- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 345791, 12 pages
Modulation of Neutrophil Apoptosis by Antimicrobial Peptides
1Department of Host Defense and Biochemical Research, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
2Atopy (Allergy) Research Center, Juntendo University, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan
3Seikagaku Biobusiness Corporation, Tokyo 104-0033, Japan
4Institute of Ohtaka Enzyme Co., Hokkaido 047-0156, Japan
Received 1 December 2011; Accepted 11 January 2012
Academic Editors: V. Juillard, A. Mirazimi, F. Navarro-Garcia, and A. Netrusov
Copyright © 2012 Isao Nagaoka et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Peptide antibiotics possess the potent antimicrobial activities against invading microorganisms and contribute to the innate host defense. Human antimicrobial peptides, α-defensins (human neutrophil peptides, HNPs), human β-defensins (hBDs), and cathelicidin (LL-37) not only exhibit potent bactericidal activities against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, but also function as immunomodulatory molecules by inducing cytokine and chemokine production, and inflammatory and immune cell activation. Neutrophil is a critical effector cell in host defense against microbial infection, and its lifespan is regulated by various pathogen- and host-derived substances. Here, we provided the evidence that HNP-1, hBD-3, and LL-37 cannot only destroy bacteria but also potently modulate (suppress) neutrophil apoptosis, accompanied with the phosphorylation of ERK-1/-2, the downregulation of tBid (an proapoptotic protein) and upregulation of Bcl- (an antiapoptotic protein), and the inhibition of mitochondrial membrane potential change and caspase 3 activity, possibly via the actions on the distinct receptors, the P2Y6 nucleotide receptor, the chemokine receptor CCR6, and the low-affinity formyl-peptide receptor FPRL1/the nucleotide receptor P2X7, respectively. Suppression of neutrophil apoptosis results in the prolongation of their lifespan and may be advantageous for the host defense against bacterial invasion.
Neutrophils play an important role as an effector of inflammation, tissue injury, and host defense against microbial infection . The lifetime of neutrophils, terminally differentiated blood cells, is relatively short, and they constitutively undergo apoptosis . Apoptotic neutrophils are phagocytosed by macrophages without release of proinflammatory mediators, leading to the limitation of tissue injury and resolution of inflammatory process [2–4]. In this context, it is interesting to note that spontaneous apoptosis of neutrophils is inhibited in patients with sepsis, systemic inflammatory syndrome (SIRS), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by the action of various pathogen- and host-derived substances, such as bacterial products (i.e., Gram-negative lipopolysaccharide; LPS), cytokines, and chemokines (i.e., IL-1β and IL-8) [3, 5–8]. The suppressed neutrophil apoptosis results in the prolongation of their life span and causes the uncontrolled release of cytotoxic metabolites and proinflammatory substances (i.e., reactive oxygen species and proteases), which leads to the amplification of systemic inflammation, tissue injury, and organ failure observed in those disorders [9, 10]. In contrast, neutrophil apoptosis can be accelerated by Fas ligand, reactive oxygen species, immune complexes, and bacterial toxins (such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa exotoxin, pyocyanin) produced at the sites of inflammation and infection [11–14]. Inappropriate induction of neutrophil apoptosis is likely to deplete neutrophil numbers and functions, thereby impairing host defense and favoring bacterial invasion and persistence.
Mammalian cells express a number of antimicrobial peptides (host defense peptides) that function as effector components in the innate host defense system . They are found in blood, secretions, epithelial tissues as well as in neutrophil granules and exhibit potent antimicrobial activities against a broad spectrum of invading microorganisms, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and viruses [16–20]. Among these peptides, defensins and cathelicidin are considered as the two major classes of antimicrobial peptides in humans [16–20]. Defensins are characterized by the six-cysteine residues forming three intramolecular disulfide bridges and are divided into α- and β-defensins based on the distribution of cysteines and the linkages of disulfide bonding [16, 17, 19, 20]. Human α-defensins are found in neutrophils and the Paneth cells of the small intestine, whereas human β-defensins (hBDs) are mainly expressed by epithelial tissues. In contrast, cathelicidins are a family of antimicrobial peptides, characterized by the highly conserved cathelin-like prosequence and variable C-terminal sequences that correspond to the mature antibacterial peptides . About 30 cathelicidin members have been identified from various mammalian species; however, only one cathelicidin, human cationic antibacterial protein of 18 kDa (hCAP18) has been found in humans, and its C-terminal mature antimicrobial peptide, called LL-37, which comprises 37 aminoacid residues (L1LGDFFRKSKEKIGKEFKRIVQRIKDFLRNLVPRTES37), has been identified [21, 22].
To date, six different human α-defensin molecules have been described [16, 17, 19, 20]. Human α-defensin-1, -2, -3, and -4 are also termed as human neutrophil peptide (HNP)-1, -2, -3, and -4, as they are mainly expressed in neutrophils. HNP-1, -2 and -3, which differ only in the first aminoacid, account for 5–7% of total neutrophil proteins, whereas HNP, with an aminoacid sequence distinct from other HNP sequences, comprises <1% of total defensins in neutrophils. Since no gene that encodes HNP-2 has been identified, it is regarded as a proteolytic product of HNP-1 and/or HNP-3. The other two human α-defensins, human defensin (HD)-5 and HD-6, are constitutively expressed in the Paneth cells within the epithelium in the small intestine. Thus, they are called enteric defensins.
Similarly, six hBDs (hBD-1 to -6) have been identified in human tissues. hBD-1 is constitutively expressed in various epithelial tissues, including urogenital and respiratory tracts [26, 27]. hBD-2, which was originally isolated from lesional scale of psoriatic skin, is mainly found in skin and respiratory as well as gastrointestinal tracts and is upregulated by various stimuli (e.g., LPS and cytokines) [28, 29]. The third β-defensin, hBD-3, which was also isolated from human lesional psoriatic scale, is detected in both epithelial and nonepithelial tissues, and its expression is inducible upon stimulation with bacteria and cytokines [30, 31]. hBD-4, which was initially identified by screening of human genomic sequences, is upregulated in epithelial cells by stimulation with bacteria and cytokines [32, 33]. However, the antimicrobial and other cellular activities have not yet been determined for hBD-5 and hBD-6, the newly discovered hBDs based on the human genome database .
In addition to their antimicrobial properties, HNPs, hBDs, and LL have the potential to stimulate various host cell types to induce cytokine and chemokine production as well as to chemoattract immune and inflammatory cells [19, 35]. In this context, HNPs, hBDs, and LL-37 possess the ability to chemoattract neutrophils, monocyte, T cells, and immature dendritic cells [36–39]. Given that HNPs, hBDs, and LL-37 are multifunctional molecules as host defense peptides and act on neutrophils as chemoattractants [36, 38, 39], we hypothesized that they may have a potential to modulate the lifetime (apoptosis) of neutrophils. Here, we provided the evidence that HNP-1, hBD-3, and LL-37 can potently suppress neutrophil apoptosis, possibly via the actions on the distinct receptors; the P2Y6 nucleotide receptor, the CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 6, and the low-affinity formyl-peptide receptor, formyl-peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1)/the nucleotide receptor P2X7, respectively [23–25].
2. Modulation of Neutrophil Apoptosis by LL-37
Before looking at the actions of LL-37, we determined the spontaneous apoptosis of neutrophils. When neutrophils were incubated alone for 18 h at 37°C, they exhibited characteristic features of apoptosis, such as chromatin condensation, formation of rounded nuclear profiles, cell shrinking, and presence of cytoplasmic vacuolization (Figure 1(b)), compared to resting cells incubated for 18 h at 4°C (Figure 1(a)). Alternatively, neutrophil apoptosis was evaluated by flow cytometry using FITC-annexin V and propidium iodide staining. Incubation of neutrophils alone for 18 h at 37°C substantially induced apoptosis defined as annexin V positive but propidium iodide negative (Figure 1(e)), compared to resting cells incubated for 18 h at 4°C (Figure 1(d)). Evaluation of neutrophil apoptosis based on the morphological changes revealed that of neutrophils underwent apoptosis after incubation alone for 18 h (Figure 2(a)). LPS used as a control stimulus reduced the neutrophil apoptosis. Interestingly, spontaneous apoptosis of neutrophils was inhibited by incubation with LL-37 (Figures 1(c), 1(f), and 2(a)).
Next, we evaluated the activation of caspase 3, a key executor for apoptosis . Consistent with the changes in the number of apoptotic cells, caspase 3 activity was increased after 18 h of incubation (Figure 2(b)), and the activity was reduced by LPS-stimulation. Of importance, LL-37 dose dependently suppressed the activation of caspase 3.
To clarify the mechanism for the action of LL-37, we investigated the signaling molecules by Western blot analysis. First, we looked at the effect of LL-37 on the phosphorylation of ERK, a member of mitogen-activated kinase family. LL-37 (1 μg/mL) stimulation strikingly enhanced the phosphorylation of ERK-1/-2 (data not shown). Further, we evaluated the effect of LL-37 on the expression of Bcl-XL, an antiapoptotic protein. LL-37 (1 μg/mL) markedly induced the expression of Bcl-XL (data not shown).
It has been demonstrated that LL-37 uses FPRL1 as a receptor to chemoattract neutrophils, monocytes and T cells . In addition, LL-37 is reported to promote the processing and release of IL-1β from monocytes via the activation of P2X7 receptor . Thus, we determined the involvement of FPRL1 and P2X7 in the LL-37-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis by using FPRL1 antagonist and P2X7 inhibitors. As shown in Figure 3, antagonistic agents for FPRL1 (WRW4, Trp-Arg-Trp-Trp-Trp-Trp-CONH2)  and P2X7 (oxidized ATP and KN-93) [43–45] significantly reversed the LL-37-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis. Similarly, FPRL1 antagonist (WRW4) and P2X7 inhibitors (oxidized ATP and KN-93) obviously attenuated the LL-37-induced inhibition of caspase 3 activity (data not shown). These observations apparently suggest that FPRL1 and P2X7 are involved in the LL-37-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis.
Next, to further determine the involvement of FPRL1 and P2X7 in the suppression of neutrophil apoptosis, neutrophils were directly incubated with the FPRL1 and P2X7 agonists. As shown in Figure 4, agonistic agents for FPRL1 (WKYMVm, Trp-Lys-Tyr-Met-Val-D-Met-CONH2 and MMK-1, LESIFRSLLFRVM) , and P2X7 (Bz-ATP, benzoylbenzoyl-ATP) [43, 44] dose dependently suppressed neutrophil apoptosis. Notably, the combinations of FPRL1- and P2X7-agonists cooperatively suppressed neutrophil apoptosis as well as the activation of caspase 3 (data not shown). These observations most likely indicate that the activation of FPRL1 and P2X7 in concert acts to induce the suppression of neutrophil apoptosis.
3. Modulation of Neutrophil Apoptosis by hBDs
Next, we determined the effect of HBDs on neutrophil apoptosis. Interestingly, hBD-3 dose dependently inhibited the neutrophil apoptosis (Figure 5). Of note, neither hBD-1, hBD-2 nor hBD-4 significantly influenced neutrophil apoptosis at the concentrations examined. Similarly, hBD-3 but not hBD-1, hBD-2 and hBD-4 significantly suppressed the activation of caspase 3 (data not shown).
Further, we evaluated the expression of apoptosis-associated proteins, truncated Bid (a proapoptotic protein) and Bcl-xL (an antiapoptotic protein). Of note, consistent with its suppressive action on neutrophil apoptosis, hBD-3 downregulated truncated Bid, whereas it upregulated Bcl-xL (Figure 6).
The dissipation of mitochondrial electrochemical potential gradient is known as an early event of apoptosis . Thus, we investigated the effect of hBD-3 on the mitochondrial membrane potential change in apoptotic neutrophils. Assessment of the mitochondrial membrane potential change with a cationic lipophilic dye JC-1  revealed that the percentage of cells with intact mitochondrial membrane potential (enhanced red but diminished green fluorescent cells) decreased, whereas that with disrupted mitochondrial membrane potential (enhanced green but diminished red fluorescent cells) increased after incubation at 37°C for 18 h (Figure 7). Importantly, hBD-3 suppressed the mitochondrial membrane potential change; hBD-3 (1 ~ 10 μg/mL) dose dependently decreased neutrophil number with disrupted mitochondrial membrane potential, but increased that with intact mitochondrial membrane potential even after incubation at 37°C for 18 h.
Although CCR6 is known as a specific receptor for CCL20/MIP-3α , hBD-3 also utilizes CCR6 to stimulate chemotaxis for monocytes and CCR6-transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells . Thus, we determined the participation of CCR6 in the hBD-3-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis. When neutrophils were incubated with hBD-3 in the presence of anti-CCR6 mAb or control IgG, anti-CCR6 mAb but not control IgG significantly reversed the hBD-3-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis (Figure 8). To further clarify the involvement of CCR6 in the suppression of neutrophil apoptosis, neutrophils were incubated with MIP-3α, a specific ligand for CCR6 . MIP-3α ( μg/mL) dose dependently suppressed neutrophil apoptosis, and MIP-3α-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis was obviously attenuated by anti-CCR6 mAb but not control IgG. These observations suggest that CCR6 is involved in not only the MIP-3α-induced but also the hBD-3-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis.
4. Modulation of Neutrophil Apoptosis by α-Defensins
Further, we determined the effect of α-defensins on neutrophil apoptosis. Interestingly, HNP-1 ( μg/mL) dose dependently suppressed neutrophil apoptosis (Figure 9). However, HNP-2, HNP-3 and HD-5 (data not shown) did not significantly influence the neutrophil apoptosis at the concentrations examined. Similarly, HNP-1 but not HNP-2, HNP-3, and HD-5 significantly suppressed the activation of caspase-3 (data not shown). Moreover, consistent with its suppressive action on neutrophil apoptosis, HNP-1 downregulated truncated Bid, whereas it upregulated Bcl-xL (data not shown). Importantly, we confirmed that HNP-1 suppressed the mitochondrial membrane potential change; HNP-1 (40 μg/mL) increased neutrophil number with intact mitochondrial membrane potential, but decreased that with disrupted mitochondrial membrane potential even after incubation at 37°C for 18 h (data not shown).
