Research Article
Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced FLAIR Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosis of Meningitis Correlated with CSF Analysis
Table 1
Comparison between this study and other studies highlighting the importance of postcontrast FLAIR in the diagnosis of meningitis.
| Studies | Postcontrast FLAIR | Postcontrast T1W | Noncontrast FLAIR | Postcontrast T1W FAT SAT |
| This study | More sensitive | Less sensitive | — | — |
Allesandra et al. (2005) [11] | More sensitive | Less sensitive | — | — | Parmar et al. (2006) [7] | Similar sensitivity but higher specificity | Similar sensitivity but lower specificity | — | — | Singer et al. (1998) [13] | — | Less sensitive than noncontrast FLAIR | More sensitive than postcontrast T1W | — | Tsuchiya et al. (1997) [14] | — | Better than noncontrast FLAIR | Better than conventional T2 or proton density | — | Falzone et al. (2008) [15] | More sensitive than postcontrast T1W in enhancing parenchymal lesions | Less sensitive than postcontrast T1W in enhancing parenchymal lesions | — | — | Galassia et al. (2005) [16] | Less sensitive than postcontrast T1W FAT SAT. | — | — | More sensitive than contrast-enhanced FLAIR | Ercan et al. (2004) [17] | Postcontrast FLAIR is a valuable adjunct to postcontrast T1W | Postcontrast T1W is essential. | — | — |
|
|