<svg style="vertical-align:-0.26999pt;width:41.362499px;" id="M1" height="21.1875" version="1.1" viewBox="0 0 41.362499 21.1875" width="41.362499" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g transform="matrix(.016,-0,0,-.016,.062,10.025)"><path id="x37" d="M447 623l8 -12l-283 -613l-74 -10l-7 11q174 283 297 551h-216q-48 0 -62.5 -12t-33.5 -63h-29q10 60 18 148h382z" /></g><g transform="matrix(.016,-0,0,-.016,7.594,10.025)"><path id="x33" d="M285 378v-2q65 -13 102 -54.5t37 -97.5q0 -57 -30.5 -104.5t-74 -75t-85.5 -42t-72 -14.5q-31 0 -59.5 11t-40.5 23q-19 18 -16 36q1 16 23 33q13 10 24 0q58 -51 124 -51q55 0 88 40t33 112q0 64 -39 96.5t-88 32.5q-29 0 -64 -11l-6 29q77 25 118 57.5t41 84.5
q0 45 -26.5 69.5t-68.5 24.5q-67 0 -120 -79l-20 20l43 63q51 56 127 56h1q66 0 107 -37t41 -95q0 -42 -31 -71q-22 -23 -68 -54z" /></g><g transform="matrix(.022,-0,0,-.022,15.75,20.788)"><path id="x47" d="M692 302v-28q-45 -6 -54.5 -17t-9.5 -55v-86q0 -62 7 -95q-7 -2 -32 -7.5l-37 -8l-35.5 -7.5t-40.5 -7t-38.5 -4t-40.5 -2q-165 0 -266 93t-101 243q0 84 32 151t86 108t121.5 63t142.5 22q29 0 62.5 -4t52 -7.5t47.5 -10.5t31 -7l15 -156l-28 -6q-17 87 -66.5 121.5
t-128.5 34.5q-117 0 -191 -80.5t-74 -216.5q0 -56 17 -110t49.5 -100.5t87.5 -74.5t124 -28q53 0 87 17q17 9 24.5 23t7.5 43v85q0 54 -15.5 67.5t-89.5 18.5v28h254z" /></g><g transform="matrix(.022,-0,0,-.022,31.778,20.788)"><path id="x65" d="M380 106l15 -22q-42 -52 -87 -74t-76 -22q-89 0 -142 62t-53 151q0 103 66 175q67 73 146 73h1q61 0 105.5 -46.5t44.5 -105.5q0 -16 -4.5 -22.5t-18.5 -9.5q-54 -10 -262 -17q1 -95 46 -143.5t104 -48.5q61 0 115 50zM225 412q-35 0 -64.5 -32.5t-40.5 -90.5q83 0 170 3
q14 0 19 4.5t5 15.5q1 41 -23.5 70.5t-65.5 29.5z" /></g></svg> Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Germanium Compounds

Weinert, Charles S.

doi:https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/718050

International Scholarly Research Notices

On this page

Abstract Introduction References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 | Article ID 718050 | https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/718050

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Germanium Compounds

Charles S. Weinert¹

Academic Editor: J. Spěváček, N. Zanatta

Received05 Aug 2012

Accepted26 Aug 2012

Published14 Nov 2012

Abstract

The field of NMR spectroscopy is reviewed in this paper, from early developments in the 1950s to present day research. Specific attention is paid to recent investigations, including the observation of fluxional behavior of hypervalent germanium species having five or six attached ligands by ⁷³Ge NMR spectroscopy, the spectral properties of linear and branched oligogermanes that contain single germanium-germanium bonds, and the relatively new field of solid-state germanium-73 NMR.

1. Introduction

The use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to characterize and probe the nuclei of the group 14 elements is highly useful, with the notable exception of the central element germanium. Carbon-13 NMR spectroscopy is invaluable for the characterization of organic compounds, and silicon-29 NMR spectroscopy can provide a wealth of structural information for organosilicon compounds [17–20], and allows direct observation of the silicon nucleus itself rather than gaining information regarding the silicon centers indirectly by probing the attached organic substituents. Tin has two NMR-active nuclei, tin-117 and tin-119, which, like carbon-13 and silicon-29, are both spin 1/2 nuclei. These two nuclei have also been extensively used for the characterization of organotin compounds, and ¹¹⁷Sn–¹¹⁹Sn coupling between the two nuclei can also be readily observed [21]. Lead-207 is the only NMR-active nucleus for this element, and it is also spin 1/2 and has been regularly used to characterize organolead compounds [22]. The relevant NMR parameters for the group 14 nuclei are summarized in Table 1.

In terms of germanium, the only NMR-active nucleus this element possesses is ⁷³Ge [23, 24], which has a spin of 9/2 and a relatively large quadrupole moment of −19.6 fm² [25]. This large quadrupole moment leads to the observation of broad lines if the germanium nucleus being observed is not disposed in a symmetric environment. To further complicate matters, the gyromagnetic ratio of all other observable nuclei in group 14 render them sensitive enough to be observed without considerable difficulty. However, the gyromagnetic ratio for the ⁷³Ge nucleus is 0.9332 × 10⁷ rad T⁻¹ s⁻¹ [26–28] which results in an inherent lack of sensitivity despite the fact that the natural abundance of the ⁷³Ge nucleus is 7.7% which is seven times that of ¹³C (1.1%). At a magnetic field strength of 11.74 T, the ⁷³Ge nucleus resonates at 17.44 MHz and therefore requires a dedicated low-band probe for its observation. In fact, the gyromagnetic ratio of the ⁷³Ge nucleus is among the lowest on the periodic table, with those of the nuclei ⁴¹K, ⁵⁷Fe, ¹⁰³Rh, ¹⁸⁷Os, ¹⁹¹Ir, ¹⁹³Ir, and ¹⁹⁷Au being lower [26]. Of these seven nuclei, ¹⁹⁷Au is very difficult to detect and the two isotopes of iridium have not been studied.

The purpose of this paper is to present a summary of the advances in the field of ⁷³Ge NMR spectroscopy, with a specific focus on some recent investigations including the use an applications of ⁷³Ge solid-state NMR spectroscopy. The field was first reviewed in 1978 where chemical shift data for only 20 compounds were collected [27]. Advances in instrumentation and techniques in the late 1970s and early 1980s expanded the field considerably, and two more comprehensive reviews were published in 1987 [29] and in 1988 [23]. A recent comprehensive review was also published in 2005 [24].

2. Observation of the ⁷³Ge Nucleus

As mentioned previously, ⁷³Ge is an extremely challenging nucleus to study, especially when considered relative to the other nuclei of the group 14 elements, and there are two major complications in this regard. First, the low resonance frequency of 17.4 MHz at a field strength of 11.74 T (¹H = 500 MHz) requires that the radiofrequency pulses used to excite the nucleus to be both long and nonhomogeneous, which results in significant acoustic ringing of the probe. Second, the high spin () results in quadrupolar relaxation of the nucleus. Acoustic ringing is most significant during the early portion of the acquisition and thus the most useful part of the FID is complicated by the presence of transient responses in the probe [30]. As a result, baseline distortions will be present especially when spectra are acquired at lower magnetic fields. This can be remedied by using high sample concentrations and is not a significant problem if the signals are sharp. However, broad signals, which are often of significant interest, will often not be resolved due to baseline roll.

Several pulse sequences for the containment of acoustic ringing were developed in the early 1980s that improved the resolution of broad resonances. One of these included implementation of a three-pulse sequence (π/2)-(acquisition/add)-π-τ-(π/2)-(acquisition/subtract) shown in Figure 1 that was applied for the observation of ¹⁷O NMR spectra [31] and is a modification of the inversion-recovery sequence. A second technique was directed at the suppression of the effect of ringing in the spectrum itself and consists of the pulse sequence (delay)-θ°-(acquire/add)-delay-π-τ-θ°-(acquire/subtract), which is known as the ACOUSTIC (Alternate Compound One-eighties Used to Suppress Transients In the Coil) technique and also was investigated with respect to the acquisition of ¹⁷O NMR spectra [32]. It was shown in 1984 that proton polarization transfer using INEPT could be applied to the ⁷³Ge nucleus, and significant signal enhancements were shown in the spectra of the germanes GeH₄, GeMe₄, GeEt₄, MeGeH₃ and the digermane Ge₂H₆ [33]. The RIDE (RIng down DElay) sequence was also reported (Figure 2) to suppress acoustic ringing during the acquisition of ³³S NMR spectra [34], and the use of composite pulses [35] increases the size of the spectral window in which the RIDE sequence can be applied for observation of the ⁷³Ge nucleus and results in suppression of the acoustic ringing to a significant extent such that very weak and broad signals could be observed [36]. The EXSPEC (EXtended SPin ECho) sequence [37] also allows for very good signal enhancement and is a combination of RIDE and PHASE (PHase Alternated Spin Echo) (Figure 2), and representative spectra showing the application of these techniques to the ⁷³Ge NMR spectrum of Ph₃GeEt are shown in Figure 3.