Although P2Y6 is known as a purinergic receptor for UDP , it has been reported that HNPs utilizes P2Y6 signaling to stimulate human lung epithelial cells to produce IL-8 . Thus, we determined the involvement of P2Y6 in the HNP-1-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis. To determine the involvement of P2Y6 in the suppression of neutrophil apoptosis, neutrophils were directly incubated with a P2Y6 agonist UDP, and its effect on neutrophil apoptosis was evaluated. UDP ( μM) dose dependently suppressed neutrophil apoptosis (data not shown). Furthermore, we evaluated the effects of a P2Y6 antagonist MRS2578 . Of importance, MRS2578 significantly reversed the HNP-1-induced as well as UDP-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis (Figure 10). These observations suggest that P2Y6 is involved in not only the UDP-induced but also the HNP-1-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis.
We demonstrated that the human antimicrobial peptides, LL-37, hBD-3, and HNP-1 can suppress neutrophil apoptosis. Thus, we determined whether LL-37, hBD-3, and HNP-1 could cooperatively suppress the neutrophil apoptosis by incubating neutrophils with the combinations of LL-37, hBD-3, and HNP-1. As shown in Figure 11, the low concentrations of LL-37 (0.1 μg/mL), hBD-3 (1 μg/mL), and HNP-1 (10 μg/mL) slightly reduced the neutrophil apoptosis. Of note, the combinations of 2 peptides cooperatively decreased apoptosis, and the combination of 3 peptides further reduced apoptosis. These observations clearly indicate that LL-37, hBD-3, and HNP-1 can act in concert on neutrophils to suppress the apoptosis.
Host defense peptides (α- and β-defensins; cathelicidins), as the effectors in the innate host defense system, exhibit antimicrobial activities against a broad spectrum of microbes, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and viruses . In addition to their antimicrobial properties, HNPs, hBDs, and LL-37 have the potential to stimulate various host cell types to induce cytokine and chemokine production [19, 35]. Furthermore, HNPs, hBDs, and LL-37 possess the ability to chemoattract neutrophils, monocyte, T cells, and immature dendritic cells [36–39].
In this paper, we demonstrated that HNP-1, hBD-3, and LL-37 can potently suppress neutrophil apoptosis among the peptides examined. During the process of apoptosis, truncated Bid (a proapoptotic protein) is cleaved from Bid and translocates to mitochondria to perturb the mitochondrial functions, thereby disrupting mitochondrial membrane potential and promoting cytochrome c release, which results in the activation of effector caspases and finally induces apoptosis [40, 53]. In contrast, Bcl-xL acts as an antiapoptotic protein to preserve mitochondrial integrity, thereby suppressing the activation of caspase cascade and apoptosis [40, 54]. Consistent with their antiapoptotic actions, HNP-1, hBD-3, and LL-37 downregulated truncated Bid and upregulated Bcl-xL. Furthermore, they inhibited the dissipation of mitochondrial membrane potential and activation of caspase 3, one of the death proteases functioning as the central executioners of apoptosis . It has been shown that the activation of ERK, a member of mitogen-activated kinase family, generates the survival signals via the upregulation of antiapoptotic proteins of Bcl-2 family (such as Bcl-XL) to prolong the life span of cells [3, 55]. Since we confirmed that HNP-1 and hBD3 as well as LL-37 induced the phosphorylation of ERK-1/-2 in neutrophils, it is feasible to assume that the stimulation of neutrophils with HNP-1, hBD-3, and LL-37 induces the phosphorylation of ERK-1/-2 and the subsequent upregulation of antiapoptotic protein Bcl-XL and downregulation of proapoptotic protein truncated Bid, which inhibits the mitochondrial membrane potential change and caspase 3 activity, thereby suppressing neutrophil apoptosis (Figure 12).
Cationic antimicrobial peptides (such as defensins and cathelicidins) kill the invaded microorganisms by perturbing their membranes; the action of those peptides is not receptor-mediated but involves a less specific interaction with microbial membrane components, since the peptides target cell surface anionic lipids such as phosphatidyl glycerol and cardiolipin that are abundant in microorganisms . In contrast, the mammalian cell membrane is mainly composed of electrically neutral phospholipids such as phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin, for which the affinity of antimicrobial peptides is generally low . Recently, antimicrobial peptides have been shown to act on the cell surface receptors to modulate various host cell functions (i.e., proinflammatory mediator production; immune and inflammatory cell activation). For instance, HNPs induce IL-8 production from A549 lung epithelial cells via the action on P2Y6 nucleotide receptor , and hBD-3 utilizes a chemokine receptor CCR6 to chemoattract monocytes and CCR6-transfected HEK 293 cells . Moreover, LL-37 functions as a chemoattractant for neutrophils, monocytes, and T cells via the interactions with FPRL1, a low-affinity formyl-peptide receptor  and promotes the processing and release of IL-1β from monocytes via the activation of P2X7 nucleotide receptor . Using antagonistic and agonistic agents and a neutralizing antibody, we demonstrated that P2Y6, CCR6, and FPRL1/P2X7 are likely involved in the HNP-1-, hBD-3, and LL-37-induced suppression of neutrophil apoptosis, respectively. To date, it is proposed that LL-37 and hBD-3 can directly bind to and activate FPRL1 and CCR6 [24, 46]. However, the exact mechanisms by which LL-37 and HNPs signal through the P2Y7 and P2Y6 receptors remain to be elucidated [41, 51]. The current study demonstrated that among α-defensins, HNP-1 but not HNP-2, HNP-3 and HD-5 suppresses the apoptosis of neutrophils via the P2Y6 signaling. Of interest, aminoacid sequences of HNP-1, -2, and -3 differ only in the N-terminal end, whereas HD-5 is distinct from other HNPs. Thus, it can be postulated that the difference in the N-terminal sequences of HNP- can be recognized by the P2Y6 signaling to induce the suppression of neutrophil apoptosis. Supporting this sequence-specific actions of HNPs, it has been reported that HNP-1 most potently exhibits the chemotactic activity for monocytes among HNP- .
HNPs are synthesized in neutrophils, whereas hBDs are mainly produced in epithelial tissues, including respiratory and urogenital tracts and skin [16, 17, 19, 20]. Furthermore, LL-37 is expressed in keratinocytes and lung epithelial cells as well as neutrophils [19, 57]. Interestingly, the expression of these antimicrobial peptides is locally induced at the sites of inflammation and infection within epithelial cells, and invading neutrophils represent an additional source for the peptides [57, 58]. In this context, it has been reported that the concentrations of HNPs, hBDs, and LL-37 are increased up to 40 μg/mL in bronchoalveolar and nasal fluids from patients with inflammation and infection [58–60]. Importantly, we demonstrated that LL-37, hBD-3, and HNP-1 can suppress neutrophil apoptosis in vitro at the concentrations ( μg/mL) comparable to those at the sites of inflammation and infection, and that LL-37, hBD-3, and HNP-1 can cooperatively suppress neutrophil apoptosis in vitro. Thus, it can be speculated that antimicrobial peptides LL-37, hBD-3, and HNP-1, in concert modulate neutrophil apoptosis in vivo in the local milieu at the sites of inflammation or infection by utilizing different receptors (e.g., FPRL1, P2X7, CCR6, and P2Y6). Furthermore, HNPs, and LL-37 are expected to exert their actions on neutrophils in a paracrine/autocrine fashion, as they are stored in the azurophil and specific granules of neutrophils, respectively, and extracellularly released from activated neutrophils [61, 62]. In this context, it should be noted that antiapoptotic genes are upregulated, and proapoptotic genes are downregulated in vivo in neutrophils that challenged with inflammatory/immunomodulatory molecules (including LL-37, hBDs, and HNPs), and transmigrated to the inflammatory skin lesions .
Clearance of neutrophils from inflamed tissues is critical for the resolution of inflammation. Clinical studies have indicated that spontaneous neutrophil apoptosis is inhibited in patients with severe inflammation (e.g., sepsis, SIRS and ARDS) by the actions of various bacterial products, cytokines and chemokines, detected in these disorders [3, 5–8]. Activated neutrophils with prolonged survival cause the amplification of inflammation and tissue injury via the uncontrolled release of cytotoxic metabolites and proinflammatory substances [9, 10]. From this point of view, antimicrobial peptides (LL-37, hBD-3, and HNP-1) may exert a harmful effect during inflammation by suppressing apoptosis and prolonging the lifespan (survival) of neutrophils, which could lead to the augmented inflammatory reactions. In contrast, physiological process of neutrophil apoptosis can be subverted by bacterial pathogens during infections . Inappropriate or premature apoptosis of neutrophils could deplete cell numbers and functions, impairing host defense and favoring bacterial persistence in infections. In this context, it has been reported that neutrophil apoptosis is accelerated and neutrophil-mediated host defense is impaired in vivo during infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa by the action of pyocyanin, a predominant phenazine exotoxin . Considering their antiapoptotic action, antimicrobial peptides (LL-37, hBD-3, and HNP-1) can exert an advantageous effect on host defense against bacterial infections by prolonging the lifespan of neutrophils, major phagocytes engaged in the killing of invading bacteria.
