About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Amino Acids
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 461216, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/461216
Review Article

Protein Modification by Dicarbonyl Molecular Species in Neurodegenerative Diseases

1Department of Biological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
2Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA

Received 3 November 2010; Accepted 10 January 2011

Academic Editor: Jackob Moskovitz

Copyright © 2011 Wesley M. Williams et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Neurodegeneration results from abnormalities in cerebral metabolism and energy balance within neurons, astrocytes, microglia, or microvascular endothelial cells of the blood-brain barrier. In Alzheimer's disease, -amyloid is considered the primary contributor to neuropathology and neurodegeneration. It now is believed that certain systemic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, can contribute to neurodegeneration through the effects of chronic hyperglycemia/insulin resistance resulting in protein glycation, oxidative stress and inflammation within susceptible brain regions. Here, we present an overview of research focusing on the role of protein glycation, oxidative stress, and inflammation in the neurodegenerative process. Of special interest in this paper is the effect of methylglyoxal (MGO), a cytotoxic byproduct of glucose metabolism, elevated in neurodegenerative disease, and diabetes mellitus, on cerebral protein function and oxidative stress. How MGO interacts with amino acid residues within -amyloid, and small peptides within the brain, is also discussed in terms of the affect on protein function.

1. Introduction

Approximately 24 million people worldwide suffer the effects of some form of dementia, with numbers expected to increase substantially over the next several decades [1]. Neurodegenerative diseases are highly dynamic, multifactorial pathological conditions the causes of which remain poorly understood. The chronic nature of their development and progression suggests an insidious etiology that may involve multiple synergistic interactions among biochemically unrelated molecular species, and perhaps dysfunctional or overcompensatory metabolic, and immunologic pathways. Numerous studies have contributed to our improved, yet far from complete understanding of the etiological causes of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), multiple sclerosis, Pick’s disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), and Parkinson’s disease (PD). Many of these studies suggest several mechanistic similarities among these clinically disparate diseases, including abnormalities in protein folding and aggregation, elevated release of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to development of oxidative stress and inflammation, and increased glycation of key cellular proteins [2]. In this paper we will address key elements of our current level of understanding as they relate to the effects of oxidative stress and inflammation on neuronal degeneration. We will then focus on the abnormal glycation of proteins and small peptides relevant to specific neurodegenerative diseases and how the formation of aldehydic molecular species, such as the -dicarbonyls methylglyoxal (MGO) and glyoxal (GO), contribute to the chronic development of this process. MGO is the most reactive dicarbonyl and in vivo during aerobic glycolysis is formed by the spontaneous decomposition of triose phosphate intermediates, although MGO can also form from the oxidative degradation of pentoses, ascorbate, and lipids [3]. Finally, we will discuss the mechanisms by which certain proteins and peptides prove susceptible to nonenzymatic glycation (Maillard reaction) through interaction of these dicarbonyls with specific amino acid residues of their primary structure. This paper is intended to be a succinct overview of current concepts regarding the role of protein glycation in the development of oxidative stress and inflammatory response within the CNS. Perhaps concurrently, posttranslational modification of proteins can also occur via oxidative and lipoperoxidative reaction with susceptible amino acids. These reactions, together with glycoxidation likely contribute by varying degree to neurodegeneration associated with AD and CJD [4, 5].

2. Neurodegenerative Diseases-Etiological Similarities

Neurodegenerative disorders of the central nervous system are slowly developing, insidious conditions that contribute to initial neuronal cell degeneration and ultimately cell death. Noteworthy is the occurrence of specific pathological markers that denote the major neurodegenerative diseases, including AD, PD, and CJD. While the cytological location and expression of these posttranslational pathological markers may vary each of these disorders involves (1) abnormal protein folding and aggregation and (2) elevated levels of nonenzymatic protein glycation. Dicarbonyl molecular species (MGO and GO) are unavoidable byproducts of sugar metabolism and are known contributors to the misfolding, aggregation, and insolubility of susceptible proteins through their ability to adduct and form crosslinks via stable advanced glycation end products (AGEs) [6, 7]. Using PrP27-30 an infective variant of prion protein ( ) isolated from infected Syrian hamster brain [8], Panza et al. [9] showed in vitro that AGE formation by GO and MGO is more highly adducted in noninfectious PrP than in infectious PrP27-30. Interestingly, they found AGE-modification of prion resulted in reduced fibril formation, an event that may actually contribute to reduced prion infectivity in vivo. In other neurodegenerative diseases, such as AD the effect of AGE-related adduct formation may contribute to modification of both intracellular (lipofuscin, neurofibrillary tangles; NFTs) and extracellular proteins ( -amyloid) [1012]. In addition to their effects on protein folding and aggregation AGEs are likely contributors to the generation of ROS and nitrogen oxygen species, including the radicals superoxide and peroxynitrite in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases [13]. Superoxide ( not only can react with nitric oxide ( ) to form the reactive nonradical peroxynitrite (ONOO), but also in the presence of transition metals (e.g., Fe2+), and Fenton chemistry produces the nonradical hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) that decomposes to the hydroxyl anion (OH) and highly reactive hydroxyl radical ( ) [14, 15].