Successful acquisition of ⁷³Ge NMR spectra has also resulted from the use of the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) sequence [38, 39]. This involves a modification of Hahn’s spin-echo method [40] where a combination of 90- and 180-degree pulses is used with varying intensity and duration. The radiofrequency pulses are kept coherent and a 90-degree phase shift is incorporated into the first pulse.

3. Early Developments in ⁷³Ge NMR Spectroscopy

Initial NMR investigations on the ⁷³Ge nucleus were reported in 1953 and involved measuring its magnetic moment, which was found to be − μ without diamagnetic correction for pure GeCl₄ [41]. This was later reevaluated to be − μ in 1967, where the Larmor frequency was also determined to be 2.68 MHz in a magnetic field with a strength of 1.80 T [42]. Two values for the coupling constant for GeMe₄ were reported in 1963 to be Hz [43] and 2.94 Hz [44]. One-bond germanium-fluorine coupling constant data was reported in 1964 for GeF₄ to be = 178.5 Hz [45], while the coupling constant for GeH₄ was determined in two separate studies to be Hz [46] or 97.6 Hz [47].

In 1973, the first reports of chemical shift values for the three germanium halides GeX₄ (X = Cl, Br, I) as well as all twelve permutations of the mixed halide species were reported [1]. These values are collected in Table 2. As expected, the shielding of the ⁷³Ge nucleus increases in the halogenated compounds GeX₄ in the order Cl < Br < I, such that the chemical shift of the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance for these species shifts upfield as the electronegativity of the halogen decreases. The chemical shifts of the fifteen halogermanes tabulated in Table 2 do not show a linear relationship in their chemical shift values, but rather exhibit a second-order dependence that arises from the change that one substituent exerts on the wavefunctions of all of the other substituents present.

4. Correlation of ⁷³Ge NMR Spectra with Other Group 14 Nuclei and Applications to the Conformational Analysis of Organogermanes

The effects on the ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shifts resulting from interchanging relatively neutral substituents are generally predictable, as illustrated by the data collected in Table 3. In the series of methylgermanes Me_xGeH_4−x, there is a progressive upfield shift of the ⁷³Ge chemical shift as hydrogen atoms are substituted for methyl group, which is observed over a range of approximately 300 ppm [2]. The same pattern is observed in the series of ethylgermanes Et_xGeH_4−x, [2] but the chemical shifts for this series of compounds are shifted further downfield than the corresponding chemical shifts for the methyl series which might be expected to result from the enhanced shielding effects of the ethyl substituents resulting from their being more inductively electron donating.

However, when comparing the ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shifts of the tetraalkyl substituted germanes GeR₄, very little difference in the chemical shifts of the single resonances for these species was observed, with the exception of GeEt₄ [2]. The chemical shift for this species is anomalously shifted downfield and was observed at δ 17.8 ppm. A similar anomaly was observed for the corresponding silicon compounds in their ²⁹Si NMR data [57]. The ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shifts for the three species , , and are all very close to δ 6.0 ppm, despite the increase in the inductive donating properties of the alkyl groups. Similar to the alkyl-substituted germanes, the series of phenyl-substituted species Ph_xGeH_4−x also exhibit a progressive upfield shift in their ⁷³Ge NMR resonances [3, 4]. However, the deshielding effects of the phenyl substituents, versus their alkyl counterparts, result in a net upfield shift of the chemical shifts of the Ph_xGeH_4−x germanes versus those of the alkyl-substituted R_xGeH_4−x compounds.

The quadrupolar coupling constants of six symmetric tetra substituted germanes were measured in solution by obtaining their spin-lattice relaxation times () and their reorientation correlation times () [58]. The quadrupolar coupling constant can be obtained from these values using the following equation (in the extreme-narrowing limit): The quadrupolar coupling constants for GeMe₄, GeEt₄, , , GeCl₄, and GeBr₄ were determined to be 1.51, 0.97, 1.00, 0.72, 1.45, and 1.25 MHz, respectively.

Several studies have been directed at the correlation of ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shifts with those of the other group 14 elements, specifically ²⁹Si and ¹¹⁹Sn, and several correlation equations have been developed. The comparison of NMR data for 29 pairs of analogous silicon and germanium compounds and 26 pairs of analogous germanium and tin compounds was reported in 1984 [59], and two correlation equations were derived are shown as follows: Takeuchi et al. published a series of thirteen papers in the 1980s that focused on the ⁷³Ge NMR of numerous germanes and correlated their spectral data with those of the analogous silicon and tin compounds [48–50, 60–69]. Molecular mechanics calculations were also used to further explain the experimental data.

One such study that was reported in 1984 [60] involved the acquisition of ⁷³Ge NMR data for six symmetrically substituted germanes, including GeMe₄, GeEt₄, GePh₄, and Ge(2-furyl)₄. The chemical shifts of these species were found to be related to their silicon analogs according to The ⁷³Ge NMR spectra of Ge(2-thienyl)₄ and GeCl₄ were also recorded which exhibited peaks at δ −95.5 and 30.9 ppm (resp.). The linewidths for these six symmetrical compounds were all sharp, ranging from 1.2 to 11 Hz. The ⁷³Ge spin-lattice relaxation times () for these six species were also determined and were the first unambiguous determination that the ⁷³Ge nucleus relaxes via a quadrupolar mechanism [60]. The spin-spin relaxation times () of these compounds as well as the symmetrical germanes GeR₄ (R = Me, Et, Prⁿ, and Buⁿ) were also subsequently measured, and it was found that the unsymmetrical methylgermacyclohexanes exhibited shorter and values than the alkylgermanes [63]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that both of these values also decrease as the molecular radius becomes larger [63]. The spectrum of the unsymmetrical compound Me₃GeCH₂CH₂COOH was also acquired, and this compound exhibited a resonance at δ 6.3 ppm with a value of 54 Hz, where the line broadening is result of the perturbation of the electric field gradient at the germanium center [60].

It was also shown that ⁷³Ge NMR, when combined with ¹³C NMR, could be used to determine the conformation of organogermanium compounds [48]. The ⁷³Ge NMR spectrum of 1,4-dimethylgermacyclohexane exhibited two resonances at δ −61.5 and −73.4 ppm, where the resonance at δ −61.5 ppm is assigned to the trans-isomer while the other resonance corresponds to the cis-isomer (Scheme 1). The signal at δ −73.4 ppm is also more intense which correlates with the observation that the cis-isomer is the more abundant conformation. Six other methyl-substituted germacyclohexanes were also characterized, as well as the parent unsubstituted germacyclohexane, and it was determined that the exchange of one hydrogen bound to germanium in germacyclohexane with a methyl group in 1-methyl-1-germacyclohexane not only shifts the ⁷³Ge resonance downfield but reduces the coupling constant [48]. Molecular mechanics calculations combined with ⁷³Ge and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy also indicted that 1-methyl-1-germacyclohexane slightly prefers the axial conformer (Scheme 1) versus the equatorial isomer [62].

Further investigations also indicated that ⁷³Ge NMR resonances appear upfield for germanium atoms incorporated into germacyclohexanes that bear an axial methyl-substituent in the 3-position [64]. Eight different germacyclohexanes having a tert-butyl group bound to germanium that also had methyl groups at various positions around the GeC₅ ring were also characterized in this fashion, and it was ascertained that an upfield shift in the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance for these compounds also resulted when the tert-butyl group was in the axial, versus equatorial, position [67]. However, the lines in the tert-butyl-substituted compounds were broadened such that features for those species having different cis- and trans-isomers could not be resolved, which was attributed to the increased molecular masses of these compounds combined with the increase in asymmetry of the electric field gradient at germanium. Similarly, the lines in a series of seven 1-phenylgermacyclohexanes were broadened to the extent that they could not be observed and did not permit resolution of the different signals arising from the cis- and trans-isomers [66].

A series of 1-germacyclopentanes was also synthesized and characterized by ⁷³Ge and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and MDNO calculations [68]. These species show similar effects of methyl substitution at germanium in their ⁷³Ge NMR spectra as found for the methylgermacyclohexanes, in that there is a downfield shift in the resonance upon exchanging a hydrogen atom for a methyl group. Also of interest is that the chemical shift difference between 1,1-dimethylgermacyclopentane and 1,1-dimethylgermacyclohexane is very nearly related to the difference between those of their respective silicon analogues [70].

The ⁷³Ge NMR spectra for several macrocyclic digerma- and tetragermacycloalkanes were also determined (Scheme 2 and Table 12) [49]. The large size of some of these systems suggested that observation of ⁷³Ge NMR signals might prove difficult, as the signal generally becomes broadened as the molecular mass of the compounds increases. However, ⁷³Ge NMR signals for all compounds except the twelve-membered digermacycloalkane were observed. The chemical shift range for all nine compounds that were observed is only 5.0 ppm and there is no apparent correlation between chemical shift and ring size.

