About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
ISRN Applied Mathematics
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 850686, 36 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/850686
Review Article

System Reliability at the Crossroads

School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA

Received 30 August 2012; Accepted 10 October 2012

Academic Editors: J. R. Fernandez and Y. Tsompanakis

Copyright © 2012 Vitali Volovoi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. G. Vincenti, What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
  2. M. Hinchey, M. Jackson, P. Cousot, B. Cook, J. P. Bowen, and T. Margaria, “Software engineering and formal methods,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 51, no. 9, pp. 54–59, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. M. Hocker, Vasa: A Swedish Warship, Medströms Bokförlag, Stockholm, Sweden, 2011.
  4. J. Reason, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Ashgate, Brookfield, 1997.
  5. T. Harford, Adapt: Why Success Always Starts with Failure, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York, NY, USA, 2011.
  6. D. Vaughan, The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Ill, USA, 1996.
  7. S. G. Vick, Degrees of Belief: Subjective Probability and Engineering Judgment, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2002.
  8. “In-flight breakup over the atlantic ocean Trans World Airlines flight 800 Boeing 747-131, n93119 near East Moriches, New York,” Aircraft Accident Report PB2000-910403, NTSB/AAR-00/03, DCA96MA070, National Transportation Safety Board, 2000.
  9. “Space shuttle orbiter reaction jet driver (RJD): independent technical assessment/inspection (ITA/I) report,” Tech. Rep. NASA/TM-2005-213750, NASA Engineering and Safety Center, 2005.
  10. H. Petroski, “History and failure,” American Scientist, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 523–526, 1992.
  11. P. Érdi, Complexity Explained, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008.
  12. “Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures,” no. ASCE-7-05, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2006.
  13. J. H. Saleh and K. Marais, “Highlights from the early (and pre-) history of reliability engineering,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 249–256, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. Zio, “Reliability engineering: old problems and new challenges,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 125–141, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. F. Moore and C. E. Shannon, “Reliable circuits using less reliable relays,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 191–208, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. J. von Neumann, “Probabilistic logics and the synthesis of reliable organisms from unreliable components,” in Annals of Mathematics Studies, no. 34, pp. 43–98, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1956.
  17. M. Rausand and A. Høyland, System Reliability Theory. Models, Statistical Methods, and Applications, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2004.
  18. A. Birolini, Reliability Engineering: Theory and Practice, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 5th edition, 2007.
  19. R. E. Barlow and F. Proschan, Mathematical Theory of Reliability, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1965.
  20. A. Avižienis, J. C. Laprie, and B. Randell, “Fundamental concepts of dependability,” Tech. Rep. 1145, Laboratoire d'Analyse et d'Architecture des Systèmes (LAAS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), 2001.
  21. B. P. Zeigler, Object Oriented Simulation with Hierarchical Modular Models, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1990.
  22. “Failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) for command, control, communications, computer, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR),” Tech. Rep. TM 5-698-4, Department of the Army, 2006.
  23. E. Hollnagel, FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-Technical Systems, Ashgate Publishing, Farnham, UK, 2012.
  24. “The Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) final report,” 2003.
  25. “Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for nasa managers and practitioners, Second edition,” Tech. Rep. SP-2011-3421, NASA, 2011.
  26. W. B. Nelson, Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans, and Data Analysis, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1990.
  27. W. Q. Meeker and L. A. Escobar, Statistical Methods for Reliability Data, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1998.
  28. V. Bagdonavicius and M. Nikulin, Accelerated Life Models: Modeling and Statistical Analysis, Monographs on Statistics & Applied Probability, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2001.
  29. S. M. Ross, Stochastic Processes, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1996.
  30. P. J. Haas, Stochastic Petri Nets. Modelling, Stability, Simulation, Springer Series in Operations Research, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2002.
  31. G. C. Fraccone, V. Volovoi, A. E. Colón, and M. Blake, “Novel air traffic procedures: investigation of off-nominal scenarios and potential hazards,” Journal of Aircraft, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 127–140, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. W. R. Blischke and D. N. P. Murthy, Reliability. Modeling, Prediction, and Optimization, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  33. V. Volovoi, “Quantification of system-level business effects of IVHM,” in IVHM the Business Case, I. Jennions, Ed., chapter 5, SAE, 2012.
