites size of 6.6 nm behaves similar to bulk silicon. The absence of PL signal from sample c and a strong signal from sample a indicates that the quantum confinement effect in the narrow silicon regime between two pores results in a strong PL signal. To exclude an effect of other chemical species, for example, SiHx, siloxene, and so forth, we have carried out FTIR measurement of all three PS samples.

163168.fig.002
Figure 2: Photoluminescence of PS samples a, b, and c.
3.3. Chemical Species in PS

In Figure 3 we show transmission FTIR spectra of all three PS samples. The spectrum of PS sample exhibits a Si–H bending mode at 630 cm−1, a Si–H2 wagging mode at 680 cm−1 and a Si–H scissor mode at 910 cm−1. The presence of an absorption peak around 1100 cm−1 which is assigned to the Si–O–Si antisymmetric stretching mode in as prepared PS sample, indicates that the PS layer is already partially oxidized while transferring the sample from the etching cell to the FTIR setup [34, 35]. The structure in the spectrum located between 2050 and 2150 cm−1 correspond to silicon hydride species while those between 2150 and 2300 cm−1 corresponds to silicon oxyhydride species. The three strong absorption peaks at 2090, 2110, and 2140 cm−1 are associated with Si–H, Si–H2, and Si–H3 vibrational stretching modes, respectively. The absorption lines at 2195 and 2250 cm−1 are attributed to H2Si–O2 and HSi–O3 bonding, respectively. The peaks assigned in Figure 3 are in good agreement with data reported in the literature [36, 37]. It is interesting to point out that no clear difference in the FTIR spectra can be found in Figure 3 between all three PS samples. This means that the light emission in porous materials are in no relation to extrinsic origins or effects, such as hydrogenated amorphous Si, surface hydrides, defects in Si or SiOx, siloxene, or surface states. To further survey the effect of these species, we annealed the sample (a) at different temperature up to 500°C for 1 hrs and measured the FTIR and photoluminescence.

163168.fig.003
Figure 3: FTIR spectra of PS samples a, b, and c.
3.4. Thermal Annealing of PS

In Figure 4 we show the FTIR spectra of thermally annealed PS. From the spectra it is clearly seen that most of the molecular species desorbs at 500°C. The corresponding photoluminescence of thermally annealed PS at different temperature can be seen in Figure 5. Except small change in peak position and intensity the PL is still observed, which further proves that PL in PS with the crystallites size of 2.8 nm is not related to the external species. The initial change in peak position of PL till the annealing temperature of 200°C was blue shifted, which can be understood that the surface-oxidation-induced reduction of the particle sizes leads to higher PL peak energies. But on further increase in annealing temperature the red shift in the PL spectra was observed. The red as well as blue PL peak position shift in PS with increase in thermal annealing temperature has been reported by several researchers. Roy et al. has reported the similar observations that the PL peak in PS with increase in annealing temperature shows first blue shift and then red shift. They have attributed their observation to the hybrid model in which both quantum confinement and luminescence centres outside the nanoscale unit has been accounted [38]. Recently Huang et al. have reported theoretical calculation where they showed that the trap electronic states appear in the energy gap of the smaller nanocrystal Si on thermal annealing when Si=O bonds or Si–O–Si bonds are formed [39]. In the present study, the red shift in PL peak of PS can be understood as follows. In Figure 4 it can be seen that the pore surface initially saturated by the hydrogen atoms, and during the oxidation process they are gradually substituted by oxygen atoms. When the annealing temperature is ≥300°C the oxides layer on porous Si nanocrystal formed. When nanocrystalline Si is oxidized, the Si–Si bonds are likely to weaken or break because of large stress at the distortion surface. Then the Si–O–Si bonds is more likely to be formed and stabilized the interface, since it requires neither large deformation energy nor an excess element, while the localized trap states are formed in band gap gradually. A schematic diagram showing oxide formation on pore walls and their corresponding localized states formation due to Si–O–Si bonds are shown in Figure 6. The present observation of the red shift in PL peak position on thermal annealing are in agreement with the theoretical model about the trap electronic states in nanocrystal Si reported by Huang et al. [39].