Although the ring size has little influence on the ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shift in the aforementioned macrocyclic species, this is not true in systems having smaller rings, where the ring size has a pronounced effect on the ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shift, as indicated by 1,1-dimethyl-1-germacyclopent-3-ene [71] and 1,1-dimethylgermacyclohexane [48] that differ in chemical shift by over 50 ppm. Germanium-73 chemical shift values also appear to reflect the two possible conformations (boat or chair) in 3-germabicylco[3.1.0]hexanes (Scheme 3 and Table 13) [50]. Considering the progression of chemical shifts of 3,3-dimethyl-3-germabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane (1), 3,3-diethyl-3-germabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane (2), and 3,3-diethyl-1-methyl-3-germabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane (3) relative to that of 1,1-dimethylgermacyclopentane, which has a ⁷³Ge NMR resonance at δ 40 ppm, it was suggested that all three of these compounds had the boat conformation, while the remaining species 3,3-diethyl-1,5-dimethyl-3-germabicyclo[3.1.0]hexane (4) has a chair conformation since the chemical shift of this compound is at higher field than those of compounds 1–3.

The tetraalkoxygermanes Ge(OR)₄ (R = Me, Et, Prⁿ, Prⁱ, Buⁿ, Buⁱ, and Bu^s) were characterized by ⁷³Ge NMR spectroscopy in 1986 [5]. The chemical shifts for these species are summarized in Table 4 and range from δ −37.8 to −47.5 ppm. A progressive upfield shift is observed for these compounds as the organic substituent becomes more and more inductively donating, except for the sec-butyoxy derivative which does not follow this trend. The electron donating ability of an alkyl group can be loosely quantified by the term σ_I [6], and values for these parameters are shown in Table 4. When compared to their silicon analogues, there is a linear relationship between the ²⁹Si [72] and ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shifts of the group 14 element center that follows It was also noted that the ⁷³Ge NMR signals are more sensitive to changes in the structure of the organic group than the ²⁹Si NMR signals of their lighter congeners [72].

The ⁷³Ge NMR spectra of four methylvinylgermanes were reported in 1989 that have the general formula Ge(CH=CH₂)_n [65]. The chemical shifts for these species, relative to Me₄Ge at δ 0.00 ppm, are δ −15.82 (), −30.61 (), −44.98 (), and −58.73 ppm (). There is therefore a progressive upfield shift in the ⁷³Ge NMR signal over a range of δ 43.1 ppm for these species as methyl groups are exchanged for vinyl groups. Calculations (MDNO) on these molecules indicated that the electron density at the germanium atoms decreased as the number of attached vinyl substituents increased, but an upfield shift in the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance was observed nonetheless, indicating that there is not a correlation between the electron density at germanium and the chemical shift of the ⁷³Ge nucleus in these species. The same trend was observed for the related silicon compounds Si(CH=CH₂)_n although the chemical shift range in the ²⁹Si NMR spectra of these species was only δ 19.6 ppm [73]. The chemical shifts of the germanium containing species can be correlated to those of their silicon analogues according to The series of methylethynylgermanes Ge(CCH)_n were characterized by ⁷³Ge NMR spectroscopy as well, and a progressive upfield shift of the resonance with increasing numbers of ethynyl substituents was also observed [74]. The chemical shift range in this case was 173 ppm, with peaks for the four species being observed at δ −34 (), −77 (), −118 (), and −173 () ppm. A nearly identical pattern was observed for the tin analogues of these species in their ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectra [74].

Similarly, the three series of compounds shown in Scheme 4 were investigated using ⁷³Ge NMR spectroscopy [51]. The chemical shift range for the 2-furyl series ranges from δ −22.1 to −115.0 ppm and exhibited a progressive upfield shift of the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance as methyl groups were substituted by 2-furyl groups. The related 2-thienyl series exhibited a similar upfield shift in the chemical shifts of these species, but the range of δ −10.1 to −56.5 ppm was less than that for the 2-furyl series. A nearly identical pattern to the 2-furyl series was observed for the 2-(4,5-dihydrofuryl) series with a chemical shift range of δ −22.5 to −119.1 ppm. These trends are similar to those observed for the aforementioned vinyl series Ge(CH=CH₂)_n, and the same upfield progressions were reported for the analogous silicon- and tin-containing 2-furyl [75] and 2-thienyl [76] compounds as well as the analogous 2-(4,5-dihydrofuryl)silanes [77]. Combining these data with the previously described studies of methylvinylgermanes allows a correlation of ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shifts with those of the ²⁹Si and ¹¹⁹Sn nuclei according to the following equations (resp.) [51]:

5. Effects of Hyperconjugation on the ⁷³Ge NMR Spectra of Germanes

The presence of hypervalency has a dramatic effect on the chemical shift of the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance. In the case of hexacoordinate compounds GeL₆, which include the bidentate ligands 2,2′-bipyridine or 1,10-phenanthroline in six of the seven examples shown, resonances were observed between δ −319.4 and −442.5 ppm (Table 5) [7]. The addition of 2,2′-bipyridine to GeCl₄ yields (bipy)GeCl₄, and this species exhibits a ⁷³Ge NMR resonance at δ −313.7 ppm that is shifted far upfield from that observed for GeCl₄ itself at δ 30.9 ppm [78]. As successive chloride ligands are replaced by thiocyanate ligands in the (bipy)Ge(NCS)_n derivatives, a progressive upfield shift of the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance was observed. The trend is this case can be explained by the lower electronegativity of the ⁻NCS ligand versus that of Cl⁻, which leads to increased electron density at germanium and therefore a higher shielding of the ⁷³Ge nucleus. The chemical shift of the [Ge(NCS)₆]²⁻ anion lies very far upfield at δ −442.5 ppm [7, 79], which contrasts strongly with the chemical shifts observed for the tetracoordinate Ge(NCO)₄ at δ −88.9 ppm and the amide compounds Ge(NR₂)₄ (R₂ = Me₂, Et₂, Pr₂, or HPr) that range from δ 22.0 to 55.8 ppm [79].

Similar to the exchange study of the germanium halides GeX₄ [1], GeCl₄ was combined with different stoichiometric ratios of KSCN in acetone and the ⁷³Ge and ¹⁴N NMR spectra were recorded of the resulting mixed chloride/thiocyanate species formed in solution [80]. In addition to [Ge(NCS)₆]^2-, the formation of hexacoordinate species [GeCl₂(NCS)₄]²⁻ was detected as evidenced by the observation of an upfield feature at δ −434.8 ppm. Three different resonances for the tetracoordinate species GeCl_x were observed at δ 25.0, 20.0, and 14.0 as the ratio of GeCl₄ to KSCN was varied from 2 : 1 to equimolar to 1 : 2, but individual features could not be resolved. The upfield progression of this peak as the stoichiometric amount of KSCN was increased suggested that more chloride ligands are being replaced by thiocyanate ligands in the tetracoordinate species. Curiously, the formation of the heptacoordinate species [Ge(NCS)₇]³⁻ was postulated to have occurred when the ratio of GeCl₄ to KSCN was 1 : 10, as a signal in the ¹⁴N NMR spectrum at δ −201.5 ppm was observed. However, no feature in the ⁷³Ge NMR spectrum of this mixture was reported.

The linewidth at half-height () has been shown to vary with the presence or absence of hypercoordination in germanes. For example, the species shown in Scheme 5 are expected to contain a hypervalent germanium center resulting from the attachment of the oxygen atom of the organic side chain. The values for 5 and 6 are 370 and 580 Hz, respectively [3], indicating that the hypercoordinative interaction in 6 is stronger than that in 5. Compound 6, which contains a longer side chain than 5, allows the formation of a five-membered ring in the six-coordinate compound, whereas in 5 only a four-membered ring would be possible.

The breadth of the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance is therefore correlated to the strength of the interaction. For example, the two compounds shown in Scheme 6 exhibit values of 30 and 165 Hz for 7 and 8, respectively [52]. In this case, nitrogen is a stronger donor than oxygen and the corresponding linewidth of the germane 8 is larger than that observed for 7 which contains only oxygen atoms as potential donors. Similarly, in the triaryl-substituted germanes 9–11 (Scheme 7), the strength of the donor interaction is expected to decrease with the identity of the donor atom in the order N > O > S [53], and the order of values of these compounds follows the expected trend, measuring 900 Hz (9), 350 Hz (10), and 270 Hz (11). In addition, the steric bulk of the substituent in the oxygen substituted species has little effect on the observed values in these compounds, as the values for 9, 12, and 13 are all 350 Hz [53].