  34. W. A. Thompson Jr., “On the foundations of reliability,” Technometrics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 1981.
  35. S. Blumenthal, “New approximations for the event count distribution for superimposed renewal processes at the time origin with application to the reliability of new series systems,” Operations Research, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 409, 1993.
  36. T. Nakagawa, Maintenance Theory of Reliability, Springer, London, UK, 2005.
  37. C. Meyer, Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Kijima, Markov Processes for Stochastic Modeling, Stochastic Modeling Series, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1997.
  39. M. Boussemart, T. Bickard, and N. Limnios, “Markov decision processes with a constraint on the asymptotic failure rate,” Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 199–214, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. D. Braha, A. A. Minai, and Y. Bar-Yam, Eds., Complex Engineered Systems: Science Meets Technology, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
  41. B. A. Huberman and T. Hogg, “Complexity and adaptation,” Physica D, vol. 22, no. 1–3, pp. 376–384, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. T. J. McCabe, “A complexity measure,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, vol. SE-2, no. 4, pp. 308–320, 1976.
  43. N. P. Suh, “Theory of complexity, periodicity and the design axioms,” Research in Engineering Design, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 116–131, 1999. View at Scopus
  44. E. Vanem and R. Skjong, “Designing for safety in passenger ships utilizing advanced evacuation analyses—a risk based approach,” Safety Science, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 111–135, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. P. Latinopoulos, N. Mylopoulos, and Y. Mylopoulos, “Risk-based decision analysis in the design of water supply projects,” Water Resources Management, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 263–281, 1997. View at Scopus
  46. R. A. Freeman and J. W. Kleffner, “Risk based package design,” Process Safety Progress, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 14–17, 1997. View at Scopus
  47. R. P. Kennedy, “Risk based seismic design criteria,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 117–135, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. R. V. G. Seung-Kyum Choi and R. A. Canfield, Reliability-Based Structural Design, Springer, London, UK, 2007.
  49. C. Perrow, Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 1999.
  50. H. A. Simon, “Near decomposability and the speed of evolution,” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 587–599, 2002. View at Scopus
  51. K. Frenken and A. Nuvolari, “The early development of the steam engine: an evolutionary interpretation using complexity theory,” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 419–450, 2004. View at Scopus
  52. P.-J. Courtois, Decomposability: Queueing and Computer System Applications, ACM Monograph Series, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1977.
  53. W. P. Stevens, G. J. Myers, and L. L. Constantine, “Structured design,” IBM Systems Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 115–139, 1974. View at Scopus
  54. A. Tahbaz-Salehi, D. Acemoglu, and A. Ozdaglar, “Systemic risk and stability in financial networks,” in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting Phoenix (INFORMS '12), INFORMS, Phoenix, Ariz, USA, 2012.
  55. P. Csermely, Weak Links: The Universal Key to the Stability of Networks and Complex Systems, The Frontiers Collection, Springer, 2006.
  56. V. Volovoi and R. V. Vega, “On compact modeling of coupling effects in maintenance processes of complex systems,” International Journal of Engineering Science, vol. 51, pp. 193–210, 2012.
  57. D. Crowe and A. Feinberg, Eds., Design for Reliability, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2001.
  58. G. Galilei, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences, MacMillan Company, New York, NY, USA, 1914.
  59. J. M. Gere and S. P. Timoshenko, Mechanics of Materials, Pws Publication, Boston, Mass, USA, 4th edition, 1997.
  60. M. Boussemart, N. Limnios, and J. C. Fillion, “Non-ergodic Markov decision processes with a constraint on the asymptotic failure rate: general class of policies,” Stochastic Models, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 173–191, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. M. Boussemart and N. Limnios, “Markov decision processes with asymptotic average failure rate constraint,” Communications in Statistics, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1689–1714, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. D. Prescott and J. D. Andrews, “A comparison of modelling approaches for the time-limited dispatch (TLD) of aircraft,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers O, vol. 220, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 2006.
