Epicutaneous Immunotherapy Compared with Sublingual Immunotherapy in Mice Sensitized to Pollen (Phleum pratense)

Figure 3

Recruitment of eosinophils in the BAL fluid measured 48 h after the last aerosol challenge. Treatment groups were EPIT (epicutaneous immunotherapy), SLIT (sublingual immunotherapy), sham (sensitized not treated), and C (control, not sensitized and not treated). *𝑃<0.05, **𝑃<0.01, ***𝑃<0.001.