The ⁷³Ge NMR spectra of a series of oxygen- and sulfur-substituted germanes having tetrahedral molecular symmetry were acquired in order to investigate the effects of ligand structure on the chemical shift and lineshape of the ⁷³Ge resonances [8]. These data are collected in Table 6. Germanes having tetrahedral symmetry at germanium typically exhibit sharp lines that are easy to observe, but a loss of tetrahedral symmetry at germanium can result in significant broadening of the signal, even to the extent that no resonance is observed. In the data for compounds 14–24, no resonances were observed for the two species 14 and 15 and it was assumed that some, but not all four, nitrogen atoms of the pendant –NMe₂ groups coordinate to the central germanium atom, resulting in a distortion of the tetrahedral symmetry and therefore loss of the ⁷³Ge NMR signal. Compounds 16 and 17 do have an observable resonances at δ −45 and −44 ppm (resp.) that are significantly broadened with values of 103 and 101 Hz (resp.). The fact that 16 and 17 have observable ⁷³Ge NMR signals, while 14 and 15 do not, can be attributed to the fact that the longer alkyl groups separating the germanium-bound oxygen atoms in the former two compounds from the terminal –NMe₂ groups do not allow the –NMe₂ groups to approach the central germanium atom as closely as is possible in 14 and 15, preserving the tetrahedral symmetry.

The identity of the terminal basic site, as well as that of the atom directly bound to germanium, also has observable effects on the ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shifts for the germanium atoms in these species. The values for the alkoxy-terminated compounds 19 and 20 are diminished relative to the amine-terminated species 14–17 since oxygen is a less basic, and therefore weaker coordinating, atom than nitrogen. No resonance was observed for Ge[O(CH₂)₂NMe₂] (15) but a signal at δ 141 ppm for its sulfur-substituted analogue Ge[S(CH₂)₂NMe₂] (24) was observed with a value of 79 Hz. This is due to the fact that the sulfur atoms in 24 that are bound to germanium render the germanium atom less electron deficient than the more electronegative oxygen atoms in 15, such that hyperconjugation involving the terminal –NMe₂ groups in 24 is not as significant as that in 15. These findings indicate that weak hyperconjugative interactions at the germanium center can result in broadening of the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance. However, these interactions are not sufficient enough to cause significant downfield shifting of the resonances as was observed for the hexacoordinate bipyridine germanes described in Table 5 [7]. Therefore, hyperconjugation in these molecules results in disruption of the tetrahedral symmetry at germanium which in turn broadens the resonances for the germanium atom. This occurs before the coordination of the pendant ligand atoms can become sufficient enough to shift the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance downfield.

Similarly, the ⁷³Ge NMR spectra for series of aryl-substituted germanes were obtained to investigate the effects of hyperconjugation in these systems, and the data are collected in Table 7 [9]. These findings indicate that the amount of hyperconjugation occurring in this series of compounds is not as significant as in the alkoxy and thioalkoxy species 14–24. The ortho-alkoxy derivatives Ge(C₆H₄-o-Me)₄ and Ge(C₆H₄-o-Et)₄ exhibit upfield chemical shifts and broader resonances than the other compounds listed in Table 7 which is attributed to the interaction of the oxygen atoms of the ortho-substituents with the central germanium atom.

6. One-Bond Coupling of Germanium to Hydrogen in ⁷³Ge NMR Spectra

As mentioned above, the ¹J value for GeH₄ was determined to be [46] or 97.6 Hz [47]. In 1987, coupling constant data for thirteen additional compounds were reported and these data are collected in Table 8 [2]. The higher ¹J coupling constant for GeH₄ was also confirmed as this species was reported to have a one-bond coupling constant of Hz. The ¹J coupling constants reported by Wilkins et al. [2] range from to Hz. In comparing the series of methylgermanes Me_xGeH_4−x and ethylgermanes Et_xGeH_4−x, it was observed that the magnitude of the coupling constant increases as the number of hydrogen atoms increases that is a result of the increasing amount of s-character present in the Ge–H bonds. This study also represents the first dissemination of coupling constant data for oligogermanium compounds, which are catenated species that in this case have single Ge–Ge bonds. In comparing the series of parent oligogermanes Ge_nH_2n+2, the coupling constants become successively smaller as the degree of catenation increases.

The coupling constants for seven different arylgermanes were reported in 1999 and are collected in Table 8, and the ⁷³Ge NMR spectra of PhGeH₃, Ph₂GeH₂, Ph₃GeH, and MesGeH₃ (Mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl) are shown in Figure 4 [4]. The chemical shifts for these species show the expected trend, in that as hydrogen atoms are exchanged for aryl groups in the general formula Ar_xGeH_4−x the resonances for these species shift progressively upfield (Table 3). The ⁷³Ge NMR spectra of each of these species, with the exception of (p-MeOC₆H₄)₂GeH₂ that was observed as a single line, show the appropriate number of lines, as resonances for the ArGeH₃ compounds were all observed as quartets, that for Ph₂GeH₂ was observed as a triplet, and that for Ph₃GeH was found to be a doublet. The coupling constants in these species all fall into the range of ca. 85–100 Hz found for the simple germanes mentioned above.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

7. ⁷³Ge NMR Spectra of Oligogermanes

As part of our extensive investigations on the chemistry of discrete oligogermanes [13–15, 81–89], we recently reported an investigation of the ⁷³Ge NMR spectra of several oligogermanes [13], which furthers the studies conducted by Wilkins et al. [2] and Thomson et al. [11]. The data from these three studies are shown in Table 9. In all cases it has been determined that the presence of hydrogen attached to a germanium center results in a significant upfield shift of the resonances for these compounds.

The parent germanes Ge_nH_2n+2 (25–27) exhibit resonances with chemical shifts ranging from δ −284 to −312 ppm [2], where resonances for the terminal –GeH₃ germanium atoms appear downfield from those of the internal –GeH₂- atoms. For the mixed methyl/hydrogen-substituted oligogermanes 28–32, resonances for germanium atoms bearing methyl substituents appear downfield from those having only hydrogen atoms bound to germanium [2]. For example, in MeH₂GeGeH₃ (28) the resonance for the –GeH₃ atom appears at δ −306 ppm while that for the –GeH₂Me atom was observed at δ −210 ppm. In the more highly methyl substituted oligogermane Me₂HGeGeH₃ (30) the resonance for the –GeHMe₂ atom appears at δ −127 ppm and in Me₃GeGeH₃ (31) the resonance for the –GeMe₃ atom appears at δ −48 ppm [2]. Only one resonance was observed in the ⁷³Ge NMR spectrum of Me₂ClGeGeH₃ (33) at δ −281 ppm arising from the –GeH₃ atom [11]. No resonance was observed for the –GeMe₂Cl atom due to the presence of the single chlorine atom that results in excessive broadening of the signal for the germanium atom to which it is attached.

The presence of aryl substituents in place of alkyl substituents also affects an upfield shift of the ⁷³Ge NMR resonance, albeit to a significantly lesser extent than what is observed for hydrogen substituents. The single resonance for the permethyl- and perethyl-substituted digermanes Ge₂Me₆ (34) [11] and Ge₂Et₆ (35) [12] was observed at δ −59 and −35 ppm (resp.) while that for Ge₂Ph₆ (36) [11] was observed upfield at δ −67 ppm. This was also observed in several oligogermanes of the general formula R₃GeGePh₃ (37–42) [13]. In cases where a resonance was observed for both the phenyl-substituted germanium –GePh₃ and the alkyl-substituted germanium –GeR₃, the resonance for the –GePh₃ group was consistently observed upfield from that of the –GeR₃ group. This can be seen in the two compounds GeGePh₃ (38) and GeGePh₃ (39) where the resonance for the phenyl-substituted germanium atom both appeared at δ −65 ppm while those for the alkyl-substituted atom were observed at δ −56 and −58 ppm (resp.).

A resonance for the alkyl-substituted germanium atom in Et₃GeGePh₃ (37) and PhMe₂GeGePh₃ (41) was not observed [13]. In the case of 37, it is unclear why this was so, but it can be argued in 41 the different electronic nature of the single phenyl and two methyl substituents bound to germanium result in a significant enough distortion of the electric field gradient to affect rapid quadrupolar relaxation resulting in a broad, unobservable resonance. These effects are subtle, however, as shown by CH₂CH₂OEt (42) that contains two n-butyl substituents and an ethoxyethyl group as ligands at the –GeR₃ atom [13]. Two resonances were observed for 42 at δ −57 and −64 ppm corresponding, respectively, to the alkyl- and phenyl-substituted germanium atoms. Here, the electronic nature of the n-butyl and ethoxyethyl groups is relatively similar, at least in the proximity of the germanium atom, and therefore it is likely that the electronic field gradient at germanium in this case is symmetric enough to allow observation of a resonance. Curiously, we have found no evidence for hypercoordination in 42 or in its related long-chain analogues (vide infra), despite the fact that the oxygen atom of the –CH₂CH₂OEt substituent could coordinate to the germanium atom to form a germaoxacyclobutane (Scheme 8).

Prior to our investigations, the only linear oligogermanes having more than two catenated germanium atoms in the chain to be investigated by ⁷³Ge NMR spectroscopy were Ge₃H₈ (26), Ge₄H₁₀ (27), and MeH₂GeGe(MeH)GeH₂Me (32) [2], and we have obtained ⁷³Ge NMR spectra for four additional linear oligogermanes [13] as well as six branched oligogermanes [13–15, 88]. Data for the linear oligogermanes 43–46 are collected in Table 9. Two resonances, instead of the expected three, were observed for the trigermanes 43 and 44 [13]. Based on the chemical shifts of these peaks, these are assigned to the two terminal germanium atoms since a resonance for the central –– atom in 43 and 44 would be expected to appear between δ −110 to −125 ppm. Specifically, the features at δ −63 (43) and −65 (44) ppm are due to the terminal –GePh₃ atom, while those at δ −57 (43) and −54 (44) ppm are assigned to the –GeR₂L atom. For the trigermanes 45 and 46, resonances for only the central germanium atoms were observed at δ −111 (45) and −121 (46) ppm [13]. These data suggest that the central germanium atoms in 45 and 46 have a symmetric electronic environment at germanium, as they each have a ligand set consisting of two phenyl substituents and two –GeR₂L groups. However, the different germyl substituents attached to the central germanium atoms in 43 and 44 appear to render the electronic environment at the central germanium atom significantly unsymmetrical to broaden the resonances for these atoms.

The ⁷³Ge NMR spectra of the branched oligogermanes PhGe(GeR₃)₃ (47: R = Buⁿ; 48: R = Ph) [13], HGe(GePh₃)₃ (49) [14, 88], Ge(GeMe₃)₄ (50) [15], PhGe(CH₂CH₂OEt)₃ (51) [13], and PhGe(CH₂CH₂OEt)₃ (52) [13] have been reported, and these data are collected in Table 10. In these compounds, the central germanium atom is formally germanium(I) with the exception of 50, where it is formally germanium(0). Therefore, resonances corresponding to these Ge atoms are expected to appear upfield from those for the internal germanium atoms of linear tri- and higher oligogermanes. The ⁷³Ge NMR for 49 was reported in 1999, where the resonance for the central germanium atom appeared as a singlet at δ −314 ppm and a feature for the three peripheral germanium atoms was not observed [11]. The resonance in this case was broad, with a half-height linewidth of 200 Hz.

We acquired the proton-decoupled ⁷³Ge NMR spectrum of 49 that contained a doublet centered at δ −311 ppm with a ¹J coupling constant of 191 Hz [14]. A second resonance at δ −56 ppm ( = 35 Hz) was also observed for the peripheral –GePh₃ atoms. The doublet at δ −311 ppm converges a broad singlet with a value of 210 Hz when the proton-coupled ⁷³Ge NMR spectrum was acquired. The coupling constant observed for 49 is on the order of twice that observed for all other compounds (vide supra) including those for linear oligogermanes. To our knowledge no other coupling constant data for branched compounds like 50 has been reported, and therefore the presence of branching at the central germanium atom in 50 might be due to the larger coupling constant observed for this species relative to other systems.

The resonance for the central germanium atom in 49 is significantly shifted upfield by over 100 ppm relative to that in the related systems 47 and 48 that were observed at δ −195 and −202 ppm (resp.) [13]. The upfield shift observed for the central germanium atom of 49 is similar to data reported for linear oligogermanes. As mentioned above, the resonance for the hydrogen-substituted germanium atom in MeH₂GeGeH₂Me (29) is shifted upfield from that in Ge₂Me₆ (34) by 150 ppm [2]. A sharp resonance for the central germanium atom in Ge(GeMe₃)₄ (50) was observed at δ −339 ppm with a value of 9 Hz [15]. The sharpness of this resonance can be attributed to the highly symmetric geometric environment at the central germanium atom, which is expected to closely approach the ideal tetrahedral environment in solution. This is not true for 48 [86], for which the X-ray crystal structures have been determined, and likely would not be the case for the n-butyl-substituted compound 47 that has not been crystallographically characterized. Compounds 47 and 48 have values of 240 and 290 Hz (resp.) for the resonances corresponding to their central germanium atoms [13].

8. Solid-State ⁷³Ge NMR Spectroscopy (⁷³Ge SSNMR Spectroscopy)

The difficulties encountered in solution ⁷³Ge NMR spectroscopy stemming from the low gyromagnetic ratio and large quadrupole moment of the ⁷³Ge nucleus are expected to be compounded in solid-state ⁷³Ge NMR (⁷³Ge SSNMR) spectroscopy. As a result, the first report of a solid-state magic angle spinning (MAS) ⁷³Ge NMR investigation did not appear until 2000 [90], where the two organogermanes Ph₄Ge and (PhCH₂)₄Ge were investigated due to their high symmetry in their X-ray crystal structures [91, 92]. The proton-decoupled MAS spectrum of Ph₄Ge exhibited a single resonance at δ −31.0 ppm with a value of 40 Hz, while the proton-coupled spectrum contained a single resonance also at δ −31.0 ppm that was slightly broader ( = 49 Hz). This is shifted slightly from the solution state chemical shift of δ −33.2 ppm and is expectedly broader than the resonance observed solution ( = 5.9 Hz) [2, 60]. For (PhCH₂)₄Ge, the chemical shift was observed at δ 0.14 ppm ( = 350 Hz) in the proton-decoupled MAS ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectrum, where the chemical shift value is again similar to the solution state value of δ 0.04 ppm. It was postulated that the resonance in the ⁷³Ge SSNMR for (PhCH₂)₄Ge is significantly broadened compared to Ph₄Ge since the latter species has idealized symmetry ( point group symmetry) and thus has only one crystallographically unique phenyl ring [91] in the crystalline state while then benzyl derivative does not [92].

The spin-lattice relaxation times () of Ph₄Ge and (p-C₆H₅C₆H₄)₄Ge in the solid state were also determined [93]. Obtaining a value for (PhCH₂)₄Ge was precluded due to its large value. The value for Ph₄Ge, obtained by the inversion-recovery method, was found to be 2.6 s, which is significantly longer than the solution phase of 0.42 s. The for (p-PhC₆H₄)₄Ge was determined to be 1.2 s. The value for powdered germanium was also measured to be 10.6 s with MAS [93] which was similar to the previously reported value of 11.0–12.4 s that was obtained without MAS [94]. The use of MAS also results in a sharper resonance for powdered germanium of = 18 Hz versus = 60 Hz that was obtained without MAS. The value with MAS for germanium powder also was found to increase to 230 Hz [93] when isotopically enriched germanium (>98% ⁷³Ge) was used with no change in due to the homonuclear dipolar interaction occurring between identical isotopes [60].

An attempt to obtain the MAS ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectra of eight other tetrahedrally substituted germanes, as well as four other compounds having lower symmetry, resulted in success in all but three of the cases, and the results are collected in Table 11 [16]. The chemical shifts of all compounds that could be observed were the same as those observed in solution within ±6 ppm, with the exception of (p-MeOC₆H₄)₄Ge that exhibited a resonance at δ 10.8 ppm in the solid state versus δ −11.3 ppm in solution. Of the fifteen compounds that were investigated by ⁷³Ge SSNMR, Ph₄Ge exhibited the sharpest resonance while (p-MeOC₆H₄)₄Ge and (p-C₆H₅C₆H₄)₄Ge had values of less than 100 Hz. However, the for Tol₄Ge (Tol = p-CH₃C₆H₄) was 400 Hz, which is on the order exhibited by the nonsymmetric species Ph₂GeTol₂ and PhGeTol₃ of 450 and 430 Hz (resp.). The crystal structure of Tol₄Ge has Ge–C_ipso bond lengths ranging from 1.941(4) to 1.958(5) Å [95] and therefore lacks the idealized symmetry of Ph₄Ge. This was the first suggestion that ⁷³Ge SSNMR is highly sensitive to the local environment at the germanium center. Furthermore, the observation of resonances for Ph₂GeTol₂and PhGeTol₃, which contain only slightly different substituents at germanium, suggested that ⁷³Ge SSNMR studies on compounds with less than full symmetry should be possible.

The first report on the ⁷³Ge SSNMR of hexacoordinate germanium compounds was published in 2004 [54]. The first investigation focused on GeI₂, which was shown to have six iodine atoms disposed around germanium in an octahedral environment [96]. The ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectrum for GeI₂ exhibited a single resonance at δ −213.4 ppm with = 270 Hz. A resonance for GeI₂ in solution could not be observed. The ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectrum of GeI₄ exhibited a single resonance at δ −1171 ppm with = 950 Hz [54] where the chemical shift was similar to the value obtained in solution at δ −1117 ppm ( = 4.8 Hz) [23]. The ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectrum of the germanium porphyrin bis(1-pyrrolyl)(meso-tetraphenylporphyrinato)germanium (Scheme 9) revealed a single resonance at δ −259 ppm ( = 156). The germanium center in this species is surrounded by six pyrrolyl moieties and the porphyrin ring bears four identical phenyl substituents therefore rendering a symmetric environment at germanium. Replacing the two axial pyrrole substituents with other ligands, including chloride, methyl, or phenyl, did not allow the observation of a signal in the solid state nor in solution.

Increases in sensitivity have been realized by the use of ultrahigh field magnets that have become more readily available in recent years. Several new pulse sequences have also assisted in the acquisition of meaningful ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectra. This includes the quadrupolar Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (QCPMG) sequence that involves acquisition of a quadrupolar echo spectrum during the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill sequence and results in a two- to thirtyfold increase in sensitivity when compared to results when a normal quadrupolar echo sequence is applied [55]. The pulse sequence is shown in Figure 5. Other modified QCPMG pulse sequences have been developed that are of use in this regard as well, including the double-frequency sweep (DFS-QCPMG) and rotor-assisted population transfer (RAPT-QCPMG) sequences [97]; combination of a hyperbolic-secant π-inversion pulse to the QCPMG sequence [98], and application of the WURST-QCPMG (WURST = wideband uniform-rate smooth truncation) sequence [99] have also lead to improved spectra.

The ⁷³Ge NMR spectrum of GeO₂ had been initially determined in neutral aqueous solution and displayed a single resonance at −16.7 ppm with a value of 22 Hz despite the low solubility of GeO₂ in water. The addition of triethylamine increased the solubility of GeO₂ but also resulted in the appearance of a resonance at −269.1 ppm that was assigned to the formation of the [Ge(OH)₆]²⁻ anion [100]. The ⁷³Ge spin-echo SSNMR of GeO₂ was successfully collected at a field strength of 18.8 T where the ⁷³Ge nucleus resonates at 27.9 MHz (¹H = 800 MHz) and isotropic chemical shift (δ_iso) was found to be in the range of 50 to −100 ppm [101]. The quadrupolar coupling constant () was determined to be between 8 and 10 MHz. The isotopic disorder in crystalline GeO₂ has been investigated using ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectroscopy as well [102].

The ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectra of GeCl₂·dioxane and GePh₄ were acquired at a field strength of 21.1 T, where the resonance frequency of the ⁷³Ge nucleus is 31.4 MHz (¹H = 900 MHz) [56]. The GeCl₂·dioxane complex does not have high symmetry at the germanium center since it is formally bound to two chlorine atoms and datively bound to the two oxygen atoms of the coordinated dioxane molecule. It does, however, possess pseudo-octahedral coordination due to the presence of two additional nonbonded chlorine atoms from neighboring molecules [103]. Nevertheless, the low symmetry at the germanium center rendered acquisition of its ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectrum tedious, requiring the acquisition of 23 piecewise frequency-stepped QCMPG subspectra and a total acquisition time of 115 hours.

The ⁷³Ge quadrupolar coupling constant was determined to be 44(2) MHz and is the largest such value to be determined at the time the spectrum was determined, resulting from the lack of a spherical environment at the germanium center in GeCl₂·dioxane. The δ_iso was determined to be 1110 ppm with a rather large uncertainty of 250 ppm, indicating that the divalent ⁷³Ge nucleus in this species is more deshielded than that of GeI₂ that has a chemical shift of δ −213 ppm [54]. Both GeCl₂•dioxane and GeI₂ are more deshielded than their corresponding tetravalent germanium analogues GeCl₄ (δ30.0 ppm) [22] and GeI₄ (δ −101.8 ppm) [22] due to the lower formal oxidation state of germanium.

The acquisition of the ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectrum of GePh₄ at high field was considerably more facile, again due to the high symmetry at germanium in this species. The δ_iso of GePh₄ was determined to be −30 ppm [56] which is nearly identical to the value of δ −31.0 ppm determined by MAS ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectroscopy [90]. The use of a high field spectrometer also permitted, for the first time, direct observation of the ⁷³Ge NMR chemical shift anisotropy (CSA). The measurement of CSA is not possible for quadrupolar nuclei at low field since the magnitude of the second-order quadrupolar interaction is large compared to the CSA. However, at high field, this problem is diminished and the CSA can be extracted from the spectrum. The spectral results, as well as the simulated spectrum, are shown in Figure 6. A value for the span () was determined to be 30(3) ppm and the skew (κ) has a value of −1 indicating the presence of an axially symmetric ⁷³Ge chemical shift tensor, as it should be at a germanium center having symmetry. The quadrupolar coupling constant () is not zero and had an upper limit of 0.3 MHz, which is also indicated in the MAS spectrum by the presence of spinning side bands that arise from satellite transitions. The CS tensor contains one unique component that was shown to be oriented along the 2-fold axis at the germanium center that bisects the C_ipso–Ge–C_ipso bond angle. The C_ipso–Ge– angle is 54.59° in this system.

These recent findings suggest that ⁷³Ge SSNMR spectroscopy can become a viable and useful tool for the study of a diverse array of germanium compounds. From these types of investigations a variety of structural and bonding information can be obtained. Further advances in instrumentation and software will likely continue to make such investigations more facile.

Acknowledgment

Funding for our research has been provided by a Grant from the US National Science Foundation (no. CHE-0844758) and is gratefully acknowledged.