  63. C. Perrow, The Next Catastrophe: The Next Catastrophe: Reducing Our Vulnerabilities to Natural, Industrial, and Terrorist Disasters, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2007.
  64. W. A. Shewhart, Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product, D. Van Nostrand Company, New York, NY, USA, 1931.
  65. H. O. Madsen, S. Krenk, and N. C. Lind, Methods of Structural Safety, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY, USA, 2006.
  66. M. J. Carrillo, “Extensions of Palm's theorem: a review,” Management Science, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 739–744, 1991.
  67. R. Fisher and L. H. C. Tippett, “Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest and smallest member of a sample,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, vol. 24, pp. 180–190, 1928.
  68. B. Gnedenko, “Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d'une série aléatoire,” Annals of Mathematics, vol. 44, pp. 423–453, 1943.
  69. A. N. Kolmogorov, “On the log-normal distribution of particles sizes during break-up process,” The Proceedings of the USSR Academy of Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 99–101, 1941.
  70. J. M. van Noortwijk, “A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 2–21, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. Z. W. Birnbaum and S. C. Saunders, “A new family of life distributions,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 6, pp. 319–327, 1969.
  72. A. N. Srivastava and J. Han, Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery for Engineering Systems Health Management, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2011.
  73. E. Chu, D. Gorinevsky, and S. Boyd, “Scalable statistical monitoring of fleet data,” in Proceedings IFAC World Congress, pp. 13227–13232, Milan, Italy, August 2011.
  74. F. K. Chang, Ed., Structural Health Monitoring. The Demands and Challenges, SRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2002.
  75. A. Tiwari, P. Ballal, and F. L. Lewis, “Energy-efficient wireless sensor network design and implementation for condition-based maintenance,” ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, vol. 3, no. 1, Article ID 1210670, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. S. Vandermerwe and J. Rada, “Servitization of business: adding value by adding services,” European Management Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 314–324, 1988. View at Scopus
  77. A. Neely, “Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing,” Operations Management Research, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 103–118, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. S. L. Vargo and R. F. Lusch, “Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2004. View at Scopus
  79. M. Uhl-Bien, R. Marion, and B. McKelvey, “Complexity Leadership Theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era,” Leadership Quarterly, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 298–318, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. J. A. Guajardo, M. A. Cohen, S. H. Kim, and S. Netessine, “Impact of performance-based contracting on product reliability: an empirical analysis,” Management Science, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 961–979, 2012.
  81. R. E. Melchers, Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction, Ellis Horwood Series in Civil Engineering, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1987.
  82. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. “Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification,” Tech. Rep. DO-178C, Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA), 2011.
  84. D. A. Peled, Software Reliability Methods, Springer, 2001.
  85. Formal Methods Supplement to DO-178C and DO-278A, no. DO-333, Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA), 2011.
  86. A. Swain and H. Guttman, Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, no. NUREG/CR-1278, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1987.
  87. J. Reason, The Human Contribution. Unsafe Acts, Accidents and Heroic Recoveries, Ashgate Publishing, Great Britain, UK, 2008.
  88. H. A. Simon, “Bounded rationality and organizational learning,” Organization Science, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 125–134, 1991.
  89. E. Hollnagel, The ETTO Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off, Ashgate Publishing, Great Britain, UK, 2009.
  90. D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, and A. Tversky, Eds., Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1982.
  91. M. Maruyama, “The second cybernetics: deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes,” American Scientist, vol. 44, pp. 164–179, 1963.
  92. D. Javaux and E. Olivier, “Assessing and understanding pilots knowledge of mode transitions on the A340-200/300,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics (HCI-Aero '00), pp. 81–86, 2000.
