Comparative Evaluation of Two Types of Immediately Loaded Implants Using Biomechanical and Histomorphometric Tests: An Animal Case Study

<table>Cross-section of bone-implant surface. Bone trabeculae are in close contact with the implant surface in two groups. (a) Xive implant and (b) Nisastan implant. (Acid fuchsin and toluidine blue, optical microscope; original magnification <svg height="8.7875004" id="M6" style="vertical-align:-0.3135pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 10.125 8.7875004" width="10.125" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,8.7875)">
<g transform="translate(72,-64.97)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,65.34)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">×</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>100).</table>

International Scholarly Research Notices

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Comparative Evaluation of Two Types of Immediately Loaded Implants Using Biomechanical and Histomorphometric Tests: An Animal Case Study 