References

R. G. Kidd and H. G. Spinney, “Germanium-73 nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of germanium tetrahalides,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 88–90, 1973.
View at: Google Scholar
A. L. Wilkins, P. J. Watkinson, and K. M. MacKay, “Aspects of germanium-73 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, no. 10, pp. 2365–2372, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, K. Tanaka, S. Aoyagi, and H. Yamamoto, “A relationship between the half-width of ${}^{73}G e$ NMR signals and hypercoordination in some phenylgermanes,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 241–243, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Riedmiller, G. L. Wegner, A. Jockisch, and H. Schmidbaur, “Preparation, structure, and ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectroscopy of arylgermanes ArGeH₃, Ar₂GeH₂, and Ar₃GeH,” Organometallics, vol. 18, no. 21, pp. 4317–4324, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Liepiņš, I. Zicmane, and E. Lukevics, “ ${}^{73}G e$ , ¹⁷O, ¹³C NMR Spectra of alkoxygermanes,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 306, no. 3, pp. 327–335, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
P. Hanson, “Alkyl substituent effects. Part 1. An analysis of alkyl inductive properties in terms of group connectivity,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2, no. 1, pp. 101–108, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Kupče, L. M. Ignatovich, and E. Lukevics, “ ${}^{73}G e$ NMR of hexacoordinate organogermanium compounds,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 372, no. 2, pp. 189–191, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
C. H. Yoder, T. M. Agee, C. D. Schaeffer, M. J. Carroll, A. J. Fleisher, and A. S. DeToma, “Use of ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectroscopy for the study of electronic interactions,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 22, pp. 10765–10770, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Yoder, T. M. Agee, A. K. Griffith et al., “Use of ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography for the study of electronic interactions in substituted tetrakis(phenyl)-, -(phenoxy)-, and -(thiophenoxy) germanes,” Organometallics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 582–590, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Wilkins, P. J. Watkinson, and K. M. MacKay, “Aspects of germanium-73 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, no. 10, pp. 2365–2372, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Thomson, A. L. Wilkins, and K. M. Mackay, “Further adventures in germanium NMR,” Phosphorus, Sulfur and Silicon and Related Elements, vol. 150-151, pp. 319–324, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Liepins, I. Zicmane, and E. Lukevics, “⁷³Ge NMR spectroscopic studies of organogermanium compounds,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 341, no. 1-3, pp. 315–333, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Amadoruge, C. H. Yoder, J. H. Conneywerdy, K. Heroux, A. L. Rheingold, and C. S. Weinert, “ ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectral investigations of singly bonded oligogermanes,” Organometallics, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 3067–3073, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Samanamu, M. L. Amadoruge, C. H. Yoder et al., “Syntheses, structures, and electronic properties of the branched oligogermanes (Ph₃Ge)₃GeH and (Ph₃Ge) ₃GeX (X = Cl, Br, I),” Organometallics, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1046–1058, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Samanamu, N. F. Materer, and C. S. Weinert, “Absorption, electrochemical, theoretical, and ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectral characterization of the germanium neo-pentane abalogue (Me₃Ge)₄Ge,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 698, no. 1, pp. 62–65, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, M. Nishikawa, H. Hachiya, and H. Yamamoto, “High-resolution solid-state MAS ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectra of some organogermanes,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 662–664, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Wrackmeyer, “Applications of ${}^{29}S i$ NMR parameters,” Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, vol. 57, pp. 1–49, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kupče and E. Lukevics, “Ultrahigh-resolution ${}^{29}S i$ NMR,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 359–363, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
E. A. Williams, “Recent advances in silicon-29 NMR spectroscopy,” Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, vol. 15, pp. 235–289, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Williams and J. D. Cargiolo, “Silicon-29 NMR spectroscopy,” Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, vol. 9, pp. 221–319, 1979.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Wrackmeyer, “NMR Spectroscopy of Tin Compounds,” in Tin Chemistry, A. G. Davies, M. Gielen, K. H. Pannell, and E. R. T. Tiekink, Eds., pp. 17–52, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Wrackmeyer and K. Horchler, “ ${}^{207}P b$ -NMR parameters,” Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, vol. 22, pp. 249–306, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Liepiņš, I. Zicmane, and E. Lukevics, “ ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectroscopic studies of organogermanium compounds,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 341, no. 1–3, pp. 315–333, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi and T. Takayama, “ ${}^{73}G e$ NMR Spectroscopy of organogermanium compounds,” Annual Reports on NMR Spectroscopy, vol. 54, pp. 155–200, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Pyykkö, “Year-2008 nuclear quadrupole moments,” Molecular Physics, vol. 106, no. 16–18, pp. 1965–1974, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Brevard and P. Granger, Handbook of High Resolution NMR, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1981.
R. K. Harris and B. E. Mann, NMR and the Periodic Table, Academic Press, London, UK, 1978.
J. Mason, Multinuclear NMR, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1987.
K. M. Mackay and R. A. Thomson, “Germanium-73 nuclear magnetic resonance: esoteric study or useful tool?” Main Group Metal Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 83–108, 1987.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Fukushima and S. B. W. Roeder, “Spurious ringing in pulse NMR,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 199–203, 1979.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Canet, J. Brondeau, J. P. Marchal, and B. Robin-Lherbier, “A convenient method of observing relatively broad nuclear magnetic resonances in the fourier transform-mode,” Organic Magnetic Resonance, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 51–53, 1982.
View at: Google Scholar
S. L. Patt, “Pulse strategies for the suppression of acoustic ringing,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 161–163, 1982.
View at: Google Scholar
K. M. MacKay, P. J. Watkinson, and A. L. Wilkins, “Application of proton polarization transfer to a high-spin nucleus, germanium-73,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Belton, I. J. Cox, and R. K. Harris, “Experimental sulphur-33 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Levitt, “Symmetrical composite pulse sequences for NMR population inversion. I. Compensation of radiofrequency field inhomogeneity,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 234–264, 1982.
View at: Google Scholar
A. L. Wilkins, R. A. Thomson, and K. M. MacKay, “Suppression of acoustic ringing and baseline roll effects in a low-frequency NMR nucleus- ${}^{73}G e$ ,” Main Group Metal Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 219–236, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
P. D. Ellis, “Germanium 73,” in NMR of Newly Accessible Nuclei, P. Laszlo, Ed., p. 18, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1983.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Y. Carr and E. M. Purcell, “Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments,” Physical Review, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 630–638, 1954.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Meiboom and D. Gill, “Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 688–691, 1958.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. L. Hahn, “Spin echoes,” Physical Review, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 580–594, 1950.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. D. Jeffries, “The spin and magnetic moment of Ti⁴⁷ and Ti⁴⁹ and the magnetic moment of Ge⁷³,” Physical Review, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1262–1263, 1953.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Lutz, A. Schwenk, and G. Zimmermann, “The ratio of the larmor frequency of ${}^{73}G e$ relative to 2 H and 41 K,” Physics Letters A, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 653–654, 1967.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Smith, “¹³C–H and X–X coupling constants of the type (X(CH₃)₄,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2031–2034, 1963.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Tzalmona, “Measurement of the ${}^{73}G e$ -proton spin-spin coupling in Ge(CH₃)₄,” Molecular Physics, vol. 7, pp. 497–498, 1963.
View at: Google Scholar
P. T. Inglefield and L. W. Reeves, “Correlation of nuclear spin-spin coupling constants with atomic number. VI. Exceptions to the rule,” Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 2425–2426, 1964.
View at: Google Scholar
E. A. V. Ebsworth, S. G. Frankiss, and A. G. Robiette, “Proton resonance spectra of some derivatives of monogermane,” Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 299–300, 1964.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Dreeskamp, “Indirect nuclear spin coupling between protons and elements of Group IV,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. A19, no. 1, pp. 139–142, 1964.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, M. Shimoda, and S. Tomoda, “ ${}^{73}G e$ and ¹³C NMR spectra of some methylgermacyclohexanes,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 580–581, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Aoyagi, K. Tanaka, I. Zicmane, and Y. Takeuchi, “Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of organogermanium compounds. Part 11. Synthesis and nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of tetramethyldigerma- and octamethyltetragerma-cycloalkanes,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2, no. 12, pp. 2217–2220, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, I. Zicmane, G. Manuel, and R. Boukherroub, “NMR spectra of organogermanium compounds. Part XII. ${}^{73}G e$ and ¹³C NMR spectra and molecular mechanics calclations of 3-germabicyclo[3. 1. 0]hexanes and related compounds,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 1732–1737, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Liepiņš, I. Zicmane, L. M. Ignatovich, and E. Lukevics, “ ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectra of 2-thienyl-, 2-furyl- and 2-(4,5-dihydrofuryl)germanes,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 389, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Kupče, E. Lukevics, O. D. Flid, N. A. Viktorov, and T. K. Gar, “ ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectra of 1,3-dioxa-6-aza-2-germacyclooctanes,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 372, no. 2, pp. 187–188, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, H. Yamamoto, K. Tanaka et al., “Synthesis and structure of tris[(2-alkoxymethyl)phenyl]germanes and tris[(2-methylthiomethyl)phenyl]germane,” Tetrahedron, vol. 54, no. 33, pp. 9811–9822, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, M. Nishikawa, and H. Yamamoto, “High-resolution solid-state ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectra of hexacoordinated germanium compounds,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 907–909, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. H. Larsen, H. J. Jakobsen, P. D. Ellis, and N. C. Nielsen, “Sensitivity-enhanced quadrupolar-echo NMR of half-integer quadrupolar nuclei. Magnitudes and relative orientation of chemical shielding and quadrupolar coupling tensors,” Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 101, no. 46, pp. 8597–8606, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Sutrisno, M. A. Hanson, P. A. Rupar, V. V. Terskikh, K. M. Baines, and Y. Huang, “Exploring the limits of ${}^{73}G e$ solid-state NMR spectroscopy at ultrahigh magnetic field,” Chemical Communications, vol. 46, no. 16, pp. 2817–2819, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Harris and B. J. Kimber, “ ${}^{29}S i$ and ¹³C Nuclear magnetic resonance studies of organosilicon chemistry. III. Compounds containing a direct SiH bond,” Advances in Molecular Relaxation Processes, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 1976.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Harazono, K. Tanaka, and Y. Takeuchi, “Quadrupled coupling constants in the symmetric tetrasubstituted germanes,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 919–921, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