163168.fig.004
Figure 4: FTIR spectra of PS sample (a) fresh PS and annealed for 1 hrs at different temperature, (b) 100°C, (c) 200°C, (d) 300°C, (e) 400°C, and (f) 500°C.
163168.fig.005
Figure 5: PL spectra of PS sample (a) fresh PS and annealed for 1 hrs at different temperature, (b) 100°C, (c) 200°C, (d) 300°C, (e) 400°C, and (f) 500°C.
163168.fig.006
Figure 6: Schematic diagram of fresh PS and annealed PS and their corresponding energy levels.

4. Conclusions

The Si crystallites size was varied in PS by changing the HF concentration in etching electrolytes. Photoluminescence was observed when the crystallite size of Si was reduced to smaller than the dimension of free exciton of bulk Si. The PL appearance in PS is attributed to quantum confinement and not to external molecular species. The effect of external species was studied with the help of FTIR and further verified by the annealing of PS. The red shift in PL peak of thermally annealed PS was observed due to the localized states in band gap. Our investigation will furthermore be useful for the researcher to understand the phenomena of PL in PS.

Acknowledgment

The author gratefully acknowledge Technische Physik, Universität des Saarland for providing the FTIR measurement facilities.

References

  1. A. Richter, P. Steiner, F. Kozlowski, and W. Lang, “Current-induced light emission from a porous silicon device,” IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 691–692, 1991. View at Scopus
  2. G. Smestad, M. Kunst, and C. Vial, “Photovoltaic response in electrochemically prepared photoluminescent porous silicon,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 277–283, 1992. View at Scopus
  3. G. Willeke, H. Nussbaumer, H. Bender, and E. Bucher, “A simple and effective light trapping technique for polycrystalline silicon solar cells,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 345–356, 1992. View at Scopus
  4. J. P. Proot, C. Delerue, and G. Allan, “Electronic structure and optical properties of silicon crystallites: application to porous silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 61, no. 16, pp. 1948–1950, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. Lehmann, “Interplay of structures and forces in the electronic conductivity of liquid mercury,” Physics and Chemistry of Liquids, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 245–252, 1996. View at Scopus
  6. A. Janshoff, K.-P. Dancil, C. Steinem et al., “Macroporous p-type silicon Fabry-Perot layers. Fabrication, characterization, and applications in biosensing,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 120, no. 46, pp. 12108–12116, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Herino, G. Bomchil, K. Barla, C. Bertrand, and J. L. Ginoux, “Porosity and pore size distributions of porous silicon layers,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 134, no. 8, pp. 1994–2000, 1987. View at Scopus
  8. R. L. Smith and S. D. Collins, “Porous silicon formation mechanisms,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. R1–R22, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. L. Smith, S. F. Chuang, and S. D. Collins, “A theoretical model of the formation morphologies of porous silicon,” Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 533–541, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. T. Canham, “Silicon quantum wire array fabrication by electrochemical and chemical dissolution of wafers,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1046–1048, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Ossicini, L. Pavesi, and F. Priolo, Light Emitting Silicon for Microphotonics, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
  12. A. G. Cullis, L. T. Canham, and P. D. J. Calcott, “The structural and luminescence properties of porous silicon,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 909–965, 1997. View at Scopus
  13. M. S. Brandt, H. D. Fuchs, M. Stutzmann, J. Weber, and M. Cardona, “The origin of visible luminescencefrom “porous silicon”: a new interpretation,” Solid State Communications, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 307–312, 1992. View at Scopus
  14. H. D. Fuchs, M. Stutzmann, M. S. Brandt et al., “Porous silicon and siloxene: vibrational and structural properties,” Physical Review B, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 8172–8189, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Y. Gorbach, G. Y. Rudko, P. S. Smertenko et al., “Simultaneous changes in the photoluminescence, infrared absorption and morphology of porous silicon during etching by HF,” Semiconductor Science and Technology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 601–606, 1996. View at Scopus
  16. G. C. John and V. A. Singh, “Theory of the photoluminescence spectra of porous silicon,” Physical Review B, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 5329–5334, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Jia, S. L. Zang, S. P. Wong et al., “Further evidence for the quantum confined electrochemistry model of the formation mechanism of p—type porous silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 69, no. 22, pp. 3399–3401, 1996. View at Scopus
