Table 6: Comparison of our effectiveness factors ((19), (24), and (29)), and Villa et al. [1] when .

Cases Effectiveness factors ( )
Villa et al. [1]Our results

Case 1 2.50.51.31951.2526
20.41.22941.1952
10.21.09611.0903
0.50.11.04461.0434
0.250.051.02151.0213
−2.5−0.50.81420.8280
−5−0.50.74610.7157
−7.5−0.50.67970.6360
−4−0.20.78270.7592
−5−0.20.74930.7193
Case 2 2.00.41.08201.0603
1.010.2 0.99400.9890
0.50.10.95720.9564
0.250.050.94030.9401
0.10.020.93060.9305
0.010.0020.92490.9249
0.0010.00020.92430.9242
−0.3−0.50.90590.9057
−0.5−0.50.89440.8937
−1.0−0.50.86760.8653
−1.5−0.20.84350.8389
−2.0−0.20.82140.8142
Case 3 1.990.4 0.99910.9678
1.00.20.97930.9168
0.50.10.96990.8910
0.250.050.96530.8783
0.10.020.96260.8708
0.010.0020.96090.8663
0.0010.00020.96080.8658