Research Article

Computed Tomography Evaluation of Craniomandibular Articulation in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion and Class I Normal Occlusion Subjects in North Indian Population

Table 2

Statistical analysis: concentric position of condyle in Class I normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 malocclusion.

GroupsSidesAnterior joint space (AJS)Posterior joint space (PJS)Anterior joint space–Posterior joint space (AJS-PJS)Paired Student’s t-testP value

Class I normal occlusionLeft 1 . 9 5 ± 0 . 3 1 2 . 3 1 ± 0 . 3 9 0 . 3 7 ± 0 . 4 6 3.090.0008
Right 2 . 0 2 ± 0 . 3 3 2 . 3 8 ± 0 . 2 9 0 . 3 6 ± 0 . 3 1 4.550.0005
Class II Division 1 malocclusionLeft 1 . 8 7 ± 0 . 1 8 2 . 3 1 ± 0 . 3 7 0 . 4 4 ± 0 . 3 7 4.580.0004
Right 1 . 9 8 ± 0 . 3 2 2 . 2 5 ± 0 . 5 5 0 . 2 7 ± 0 . 7 1 1.460.1655