Review Article

The Epidemiology and Demographics of Hip Dysplasia

Table 7

Archeological studies of hip dysplasia.

StudyYearArcheological locationEraMFUBNo. DDHNo. SkeletonsPrevalence

European peoples
Blondiaux and Millot [408]1991North and Eastern France4th–13th century3367008.6
Mafart et al. [409]2007Southern France8th–17th century0954990010.0
Mitchell and Redfern [410]2007Spitalfields, London, UK1100–15305472932902.7
Hawkes and Wells [411]1983Worthy Park, Hampshire, South England5th–7th century0990
Eng et al. [412]2009Transylvania, Romania1550–17000227028.6
Masnicová and Beňuš [413]2003Devín, Slovakia9th–12th century1113273.1
Maat et al. [414]1995Dordrecht, Netherlands1375–1572110010.0
Lieverse [415]2005Cis-Baikal, Siberia6800–1000 BC112713.7
Bourbou [416]2003Southern Greece6th–7th century02250.0
Lieverse [417]2008Padova, Italy1112134.7
Bisel [418]1991Herculaneum, Italy79 AD1111397.2
Mid-Eastern/ Egyptian peoples
Goldstein et al. [419]1976Tel Sheva, Negev200 BC0730.0
Ortner [420]1979Bâb edh-Dhrâ, JordanEarly Bronze Age (3150–2200 BC)1119210.9
Mathieson et al. [421]1997Gisr el-Mudir, Saqqara, Egypt2890–2650 BC12441.7
Indigenous peoples
Lahr and Bowan [422]1992Kechipawan, New Mexico1300–16000540.0
Pfeiffer [423]1984Uxbridge, Ontario1490131 2 3.2
Clabeaux [424]1977Fort Erie, Niagara River, OntarioPre- colonization22867.0
Wakefield et al. [425]1937Eastern ArkansasPre- colonization1110010.0
Gregg et al. [426]1981Crow Creek, South Dakota14th century1114862.11
Miles [427]1975Mesa Verde, Colorado750–1300 AD01790.0
Goldstein [428]1957Texas800–1700 AD01460.0
Loveland et al. [429]1985Red River County, Texas1100–1800 AD175
Wheeler [430]El Morro Valley, New Mexico13th Century0260.0
Merbs and Vestergaard [431]1985Sundown, Prescott, Arizona1100–1200 AD0260.0
Drusini et al. [432]1987Maguana, Santo Domingolate 15th century32510846.3
Western Europe8161262550894.9
Eastern Europe131046686.0
Mediterra- nean020225773.5
Middle East0110218910.6
Indigenous04311117986.1
All9261794483215.3

The skeletal remains derived from an ossuary make it impossible to reconstruct each individual from the commingled bones; the minimal number of individual skeletons is given. This results in a prevalence that cannot exceed the number calculated but may be less if there were more individuals represented in the ossuary.