  93. D. Javaux, “A method for predicting errors when interacting with finite state systems. How implicit learning shapes the user's knowledge of a system,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 147–165, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, “Complex networks: structure and dynamics,” Physics Reports A, vol. 424, no. 4-5, pp. 175–308, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. E. Zio, “From complexity science to reliability efficiency: a new way of looking at complex network systems and critical infrastructures,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 3, no. 3-4, pp. 488–508, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. Paczuski, S. Maslov, and P. Bak, “Avalanche dynamics in evolution, growth, and depinning models,” Physical Review E, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 414–443, 1996. View at Scopus
  97. S. I. Zaitsev, “Robin Hood as self-organized criticality,” Physica A, vol. 189, no. 3-4, pp. 411–416, 1992. View at Scopus
  98. R. Guimerà, S. Mossa, A. Turtschi, and L. A. N. Amaral, “The worldwide air transportation network: anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities' global roles,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 22, pp. 7794–7799, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. J. M. Carlson and J. Doyle, “Highly optimized tolerance: robustness and design in complex systems,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 2529–2532, 2000. View at Scopus
  100. A. E. Motter, “Cascade control and defense in complex networks,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 9, Article ID 98701, p. 1, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. R. Kinney, P. Crucitti, R. Albert, and V. Latora, “Modeling cascading failures in the North American power grid,” European Physical Journal B, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 101–107, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. L. Lacasa, M. Cea, and M. Zanin, “Jamming transition in air transportation networks,” Physica A, vol. 388, no. 18, pp. 3948–3954, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. D. De Martino, L. Dall'Asta, G. Bianconi, and M. Marsili, “Congestion phenomena on complex networks,” Physical Review E, vol. 79, no. 1, Article ID 015101, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. V. S. Afraimovich and L. A. Bunimovich, “Which hole is leaking the most: a topological approach to study open systems,” Nonlinearity, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 643–656, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. Y. Bakhtin and L. Bunimovich, “The optimal sink and the best source in a Markov chain,” Journal of Statistical Physics, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 943–954, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. J. von Neumann, “The general and logical theory of automata,” in Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior—The Hixon Symposium, pp. 32–41, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1951.
  107. S. Wolfram, “Statistical mechanics of cellular automata,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 601–644, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. P. Bak, C. Tang, and K. Wiesenfeld, “Self-organized criticality,” Physical Review A, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 364–374, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. T. Nakagawa, Shock and Damage Models in Reliability Theory, Springer, London, UK, 2007.
  110. R. Alonso-Sanz and J. P. Cárdenas, “Effect of memory on Boolean Networks with disordered dynamics: the K = 4 case,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1313–1327, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. F. Biondini, F. Bontempi, D. M. Frangopol, and P. G. Malerba, “Cellular automata approach to durability analysis of concrete structures in aggressive environments,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 130, no. 11, pp. 1724–1737, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. R. M. Pidaparti, L. Fang, and M. J. Palakal, “Computational simulation of multi-pit corrosion process in materials,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 255–265, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. H. Zeng, T. Pukkala, H. Peltola, and S. Kellomäki, “Optimization of irregular-grid cellular automata and application in risk management of wind damage in forest planning,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1064–1075, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. D. V. Alekseev and G. A. Kazunina, “Simulation of damage accumulation kinetics with a probabilistic cellular automaton,” Physics of the Solid State, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 272–278, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. M. Chrzanowski and K. Nowak, “Cellular automata in damage mechanics: creep rupture case,” Archives of Mechanics, vol. 59, no. 4-5, pp. 329–339, 2007. View at Scopus
  116. D. L. Turcotte and B. D. Malamud, “Landslides, forest fires, and earthquakes: examples of self-organized critical behavior,” Physica A, vol. 340, no. 4, pp. 580–589, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. C. H. A. Ferraz and H. J. Herrmann, “The strange man in random networks of automata,” Physica A, vol. 387, no. 23, pp. 5689–5695, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. H. M. Taylor, “A model for the failure process of semicrystalline polymer materials under static fatigue,” Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 133–162, 1987.
  119. S. Mahesh and S. L. Phoenix, “Lifetime distributions for unidirectional fibrous composites under creep-rupture loading,” International Journal of Fracture, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 303–360, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. Z. W. Birnbaum and S. C. Saunders, “A probabilistic interpretation of Miner's rule,” SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 637–652, 1968.
  121. A. J. Lemoine and M. L. Wenocur, “On failure modeling,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 497–508, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. P. E. Labeau, C. Smidts, and S. Swaminathan, “Dynamic reliability: towards an integrated platform for probabilistic risk assessment,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 219–254, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. Sense and avoid for Unmanned Aircraft Systems, “Final report of FAA sponsored sense and avoid workshop,” Tech. Rep., Federal Aviation Administration, 2009.