  18. V. Lehmann and U. Gosele, “Porous silicon: quantum sponge structures grown via a self-adjusting etching process,” Advanced Materials, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 114–116, 1992. View at Scopus
  19. P. Kumar, P. Lemmens, M. Ghosh, F. Ludwig, and M. Schilling, “Effect of HF concentration on physical and electronic properties of electrochemically formed nanoporous silicon,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2009, Article ID 728957, 7 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Kumar and P. Huber, “Quenching of reducing properties of mesoporous silicon and its use as template for metal/semiconductor deposition,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. D172–D176, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. O. Keeffe, Y. Aoyagi, S. Komuro, T. Kato, and T. Morikawa, “Room-temperature backbond oxidation of the porous silicon surface by oxygen radical irradiation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 66, p. 836, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. G. Zhang, S. D. Collins, and R. L. Smith, “Porous silicon formation and electropolishing of silicon by anodic polarization in HF solution,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 136, no. 5, pp. 1561–1565, 1989. View at Scopus
  23. X. G. Zhang, “Mechanism of pore formation on n-type silicon,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 138, no. 12, pp. 3750–3756, 1991. View at Scopus
  24. Z. Sui, P. P. Leong, I. P. Herman, G. S. Higashi, and H. Temkin, “Raman analysis of light-emitting porous silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 60, no. 17, pp. 2086–2088, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Furukawa and T. Miyasato, “Quantum size effects on the optical band gap of microcrystalline Si:H,” Physical Review B, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 5726–5729, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Richter, Z. P. Wang, and L. Ley, “The one phonon Raman spectrum in microcrystalline silicon,” Solid State Communications, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 625–629, 1981. View at Scopus
  27. I. H. Campbell and P. M. Fauchet, “The effects of microcrystal size and shape on the one phonon Raman spectra of crystalline semiconductors,” Solid State Communications, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 739–741, 1986. View at Scopus
  28. T. Kanata, H. Murai, and K. Kubota, “Raman and x-ray scattering from ultrafine semiconductor particles,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 969–972, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. K. K. Tiong, P. M. Amirtharaj, F. H. Pollak, and D. E. Aspnes, “Effects of As+ ion implantation on the Raman spectra of GaAs: “spatial correlation” interpretation,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 122–124, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. V. Paillard, P. Puech, M. A. Laguna, R. Carles, B. Kohn, and F. Huisken, “Improved one-phonon confinement model for an accurate size determination of silicon nanocrystals,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1921–1924, 1999. View at Scopus
  31. Z. Sui, P. P. Leong, I. P. Herman, G. S. Higashi, and H. Temkin, “Raman analysis of light-emitting porous silicon,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 60, no. 17, pp. 2086–2088, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. P. Moriarty, “Nanostructured materials,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 297–381, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. K. Sood, K. Jayaram, and D. V. S. Muthu, “Raman and high-pressure photoluminescence studies on porous silicon,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 4963–4965, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Y. H. Ogata, N. Yoshimi, R. Yasuda, T. Tsuboi, T. Sakka, and A. Otsuki, “Structural change in p-type porous silicon by thermal annealing,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 6487–6492, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Kumar and P. Huber, “Nucleation and growth of copper on mesoporous silicon by immersion plating,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 2864–2869, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Y. K. Xu and S. Adachi, “Light-emitting porous silicon formed by photoetching in aqueous HF/KIO 3 solution,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 39, no. 21, pp. 4572–4577, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. P. Kumar, T. Hofmann, K. Knorr, P. Huber, P. Scheib, and P. Lemmens, “Tuning the pore wall morphology of mesoporous silicon from branchy to smooth, tubular by chemical treatment,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 2, Article ID 024303, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Roy, K. Jayaram, and A. K. Sood, “Raman and photoluminescence studies on thermally annealed porous silicon,” Solid State Communications, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 229–233, 1994. View at Scopus
  39. W.-Q Huang, F. Jin, H.-X Wang, L. Xu, et al., “Stimulated emission from trap electronic states in oxide of nanocrystal Si,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 22, Article ID 221910, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar