About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN High Energy Physics
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 714823, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/714823
Research Article

Krein Space Quantization of Casimir Effect for a Spherical Shell

1Department of Physics, Payame Noor University, P.O. Box 19395-3697, Tehran, Iran
2Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran 15914, Iran

Received 22 August 2011; Accepted 18 September 2011

Academic Editors: S. Paganis and I. V. Vancea

Copyright © 2012 F. Payandeh. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The Casimir stress on a spherical shell in de Sitter spacetime for a massless scalar field is calculated using Krein space quantization. In this method, the auxiliary negative frequency states have been utilized, the modes of which do not interact with the physical states and are not affected by the physical boundary conditions. These unphysical states just play the role of an automatic renormalization tool for the theory.

1. Introduction

The Casimir effect is a small attractive force acting between two parallel uncharged conducting plates and it is regarded as one of the most striking manifestation of vacuum fluctuations in quantum field theory. It is due to the quantum vacuum fluctuation of the field operator between two parallel plates. In other words, the Casimir effect can be viewed as the polarization of the vacuum by boundary conditions or geometry. The presence of reflecting boundaries alters the zero-point modes of a quantized field and results in the shifts in the vacuum expectation values of quantities quadratic in the field, such as the energy density and stresses.

In particular, vacuum forces arise acting on the constraining boundaries. The particular features of these forces depend on the nature of the quantum field, the type of spacetime manifold and its dimensionality, the boundary geometries, and the specific boundary conditions imposed on the field. Since the original work by Casimir in 1948 [1], many theoretical and experimental works have been done on this problem [214].

The time dependence of boundary conditions or geometries, the so-called dynamical Casimir effect, is also a new element which has to be taken into account. In particular, in [15] the Casimir effect has been calculated for a massless scalar field satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions on the spherical shell in de Sitter space. The Casimir stress is calculated for inside and outside of the shell with different backgrounds corresponding to different cosmological constants.

It should be remarked that the procedures of renormalization and regularization have been applied for eliminating the divergences appeared in physical quantities [1620]. The Casimir effect has been also investigated for two parallel plates in Krein space quantization [21].

The historical background of Krein space quantization goes back to the covariant quantization of minimally coupled scaler field in de Sitter spacetime. It has been shown that the linear quantum gravity in the background field method is perturbatively nonrenormalizable and also there appears an infrared divergence. This infrared divergence does not manifest itself in the quadratic part of the effective action in the one-loop approximation. This means that the pathological behavior of the graviton propagator may be gauge dependent and so should not appear in an effective way as a physical quantity [22]. The infrared divergence which appears in the linear gravity in de Sitter space is the same as the minimally coupled scalar field in de Sitter space [2327]. It is shown that one cannot construct a covariant quantization of the minimally coupled scalar field with only positive norm states [28]. It has been proved that the use of the two sets of solutions (positive and negative norm states) is an unavoidable feature if one wants to preserve causality (locality), covariance, and elimination of the infrared divergence in quantum field theory for the minimally coupled scalar field in de Sitter space [29, 30], that is, Krein space quantization.

The singular behavior of Green’s function at short relative distances (ultraviolet divergence) or in the large relative distances (infrared divergence) leads to main divergences in the quantum field theory. It was conjectured that quantum metric fluctuations might smear out the singularities of Green’s functions on the light cone, but it does not remove other ultraviolet divergences [31]. However, it has been shown that quantization in Krein space removes all ultraviolet divergences of quantum field theory (QFT) except the light cone singularity [32]. By using the Krein space quantization and the quantum metric fluctuations in the linear approximation, it has been showed that the infinities in the Green’s function are disappeared [31, 33].

Quantization in Krein space instead of Hilbert space has some interesting features. For example, in this method, the vacuum energy becomes zero naturally, so the normal ordering would not be necessary [29, 32]. The auxiliary negative norm states, which are used in the Krein space quantization, play the regularization of the theory.

Applying the unphysical negative frequency states and defining the field operator in Krein space, we can calculate the gravitational pressure on a spherical shell yielding the standard result obtained.

2. Scalar Casimir Effect for a Sphere in de Sitter Space

The Casimir force due to fluctuations of a free massless scalar field satisfying Dirichlet boundary conditions on a spherical shell in Minkowski space time has been studied in [34]. Doing the calculations in Krein space, the two-point Green's function 𝐺𝐾(𝑥,𝑡;𝑥,𝑡) is defined as the vacuum expectation value of the time-ordered product of two fields (𝐾 and 𝑇 stand for quantities in Krein space and the time-ordered product, resp.)𝐺𝐾𝑥,𝑡;𝑥,𝑡0||𝑖𝑇Φ𝐾(𝑥,𝑡)Φ𝐾𝑥,𝑡||0Φ,(1)𝐾(𝑥,𝑡)=𝑘𝑎𝑘+𝑏𝑘𝑢𝑝𝑎(𝑘,𝑥)+𝑘+𝑏𝑘𝑢𝑛.(𝑘,𝑥)(2)

The operators 𝑎(𝑘) and 𝑎(𝑘) create and destroy, respectively, the mode 𝑢𝑝(𝑘,𝑥) with positive energy (𝑘0=𝜔𝑘), which may be considered as the operators of creation and annihilation of a particle and the operators 𝑏(𝑘) and 𝑏(𝑘) create and destroy, respectively, the mode 𝑢𝑛(𝑘,𝑥) with negative energy (𝑘0=𝜔𝑘), which may be considered as the operators of creation and annihilation of an “antiparticle” in the inverse time direction. The two sets of modes do not affect each other and in the standard QFT, the negative energy states are eliminated in the quantum field operators, which are the origin of the appearance of divergence. On the contrary, the divergence disappears by taking these states into account.

The two-point Green’s function has to satisfy the Dirichlet boundary conditions on the shell: 𝐺𝐾𝑥,𝑡;𝑥,𝑡|||𝑥|=𝑎=0,(3) where 𝑎 is radius of the spherical shell. The stress-energy tensor in Krein space 𝑇𝐾𝜇𝜈(𝑥,𝑡) is given by𝑇𝐾𝜇𝜈(𝑥,𝑡)𝜕𝜇Φ𝐾(𝑥,𝑡)𝜕𝜈Φ𝐾1(𝑥,𝑡)2𝜂𝜇𝜈𝜕𝜆Φ𝐾(𝑥,𝑡)𝜕𝜆Φ𝐾(𝑥,𝑡).(4)

The radial Casimir force per unit area 𝐹/𝐴 on the sphere, called Casimir stress, is obtained from the radial-radial component of the vacuum expectation value of the stress-energy tensor:𝐹𝐴=0||𝑇𝑟𝑟in𝑇𝑟𝑟out||0||𝑟=𝑎.(5)

Taking into account the relation (1) between the vacuum expectation value of the stress-energy tensor 𝑇𝐾𝜇𝜈(𝑥,𝑡) and the Green's function at equal times 𝐺𝐾(𝑥,𝑡;𝑥,𝑡), we obtain𝐹𝐴=𝑖2𝜕𝜕𝜕𝑟𝜕𝑟𝐺𝐾𝑥,𝑡;𝑥,𝑡in𝜕𝜕𝜕𝑟𝜕𝑟𝐺𝐾𝑥,𝑡;𝑥,𝑡out|||𝑥=𝑥,|𝑥|=𝑎.(6)

One may use of the above flat space calculation in de Sitter space time by taking the de Sitter metric in conformally flat form𝑑𝑠2=Ω(𝜂)𝑑𝜂23𝚤=1(𝑑𝑥𝚤)2,(7) where Ω(𝜂)=𝛼/𝜂 and 𝜂 is the conformal time<𝜂<0.(8)

Assuming a canonical quantization of the scalar field in Krein space, the conformally transformed quantized scalar field in de Sitter spacetime is given byΦ𝐾(𝑥,𝜂)=𝑘𝑎𝑘+𝑏𝑘𝑢𝑘𝑎(𝜂,𝑥)+𝑘+𝑏𝑘𝑢𝑘,(𝜂,𝑥)(9) where 𝑎𝑘 and 𝑎𝑘 are creation and annihilation operators, respectively, and the vacuum states associated with the physical modes 𝑢𝑘 defined by 𝑎𝑘|0=0 are called conformal vacuum. Given the flat space Green's function (1), we obtain𝐺𝐾=𝑖0|||𝑇Φ𝐾(𝑥,𝜂)Φ𝐾𝑥,𝜂|||0=Ω1(𝜂)Ω1𝜂𝐺𝐾,(10) where Φ𝐾(𝑥,𝜂)=Ω1(𝜂)Φ𝐾(𝑥,𝜂) has been used. Therefore, using (5), (6), and (10), we obtain the total stress on the sphere in de Sitter spacetime and using Krein space quantization as𝐹𝐴=𝜂2𝛼2𝐹𝐴,(11) in accordance with the standard result.

3. Spherical Shell with Different Vacua in Krein Space Quantization

We assume different vacua inside and outside, corresponding to different 𝛼in and 𝛼out for the Lorentzian metric (7) and use the following relation for the stress on the shell due to boundary conditions in flat spacetime [8]: 𝐹𝐴=14𝜋𝑎2𝜕𝐸,𝜕𝑎(12) where the Casimir energy 𝐸 is the sum of Casimir energies 𝐸in and 𝐸out for inside and outside of the shell. The corresponding relation in de Sitter spacetime and applying Krein method leads to the following result [15]:𝐹𝐴=14𝜋𝑎2𝜕𝐸=𝜂𝜕𝑎28𝜋𝑎4𝑐1𝛼2in+𝑐2𝛼2out,(13) where we have used the automatically renormalized total zero-point energy in Krein Space𝜂𝐸=2𝑐2𝑎1𝛼2in+𝑐2𝛼2out,(14) in which 𝑐1=0.008873,𝑐2=0.003234.

Now, we obtain the pure effect of vacuum polarization due to the gravitational field without any boundary conditions in Euclidean (outside) region with the following metric:𝑑𝑠2=Ω(𝜂)𝑑𝜂2+3𝚤=1(𝑑𝑥𝚤)2.(15)

To this end, we calculate the automatically renormalized stress tensor in Krein space quantization for the massless scalar field in de Sitter spacetime with Euclidean signature. One may use [2]0||𝑇𝜈𝜇𝑔𝑘𝑙||0||𝐾=̃𝑔𝑔1/20||𝑇𝜈𝜇̃𝑔𝑘𝑙||0||𝐾12880𝜋216(1)𝐻𝜈𝜇(3)𝐻𝜈𝜇,(16) where ̃𝑔𝑘𝑙 is the flat Euclidean metric for which 0|𝑇𝜈𝜇[̃𝑔𝑘𝑙]|0|𝐾=0, and(1)𝐻𝜈𝜇=0,(3)𝐻𝜈𝜇=3𝛼4𝛿𝜈𝜇.(17)

We then obtain0||𝑇𝜈𝜇𝑔𝑘𝑙||0||𝐾=1960𝜋2𝛼4𝛿𝜈𝜇,(18) which is exactly the same result for the Lorentzian case [2]. Therefore, the corresponding effective radial pressures for the Euclidean (outside) and Lorentzian (inside) regions with 𝛼out and 𝛼in, due to pure effect of gravitational vacuum polarization without any boundary condition, are given, respectively, by𝑃𝐸out=0|𝑇𝑟𝑟[𝑔𝑘𝑙||]|0𝐾1=960𝜋2𝛼4out,𝑃𝐿in0||𝑇=𝑟𝑟𝑔𝑘𝑙||0||𝐾1=960𝜋2𝛼4in.(19)

The corresponding gravitational pressure on the spherical shell in Krein space quantization is then given by𝑃𝐺=𝑃𝐿in𝑃𝐸out1=960𝜋21𝛼4in1𝛼4out.(20)

4. Conclusion

The Casimir effect has been studied for spherical bubbles with different vacua inside and outside, corresponding to de Sitter metrics. The metrics inside and outside are taken by Lorentzian and Euclidean, respectively. The case of different vacua in a Lorentzian de Sitter spacetime has already been studied in [15]. In the present work, we have shown that the same results could be attained using Krein space quantization. Presence of the unphysical negative frequency states plays the role of an automatic renormalization tool.

