An Assessment of Antibacterial Activity of Four Endodontic Sealers on Enterococcus faecalis by a Direct Contact Test: An In Vitro Study

Table 2

Showing intergroup statistical significance of bacterial growth kinetics.

Dunn’s multiple comparison test	A wells	B wells
Group I (ZnOE) versus Group II (Ketac Endo)	𝑃<0.01	𝑃<0.001
Group I (ZnOE) versus Group III (Gutta Flow)	𝑃<0.001	𝑃<0.001
Group I (ZnOE) versus Group IV (resin)	𝑃<0.001	𝑃<0.001
Group I (ZnOE) versus Group V (control)	𝑃<0.001	𝑃<0.001
Group II (Ketac Endo) versus Group III (Gutta Flow)	𝑃<0.05	𝑃>0.05
Group II (Ketac Endo) versus Group IV (resin)	𝑃<0.001	𝑃<0.05
Group II (Ketac Endo) versus Group V (control)	𝑃<0.001	𝑃<0.05
Group III (Gutta Flow) versus Group IV (resin)	𝑃>0.05	𝑃>0.05
Group III (Gutta Flow) versus Group V (control)	𝑃>0.05	𝑃>0.05
Group IV (resin) versus Group V (control)	𝑃>0.05	𝑃>0.05