3. Alzheimer’s Disease-Protein Glycation and -Amyloid

A well-established hallmark of Alzheimer’s neuropathology is the excessive presence of extracellular senile plaques, comprised predominantly of -amyloid and NFT [16]. Previous study has shown that the glycation process results in the extracellular formation of adducts and AGEs on -amyloid [17], that MGO is a major glycating agent in this process [18], and that an accelerated polymerization of the peptide occurs as a result of AGE crosslinkage [19]. These findings have led to the proposal that AGEs may act to promote increased -amyloid and plaque deposition within the AD brain [2]. AGEs also adduct to proteins intracellularly, including NFT with the level of glycation increasing with age and severity of AD [20].

In a recent review by Münch and colleagues [2], a sequence of events has been outlined detailing the involvement of increased production of MGO through accumulation of triose phosphates [21]. Triosephosphate isomerase (TPI) is an enzyme that interconverts dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) and d-glyceraldehyde phosphate [22], thus limiting the metabolic production of MGO under physiological conditions [23, 24]. It is the only glycolytic enzyme that exhibits a functional deficiency correlated with neurodegenerative disease [25]. The deficiency in TPI function results in the accumulation of DHAP that spontaneously degrades to MGO [26]. Dysfunctional TPI in AD appears to result from a -amyloid-dependent nitrosylation of tyrosine in TPI as demonstrated in both AD brain and in mouse brain overexpressing -amyloid and presenilin 1 [27]. Together with increased levels of unchelated transition metals (copper and iron) associated with amyloid plaques, glycated proteins become increasingly oxidized, resulting in the elevated presence of cytotoxic proteins [2, 28].

3.1. Glycation and the Onset of Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Neurodegeneration

The generation of ROS and their cytotoxic effects are common to the pathophysiology of many neurodegenerative disorders. Noteworthy is the mechanism by which these free radicals and free-radical-producing substrates, such as H2O2, are generated. Evidence for the presence of oxidative stress within the AD brain is substantial [2932] and is multifactorial, originating from peroxidation of lipids by aldehydes such as hydroxynonenal [33], protein and DNA oxidation by carbonylation [34], and glycation-related reactions [35] suggesting an imbalance between the abnormal production of free-radical species and the compromised cellular mechanisms responsible for their neutralization. The question arises however, as to whether the onset of oxidative stress is an early feature of neurodegenerative diseases or an epiphenomenon. The answer to this question remains equivocal, although there is considerable evidence to support the involvement of ROS and oxidative stress in the early development and progression of neurodegeneration. In PD, ROS are produced at a higher rate than that observed in age-matched healthy controls. Moreover, appearance of ROS occurs in association with the presence of AGEs in Lewy bodies prior to appearance of the Parkinson’s phenotype [36].

The well-characterized nonenzymatic reaction of reducing sugars glucose, fructose and glyceraldehyde with susceptible amino acid residues of proteins can lead to the irreversible formation of the Schiff base, and the more stable Amadori product [37]. The reaction may proceed further by condensation, dehydration, and additional rearrangements to form advanced glycation endproducts or AGEs [38]. In addition to the potential contribution of -amyloid to protein oxidation and oxidative stress [39] experimental evidence supports the underlying involvement of accelerated AGE formation as a significant contributor to oxidative stress and neurodegeneration of the Alzheimer’s type [40], not only by the direct production of ROS but also through their binding to the multiligand receptor RAGE, a cell-surface molecule and member of the immunoglobulin superfamily [41, 42]. In both in vitro and in vivo studies Ko and colleagues [43] show that AGEs up-regulated the expression of APP, a response that could be prevented by the pretreatment of neuroblastoma cells (cell line SH-SY5Y) with the ROS inhibitor N-acetyl-L-cysteine. Furthermore, the accumulation of -amyloid1–42 was also increased following the treatment of these cells with AGE.

The reciprocal interaction between oxidative stress, through protein oxidation and lipid peroxidation, and the activation of proinflammatory pathways as part of the innate immune response within the brain has been extensively studied and shown to be a biologically significant component of neuropathogenesis in AD [43, 44]. This was demonstrated histochemically in AD brain, where activated microglial cells and astrocytes, both resident immune cells of the brain [45], express proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1 , IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor- , along with ROS [46]. This expression of proinflammatory cytokines may result from the binding of -amyloid1–42 fibrils to complement factor C1q and serum amyloid P component, as shown by Eikelenboom et al. [47] in cultures of human microglial cells. The AGE-RAGE pathway is a significant contributor to this process in part through the ability of RAGE to bind with various proinflammatory ligands, including AGEs and -amyloid and through the generation of ROS as second messengers [48]. This was demonstrated by Gasic-Milenkovic et al. [49] who showed the inflammatory response from murine microglial cells was augmented by exposure to AGE-bound -amyloid, relative to unbound -amyloid. Neuroinflammation and impairment of neurogenesis in AD may be promoted not only by -amyloid, but also by the intracellular domain of expressed amyloid precursor protein (AICD), as shown by Ghosal et al. [50] in transgenic mice coexpressing the 59-residue long AICD fragment and in APP-knockout mice.

3.2. MGO Cytotoxicity and Neurodegeneration

MGO is the most reactive -dicarbonyl and is increased in normal aging and especially in neurodegenerative disease [51]. Exposure of neuroblastoma cells to MGO for up to 24 hrs induces depolarization of the plasma membrane, release of glutamate, and formation of ROS [52]. Experimental evidence also confirms the capability of MGO to impair cellular glucose metabolism and energy depletion, as shown in cultured neuroblastoma cells [53]. Elevated MGO in Type 2 diabetes and in at least some neurodegenerative diseases, including AD strongly supports the proposal that dicarbonyl stress, particularly that due to MGO contributes significantly to alterations in protein function in these conditions and to their neuropathology. Support for this proposal comes from experiments on cultured rat hippocampal neuronal cells exposed to MGO [54]. MGO induced oxidative-stress related neuronal cell death and concurrently induced expression of nerve growth factor and release of proinflammatory cytokine IL-1 . Studies also demonstrate the ability of MGO to inhibit protein function. Argpyrimidine, formed by the reaction of MGO with arginine residues, is a specific marker for protein glycation and is present in human renal tissue and lens proteins from diabetic patients, as well as in at least some neurodegenerative conditions [5557]. These results lend additional support for a central role of dicarbonyl molecular species in vivo, especially MGO, in the early development and progression of oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetes and neurodegenerative disease.

4. Diabetes Mellitus—A Risk Factor for AD?

Considerable evidence is presented in the literature supporting the association of the 2 major components of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance and hyperglycemia with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type [58, 59], although acceptance of this association is not universal. An often referenced longitudinal study supporting an association is the Rotterdam study reported by Ott et al. [60]. Study data gathered from 5,000 subjects 55 years of age and older suggested a strong correlation between Type 2 diabetes and the subsequent development of AD. Baker et al. [61], reporting on a study of human subjects diagnosed with diabetes or presenting with elevated glycemic indices showed that individuals with increased insulin resistance also presented with an AD-like pattern of reduced cerebral glucose metabolic rate in frontal, parietotemporal, and cingulated regions of the brain, suggesting insulin resistance as a predictive marker for AD. Additional support for Type 2 diabetes as a risk factor for AD comes from studies by Curb et al. [62] and Leibson et al. [63], among others. In view of recent reports, a causative association between Type 2 diabetes, perhaps as a result of hyperinsulinemia and/or hyperglycemia, and cognitive impairment is strong, with an association to AD somewhat less so. Although both diseases exhibit some similarities, such as insulin resistance [64], dysregulation of iron homeostasis, and increases in metallothionein and heme oxygenase-1 [65], there is limited evidence that Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes leads to AD neuropathology [66].

Overall, study findings to date suggest a strong correlation between chronic Type 2 diabetes and subsequent development of dementia, however, the effect of diabetes on cerebral function may be related more to an initial predisposition to vascular dementia than to development of classical AD neuropathology [67, 68]. In the following section we will discuss the involvement of insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, both hallmarks of Type 2 diabetes in the pathophysiology of neurodegeneration, including AD.

5. Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Neurodegeneration

Although some question remains as to the predisposition of the diabetic brain to develop AD pathology, recent studies suggest a strong correlation between Type 2 diabetes, brain atrophy and reduced neuronal integrity. In one clinical study [69] of 89 patients with diabetes, 70 to 82 years of age MRI scans and cognitive function testing was conducted at baseline and again 3 years later. After correcting for age, gender, educational level, hypertension, and treatment with pravastatin linear regression analysis revealed statistically significant atrophy of the brain in diabetic patients in comparison to matched control subjects without diabetes. A second MRI study by de Bresser et al. [70] conducted over 4 years on 55 patients with Type 2 diabetes showed significant reduction in total brain volume and increased peripheral cerebrospinal fluid volume, leading to the conclusion that Type 2 diabetes can lead to slow, chronic cerebral atrophy. Encephalopathy with neuronal degeneration and inflammation has also been demonstrated in the hippocampus of the streptozotocin (STZ) Type 2 diabetic rat model [71]. The hyperglycemia associated with Type 2 diabetes also appears to impair gap junctional communication between astrocytes as shown in (1) cultured astrocytes harvested from 1-day-old Wistar-Hanover rats and exposed to high glucose, and (2) brain slices from 20-to-24-week-old STZ rats [72]. Assessment of gap junction channel-mediated dye transfer was used to determine astrocytic gap junctional function.

Difficulty in determining the causative relationship between Type 2 diabetes and AD is, in part, due to the heterogeneous nature of AD. A definitive diagnosis of AD can only be made postmortem. Moreover, AD is frequently associated with a microvascular component [73], and as Luchsinger and Gustafson correctly state [74], AD may illustrate a neurodegenerative disease with a graded overlapping of vascular and amyloid neuropathologies.

The AD brain exhibits regional glucose hypometabolism as well as abnormalities in insulin signaling [75], both components of diabetes mellitus [76, 77]. The presence of glucose hypometabolism and development of a hyperglycemic cellular microenvironment precipitated by progressive insulin resistance and altered insulin signaling pathways contribute to neuronal death [78]. MGO may promote neuronal cell death by contributing directly to insulin resistance via acceleration of AGE formation [79], and also by involvement in the combined effects of dicarbonyl reactivity with tau, and hyperphosphorylation of tau and other proteins by protein O-glycosylation via monosaccharide -N-acetylglucosamine attachment to serine/threonine residues via an O-linked glycosidic bond [80]. Present data suggests that glucose hypometabolism and insulin resistance in AD contribute to the development of tau hyperphosphorylation by reduction of this glycosylation process, thus leading to the formation of tangles and eventual neuronal cell death [81]. Increased tau phosphorylation has also been described in a mouse model of Type 1 (STZ injected) and 2 (db/db) diabetes mellitus [82]. In this study, tau phosphorylation was found to increase in the cortex and hippocampus of both mouse models, but the increase was particularly noteworthy in the STZ-injected mouse brain. Study results suggested that tau phosphorylation was directly induced by hyperglycemic (Type 2) and insulin deficiency (Type 1). Similar results were reported by Ke et al. [83] in the pR5 transgenic mouse model of AD with superimposition of Type 2 diabetes induced by STZ. Immunocytochemical and Western blot analyses indicated tau hyperphosphorylation was accelerated in the diabetic transgenic model. Hyperglycemic conditions in Type 2 diabetes and perhaps in AD can elevate tissue dicarbonyl levels, primarily MGO and GO molecular species, thus contributing to tau crosslinking and oligomer formation. That this can occur has been shown by Kuhla et al. [84], who demonstrated increased dimer and oligomer formation in wild-type and pseudophosphorylated mutant tau proteins, particularly when exposed to MGO.

6. Dicarbonyl Interaction with Proteins—Amino Acid Residues and Protein Susceptibility

Production of -dicarbonyl molecular species, most notably GO and MGO, occurs slowly under physiological conditions, yet adduction to susceptible lysine, arginine and cysteine residues occurs, with the hydroimidazolones being the most commonly formed adducts, primarily on proteins with long half-lives [85, 86]. Compromise of protein function is effected initially by glycation of the lysine side chain and N-terminal amino acid residues, followed by later stage modification involving not only these, but arginine and cysteine residues and stabilization to AGEs via Schiff base and Amadori rearrangement [87, 88]. The impact of glycation on protein function depends in part on the turnover rate of the protein, and cellular defense mechanisms, such as activity of the glyoxalase system responsible for the degradation of unadducted dicarbonyl [89]. Because activity of the glyoxalase system declines with progression of Type 2 diabetes and AD [84] MGO levels can rise significantly. Glyoxalase activity depends on the availability of reduced glutathione which can be decreased in neurodegenerative disease [90].

Both in vitro and in vivo studies indicate that presence of glycating agents, such as MGO, within the vicinity of arginine, lysine, and cysteine residues of a protein is not necessarily predictive of adduction at these sites. Moreover, glycation and reactivity of dicarbonyls with amino acids is a dynamic process. Jia et al. [91] demonstrated in vitro the susceptibility of insulin to glycation by MGO, while glucagon, a protein of similar mass with two arginines and a single lysine, was resistant to modification. Additional support for the selective nonenzymatic glycation of proteins comes from studies of human [92], mouse, and rat [93] plasma proteins obtained from aged populations. Both studies show glycation may be limited to relatively few proteins.

The tertiary structure of a protein, and therefore accessibility of the glycating agent to susceptible residues, is a primary determinant of whether the glycation process proceeds. This was shown by Gao and Wang [94] who correlated selective modification of specific arginine residues within the hemoglobin molecule with solvent accessibility, as determined by the “relative surface exposable area” calculated for each arginine within the native molecule. Conversely, in an earlier study on glycation of RNase protein Watkins et al. [95] note that the only common characteristic of unreactive lysine residues in the protein were their location on the protein surface, and thus readily solvent accessible. They point out, however, that this nonreactivity may be due to a calculated 20% reduction in the rate constant for glycation following reaction of highly reactive lysine residues. A second determinant of site specificity of protein glycation is the p of the competing residues, with the residue having the lower value more susceptible to initial Schiff base formation and subsequent conversion to stable glucosamines via the Amadori rearrangement [96]. However, the initial formation of the Schiff base is not necessarily predictive of the Amadori rearrangement, as shown by the observation that Lys-41 in bovine pancreatic RNase A although less susceptible to Schiff base modification than is -lys-1, accounts for more than twice the Amadori adduct to the RNase. It should be emphasized that failure of the amino acid to initially react with the glycating agent does not preclude eventual modification. Thirdly, reactivity with glucose appears to be enhanced when specific residues, like lysine, are proximal to high-affinity binding sites for phosphate ion or organic phosphate often within basic regions of the molecule, a frequent condition within substrate and effector binding sites of the protein [95]. Proximity of lysine to carboxylic acid containing residues within the primary or tertiary structure has been noted by Shapiro et al. [97].

7. Discussion and Summary

The preponderance of reported studies support an association between hyperglycemia and insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia, both components of uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes, and similar conditions in AD. Increased glycation of susceptible proteins is also of pathophysiological significance in both diabetes and neurodegenerative diseases. Attempting to demonstrate Type 2 diabetes as a risk factor for AD has been inherently difficult for 2 reasons: (1) the percentage of study subjects maintaining good glycemic control has often not been strictly recorded, thus these individuals may present with few, if any systemic complications such as cardiovascular, renal, or peripheral nerve pathology most often associated with diabetes and (2) confirmation of AD cannot be made until postmortem examination of brain sections. To date, there are no reported study findings relating the level of long-term glycemic control to cognitive function in Type 2 diabetes. However, in 2007, Williamson et al. [98] initiated the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Memory in Type 2 Diabetes Study (ACCORD-MIND), the first such study to formally assess cognitive outcome following a treatment program designed to compare the effects of standard care versus intensive care guidelines. This study should contribute importantly to our understanding of how, and whether long-term stability of blood sugar affects cognitive function.

The role of protein and peptide glycation, and that of MGO and other dicarbonyl molecular species, in the development and progression of neurodegenerative diseases remains poorly defined, due largely to a lack of rigorous corroborative studys conducted in vivo. Interpretation of in vitro findings are often tentative, given that tissue localization, concentration, half-life, and reactivity of key reactants, that is, dicarbonyl molecular species, susceptible protein, and host defense systems, such as antioxidants, reduced glutathione, and glyoxylase I and 2 may not be reflective of disease conditions in vivo. Nonetheless, there is considerable evidence supporting the role of protein glycation and associated oxidative stress and inflammation as central to the progression of some neurodegenerative diseases, AD being a prime example [99]. However, whether these events are early, causative events in the disease remains unclear, although Smith et al. [99] point out that the presence of AGE epitopes localized to diffuse β-amyloid plaques represent an early pathological event in AD. Oxidative stress brought about by glycation of amino acids, and the irreversible formation of AGEs is likely to be but one of several pathways contributing to protein dysfunction. Recently, elevation of redox-active iron was found in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum in human preclinical AD brains, and brains with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), indicating transition-metal-induced free radical generation within these brain regions [100]. Occurrence of increased iron in brain from MCI patients is also highly suggestive of an iron-generated free radical-induced primary event within this and perhaps other neurodegenerative diseases that may respond to the use of antioxidant therapies. Elevated levels of transition metals within AD brain may be primary contributors to the augmentation of oxidative stress associated with amino acid-MGO adduct formation. Concurrently, MGO-induced AGE formation and AGE-RAGE binding can regulate expression of proinflammatory cytokines via redox-sensitive pathways that may be central to neuroinflammation in AD [44]. Potential therapies for AD and other neurodegenerative diseases focusing on antioxidants, anti-inflammatory agents, and inhibitors of AGE-RAGE pathways are currently intense areas of research.

In recent years an increasing number of animal models have been developed that closely approximate conditions reflecting the human disease. Increased emphasis on utilization of these in vivo models in long-term studies of dicarbonyl-protein interactions is a plausible and necessary alternative for future investigations. Increased focus on in vivo studies will be required to determine, conclusively, the relative involvement of dicarbonyl-induced glycation, oxidative stress, and inflammatory responses in the etiology of human neurodegenerative disease.

Acknowledgment

This paper is dedicated to Mark A. Smith, Ph.D., a visionary, whose scientific passion and curiosity will not be forgotten.