Appendix

In this appendix, we review the elementary facts about Krein space quantization. As we know, the origin of divergences in standard quantum field theory lies in the singularity of the Green's function. The divergence appears in the imaginary part of the Feynman propagator, and the real part is convergent [35]: 𝐺𝑃𝐹𝑥,𝑥1=𝛿𝜎8𝜋0+𝑚2𝜃𝜎8𝜋0𝐽12𝑚2𝜎0𝑖𝑁12𝑚2𝜎02𝑚2𝜎0𝑖𝑚24𝜋2𝜃𝜎0𝐾12𝑚2𝜎02𝑚2𝜎0.(A.1)

Consideration of negative frequency states removes singularity of the Green’s function with exception of delta function singularity:𝐺𝑇𝑥,𝑥1=𝛿𝜎8𝜋0+𝑚2𝜃𝜎8𝜋0𝐽12𝑚2𝜎02𝑚2𝜎0,𝜎00.(A.2)

However, considering the quantum metric fluctuations removes the latter singularity:𝐺𝑇𝑥,𝑥1=8𝜋𝜋2𝜎21𝜎exp202𝜎21+𝑚2𝜃𝜎8𝜋0𝐽12𝑚2𝜎02𝑚2𝜎0,(A.3) where 𝜎21 is related to the density of gravitons. When 𝜎0=0, due to the metric quantum fluctuation 𝜎210, and we have 𝐺𝑇1(0)=8𝜋𝜋2𝜎21+𝑚2.16𝜋(A.4)

By using the Fourier transformation, we obtain [36]𝐺𝑇=𝐺(𝑝)𝑇𝑚(𝑝)+𝑃𝑃2𝑝2𝑝2𝑚2.(A.5)

However, in the one-loop approximation, the contribution of delta function is negligible and the Green’s function in Krein space quantization appearing in the transition amplitude is𝐺𝑇|||(𝑝)one-loop𝐺𝑇||(𝑝)one-loop𝑚𝑃𝑃2𝑝2𝑝2𝑚2.(A.6)

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank M. V. Takook for useful discussions.