HNPs, hBDs, and LL-37 are originally identified as antimicrobial peptides, which participate in the innate immune system, capable of protecting host from invasive microbial infections [16, 17], and now regarded as multifunctional molecules that link the innate immune response to the adaptive immune system by exerting various immunomodulatory actions, such as cytokine and chemokine production, and immune and inflammatory cell migration [19, 35]. In this paper, we have demonstrated an additional function of HNPs, hBDs, and LL-37 to prolong the lifespan of neutrophils via the actions on the distinct receptors. This finding provides a novel insight into the role of antimicrobial peptides in the regulation of neutrophil lifespan (apoptosis) as well as the innate and adaptive host defense systems.
This paper was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from Scientific Research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Technology in Japan (MEXT) for the Foundation of Strategic Research Projects in Private Universities, and Seikagaku Biobusiness Corporation, Japan.
- J. A. Smith, “Neutrophils, host defense, and inflammation: a double-edged sword,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 672–686, 1994.
- M. Whyte, S. Renshaw, R. Lawson, and C. Bingle, “Apoptosis and the regulation of neutrophil lifespan,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 802–807, 1999.
- C. Akgul, D. A. Moulding, and S. W. Edwards, “Molecular control of neutrophil apoptosis,” FEBS Letters, vol. 487, no. 3, pp. 318–322, 2001.
- H. U. Simon, “Neutrophil apoptosis pathways and their modifications in inflammation,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 101–110, 2003.
- F. Colotta, F. Re, N. Polentarutti, S. Sozzani, and A. Mantovani, “Modulation of granulocyte survival and programmed cell death by cytokines and bacterial products,” Blood, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 2012–2020, 1992.
- M. F. Jimenez, R. W. G. Watson, J. Parodo et al., “Dysregulated expression of neutrophil apoptosis in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 1263–1270, 1997.
- M. Keel, U. Ungethüm, U. Steckholzer et al., “Interleukin-10 counterregulates proinflammatory cytokine-induced inhibition of neutrophil apoptosis during severe sepsis,” Blood, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 3356–3363, 1997.
- G. Matute-bello, W. C. Liles, F. Radella II et al., “Neutrophil apoptosis in the acute respiratory distress syndrome,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 156, no. 6, pp. 1969–1977, 1997.
- C. Oberholzer, A. Oberholzer, M. Clare-Salzler, and L. L. Moldawer, “Apoptosis in sepsis: a new target for therapeutic exploration,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 879–892, 2001.
- J. Cohen, “The immunopathogenesis of sepsis,” Nature, vol. 420, no. 6917, pp. 885–891, 2002.
- W. C. Liles, P. A. Kiener, J. A. Ledbetter, A. Aruffo, and S. J. Klebanoff, “Differential expression of Fas (CD95) and Fas ligand on normal human phagocytes: implications for the regulation of apoptosis in neutrophils,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 429–440, 1996.
- Y. Kasahara, K. Iwai, A. Yachie et al., “Involvement of reactive oxygen intermediates in spontaneous and CD95(Fas/APO-1)-mediated apoptosis of neutrophils,” Blood, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 1748–1753, 1997.
- R. Gamberale, M. Giordano, A. S. Trevani, G. Andonegui, and J. R. Geffner, “Modulation of human neutrophil apoptosis by immune complexes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 161, no. 7, pp. 3666–3674, 1998.
- L. Allen, D. H. Dockrell, T. Pattery et al., “Pyocyanin production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa induces neutrophil apoptosis and impairs neutrophil-mediated host defenses in vivo,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 6, pp. 3643–3649, 2005.
- R. E. W. Hancock and G. Diamond, “The role of cationic antimicrobial peptides in innate host defences,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 402–410, 2000.
- T. Ganz, “Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 710–720, 2003.
- M. E. Selsted and A. J. Ouellette, “Mammalian defensins in the antimicrobial immune response,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 551–557, 2005.
- R. Gennaro and M. Zanetti, “Structural features and biological activities of the cathelicidin-derived antimicrobial peptides,” Biopolymers, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 31–49, 2000.
- F. Niyonsaba, I. Nagaoka, and H. Ogawa, “Human defensins and cathelicidins in the skin: beyond direct antimicrobial properties,” Critical Reviews in Immunology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 545–576, 2006.
- L. M. Rehaume and R. E. W. Hancock, “Neutrophil-derived defensins as modulators of innate immune function,” Critical Reviews in Immunology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 185–200, 2008.
