- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 961429, 5 pages
Study of Position, Shape, and Size of Mental Foramen Utilizing Various Parameters in Dry Adult Human Mandibles from North India
1Department of Anatomy, L.N. Medical College and J.K. Hospital, Sector-C, Sarvadhram, Kolar Road, Bhopal 460246, India
2Department of Anatomy, L.L.R.M. Medical College, Meerut, India
3Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, India
4Department of Biochemistry, L.N. Medical College, Bhopal, India
Received 30 October 2012; Accepted 22 November 2012
Academic Editors: C. Acosta Hospitaleche, C. Charles, B. Mitchell, and J. A. Vega
Copyright © 2013 Virendra Budhiraja et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background. As the mental foramen (MF) is an important landmark to facilitate surgical, local anesthetic, and other invasive procedures, the present study was aimed to elucidate its morphological features and morphometric parameters with reference to surrounding landmarks. Material and Method. 105 dry adult human mandibles of unknown sex were observed for position, shape, and number of mental foramina. Their size was measured using a digital vernier caliper and statistically analyzed by mean and standard deviations (SD). Results. In most cases (74.3%), the MF was oval in shape and situated on the longitudinal axis of the 2nd premolar tooth (61% on right side and 59.1% on left side). The mean distance for the right and left sides was measured from various landmarks. Conclusion. Prior knowledge of mental foramen variations helps surgeons in planning surgery in that region to avoid nerve damage and also enable effective mental nerve block anesthesia.
The mental foramen (MF) is situated on the anterolateral aspect of the body of mandible. It gives path to mental nerve and vessels [1–3]. Variations of the mental foramen are often encountered ranging from difference in shape and positions [4–6] to presence of accessory foramen  or even complete absence in some cases [8, 9]. Knowledge of its position, shape, and size is important for performing anesthetic block prior to clinical procedures in lower anterior teeth and to preserve integrity of the mental nerve trunk in surgical interventions [10, 11]. As the mental foramen is an important anatomical landmark to facilitate surgical, local anesthetic, and other invasive procedures, the present study is aimed at assessing morphological and morphometric features of mental foramen with reference to surrounding landmarks.
2. Material and Method
105 dry adult human mandible of unknown sex obtained from the Anatomy Department of L.L.R.M. and Subharti Medical College formed the material for study. We observed the position, shape, and number of MF. We measured the distance of MF (in mm) from various landmarks including symphysis menti, alveolar crest, posterior border of the ramus of mandible, and lower border of mandible with digital vernier caliper and calculated the size of mental foramen  (Figure 1).AC: distance from alveolar crest to upper margin of mental foramen.BD: distance from lower border of mandible to lower margin of mental foramen.AB: distance from alveolar crest to lower border of mandible.VD: vertical diameter of foramen = .WY: distance from symphysis menti to medial margin of mental foramen.XZ: distance from posterior border of ramus of mandible to lateral margin of mental foramen.WX: distance from symphysis menti to posterior border of ramus of mandible.HD: horizontal diameter of foramen = .
The results are expressed as mean and standard deviations (SD).
The position of MF was classified in relation to teeth of the lower jaw in accordance with Tebo and Telford  (Figure 2).(I)Foramen lying on a longitudinal axis passing between canine and first premolar;(II)foramen lying on the longitudinal axis of first premolar;(III)foramen lying on a longitudinal axis passing between first and second premolars;(IV)foramen lying on longitudinal axis of second premolar;(V)foramen lying on a longitudinal axis passing between second premolar and first molar;(VI)foramen lying on longitudinal axis of first molar.
The most common position was on the longitudinal axis of second premolar (position IV) (Figure 3) followed by positions III (Figure 4), V (Figure 5), II (Figure 6), and VI (Figure 7). The MF was not observed in position I in any mandible. Results are presented in Table 1. To locate the MF and to measure its size, various parameters were considered and the results are presented in Tables 2 and 3.
In the majority of cases 78/105 (74.3%), the MF was oval in shape and in remaining cases 27/105 (25.7%) the mental foramen was round on the right side as well as on the left side. An accessory mental foramen (AMF) (Figure 3) was observed in 7 cases and was unilateral.
The location of the MF is an important factor when considering the mental incisive anesthetic block and surgery in the outer premolar mandibular region. There are significant differences reported in the location of MF among different ethnic groups. Igbigbi and Lebona  in Malawians and Mbajiorgu et al.  in Zimbabweans mandibles reported position IV as the commonest followed by position V; however, Santini and Land  in British and Green  in Chinese mandibles observed position III being the commonest followed by position IV. In other studies on Kenyans mandibles , the position III was found most common followed by position II and in Malay populations  the most common position was IV followed by III, but in the above-mentioned studies right and left sides not considered separate from each other. In the present study, we considered right and left sides separately and compared the results with those of similar studies conducted in different population groups (Table 4) [4, 12, 13].
Variability in MF position may be related to different feeding habits subsequently affecting mandibular development . Prior knowledge of common positions in local populations may be helpful in effective nerve blocks and surgeries in those regions. Considering the mean and respective SD of various parameters of MF in adult mandibles, the results of present study were similar to those observed by Amorim et al.  in Brazilian’s mandible and Agarwal and Gupta  in mandibles from central India, but the mean of various measurements in Turkish  and Korean  mandibles were much lower than the present study. The differences observed among studies may be related to different methodology, such as measurements on skull photographs or use of different skull marks—center versus anterior or inferior margin of mental foramen or absence of skull mark information [11, 21].
We also measured the size of mental foramen. The mean VD of mental foramen in our study was on the right side and on the left side, respectively and mean HD was on the right side and on the left side, respectively. The results have been very close to those of Igbigbi and Lebona ; however, Oguz and Bozkir  did measurements in 34 dry mandibles of people from Turkey and found a mean HD of 2.93 mm on the right side and 3.14 mm on the left side, and a mean VD of 2.38 mm and 2.64 mm on the right and left sides, respectively. The present results differ significantly for HD from those of Oguz and Bozkir . In another study conducted by Singh and Srivastav , only the HD was taken and the results showed the mean HD to be 2.79 mm on the right side and 2.57 mm on the left side, again much less than the present study. The probable reason for a significant difference in HD in their study was a higher number of rounds than oval MF. In the present study, we observed an oval-shaped MF in 74.3% mandibles and a round-shaped MF in 25.7%. A comparison between the results of the present study and previous ones is presented in Table 5 [4, 15–18].
The incidence of AMF varies in the literature. Singh and Srivastav  observed AMF in 13% mandibles; Gershenson et al.  examined 525 dry mandibles and reported that 4.3% mandibles had a double mental foramen and 0.7% mandibles had triple mental foramen; however, Serman  reported the incidence of AMF to be 2.7%. In the present study, we observed an AMF in 7/105 (6.6%) mandibles. An AMF is due to branching of mental nerve prior to its passing through mental foramen. Thus, the verification of the existence of an AMF would prevent nerve injury during periapical surgery.
Paralysis of the mental nerve is one of the principal complications of surgery of the mandibular canal and mental foramen regions. Therefore, identification of mental foramen in its various positions and its morphometric analysis is important for dental surgeons in nerve block and surgical procedures like apical curettage of mandibular premolars and periodontal surgery, to avoid injury to neurovascular bundle. In a majority of mandibles, we have found oval-shaped foramina lying in position IV. However, variations do exist in the position, shape, and size of mental foramen in different population groups. It is essential to be aware of the possibility of these anatomical variations while planning surgery in that region to avoid nerve damage and also to enable effective mental nerve block anesthesia.
- S. Agthong, T. Huanmanop, and V. Chentanez, “Anatomical variations of the supraorbital, infraorbital, and mental foramina related to gender and side,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 800–804, 2005.
- P. S. Igbigbi and S. Lebona, “The position and dimensions of the mental foramen in adult Malawian mandibles,” West African Journal of Medicine, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 184–189, 2005.
- J. L. Phillips, R. N. Weller, and J. C. Kulild, “The mental foramen: 3. Size and position on panoramic radiographs.,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 383–386, 1992.
- D. R. Agarwal and S. B. Gupta, “Morphometric analysis of mental foramen in human mandibles of south Gujarat,” People’s Journal of Scientific ReSearch, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 2011.
- A. Santini and M. Land, “A comparison of the position of the mental foramen in Chinese and British mandibles,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 208–212, 1990.
- S. Zivanović, “Some morphological characters of the East African mandible.,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 109–119, 1970.
- D. R. Sawyer, M. L. Kiely, and M. A. Pyle, “The frequency of accessory mental foramina in four ethnic groups,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 417–420, 1998.
- V. Defreitas, M. C. Mdeira, J. L. Tsledofilhs, and C. F. Chagas, “Absence of the mental foramen in dry human mandible,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 353–355, 1979.
- T. Hasan, M. Fauzi, and D. Hasan, “Bilateral absence of mental foramen, a rare Variation,” International Journal of Anatomical Variations, vol. 3, pp. 167–169, 2010.
- D. L. Mwaniki and J. Hassanali, “The position of mandibular and mental foramina in Kenyan African mandibles.,” East African Medical Journal, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 210–213, 1992.
- B. Cutright, N. Quillopa, and W. Schubert, “An anthropometric analysis of the key foramina for maxillofacial surgery,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 354–357, 2003.
- M. M. Amorim, F. B. Prado, C. B. Borini et al., “The mental foramen position in dentate and edentulous Brazilian's mandible,” International Journal of Morphology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 981–987, 2008.
- H. Yeşilyurt, A. Aydinlioǧlu, A. Kavakli et al., “Local differences in the position of the mental foramen,” Folia Morphologica, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 32–35, 2008.
- H. G. Tebo and I. R. Telford, “An analysis of the variations in position of the mental foramen,” The Anatomical Record, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 1950.
- E. F. Mbajiorgu, G. Mawera, S. A. Asala, and S. Zivanovic, “Position of the mental foramen in adult Black Zimbabwean mandibles: a clinical anatomical study,” Central African Journal of Medicine, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 24–30, 1998.
- R. Singh and A. K. Srivastav, “Study of position, shape, size and incidence of mental foramen and accessory mental foramen in Indian adult human skulls,” International Journal of Morphology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 1141–1146, 2010.
- A. Gershenson, H. Nathan, and E. Luchansky, “Mental foramen and mental nerve: changes with age,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 1986.
- L. B. L. Prabodra and B. G. Nanayakkara, “The position, dimension and morphological variations of mental foramen in mandibles,” Galle Medical Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 13–15, 2006.
- R. M. Green, “The position of the mental foramen: a comparison between the southern (Hong Kong) Chinese and other ethnic and racial groups,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 287–290, 1987.
- W. C. Ngeow and Y. Yuzawati, “The location of the mental foramen in a selected Malay population.,” Journal of Oral Science, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 171–175, 2003.
- M. S. Chung, H. J. Kim, H. S. Kang, and I. H. Chung, “Locational relationship of the supraorbital notch or foramen and infraorbital and mental foramina in Koreans,” Acta Anatomica, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 162–166, 1995.
- O. Oguz and M. G. Bozkir, “Evaluation of location of mandibular and mental for foramina in dry, young, adult human male, dentulous mandibles,” West Indian Medical Journal, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 14–16, 2002.
- N. J. Serman, “The mandibular incisive foramen,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 167, pp. 195–198, 1989.