Clinical Study

4-Year Outcome Analysis of Endoscopic Vein Harvesting for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Table 3

Intraoperative data for 1,544 propensity-matched cases.

VariableEVH groupOVH groupP value
(%) (%)

GSV only96 (12.4)97 (12.6)0.91
LIMA492 (63.7)556 (72.0)0.06
RIMA11 (1.4)9 (1.2)0.89
Bilateral IMAs106 (13.7)51 (6.6)<0.001
Radial artery67 (8.7)59 (7.6)0.71
OPCAB536 (69.4)223 (28.9)<0.0001
Aortic cros-clamp time69.4 ± 27.570.3 ± 28.20.79
CPB time122.7 ± 55.2121.3 ± 53.10.63
Conversion to CPB9 (1.2)
Conversion to OVH6 (0.8)
Grafts/patient2.7 ± 0.42.7 ± 0.80.56
Bioprosthetic valve103 (13.3)111 (14.4)0.76
Mechanical valve35 (4.5)43 (5.6)0.81
MGF (mL/min, mean ± SD)32.8 ± 4.531.6 ± 5.10.67
Pulsatility index2.1 ± 0.52.1 ± 0.10.81

CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; EVH: endoscopic vein harvest; LIMA: left internal mammary artery; MGF: mean graft flow; OPCAB: off-pump coronary artery bypass; OVH: open vein harvest; RIMA: right internal mammary artery; and SD: standard deviation.