P. J. Watkinson and K. M. Mackay, “On the relation between germanium-73 and other main group IV element NMR chemical shifts,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, T. Harazono, and N. Kakimoto, “Germanium-73 chemical shifts and spin-lattice relaxation times of some tetrasubstituted germanes,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 23, pp. 3835–3836, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, S. Tomoda, and N. Kakimoto, “NMR spectra of organigermanium compounds 2. ¹³C NMR spectra of 2-substituted 1-trichlorogermanes,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 140–143, 1985.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, M. Shimoda, K. Tanaka, S. Tomoda, K. Ogawa, and H. Suzuki, “Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of organogermanium compounds. Part 4. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra and molecular mechanics calculations of germacyclohexane, methylgermacyclohexanes, and dimethylgermacyclohexanes,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Perkin Transactions 2, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Harazono, K. Tanaka, and Y. Takeuchi, “NMR spectra of organogermanium compounds. 5. Relaxation mechanism of germanium-73 nuclei in tetraalkylgermanes,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1894–1897, 1987.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, Y. Ichikawa, K. Tanaka, and N. Kakimoto, “NMR spectra of organogermanium compounds. VI. NMR spectra and molecular mechanics calculations of 3-methyl and 3, 3-dimethylgermacyclohexanes,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 2875–2880, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, H. Inagaki, K. Tanaka, and S. Yoshimura, “NMR spectra of organogermanium compounds. 8. ${}^{73}G e$ , ¹³C, and ¹H spectra of methylvinylgermanes,” Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 72–74, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, K. Tanaka, T. Harazono, K. Ogawa, and S. Yoshimura, “NMR spectra of organogermanium compounds. 7. NMR spectra and MNDO calculations of phenylgermacyclohexanes,” Tetrahedron, vol. 44, no. 24, pp. 7531–7539, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, K. Tanaka, T. Harazono, and S. Yoshimura, “NMR spectra of organogermanium compounds. IX. NMR spectra and molecular mechanics calculations of 1-t-butylgermacyclohexanes,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 708–715, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, K. Tanaka, and T. Harazono, “NMR spectra of organogermanium compounds. X.1) Syntheses, ¹³C and ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectra and molecular mechanics calculations of germacyclopentanes and germacyclopentenes,” Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, J. Popelis, G. Manuel, and R. Boukherroub, “NMR spectra of organogermanium compounds. Part XIII. ¹H NMR spectra of 3-germabicyclo[3. 1. 0]hexanes and 6-oxa-3-germabicyclo[3. 1. 0]hexanes,” Main Group Metal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 191–197, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Filleux-Blanchard, N. D. An, and G. Manuel, “ ${}^{29}S i$ chemical shift measurements of silacyclopentenes confirm the results obtained by ¹H and ¹³C NMR,” Organic Magnetic Resonance, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 150–151, 1978.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Zicmane, E. Liepins, E. Lukevics et al., “Germanium-73 and carbon-13 NMR spectra of some tetraalkylgermanes and their carbofunctional derivatives,” Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 896–899, 1982.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Liepiņš, I. Zicmane, and E. Lukevics, “A multinuclear NMR spectroscopy study of alkoxysilanes,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. 167–182, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Delmulle and G. P. van der Kelen, “NMR study (proton, carbon-13 and silicon-29) of methylvinylsilane [(CH₃)₄-xSi(CH=CH₂)x] compounds where x = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4,” Journal of Molecular Structure, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 309–314, 1980.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Liepiņš, M. V. Petrova, E. T. Bogoradovsky, and V. S. Zavgorodny, “ ${}^{73}G e$ , ¹³C and ¹H NMR spectra of methylethynylgermanes,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 410, no. 3, pp. 287–291, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Mägi, E. Lippmaa, E. Lukevics et al., “Group IVB organometallic compounds of furan: ¹³C, ${}^{29}S i$ , and 119 Sn NMR spectra,” Organic Magnetic Resonance, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 297–300, 1977.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Lukevics, O. A. Pudova, J. Popelis et al., “Organometallic deriviatives of furan. XXVII. Nuclear magnetic resonance of furylalkoxy- and furylaminoalkyoxysilanes,” Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 369–374, 1981.
View at: Google Scholar
N. P. Erchak, J. Popelis, I. Pihler et al., “Organic furan derivatives. Organosilicon derivatives of 2, 3-dihydrofuran,” Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1181–1187, 1982.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Kaufmann, W. Sahm, and A. Schwenk, “Germanium-73 nuclear magnetic resonance studies,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1384–1389, 1971.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Kupče and E. Lukevics, “The ${}^{73}G e$ chemical shift of hexacoordinated germanium in the $Ge {(NCS)}_{6}^{2 -}$ - anion,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 325–327, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Kupče, E. Upena, M. Trušule, and E. Lukevics, “Use of ¹⁴N and ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectroscopy for elucidation of products of the reaction between GECL4 and KSCN in acetone,” Polyhedron, vol. 8, no. 22, pp. 2641–2644, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Amadoruge and C. S. Weinert, “Singly bonded catenated germanes: eighty years of progress,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 108, no. 10, pp. 4253–4294, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Weinert, “Syntheses, structures and properties of linear and branched oligogermanes,” Dalton Transactions, no. 10, pp. 1691–1699, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. S. Weinert, “Synthetic, structural, and physical aspects of organo-oligogermanes,” Comments on Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 55–87, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Amadoruge, A. G. DiPasquale, A. L. Rheingold, and C. S. Weinert, “Hydrogermolysis reactions involving the alpha-germylated nitriles R₃GeCH₂CN (R = Ph, Prⁱ, Bu^t) and germanium amides R₃GeNMe₂ (R = Prⁱ, Bu^t) with Ph₃GeH: substituent dependent reactivity and crystal structures of Pri₃GeGePh₃ and Bu^t₃Ge[NHC(CH₃)CHCN],” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 693, no. 10, pp. 1771–1778, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Amadoruge, J. R. Gardinier, and C. S. Weinert, “Substituent effects in linear organogermanium catenates,” Organometallics, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 3753–3760, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Amadoruge, J. A. Golen, A. L. Rheingold, and C. S. Weinert, “Preparation, structure, and reactivity of discrete branched oligogermanes,” Organometallics, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1979–1984, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Amadoruge, E. K. Short, C. Moore, A. L. Rheingold, and C. S. Weinert, “Structural, spectral, and electrochemical investigations of para-tolyl-substituted oligogermanes,” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 695, no. 14, pp. 1813–1823, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Samanamu, M. L. Amadoruge, C. S. Weinert, J. A. Golen, and A. L. Rheingold, “Synthesis, structures, and properties of branched oligogermanes,” Phosphorus, Sulfur and Silicon and the Related Elements, vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 1389–1395, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Subashi, A. L. Rheingold, and C. S. Weinert, “Preparation of oligogermanes via the hydrogermolysis reaction,” Organometallics, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 3211–3219, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, M. Nishikawa, K. Tanaka et al., “First observation of high-resolution solid-state ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectra of organogermanium compounds,” Chemical Communications, no. 8, pp. 687–688, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Karipides and D. A. Haller, “The crystal structure of tetraphenylgermanium,” Acta Crystallographica B, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2889–2892, 1972.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Ferguson and C. Glidewell, “Tetrabenzylgermanium,” Acta Crystallographica Section C, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1889–1891, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Takeuchi, M. Nishikawa, K. Tanaka, and T. Takayama, “The first determination of spin-lattice relaxation times (T1) of ${}^{73}G e$ in the solid state,” Chemistry Letters, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 572–573, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
S. V. Verkhovskii, B. Z. Malkin, A. Trokiner et al., “Quadrupole effects on ${}^{73}G e$ NMR spectra in isotopically controlled Ge single crystals,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A, vol. 55, no. 1-2, pp. 105–110, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Charissé, S. Roller, and M. Dräger, “Tetra-p-tolyl-verbindungen p-Tol₄Si und p-Tol₄Ge: ein beitrag zur konfiguration der tetraaryl-methan-analoga Ar₄M (M = C, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb),” Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, vol. 427, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
W. L. Jolly and W. M. Latimer, “The heat of oxidation of germanous iodide to germanic acid,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 74, no. 22, pp. 5752–5754, 1952.
View at: Google Scholar
R. W. Schurko, I. Hung, and C. M. Widdifield, “Signal enhancement in NMR spectra of half-integer quadrupolar nuclei via DFS-QCPMG and RAPT-QCPMG pulse sequences,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 379, no. 1-2, pp. 1–10, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Siegel, T. T. Nakashima, and R. E. Wasylishen, “Signal enhancement of NMR spectra of half-integer quadrupolar nuclei in solids using hyperbolic secant pulses,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 388, no. 4–6, pp. 441–445, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. O'Dell and R. W. Schurko, “QCPMG using adiabatic pulses for faster acquisition of ultra-wideline NMR spectra,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 464, no. 1–3, pp. 97–102, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kupce and E. Lukevics, “Germanium-73 nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of GeO₂ dissolved in water,” Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions, no. 7, pp. 2319–2320, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
J. F. Stebbins, L. S. Du, S. Kroeker et al., “New opportunities for high-resolution solid-state NMR spectroscopy of oxide materials at 21.1- and 18.8-T fields,” Solid State Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, vol. 21, no. 1-2, pp. 105–115, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. V. Verkhovskii, A. Y. Yakubovsky, B. Z. Malkin et al., “Isotopic disorder in Ge single crystals probed with ${}^{73}G e$ NMR,” Physical Review B, vol. 68, no. 10, Article ID 104201, 2003.
View at: Google Scholar
M. K. Denk, M. Khan, A. J. Lough, and K. Shuchi, “Redetermination of the germanium dichloride complex with 1,4-dioxane at 173 K,” Acta Crystallographica Section C, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 1830–1832, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Charles S. Weinert. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

4405

Downloads

1754

Citations

International Scholarly Research Notices

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Germanium Compounds

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Observation of the 73Ge Nucleus

3. Early Developments in 73Ge NMR Spectroscopy

4. Correlation of 73Ge NMR Spectra with Other Group 14 Nuclei and Applications to the Conformational Analysis of Organogermanes

5. Effects of Hyperconjugation on the 73Ge NMR Spectra of Germanes

6. One-Bond Coupling of Germanium to Hydrogen in 73Ge NMR Spectra

7. 73Ge NMR Spectra of Oligogermanes

8. Solid-State 73Ge NMR Spectroscopy (73Ge SSNMR Spectroscopy)