- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Recently Accepted Articles ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 470921, 3 pages
Use of Surgical Sponge with Running Sutures for Securing Full-Thickness Skin Grafts
1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumiro, Bundang, Gyeonggi, Seongnam 463-707, Republic of Korea
2Plastic Surgeon, 54623 Thessaloniki, Greece
Received 2 July 2011; Accepted 3 August 2011
Academic Editors: M. A. Trelles and W. Vanscheidt
Copyright © 2011 Stamatis Sapountzis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
One of the most common methods of skin defect repairing is the use of a skin graft. It is simple and reliable technique, although sometimes it is not totally successful due to hematoma and seroma formation between the skin graft and the recipient bed. Here in, we present a method to secure the skin grafts using a surgical sponge with two running sutures. This technique ensures high survival rate of the skin grafts, and in addition it is easy to be performed by the surgeon only.
The reconstruction of skin defects with skin graft is one of the most common techniques in plastic surgery. It has been proven an especially reliable method. However, skin grafting may be partially, or totally unsuccessful for numerous reasons. The most common cause of skin graft failure is the hematoma formation between the skin graft and the wound bed .
2. Material and Method
Here in, we present a technique for full-thickness skin grafts securing, using a surgical scrub sponge, which is saturated with povidone-iodine (Figure 1). Firstly, we secure the skin graft to the recipient bed using a running 5-0 nylon or polypropylene suture. After the skin graft has been sutured to place, we cut the sponge according to the size of the defect—the diameter of the sponge is slight larger than the defect’s in order to have a small overlap. Between the sponge and the wound bed we always use a vaseline gauge, in order to have easier removal of the bolster dressing. Then, we perform the “Lilliputian technique”  for securing the bolster dressing. We always use two nonabsorbable sutures 4-0 nylon or polypropylene for extra secure in case of the first suture breaks. We remove the dressing bolster 5 to 7 days later.
We performed this technique in 23 patients. All of the skin defects were located in face and scalp, and the mean size was 3.8 cm (2.4–6.1 cm). The mean patient age was 73 years old. The etiology of the skin defect was BCC and SCC excision. In all cases, the percentage of skin graft take was above 90% (Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7).
Many techniques of tie-over dressing for prevention of hematoma and seroma formation have been reported in the literature. The classic “tie-over” dressing consists in multiple interrupted sutures in order to secure the skin graft with the recipient bed. Each stitch’s end is intentionally left long, so as to facilitate a tie over a bolster of cotton gauze by joining the loose ends of opposing sutures .
Srivastava and Kouba  described a method (“Lilliputian” technique) which involves one or two continuous sutures in order to secure the bolster dressing. Demir at al.  also used in their study surgical scrub sponge saturated with Povidone-iodine with success rate in graft take 95.8%.
We prefer to use the surgical sponge because it provides homogenous pressure over the graft. Furthermore, the Povidine-iodine is an anti-infection agent, so it may protect the skin graft from bacterial colonization. Additionally, with the running sutures, it is not necessary to place extra sutures at the center of the graft securing it to the graft bed. The advantage of this technique is that there is no need to reevaluate the skin graft uptake during the first 5–7 days. The pressure of the surgical sponge with continuous sutures ensure the non formation of hematoma and seroma under the skin graft. Furthermore, the technique is easy to be performed by the surgeon only, since there is no need for any assisting hand.
In our experience, the combination of a surgical sponge with running sutures is an effective, simple, and quick way to secure the skin grafts.
- P. Rudolph and D. L. Ballantyne Jr., “Skin grafts,” in Plastic Surgery, J. G. McCarthy, Ed., vol. 1, pp. 221–274, W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1990.
- D. Srivastava and D. J. Kouba, “A “lilliputian” technique for rapid and efficient securing of bolster dressings over full-thickness skin grafts: how we do it,” Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1280–1281, 2009.
- T. M. Johnson and D. Ratner, “Skin grafts,” in Textbook of Dermatologic Surgery, J. L. Ratz, Ed., p. 204, Lippincot Raven, 1997.
- H. T. Hoffman and M. La Rouere, “A simple bolster technique for skin grafting,” Laryngoscope, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 558–559, 1989.
- G. S. Branfman and J. M. Cassel, “A simple method for securing a bolster in position over a split-thickness skin graft,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 136–137, 1988.
- C. A. Egan and J. W. Gerwels, “Surgical pearl: use of a sponge bolster instead of a tie-over bolster as a less invasive method of securing full-thickness skin grafts,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1000–1001, 1998.
- H. Y. Demir, S. Tuncer, T. Eryilmaz, B. Ak, and S. Ayhan, “A practical tie-over technique: surgical scrub sponge,” Burns, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 734–735, 2008.