Research Article

Propagation of Some Local Fig (Ficus carica L.) Cultivars by Hardwood Cuttings under the Field Conditions in Tunisia

Table 5

Means of nursery plants morphological characters studied in six cuttings types of Bither’s fig cultivar (means of two replications 2009 and 2010).

Cutting typesRE %NBLP cmDP mmNLCG cmNR

Type 163.33b0.58ab19.11a8.79a14.63a53.29a4.76a
Type 263.33b0.21a21.58a10.16a13.58a55.21a10.89bc
Type 383.33b0.56ab24.52a9.68a16.04ab65.04abc10.50bc
Type 453.33ab0.44ab18.19a11.81a13.75a58.29ab14.75c
Type 550.00ab0.73ab24.13a10.53a17.07ab77.20c9.53b
Type 626.67a1.38bc18.25a9.75a22.50bc69.38bc6.38ab

calculated3.1662.7843.3703.2942.7844.2044.232

Significance***********

Type 1: type cutting of one-year-old shoots, length (30 cm), and diameter (<1.5 cm).
Type 2: type cutting of one-year-old shoots, length (40 cm), and diameter (<1.5 cm).
Type 3: type cutting of one-year-old shoots, length (60 cm), and diameter (<1.5 cm).
Type 4: type cutting of 2-year-old shoots, length (30 cm), and diameter (<1.5 cm).
Type 5: type cutting of 2-year-old shoots, length (40 cm), and diameter (<1.5 cm).
Type 6: type cutting of 2-year old shoots, length (60 cm), and diameter (>2 cm).
*, **: significant, high significant at < 0.05, respectively.
Different letters in one column indicate differences within cutting types by least significant difference (LSD) test at a significance level of 0.05.