References

  1. A. Kern and C. Behl, “The unsolved relationship of brain aging and late-onset Alzheimer disease,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1790, no. 10, pp. 1124–1132, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  2. G. Münch, B. Westcott, T. Menini, and A. Gugliucci, “Advanced glycation endproducts and their pathogenic roles in neurological disorders,” Amino Acids. 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. T. P. Degenhardt, S. R. Thorpe, and J. W. Baynes, “Chemical modification of proteins by methylglyoxal,” Cellular and Molecular Biology, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1139–1145, 1998.
  4. R. Pamplona, E. Dalfo, V. Ayala et al., “Proteins in human brain cortex are modified by oxidation, glycoxidation, and lipoxidation: effects of Alzheimer disease and identification of lipoxidation targets,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 22, pp. 21522–21530, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  5. R. Pamplona, A. Naudi, R. Gavin et al., “Increased oxidation, glycoxidation, and lipoxidation of brain proteins in prion disease,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1159–1166, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  6. C. R. Harrington and C. A. L. S. Colaco, “Alzheimer's disease. A glycation connection,” Nature, vol. 370, no. 6487, pp. 247–248, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  7. A. Gafni, “Structural modifications of proteins during aging,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 871–880, 1997.
  8. S. B. Prusiner, M. P. McKinley, K. A. Bowman, et al., “Scrapie prions aggregate to form amyloid-like birefringent rods,” Cell, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 349–358, 1983.
  9. G. Panza, C. Dumpitak, and E. Birkmann, “Influence of the maillard reaction to prion protein aggregation,” Rejuvenation Research, vol. 13, no. 2-3, pp. 220–223, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. K. Horie, T. Miyata, T. Yasuda et al., “Immunohistochemical localization of advanced glycation end products, pentosidine, and carboxymethyllysine in lipofuscin pigments of Alzheimer's disease and aged neurons,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 236, no. 2, pp. 327–332, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. S. D. Yan, X. Chen, A. M. Schmidt et al., “Glycated tau protein in Alzheimer disease: a mechanism for induction of oxidant stress,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 16, pp. 7787–7791, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. A. Smith, S. Taneda, P. L. Richey et al., “Advanced Maillard reaction end products are associated with Alzheimer disease pathology,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 5710–5714, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. C. Loske, A. Neumann, A. M. Cunningham et al., “Cytotoxicity of advanced glycation endproducts is mediated by oxidative stress,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 105, no. 8-9, pp. 1005–1015, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Carubelli, J. E. Schneider, Q. N. Pye, and R. A. Floyd, “Cytotoxic effects of autoxidative glycation,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 265–269, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. B. J. Ortwerth, H. James, G. Simpson, and M. Linetsky, “The generation of superoxide anions in glycation reactions with sugars, osones, and 3-deoxyosones,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 245, no. 1, pp. 161–165, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. J. L. Cummings, H. V. Vinters, G. M. Cole, and Z. S. Khachaturian, “Alzheimer's disease: etiologies, pathophysiology, cognitive reserve, and treatment opportunities,” Neurology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. S2–S17, 1998.
  17. K. Chen, J. Maley, and P. H. Yu, “Potential implications of endogenous aldehydes in β-amyloid misfolding, oligomerization and fibrillogenesis,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 1413–1424, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  18. J. Webster, C. Urban, K. Berbaum et al., “The carbonyl scavengers aminoguanidine and tenilsetam protect against the neurotoxic effects of methylglyoxal,” Neurotoxicity Research, vol. 7, no. 1-2, pp. 95–101, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. C. Loske, A. Gerdemann, W. Schepl et al., “Transition metal-mediated glycoxidation accelerates cross-linking of β-amyloid peptide,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 267, no. 13, pp. 4171–4178, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. H. J. Lüth, V. Ogunlade, B. Kuhla et al., “Age- and stage-dependent accumulation of advanced glycation end products in intracellular deposits in normal and Alzheimer's disease brains,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 211–220, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  21. S. A. Phillips and P. J. Thornalley, “The formation of methylglyoxal from triose phosphates. Investigation using a specific assay for methylglyoxal,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 101–105, 1993.
  22. K. K. Desai and B. G. Miller, “A metabolic bypass of the triosephosphate isomerase reaction,” Biochemistry, vol. 47, no. 31, pp. 7983–7985, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  23. J. P. Richard, “Kinetic parameters for the elimination reaction catalyzed by triosephosphate isomerase and an estimation of the reaction's physiological significance,” Biochemistry, vol. 30, no. 18, pp. 4581–4585, 1991.
  24. J. P. Richard, “Mechanism for the formation of methylglyoxal from triosephosphates,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 549–553, 1993.
  25. S. W. Eber, A. Pekrun, A. Bardosi et al., “Triosephosphate isomerase deficiency: haemolytic anaemia, myopathy with altered mitochondria and mental retardation due to a new variant with accelerated enzyme catabolism and diminished specific activity,” European Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 150, no. 11, pp. 761–766, 1991.
  26. N. Ahmed, S. Battah, N. Karachalias, et al., “Increased formation of methylglyoxal and protein glycation, oxidation and nitrosation in triosephosphate isomerase deficiency,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1639, no. 2, pp. 121–132, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. F. X. Guix, G. Ill-Raga, R. Bravo et al., “Amyloid-dependent triosephosphate isomerase nitrotyrosination induces glycation and tau fibrillation,” Brain, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 1335–1345, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  28. H. V. Miranda and T. F. Outeiro, “The sour side of neurodegenerative disorders: the effects of protein glycation,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 221, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  29. N. Durany, G. Münch, T. Michel, and P. Riederer, “Investigations on oxidative stress and therapeutical implications in dementia,” European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 249, no. 3, pp. 68–73, 1999.
  30. W. Retz, W. Gsell, G. Münch, M. Rosler, and P. Riederer, “Free radicals in Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission, no. 54, pp. 221–236, 1998.
  31. L. M. Sayre, P. I. Moreira, M. A. Smith, and G. Perry, “Metal ions and oxidative protein modification in neurological disease,” Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 143–164, 2005.
  32. L. M. Sayre, G. Perry, and M. A. Smith, “Oxidative stress and neurotoxicity,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 172–188, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  33. W. R. Markesbery and M. A. Lovell, “Four-hydroxynonenal, a product of lipid peroxidation, is increased in the brain in Alzheimer's disease,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 33–36, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. B. S. Berlett and E. R. Stadtman, “Protein oxidation in aging, disease, and oxidative stress,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 33, pp. 20313–20316, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. G. Münch, A. M. Cunningham, P. Riederer, and E. Braak, “Advanced glycation endproducts are associated with Hirano bodies in Alzheimer's disease,” Brain Research, vol. 796, no. 1-2, pp. 307–310, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. E. Koutsilieri, C. Scheller, E. Grünblatt, K. Nara, J. Li, and P. Riederer, “Free radicals in Parkinson's disease,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 249, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2002.
