CT Imaging of Coronary Stents: Past, Present, and Future

Table 3

Summary of studies on 64-slice CT angiography for assessing coronary stents.

Author/year	Patients (n)	Stents (n)	Non evaluable (%)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	PPV (%)	NPV (%)
Rixe et al. 2006 [63]	64	102	42	86	98	86	98
Van Mieghem et al. 2006 [64]	70	162	na	100	91	67	100
Rist et al. 2006 [65]	25	46	2	75	92	67	94
Oncel et al. 2007 [66]	30	39	0	89	95	94	90
Cademartiri et al. 2007 [67]	182	192	7	95	93	63	99
Ehara et al. 2007 [68]	81	163	12	92	81	54	98
Carrabba et al. 2007 [69]	41	87	0	84	97	92	97
Das et al. 2007 [70]	53	110	2.7	97	88	77	98
Schuijf et al. 2007 [71]	50	76	14	100	100	100	100
Carbone et al. 2008 [72]	41	74	19.5	75	86	71	89
Manghat et al. 2008 [73]	40	114	9.6	85	86	71	89
Hecht et al. 2008 [74]	67	132	0	94	74	39	99
Nakamura et al. 2008 [75]	49	75	14.6	67	92	29	98
Andreini et al. 2009 [47]	100	179	5	87	98	92	96
Pontone et al. 2009 [76]	80 (gating)	48	8	92	94	85	87
	80 (triggering)	66	6	73	96	80	94
Haraldsdottir et al. 2010 [77]	93	140	14	27	95	67	78
Papini et al. 2010 [78]	26	42	20	97	100	97	100
Abdelkarim et al. 2010 [79]	55	122	13.2	91	95	96	91
Chung et al. 2010 [44]	60	91	24.2	90	74	58	95
Wykrzykowska et al. 2010 [80]	52	75	36	33.3	91.7	57.1	80.5
Andreini et al. 2011 [81]	85 (gating)	163	5	86	97	91	96
	83 (triggering)	174	7	94	100	100	98
Zhao et al. 2011 [82]	18	29	0	100	95	89	100
Zhang et al. 2012 [83]	83	171	28.7	100	69	25	100
Total/mean	1608	2672	12.1	84.4	91.1	73.9	94.6

na: not available; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value.