- J. W. Larrick, M. Hirata, R. F. Balint, J. Lee, J. Zhong, and S. C. Wright, “Human CAP18: a novel antimicrobial lipopolysaccharide-binding protein,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1291–1297, 1995.
- G. H. Gudmundsson, B. Agerberth, J. Odeberg, T. Bergman, B. Olsson, and R. Salcedo, “The human gene FALL39 and processing of the cathelin precursor to the antibacterial peptide LL-37 in granulocytes,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 238, no. 2, pp. 325–332, 1996.
- I. Nagaoka, H. Tamura, and M. Hirata, “An antimicrobial cathelicidin peptide, human CAP18/LL-37, suppresses neutrophil apoptosis via the activation of formyl-peptide receptor-like 1 and P2X7,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 5, pp. 3044–3052, 2006.
- I. Nagaoka, F. Niyonsaba, Y. Tsutsumi-Ishii, H. Tamura, and M. Hirata, “Evaluation of the effect of human β-defensins on neutrophil apoptosis,” International Immunology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 543–553, 2008.
- I. Nagaoka, K. Suzuki, T. Murakami, F. Niyonsaba, H. Tamura, and M. Hirata, “Evaluation of the effect of α-defensin human neutrophil peptides on neutrophil apoptosis,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 925–934, 2010.
- C. Zhao, I. Wang, and R. I. Lehrer, “Widespread expression of β-defensin hBD-1 in human secretory glands and epithelial cells,” FEBS Letters, vol. 396, no. 2-3, pp. 319–322, 1996.
- C. Fulton, G. M. Anderson, M. Zasloff, R. Bull, and A. G. Quinn, “Expression of natural peptide antibiotics in human skin,” The Lancet, vol. 350, no. 9093, pp. 1750–1751, 1997.
- J. Harder, J. Bartels, E. Christophers, and J. M. Schröder, “A peptide antibiotic from human skin,” Nature, vol. 387, no. 6636, article 861, 1997.
- A. Y. Liu, D. Destoumieux, A. V. Wong et al., “Human β-defensin-2 production in keratinocytes is regulated by interleukin-1, bacteria, and the state of differentiation,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 275–281, 2002.
- J. Harder, J. Bartels, E. Christophers, and J. M. Schröder, “Isolation and characterization of human β-defensin-3, a novel human inducible peptide antibiotic,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 8, pp. 5707–5713, 2001.
- J. R. C. García, F. Jaumann, S. Schulz et al., “Identification of a novel, multifunctional β-defensin (human β-defensin 3) with specific antimicrobial activity: its interaction with plasma membranes of Xenopus oocytes and the induction of macrophage chemoattraction,” Cell and Tissue Research, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. 257–264, 2001.
- J. R. García, A. Krause, S. Schulz et al., “Human β-defensin 4: a novel inducible peptide with a specific salt-sensitive spectrum of antimicrobial activity,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1819–1821, 2001.
- J. Harder, U. Meyer-Hoffert, K. Wehkamp, L. Schwichtenberg, and J. M. Schröder, “Differential gene induction of human β-defensins (hBD-1,-2,-3, and -4) in keratinocytes is inhibited by retinoic acid,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 522–529, 2004.
- Y. Yamaguchi, T. Nagase, R. Makita et al., “Identification of multiple novel epididymis-specific β-defensin isoforms in humans and mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 2516–2523, 2002.
- D. Yang, O. Chertov, and J. J. Oppenheim, “Participation of mammalian defensins and cathelicidins in anti-microbial immunity: receptors and activities of human defensins and cathelicidin (LL-37),” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 691–697, 2001.
- M. C. Territo, T. Ganz, M. E. Selsted, and R. Lehrer, “Monocyte-chemotactic activity of defensins from human neutrophils,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 2017–2020, 1989.
- D. Yang, Q. Chen, O. Chertov, and J. J. Oppenheim, “Human neutrophil defensins selectively chemoattract naive T and immature dendritic cells,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2000.
- B. de Yang, Q. Chen, A. P. Schmidt et al., “LL-37, the neutrophil granule- and epithelial cell-derived cathelicidin, utilizes formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1) as a receptor to chemoattract human peripheral blood neutrophils, monocytes, and T cells,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 7, pp. 1069–1074, 2000.
- F. Niyonsaba, H. Ogawa, and I. Nagaoka, “Human β-defensin-2 functions as a chemotactic agent for tumour necrosis factor-α-treated human neutrophils,” Immunology, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 273–281, 2004.
- M. O. Hengartner, “The biochemistry of apoptosis,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6805, pp. 770–776, 2000.
