Clinical Study
Shoelace Wound Closure for the Management of Fracture-Related Fasciotomy Wounds
Table 2
Comparison between different wound closure devices.
| Authors | Devices | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| Barnea et al. [4] | Wisebands device | (i) Tension feedback control mechanism to safeguard against excessive skin tensioning | (i) Not readily available | | (ii) Expensive | Hirshowitz et al. [5] | Sure Closure device | (i) Can measure the tension across | (i) Not readily available | the wound edges | (ii) Expensive | Janzing and Broos [6] | Marburger skin approximation system | | (i) Not readily available | (ii) Expensive | Taylor et al. [8] | Skin anchors | (i) Anchors placed 1 cm away from the wound edge to prevent circulatory compromise at the skin edge | (i) Not readily available | (ii) Evenly distributed force over the full length of the wound | (ii) Expensive |
Govaert and van Helden [9] | Ty-Raps | | (i) Not readily available | This study | Paediatric urinary catheters + skin staples | (i) Readily available | (i) Point loading on the staples may lead to their failure | (ii) Inexpensive | (ii) No safe mechanism against excess tension |
|
|