  124. D. M. Blum, D. Thipphavong, T. L. Rentas, Y. He, X. Wang, and M. E. Pate-Cornell, “Safety analysis of the advanced airspace concept using monte carlo simulation,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Ontario, Canada, 2010.
  125. R. David and H. Alla, Discrete, Continuous, and Hybrid Petri Nets, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005.
  126. F. J. W. Symons, Modelling and analysis of communication protocols using numerical petri nets [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Electrical Engineering Science University of Essex, Essex, UK, 1978.
  127. S. Natkin, Les réseaux de petri stochastiques et leur application a l'evaluation des systemes informatiques [Ph.D. thesis], Conservatoure National des Arts et Metier, Paris, France, 1980.
  128. M. K. Molloy, On the integration of delay and throughput measures in distributed processing models [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, Calif, USA, 1981.
  129. S. K. Trivedi, Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queuing and Computer Science Applications, John Wiley and Sons, 2nd edition, 2002.
  130. Y. Dutuit, E. Châtelet, J. P. Signoret, and P. Thomas, “Dependability modelling and evaluation by using stochastic Petri nets: application to two test cases,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 117–124, 1997. View at Scopus
  131. K. Jensen, Coloured Petri Nets. Basic Concepts, Analysis Methods and Practical Use, vol. 1, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1993.
  132. V. Volovoi, “Modeling of system reliability Petri nets with aging tokens,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 149–161, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. H. A. P. Blom, B. K. Obbink, and G. J. Bakker, “Safety risk simulation of an airborne self separation concept of operation,” in Proceedings of the 7th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, pp. 331–339, Belfast, Northern Ireland, September 2007. View at Scopus
  134. M. H. A. Davis, “Piecewise-deterministic Markov processes: a general class of nondiffusion stochastic models,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 353–388, 1984.
  135. F. Brissaud, C. Smidts, A. Barros, and C. Bérenguer, “Dynamic reliability of digital-based transmitters,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, vol. 96, no. 7, pp. 793–813, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. E. Bonabeau and C. Meyer, “Swarm intelligence. A whole new way to think about business,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 107–114, 2001. View at Scopus
  137. J. Epstein and R. Axtell, Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from Bottom Up, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1951.
  138. M. T. Parker, “What is Ascape and why should you care?” Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 4, no. 1, 2001. View at Scopus
  139. Icosystem Corporation, 2009, http://www.icosystem.com.
  140. E. Bonabeau, “Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 7280–7287, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. W. Niedringhaus, “An agent-based model of the airline industry,” Tech. Rep., The Mitre Corporation, McLean, Va, USA, 2000.
  142. D. DeLaurentis, J. H. Lewe, and D. Schrage, “Abstraction and modeling hypothesis for future transportation architectures,” in Proceedings of the AIAA/ICAS International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Years (AIAA '03), pp. 2003–2514, Dayton, OH, USA, 2003.
  143. D. DeLaurentis and R. K. Callaway, “A system-of-systems perspective for public policy decisions,” Review of Policy Research, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 829–837, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. S. H. Stroeve, H. A. P. Blom, and G. J. (Bert) Bakker, “Systemic accident risk assessment in air traffic by Monte Carlo simulation,” Safety Science, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 238–249, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. S. Lee, A. Pritchett, and D. Goldsman, “Hybrid agent-based simulation for analyzing the National Airspace System,” in Proceedings of the 33nd Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1029–1036, Arlington, Va, USA, December 2001. View at Scopus
  146. K. Campbell, W. Cooper, D. Greenbaum, and L. Wojcik, “Modeling distributed human decision-making in traffic flow management operations,” in Proceedings of the 3rd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management Research and Development Seminar, Naples, Italy, 2000.
  147. K. Harper, S. Guarino, A. White, M. Hanson, K. Bilimoria, and D. Mulfinger, “An agent-based approach to aircraft conflict resolution with constraints,” in Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit (AIAA '02), pp. 2002–4552, Monterey, Calif, USA, 2002.
  148. I. K. Jennions, Ed., Integrated Vehicle Health Management: Perspectives on an Emerging Field, Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), 2011.