139603.fig.004a
(a)
139603.fig.004b
(b)
139603.fig.004c
(c)
139603.fig.004d
(d)
Figure 4: Performance comparison among C1M1, C1M2, C2M1, and C2M2 for three configurations for the three variables (i) population size, (ii) candidate partitions, and (iii) fitness value.