Research Article

Synergistic Effects of Nonthermal Plasma and Disinfecting Agents against Dental Biofilms In Vitro

Table 1

Logarithm of CFU/mL of S. mutans, saliva, and subgingival biofilms after treatment with different procedures (control compared with Ar gas or Ar plasma) and different agents (first agent then plasma).

AgentS. mutans SalivaPlaque
ControlAr gasAr plasmaControlAr gasAr plasmaControlAr gasAr plasma

NaCl control   
  
  
RF = 0.35
  
  
RF = 2.11
  
  
  
  
RF = 0.41
  
  
RF = 1.48
  
  
  
  
RF = 1.33
  
  
RF = 2.16

CHX   
  
RF = 1.78
  
  
RF = 1.96
  
  
RF = 1.95
  
  
RF = 0.28
  
  
RF = 1.38
  
  
RF = 1.70
  
  
RF = 0.74
  
  
RF = 1.84
  
  
RF = 1.99

OCT   
  
RF = 1.84
  
  
RF = 1.90
  
  
RF = 1.85
  
  
RF = 0.79
  
  
RF = 1.78
  
  
RF = 2.79
  
  
RF = 1.53
  
  
RF = 2.65
  
  
RF = 1.99

PHMB   
  
RF = 2.52
  
  
RF = 3.39
  
  
RF = 3.36
  
  
RF = 0.87
  
  
RF = 1.13
  
  
RF = 1.56
  
  
RF = 0.96
  
  
RF = 1.86
  
  
RF = 2.07

NaOCl   
  
RF = 6.91
  
  
RF = 6.91
  
  
RF = 6.91
  
  
RF = 2.39
  
  
RF = 2.88
  
  
RF = 3.06
  
  
RF = 1.76
  
  
RF = 1.74
  
  
RF = 1.64

H2O2   
  
RF = 6.91
  
  
RF = 6.91
  
  
RF = 6.91
  
  
RF = 1.49
  
  
RF = 1.83
  
  
RF = 2.41
  
  
RF = 1.88
  
  
RF = 1.84
  
  
RF = 2.92

EDTA   
  
RF = 1.12
  
  
RF = 1.27
  
  
RF = 2.78
  
  
RF = 0.63
  
  
RF = 0.72
  
  
RF = 2.81
  
  
RF = 1.73
  
  
RF = 2.02
  
  
RF = 2.08

Data are presented as mean lg (CFU/mL + 1) ± standard deviation. Ar: argon; CHX: 0.1% chlorhexidine; OCT: 0.1% octenidine; PHMB: 0.1% polyhexanide; NaOCl: 0.6% sodium hypochlorite; H2O2: 1.5% hydrogen peroxide; EDTA: 20% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
Entries with the lowest CFUs/mL were boldface font.
versus NaCl control (within columns); ** versus control procedure (within rows); # Ar plasma versus Ar gas (within rows), two-sided Mann-Whitney U tests, and reduction in respective CFUs/mL. P values were Bonferroni corrected.