- A. Elssner, M. Duncan, M. Gavrilin, and M. D. Wewers, “A novel P2X7 receptor activator, the human cathelicidin-derived peptide LL37, induces IL-1β processing and release,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 8, pp. 4987–4994, 2004.
- Y. S. Bae, H. Y. Lee, E. J. Jo et al., “Identification of peptides that antagonize formyl peptide receptor-like 1-mediated signaling,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 607–614, 2004.
- R. A. North and A. Surprenant, “Pharmacology of cloned P2X receptors,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 40, pp. 563–580, 2000.
- P. G. Baraldi, F. di Virgilio, and R. Romagnoli, “Agonists and antagonists acting at P2X7 receptor,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 1707–1717, 2004.
- G. H. Fan, L. Z. Wang, H. C. Qiu, L. Ma, and G. Pei, “Inhibition of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II in rat hippocampus attenuates morphine tolerance and dependence,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 1999.
- Y. Le, P. M. Murphy, and J. M. Wang, “Formyl-peptide receptors revisited,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 541–548, 2002.
- A. Cossarizza, M. Baccarani-Contri, G. Kalashnikova, and C. Franceschi, “A new method for the cytofluorimetric analysis of mitochondrial membrane potential using the J-aggregate forming lipophilic cation 5,,6,-tetrachloro-1,,3,-tetraethylbenzimidazolcarbocyanine iodide (JC-1),” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 40–45, 1993.
- A. Zlotnik and O. Yoshie, “Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity,” Immunity, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2000.
- Z. Wu, D. M. Hoover, D. Yang, et al., “Engineering disulfide bridges to dissect antimicrobial and chemotactic activities of human β-defensin 3,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 15, pp. 8880–8885, 2003.
- M. P. Abbracchio, G. Burnstock, J. M. Boeynaems, et al., “International Union of Pharmacology LVIII: update on the P2Y G protein-coupled nucleotide receptors: from molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology to therapy,” Pharmacol Reviews, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 281–341, 2006.
- A. A. Khine, L. del Sorbo, R. Vaschetto et al., “Human neutrophil peptides induce interleukin-8 production through the P2Y6 signaling pathway,” Blood, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 2936–2942, 2006.
- L. K. Mamedova, B. V. Joshi, Z. G. Gao, I. von Kügelgen, and K. A. Jacobson, “Diisothiocyanate derivatives as potent, insurmountable antagonists of P2Y6 nucleotide receptors,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 1763–1770, 2004.
- H. Li, H. Zhu, C. J. Xu, and J. Yuan, “Cleavage of BID by caspase 8 mediates the mitochondrial damage in the Fas pathway of apoptosis,” Cell, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 491–501, 1998.
- B. Lamothe and B. B. Aggarwal, “Ectopic expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl- inhibits apoptosis induced by TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) through suppression of caspases-8, 7, and 3 and BID cleavage in human acute myelogenous leukemia cell line HL-60,” Journal of Interferon and Cytokine Research, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 269–279, 2002.
- B. A. Nolan, A. Duffy, L. Paquin et al., “Mitogen-activated protein kinases signal inhibition of apoptosis in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated neutrophils,” Surgery, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 406–412, 1999.
- K. Matsuzaki, “Why and how are peptide-lipid interactions utilized for self-defense? Magainins and tachyplesins as archetypes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1462, no. 1-2, pp. 1–10, 1999.
- G. H. Gudmundsson and B. Agerberth, “Neutrophil antibacterial peptides, multifunctional effector molecules in the mammalian immune system,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 232, no. 1-2, pp. 45–54, 1999.
- D. M. E. Bowdish, D. J. Davidson, and R. E. W. Hancock, “A re-evaluation of the role of host defence peptides in mammalian immunity,” Current Protein and Peptide Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 35–51, 2005.
- C. I. U. Chen, S. Schaller-Bals, K. P. Paul, U. Wahn, and R. Bals, “β-defensins and LL-37 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with cystic fibrosis,” Journal of Cystic Fibrosis, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2004.
- A. M. Cole, S. Tahk, A. Oren et al., “Determinants of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage,” Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1064–1069, 2001.
- T. Ganz, “Extracellular release of antimicrobial defensins by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 568–571, 1987.
- O. E. Sørensen, P. Follin, A. H. Johnsen et al., “Human cathelicidin, hCAP-18, is processed to the antimicrobial peptide LL-37 by extracellular cleavage with proteinase 3,” Blood, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 3951–3959, 2001.
- K. Theilgaard-Mönch, S. Knudsen, P. Follin, and N. Borregaard, “The transcriptional activation program of human neutrophils in skin lesions supports their important role in wound healing,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 12, pp. 7684–7693, 2004.
- A. Zychlinsky and P. Sansonetti, “Apoptosis in bacterial pathogenesis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 493–496, 1997.