References

  1. H. B. G. Casimir, “On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates,” Proceedings of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, vol. 51, pp. 793–795, 1948.
  2. N. D. Birrel and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982.
  3. V. M. Mostepanenko and N. N. Trunov, The Casimir Effect and Its Applications, Clarendon, Oxford, UK, 1997.
  4. G. Plunien, B. Müller, and W. Greiner, “The Casimir effect,” Physics Reports, vol. 134, no. 2-3, pp. 87–193, 1986. View at Scopus
  5. S. K. Lamoreaux, “Resource letter CF-1: Casimir force,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 850–861, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Bordag, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko, “New developments in the Casimir effect,” Physics Report, vol. 353, no. 1-3, pp. 1–205, 2001. View at Scopus
  7. K. Kirsten, Spectral Functions in Mathematics and Physics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2001.
  8. K. A. Milton, L. L. DeRaad, and J. Schwinger, “Casimir self-stress on a perfectly conducting spherical shell,” Annals of Physics, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 388–403, 1978. View at Scopus
  9. M. R. Setare and A. Saharian, “Casimir effect in background of static domain wall,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1463–1469, 2001. View at Scopus
  10. M. R. Setare, “The Casimir effect, Hawking radiation and the trace anomaly,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, no. 11, p. 2097, 2001.
  11. M. R. Setare and R. Mansouri, “Casimir stress on parallel plates in a de Sitter space,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, no. 14, pp. 2659–2663, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. M. R. Setare, “Casimir stress for concentric spheres in de Sitter space,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, no. 22, pp. 4823–4829, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. A. A. Saharian and M. R. Setare, “The Casimir effect on background of conformally flat brane-world geometries,” Physics Letters B, vol. 552, no. 3-4, pp. 119–126, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. A. A. Saharian and M. R. Setare, “Casimir energy-momentum tensor for a brane in de Sitter spacetime,” Physics Letters B, vol. 584, no. 3-4, pp. 306–314, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  15. M. R. Setare and R. Mansouri, “Casimir effect for a spherical shell in de Sitter space,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2331–2338, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  16. F. Payandeh, M. Mehrafarin, S. Rouhani, and M. V. Takook, “Free fields quantization in the “Krein” space,” Ukrainian Journal of Physics, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1202–1207, 2008.
  17. F. Payandeh, “Spinor field in generalized Krein space quantization,” Revista Cubana de Física, vol. 26, no. 2B, pp. 232–237, 2009.
  18. F. Payandeh, M. Mehrafarin, and M. V. Takook, “Field quantization in Krein space,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Particles, Strings and Cosmology (PASCOS '07), vol. 957 of AIP Conference Proceedings, pp. 249–252, July 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Payandeh, “Krein space quantization of linear gravity in de Sitter spacetime and generalization to QFT,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 174, no. 1, Article ID 012056, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. F. Payandeh, M. Mehrafarin, and M. V. Takook, “One-loop approximation of Møller scattering in generalized Krein-space quantization,” Science in China, Series G, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 212–217, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Khosravi, M. Naseri, S. Rouhani, and M. V. Takook, “Casimir effect in Krein space quantization,” Physics Letters B, vol. 640, no. 1-2, pp. 48–51, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. I. Antoniadis, J. Iliopoulos, and T. N. Tomaras, “One-loop effective action around De Sitter space,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 462, no. 2-3, pp. 437–452, 1996. View at Scopus
  23. T. Garidi, J. P. Gazeau, S. Rouhani, and M. V. Takook, ““massless” vector field in de Sitter universe,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 49, no. 3, Article ID 032501, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Garidi, J. P. Gazeau, and M. V. Takook, ““Massive” spin-2 field in de Sitter space,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 3838–3862, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  25. S. Behroozi, S. Rouhani, M. V. Takook, and M. R. Tanhayi, “Conformally invariant wave equations and massless fields in de Sitter spacetime,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 12, Article ID 124014, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  26. M. Dehghani, S. Rouhani, M. V. Takook, and M. R. Tanhayi, “Conformally invariant “massless” spin-2 field in the de Sitter universe,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 6, Article ID 064028, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. M. V. Takook, M. R. Tanhayi, and S. Fatemi, “Conformal linear gravity in de Sitter space,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 51, no. 3, Article ID 032503, 8 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. B. Allen, “Vacuum states in de Sitter space,” Physical Review D, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 3136–3149, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  29. J. P. Gazeau, J. Renaud, and M. V. Takook, “Gupta-Bleuler quantization for minimally coupled scalar fields in de Sitter space,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1415–1434, 2000. View at Scopus
  30. M. V. Takook, “Covariant two-point function for minimally coupled scalar field in de Sitter space-time,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 16, no. 26, pp. 1691–1697, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. L. Ford, “Quantum field theory in curved spacetime,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9707062.
  32. M. V. Takook, “Negative norm states in de Sitter space and QFT without renormalization procedure,” International Journal of Modern Physics E, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 509–518, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Rouhani and M. V. Takook, “A naturally renormalized quantum field theory,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2740–2747, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. M. Bender and K. A. Milton, “Scalar Casimir effect for a D-dimensional sphere,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 6547–6555, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. Payandeh, “Is it possible to find a probable solution for the problem of divergence in QFT?” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 306, no. 1, Article ID 012054, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. A. Refaei and M. V. Takook, “Scalar effective action in Krein space quantization,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2011.