  37. M. Takeuchi and Z. Makita, “Alternative routes for the formation of immunochemically distinct advanced glycation end-products in vivo,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 305–315, 2001.
  38. M. Brownlee, A. Cerami, and H. Vlassara, “Advanced products of nonenzymatic glycosylation and the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular disease,” Diabetes/Metabolism Reviews, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 437–451, 1988.
  39. R. Sultana, M. Piroddi, F. Galli, and D. A. Butterfield, “Protein levels and activity of some antioxidant enzymes in hippocampus of subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 33, no. 12, pp. 2540–2546, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  40. M. Guglielmotto, L. Giliberto, E. Tamagno, and M. Tabaton, “Oxidative stress mediates the pathogenic effect of different Alzheimer’s disease risk factors,” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, vol. 2, pp. 1–7, 2010.
  41. M. Neeper, A. M. Schmidt, J. Brett, et al., “Cloning and expression of a cell surface receptor for advanced glycosylation end products of proteins,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 267, no. 21, pp. 14998–15004, 1992.
  42. J. Qin, R. Goswami, S. Dawson, and G. Dawson, “Expression of the receptor for advanced glycation end products in oligodendrocytes in response to oxidative stress,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 86, no. 11, pp. 2414–2422, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  43. S. Y. Ko, Y. P. Lin, Y. S. Lin, and S. S. Chang, “Advanced glycation end products enhance amyloid precursor protein expression by inducing reactive oxygen species,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 474–480, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  44. A. Maczurek, K. Shanmugam, and G. Münch, “Inflammation and the redox-sensitive AGE-RAGE pathway as a therapeutic target in Alzheimer's disease,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1126, pp. 147–151, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  45. S. M. Lucas, N. J. Rothwell, and R. M. Gibson, “The role of inflammation in CNS injury and disease,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 147, no. 1, pp. S232–S240, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  46. A. Wong, H. J. Lüth, W. Deuther-Conrad et al., “Advanced glycation endproducts co-localize with inducible nitric oxide synthase in Alzheimer's disease,” Brain Research, vol. 920, no. 1-2, pp. 32–40, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. P. Eikelenboom, R. Veerhuis, A. Familian, J. J. M. Hoozemans, W. A. van Gool, and A. J. M. Rozemuller, “Neuroinflammation in plaque and vascular β-amyloid disorders: clinical and therapeutic implications,” Neurodegenerative Diseases, vol. 5, no. 3-4, pp. 190–193, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  48. A. Wong, S. Dukic-Stefanovic, J. Gasic-Milenkovic et al., “Anti-inflammatory antioxidants attenuate the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase mediated by advanced glycation endproducts in murine microglia,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1961–1967, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. J. Gasic-Milenkovic, S. Dukic-Stefanovic, W. Deuther-Conrad, U. Gärtner, and G. Münch, “β-amyloid peptide potentiates inflammatory responses induced by lipopolysaccharide, interferon -γ and 'advanced glycation endproducts' in a murine microglia cell line,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 813–821, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. K. Ghosal, A. Stathopoulos, and S. W. Pimplikar, “APP intracellular domain impairs adult neurogenesis in transgenic mice by inducing neuroinflammation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 7, Article ID e11866, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  51. M. A. Grillo and S. Colombatto, “Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs): involvement in aging and in neurodegenerative diseases,” Amino Acids, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  52. S. Garcia de Arriba, U. Krügal, R. Regenthal, et al., “Carbonyl stress and NMDA receptor activation contribute to methylglyoxal neurotoxicity,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 779–790, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  53. S. G. de Arriba, G. Stuchbury, J. Yarin, J. Burnell, C. Loske, and G. Münch, “Methylglyoxal impairs glucose metabolism and leads to energy depletion in neuronal cells-protection by carbonyl scavengers,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1044–1050, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  54. S. Di Loreto, V. Caracciolo, S. Colafarina, P. Sebastiani, A. Gasbarri, and F. Amicarelli, “Methylglyoxal induces oxidative stress-dependent cell injury and up-regulation of interleukin-1β and nerve growth factor in cultured hippocampal neuronal cells,” Brain Research, vol. 1006, no. 2, pp. 157–167, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  55. A. K. Padival, J. W. Crabb, and R. H. Nagaraj, “Methylglyoxal modifies heat shock protein 27 in glomerular mesangial cells,” FEBS Letters, vol. 551, no. 1–3, pp. 113–118, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. T. Oya, N. Hattori, Y. Mizuno et al., “Methylglyoxal modification of protein. Chemical and immunochemical characterization of methylglyoxal-arginine adducts,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 26, pp. 18492–18502, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  57. R. Jabeen, A. A. Mohammad, E. C. Elefano, J. R. Petersen, and M. Saleemuddin, “Antibodies and Fab fragments protect Cu,Zn-SOD against methylglyoxal-induced inactivation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1760, no. 8, pp. 1167–1174, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  58. C. M. Carlsson, “Type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 711–722, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  59. A. A. Sima, “Encephalopathies: the emerging diabetic complications,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 279–293, 2010.
  60. A. Ott, R. P. Stolk, F. van Harskamp, H. A. P. Pols, A. Hofman, and M. M. B. Breteler, “Diabetes mellitus and the risk of dementia: the Rotterdam Study,” Neurology, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1937–1942, 1999.
  61. L. D. Baker, D. J. Cross, S. Minoshima, D. Belongia, G. Stennis Watson, and S. Craft, “Insulin resistance and alzheimer-like reductions in regional cerebral glucose metabolism for cognitively normal adults with prediabetes or early type 2 diabetes,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 51–57, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  62. J. D. Curb, B. L. Rodriguez, R. D. Abbott et al., “Longitudinal association of vascular and Alzheimer's dementias, diabetes, and glucose tolerance,” Neurology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 971–975, 1999.
  63. C. L. Leibson, W. A. Rocca, V. A. Hanson, et al., “The risk of dementia among persons with diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 826, pp. 422–427, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. N. Moroz, M. Tong, L. Longato, H. Xu, and S. M. de la Monte, “Limited Alzheimer-type neurodegeneration in experimental obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29–44, 2008.
  65. E. Grünblatt, J. Bartl, and P. Riederer, “The link between iron, metabolic syndrome, and Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Neural Transmission. 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  66. C. Messier and M. Gagnon, “Cognitive decline associated with dementia and type 2 diabetes: the interplay of risk factors,” Diabetologia, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 2471–2474, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  67. H. Umegaki, “Pathophysiology of cognitive dysfunction in older people with type 2 diabetes: vascular changes or neurodegeneration?” Age and Ageing, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 8–10, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  68. A. Verdelho, S. Madureira, C. Moleiro et al., “White matter changes and diabetes predict cognitive decline in the elderly: the LADIS Study,” Neurology, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 160–167, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  69. S. G. C. van Elderen, A. de Roos, A. J. M. de Craen et al., “Progression of brain atrophy and cognitive decline in diabetes mellitus: a 3-year follow-up,” Neurology, vol. 75, no. 11, pp. 997–1002, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  70. J. de Bresser, A. M. Tiehuis, E. van den Berg et al., “Progression of cerebral atrophy and white matter hyperintensities in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1309–1314, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  71. S. S. Yi, I. K. Hwang, D. W. Kim et al., “The chronological characteristics of SOD1 activity and inflammatory response in the hippocampi of STZ-induced type 1 diabetic rats,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 117–128, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  72. G. K. Gandhi, K. K. Ball, N. F. Cruz, and G. A. Dienel, “Hyperglycaemia and diabetes impair gap junctional communication among astrocytes,” ASN Neuro, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 57–73, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  73. J. A. Luchsinger, “Type 2 diabetes, related conditions, in relation and dementia: an opportunity for prevention?” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 723–736, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  74. J. A. Luchsinger and D. R. Gustafson, “Adiposity, type 2 diabetes, and Alzheimer's disease,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 693–704, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  75. E. Steen, B. M. Terry, E. J. Rivera et al., “Impaired insulin and insulin-like growth factor expression and signaling mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease—is this type 3 diabetes?” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 63–80, 2005.
  76. P. Revill, M. A. Moral, and J. R. Prous, “Impaired insulin signaling and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease,” Drugs of Today, vol. 42, no. 12, pp. 785–790, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  77. L. Mosconi, “Brain glucose metabolism in the early and specific diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: FDG-PET studies in MCI and AD,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 486–510, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  78. M. Brownlee, “Advanced protein glycosylation in diabetes and aging,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 46, pp. 223–234, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  79. Q. Guo, T. Mori, Y. Jiang et al., “Methylglyoxal contributes to the development of insulin resistance and salt sensitivity in Sprague-Dawley rats,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1664–1671, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  80. F. Liu, K. Iqbal, I. Grundke-Iqbal, G. W. Hart, and C. X. Gong, “O-GlcNAcylation regulates phosphorylation of tau: a mechanism involved in Alzheimer's disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 29, pp. 10804–10809, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  81. W. B. Dias and G. W. Hart, “O-GlcNAc modification in diabetes and Alzheimer's disease,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 766–772, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  82. B. Kim, C. Backus, S. Oh, J. M. Hayes, and E. L. Feldman, “Increased tau phosphorylation and cleavage in mouse models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes,” Endocrinology, vol. 150, no. 12, pp. 5294–5301, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  83. Y. D. Ke, F. Delerue, A. Gladbach, J. Gotz, and L. M. Ittner, “Experimental diabetes mellitus exacerbates Tau pathology in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 11, article e7917, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  84. B. Kuhla, K. Boeck, A. Schmidt et al., “Age- and stage-dependent glyoxalase I expression and its activity in normal and Alzheimer's disease brains,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  85. P. J. Thornalley, “Endogenous α-oxoaldehydes and formation of protein and nucleotide advanced glycation endproducts in tissue damage,” Novartis Foundation Symposium, vol. 285, pp. 229–243, 2007.
  86. P. J. Thornalley, A. Langborg, and H. S. Minhas, “Formation of glyoxal, methylglyoxal and 8-deoxyglucosone in the glycation of proteins by glucose,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 344, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. N. Ahmed and P. J. Thornalley, “Advanced glycation endproducts: what is their relevance to diabetic complications?” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 233–245, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  88. J. Zeng and M. J. Davies, “Evidence for the formation of adducts and S-(carboxymethyl)cysteine on reaction of α-dicarbonyl compounds with thiol groups on amino acids, peptides, and proteins,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 1232–1241, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  89. A. Negre-Salvayre, R. Salvayre, N. Auge, R. Pamplona, and M. Portero-Otin, “Hyperglycemia and glycation in diabetic complications,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 3071–3109, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  90. P. J. Thornalley, “Glutathione-dependent detoxification of α-oxoaldehydes by the glyoxalase system: involvement in disease mechanisms and antiproliferative activity of glyoxalase I inhibitors,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 111-112, pp. 137–151, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. X. Jia, D. J. Olson, A. R. Ross, and L. Wu, “Structural and functional changes in human insulin induced by methylglyoxal,” FASEB Journal, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 871–879, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  92. S. Poggioli, H. Bakala, and B. Friguet, “Age-related increase of protein glycation in peripheral blood lymphocytes is restricted to preferential target proteins,” Experimental Gerontology, vol. 37, no. 10-11, pp. 1207–1215, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. C. K. Jana, N. Das, and R. S. Sohal, “Specificity of age-related carbonylation of plasma proteins in the mouse and rat,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 397, no. 2, pp. 433–439, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  94. Y. Gao and Y. Wang, “Site-selective modifications of arginine residues in human hemoglobin induced by methylglyoxal,” Biochemistry, vol. 45, no. 51, pp. 15654–15660, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  95. N. G. Watkins, S. R. Thorpe, and J. W. Baynes, “Glycation of the amino groups in protein: studies on the specificity of modification of RNase by glucose,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 260, no. 19, pp. 10629–10636, 1985.
  96. D. J. Walton and B. H. Shilton, “Site specificity of protein glycation,” Amino Acids, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 199–203, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. R. Shapiro, M. J. McManus, C. Zalut, and H. F. Bunn, “Sites of nonenzymatic glycosylation of human hemoglobin A,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 255, no. 7, pp. 3120–3127, 1980.
  98. J. D. Williamson, M. E. Miller, R. N. Bryan et al., “The action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes memory in diabetes study (ACCORD-MIND): rationale, design, and methods,” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 99, no. 12, pp. S112–S122, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  99. M. A. Smith, L. M. Sayre, V. M. Monnier, and G. Perry, “Radical AGEing in Alzheimer's disease,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 172–176, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  100. M. A. Smith, X. Zhu, M. Tabaton et al., “Increased iron and free radical generation in preclinical Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 353–372, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed