About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Applied Chemistry
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 147945, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/147945
Research Article

Novel Oxidative Desulfurization of a Model Fuel with H2O2 Catalyzed by AlPMo12O40 under Phase Transfer Catalyst-Free Conditions

Chemistry Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Campus Universitário, Avenida PHRolfs, S/N, Viçosa, MG 36570-000, Brazil

Received 26 March 2013; Accepted 3 June 2013

Academic Editor: Stoyan Karakashev

Copyright © 2013 Márcio José da Silva and Lidiane Faria dos Santos. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

A novel process was developed for oxidative desulfurization (ODS) in the absence of a phase transfer catalyst (PTC) using only Keggin heteropolyacids and their aluminum salts as catalysts. Reactions were performed in biphasic mixtures of isooctane/acetonitrile, with dibenzothiophene (DBT) as a model sulfur compound and hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant. Remarkably, only the AlPMo12O40-catalyzed reactions resulted in complete oxidation of DBT into DBT sulfone, which was totally extracted by acetonitrile, reducing the sulfur content of isooctane from the 1000 ppm to <1 ppm. Ranking of catalyst efficiency is as follows: AlPMo12O40 > H3PMo12O40 > AlPW12O40 > H3PW12O40. The absence of a PTC, acidic organic peroxides, and the use of hydrogen peroxide, an environmentally benign oxidant, make up the positive aspects of AlPMo12O40-catalyzed ODS reactions. In these reactions, high rates of DBT removal (ca. 100%) were achieved within a short time (ca. 2 hours) and under mild reaction conditions.

1. Introduction

Demand for the production and use of more environment-friendly fuels are increasing due to the introduction of the legislative regulations requiring rigid control of green-house gas emissions [1]. Nowadays, many countries are introducing stringent regulations to reduce sulfur content in liquid fuels to ultralow levels, making the development of deep desulfurization processes an important research goal [2]. Among the main industrial processes for the sulfur removal of liquid fuels, the most important is referred as hydrodesulfurization (HDS) and operates with oxide-supported heterogeneous metal catalysts, typically Co- (or Ni-) promoted Mo/Al2O3, under high temperatures (593–653 K) and hydrogen pressures (3–7 MPa) [3]. The HDS process is an efficient technology used by the petroleum refining industries to remove aliphatic and acyclic sulfur compounds present in the liquid fuels. However, due to the high stereo hindrance and as consequence of proximity between the values of C–S and C–H bond energy, some sulfured aromatic compounds such as dibenzothiophene (DBT) and their derivatives are especially refractory to the HDS processes [4]. Moreover, the lower sulfur level achieved by the HDS process is still high when compared to the futures legal exigencies (ca. 50–15 ppm) [5]. Consequently, the development of processes for the fuels production with low sulfur content is a great challenge to overcome [6]. Alternative processes to HDS, in which high temperatures or hydrogen pressures are avoided, have been proposed, and the main examples are the biodesulfurization [7], selective adsorption [8], and ionic-liquid extraction [9]. Oxidative desulfurization (ODS) appears as a promising technology because it presents significant advantages over those processes. ODS processes are highly efficient and selective for a broad range of substrates under mild conditions (ca. 313–373 K and 0.1-0.2 MPa), working within short reaction times (1-2 hours) and requiring only a simple extraction with polar solvent [10]. In the ODS processes several different oxidants have been used; however, hydrogen peroxide is the most frequently employed. Hydrogen peroxide is a benign environmental oxidant, commercially available at affordable cost, which has been used as oxidant in reactions with different metal catalysts [11]. Moreover, it is easier to be handled and less corrosive than other organic peroxides oxidants.

In general, the ODS process can operate with heterogeneous or homogeneous catalysts, in systems with one or two liquid phases, respectively [12]. Normally, homogeneous catalysts in biphasic systems requires an additional presence of phase transfer catalyst (PTC), which notably increases mass transfer across the polar-apolar phase interface. Among the catalysts employed, heteropolyacids arise as versatile multielectronic oxidants and acidic catalysts, which have been frequently used in numerous reactions in liquid phase. Actually, the use of heteropolyacid catalysts and PTC (i.e., tetraoctylammonium bromide) in ODS reactions was recently described [13]. Alternatively, aiming to avoid the use of PTC, tungsten polyoxometalate catalysts containing organic cations (i.e., tetrabutylammonium) were synthesized and successfully applied on the ODS reactions of gas oil samples [14]. Heteropolyacid catalysts have been also employed in ODS reactions with hydrogen peroxide where organic acids are the solvent [15]. However, it results in the formation of a highly corrosive oxidant (i.e., peracetic acid), which can provoke the undesirable reactor corrosion [15].

In this work, we wish to present a novel application of aluminum dodecamolybdophosphate (AlPMo12O40), an efficient and water-tolerant Lewis acid, as catalyst for the ODS reactions. The reactions were performed in absence of PTC, using hydrogen peroxide as oxidant in CH3CN solutions. Isooctane was the model gasoline. This catalyst was easily prepared from cheap and commercially available chemicals, and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of using AlPMo12O40 as a catalyst in ODS reactions. Catalytic activities of the H3PMo12O40 and H3PW12O40 Keggin heteropolyacids and their respective aluminum salts were assessed.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals

Dibenzothiophene and heteropolyacids catalysts (H3PW12O40 and H3PMo12O40) were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (all they with 99%). Aluminum nitrate (Merck, 99%) was used without prior treatment. An aqueous H2O2 solution (ca. 34% wt., Vetec, Brazil) was the oxidant employed in all reactions, and its concentration was determined by titration against a KMnO4 solution. Acetonitrile and isooctane (Sigma-Aldrich, 99%) were used as received.

2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of Catalysts

The AlPMo12O40 and AlPW12O40 salts were synthesized according to procedures published in the literature [16]. Herein, both catalysts (AlPW12O40 or AlPMo12O40) were prepared by the addition of Al(NO3)3 aqueous solution at a rate of 1.0 mL·min−1 to an aqueous solution of heteropolyacid (H3PW12O40 or H3PMo12O40), under constant agitation and at room temperature. Then, the solution was stirred at ambient pressure, and the temperature was maintained at temperature 80°C for 24 hours; complete evaporation of water resulted in the desired salt as a white (AlPW12O40) or yellow (AlPMo12O40) powder. These Keggin heteropolyacid salts are easily handled, nonhygroscopic, noncorrosive, and water stable compounds, which makes them suitable catalysts for large-scale use [17]. Aluminum heteropolyacid salts are known products and were characterized by comparison of their physical data with that reported in the literature [16, 17].

FT-IR spectra of the catalysts were performed in the solid phase (KBr pellet samples), and a measuring range of 400–4000 cm−1 in a Varian model 660 FT-IR spectrophotometer. The contents of W and Mo in solution were determined by UV-visible spectroscopy with the aid of calibration curves (Micronal AJX Model 6100PC double beam UV-visible spectrophotometer and quartz cells with 1.0 cm path length were employed for the analysis).

2.3. Kinetic Studies and Reaction Monitoring

Catalytic tests were carried out during two hours in a 50 mL three-necked glass flask equipped with a reflux condenser at room pressure. Typically, a biphasic mixture of isooctane (10 mL) containing DBT (ca. 1000 ppm, 3.19 mmol) and CH3CN (10 mL) containing H2O2 (34% wt., 17.6 mmol) were magnetically stirred and heated to the 60°C temperature. Then, the heteropoly catalyst (5 mol%; 0.1595 mmol) was added to the mixture and the reaction started. Reaction progress was accomplished by GC analysis in a Varian gas chromatograph GC-450 instrument with flame ionization detector and Carbowax capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 mm i.d., and 0.25 mm film thickness).

2.4. Products Identification

Mass spectrometry analyses were carried in a Shimadzu GC17A gas chromatograph coupled to a Shimadzu MS-QP 5050A mass spectrometer. Chromatographic conditions were as follows: helium was the carrier gas at flow rate of 1.0 mL·min−1; the temperature profile was 180°C for 1 min, 10°C·min−1 up to 240°C, hold time of 5 min; the GC injector and MS ions source were maintained at 260–270°C, respectively; and the MS detector operated in the electronic impact mode at 70 eV with a scanning range of m/z 50–400. The chromatography standards were obtained from Supelco.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. General Aspects

Heteropoly compounds are widely applied as catalysts due to their varied composition and physical-chemical features. Moreover, heteropolyacid compounds are easily synthesized and exhibit the possibility for introducing elements into their structures that are necessary to acquire the desired properties [18]. However, data on the use of heteropolyacid salts in ODS reactions is still scarce. The present study, therefore, investigated the effects of total replacement of acidic hydrogen in heteropolyacid structure by aluminum cations. The heteropoly salts catalytic activity in ODS reactions was assessed using DBT as the model sulfur compound and hydrogen peroxide as the oxidant, in isooctane/acetonitrile biphasic mixtures in the absence of PTC.

3.2. Catalysts Characterization

In general, polyoxometalate synthesis routes are linear, and the reactions of formation of their salts occur with high yields [18, 19]. Herein, the synthesis of both AlPW12O40 and AlPMo12O40 catalysts were directly performed, with yields exceeding ca. 98%. The results obtained via elemental analysis (i.e., Mo and W percentage were determined by UV-Visible spectroscopy) indicated that the molar content of these elements is that corresponding to the salts AlPMo12O40 and AlPW12O40. Figure 1 shows FT-IR spectra of molybdenum and tungsten catalysts which allowed to prove the presenceof the Keggin anion structure in the salts synthesized.

fig1
Figure 1: FT-IR spectra of molybdenum (a) and tungsten (b) catalysts used in ODS reactions.

The (M = W or Mo) Keggin anion structure is well known; it has tetrahedral PO4 groups surrounded by four Mo3O13 groups formed by octahedral edge-sharing [19, 20]. In the heteropolyacids Keggin structure, there are four types of oxygen atoms which are distinguishable via FT-IR spectroscopy, responsible for the fingerprint bands of the Keggin ion (ca. 1200–700 cm−1). Figure 1 shows the characteristic absorption bands for the stretching of the bonds (P–O), (M–O–M), and (M–O) (with M = W or Mo), present in the FT-IR spectra of the tungsten or molybdenum compounds used as catalysts, demonstrating that the Keggin structure remained intact. However, it can be observed that the Mo–O bonds were more affected by replacement of the H+ cations by the Al3+ cations than the W–O bonds. In general, on the AlPMo12O40 FT-IR spectrum there was a small displacement for a region of lower wave number of the band corresponding to Mo=O stretching when comparatively to the same stretching on the H3PMo12O40 FT-IR spectrum. The same occurred with stretching of the P=O bond. Conversely, when comparing the H3PW12O40 and AlPW12O40 infrared spectra, a different behavior can be observed; stretching of the W=O and P–O bonds underwent a slight shift to a higher wave number. These results are in agreement with those found in the literature [19]. Previously, Deltcheff et al. reported that the M–O stretching frequency decreases while the cation size increases; those authors attributed this fact to a weakening of anion-anion interactions of the electrostatic type [20]. However, in the present study, this effect was more pronounced on the molybdenum catalysts.

3.3. Effect of Heteropoly Catalysts on PTC-Free ODS Reactions of DBT with H2O2 in Isooctane/CH3CN Biphasic Mixtures

Quaternary ammonium salts have been fairly used as PTC in oxidative desulfurization reactions with H2O2 [13, 14, 21]. In these cases, an organic peracid formed from the reaction of solvent (i.e., formic or acetic acid) and the peroxide reactant (i.e., hydrogen peroxide or t-butyl hydroperoxide) is the real oxidant [22]. Nevertheless, Trakarnpruk and Rujiraworawut assessed the ODS reactions of gas oil samples with H2O2 in HOAc solutions, catalyzed by polyoxometalates in absence of PTC. Those authors found two significance results: at first, the tungsten catalysts were more active than molybdenum catalysts [23]. Secondly, DBT conversions obtained in the reactions catalyzed by the heteropolyacids or even by their sodium salts (i.e., Na2HPMo12O40 and H3PMo12O40) were almost equal. Although being efficient, those ODS reactions have a considerable disadvantage: the use of peracids as oxidant, which are little attractive at industrial scale due to its high corrosiveness.

Herein, we investigated the activity of H3PW12O40 and H3PMo12O40 heteropolyacids and their aluminum salts in PTC-free conditions, using nonacidic solvent (CH3CN), H2O2 as oxidant, and DBT as model sulfur compound (Table 1). This way, we avoided the use of corrosive organic peracids and also circumventing the laborious PTC synthesis.

tab1
Table 1: ODS processes in the presence of different catalysts using DBT as the sulfur model compound in a biphasic mixture of isooctane/acetonitrile and H2O2 as the oxidanta.

The results obtained herein were different than those reported in the literature [23]. Indeed, the use of CH3CN and mainly the presence of aluminum cations affected drastically the behavior of the heteropolyacid catalysts. However, it is important to note that the higher activity of tungsten catalysts comparatively than molybdenum catalysts, which is described in the literature, was dependent on HOAc excess used (DBT : H2O2 : HOAc molar ratio equal to 1 : 10 : 10) [23].Thus, because HOAc was not used, this effect was not observed.

Although peroxotungstate species (i.e., ) have been described as the actives catalytically intermediates in those reactions, an increase on HOAc concentration also resulted in an consequent increase on peracetic acid concentration, which is another oxidant specie stronger than H2O2 [22, 23]. Actually, because the reactions were performed in absence of organic acids (Table 1), this behavior was not observed herein. The literature described a higher oxidative activity of molybdenum polyoxoperoxo species comparatively than tungsten species on the oxidation of other organic substrates in polyoxometalate/H2O2 systems [24].

In general, the oxidation of DBT into DBT sulfone by hydrogen peroxide typically involves the formation of DBT sulfoxide as an intermediate, as is displayed in Figure 2. Under the conditions studied and independent of the catalyst employed, the DBT was exclusively converted into DBT sulfone and no formation of DBT sulfoxide was observed throughout the reactions. Moreover, no DBT conversion was detected in the absence of heteropoly catalysts under the same reaction conditions (Table 1).

147945.fig.002
Figure 2: Oxidation of DBT into DBT sulfone by hydrogen peroxide.

In Figure 3, the kinetic curves obtained from ODS of DBT catalyzed by heteropoly compounds are displayed.

147945.fig.003
Figure 3: Kinetic curves obtained from ODS of DBT catalyzed by heteropoly compounds.

Experiments performed in the absence of the catalyst showed that there was no reaction even after a long reaction time (ca. 24 h; omitted by simplification). Conversely, when in the presence of tungsten catalysts, the reaction proceeded smoothly and DBT was oxidized into DBT sulfone with maximum conversion of 24% after a three hour reaction (Figure 2). However, the molybdenum heteropoly catalysts were the most effective. The DBT was completely removed from the isooctane phase conducing H3PMo12O40-catalyzed ODS reactions for 340 minutes (not shown in Figure 2 for simplification). When catalyzed by AlPMo12O40, all the reactions proceeded well in short reaction times (ca. 180 min) resulting in total oxidation of DBT into DBT sulfone at high rates; consequently, the content of DBT in the isooctane phase was reduced to less than 1 ppm (Table 1, Figure 1).

Moreover, in all reactions it was observe that any of the heteropoly catalysts promoted the disproportionation of hydrogen peroxide, suggesting that it remained stable throughout the time reaction. This is a welcome result; when a system H3PW12O40/tetraoctylammonium bromide/H2O2 is used, the catalyzed decomposition of H2O2 competes with DBT oxidation, and, therefore, the major cost involved in treating gas oils by ODS is the huge amount of hydrogen peroxide consumption [25].

On the other hand, the results in Table 1 strongly suggest that the replacement of hydrogen ions for aluminum cations promotes a significant improvement in heteropoly catalysts activity, in an extension much greater than those provoked by the sodium ions [23]. Thus, it can be concluded that either solvent as well as the Al3+ cations plays a key role in ODS reactions herein studied. The efficiency of aluminum-molybdenum-based catalysts was described previously, however, in heterogeneous phase. Molybdenum heteropoly catalysts supported on alumina successfully promoted the ultradeep ODS of diesel sample with hydrogen peroxide [26].

3.4. Discussions of Reaction Mechanism: the Role of Al3+ Cations

It was found that peroxo-AlPMo12O40 oxidizes DBT into DBT sulfone more efficiently than peroxo-H3PMo12O40; the same occurs when based on tungsten catalysts. Thus, it may be reasonable to consider that the Al3+ cations have properties that favored some intermediate of this reaction. In general, it is accepted that peroxo oxidant is activated electrophilically via coordination to the high valent atom present on catalyst (molybdenum or tungsten). Indeed, ours results suggested that its activation was also favored when heteropoly catalysts contained aluminum cations. The presence in the heteropolyacids structure of additional electrophilic sites allows (i.e, Al3+ cations) the activation of peroxo to intermediate.

Sodium and aluminum ions have two main features that may affect differently the activity of heteropolyacid catalysts, the Lewis acidity and the electronegativity. The ratio of charge to ionic radius (e/r (Å)) is an approximate measurement for the electron-withdrawing ability leading to the Lewis acidity of metal cations [27]. These aspects are summarized in Table 2.

tab2
Table 2: Pauling electronegativity and ratio of charge to ionic radius (e/r (Å)) of Al3+ and Na+ cations [27, 28].

In this sense, Al3+ and Na+ cations have ratio (e/r) equal to 4.5 and 0.8, respectively. Moreover, the Pauling electronegativity of these cations are equal to 10.6 and 2.9, for Na+ and Al3+ cations, respectively [28]. These data may be a reasonable explanation to fact that Al3+ cations affect much more drastically the catalytic activity of heteropolyacids than Na+ ions.

The literature describes the crystallographic characterization of active catalyst species formed by the nucleophilic attack of hydrogen peroxide on metal atoms of the polyoxometalates [29]. These species are active oxygen transfer agents in the heteropolyacid-catalyzed oxidation reactions [29, 30]. Thus, in according to the literature and based on our experimental results, heteropoly compounds catalysts of W(IV) and more remarkably Mo(IV) probably act as oxygen transfer agents from H2O2 to the sulfur compound, via an intermediate peroxo catalyst, which is more stable when Al3+ cations are present [2931]. The higher stability of peroxide-Mo-Al intermediate is attributed to higher effect electron withdrawing of Al3+ cations, which are much more electronegative than H+ or Na+ cations (Table 2) [27, 28].

Generally, in the biphasic oxidation reactions the heteropolyacids catalysts is rapidly oxidized by the H2O2 in the polar phase. When a PTC is used, the resulting peroxo-catalyst compound is transferred to the nonpolar phase by ion exchange with the PTC agent. However, no PTC catalyst was employed on this present study. Thus, we believed that the oxygen transfer step from peroxide to sulfur compound occurs via the peroxidized catalyst in the interface between isooctane and acetonitrile solvent (Figure 4).

147945.fig.004
Figure 4: AlPMo12O40-catalyzed ODS of DBT with H2O2.

Thereafter due the high solubility of sulfones in polar solvents, DBT sulfone is transferred to the CH3CN phase resulting in the production of a sulfur-free isooctane phase. Currently, acetonitrile is an appropriate solvent because it is able to extract and solve the reaction products and exhibits a low surface tension, which facilitates the transfer of products and from the apolar phase to polar though of interface, increasing notably the mass transfer along the interphase [32]. However, it is important to note that CH3CN is partially solved in the apolar phase (i.e., octane; 0.2 mol/1 mol at 330 K); consequently, there are CH3CN molecules present in the octane phase [33]. Probably, this partial solubility of the acetonitrile into isooctane phase is enough to allow the heteropoly catalysts to efficiently act on this system without a PTC.

4. Conclusions

This study consisted of investigating the catalytic activity of Keggin heteropolyacids substituted with aluminum, in ODS reactions using hydrogen peroxide as an oxidant and DBT as a model sulfur compound, in an acetonitrile/isooctane mixture. The ODS reactions were performed under acid-free conditions and in absence of a PTC. As far as we know, this is the first report on the use of aluminum heteropolyacid salts as catalysts in ODS reactions. The replacement of hydrogen cations by aluminum resulted in significant improvements to heteropolyacid activity. Tungsten and more remarkably molybdenum heteropoly salts containing aluminum reacted with hydrogen peroxide to form peroxocatalysts. Aluminum heteropoly salts were more active than their heteropolyacid precursors. Complete removal of the sulfur compound was obtained only when molybdenum catalysts (i.e., H3PMo12O40 and mainly AlPMo12O40) were used. It is intended that this novel, simple, and PTC-free protocol will be extended to the ODS of other substrates containing sulfur.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank CAPES, FUNARBE, FAPEMIG, and CNPq for their financial support. This work is part of a collaboration research project of members of the Rede Mineira de Química (RQ-MG), supported by FAPEMIG (Project: REDE-113/10).

References

  1. US EPA, Regulatory Announcement: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards and Highway Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements, December 2000.
  2. J. T. Sampanthar, H. Xiao, J. Dou, T. Y. Nah, X. Rong, and W. P. Kwan, “A novel oxidative desulfurization process to remove refractory sulfur compounds from diesel fuel,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 63, no. 1-2, pp. 85–93, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Topsøe, “Developments in operando studies and in situ characterization of heterogeneous catalysts,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 155–164, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. S. G. McKinley and R. J. Angelici, “Deep desulfurization by selective adsorption of dibenzothiophenes on Ag+/SBA-15 and Ag+/SiO2,” Chemical Communications, no. 20, pp. 2620–2621, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. G. Tailleur, J. Ravigli, S. Quenza, and N. Valencia, “Catalyst for ultra-low sulfur and aromatic diesel,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 282, no. 1-2, pp. 227–235, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. Viveros-García, J. A. Ochoa-Tapia, R. Lobo-Oehmichen, J. A. Reyes-Heredia, and E. S. Pérez-Cisneros, “Conceptual design of a reactive distillation process for ultra-low sulfur diesel production,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 119–131, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Yu, P. Xu, Q. Shi, and C. Ma, “Deep desulfurization of diesel oil and crude oils by a newly isolated Rhodococcus erythropolis strain,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 54–58, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. J. Hernandez-Maldonado, F. Yang, G. Qi, and R. T. Yang, “Desulfurization of transportation fuels by π-complexation sorbents: Cu(I)-, Ni(II)-, and Zn(II)-zeolites,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 56, no. 1-2, pp. 111–126, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Zhang, Q. Zhang, and Z. C. Zhang, “Extractive desulfurization and denitrogenation of fuels using ionic liquids,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 614–622, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. L. C. Caero, E. Hernández, F. Pedraza, and F. Murrieta, “Oxidative desulfurization of synthetic diesel using supported catalysts: part I. Study of the operation conditions with a vanadium oxide based catalyst,” Catalysis Today, vol. 107-108, pp. 564–569, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. M. Campos-Martin, M. C. Capel-Sanchez, and J. L. G. Fierro, “Highly efficient deep desulfurization of fuels by chemical oxidation,” Green Chemistry, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 557–562, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Li, Z. Jiang, J. Gao et al., “Ultra-deep desulfurization of diesel: oxidation with a recoverable catalyst assembled in emulsion,” Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2277–2280, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Noyori, M. Aoki, and K. Sato, “Green oxidation with aqueous hydrogen peroxide,” Chemical Communications, no. 16, pp. 1977–1986, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. T. O. Sachdeva and K. K. Pant, “Deep desulfurization of diesel via peroxide oxidation using phosphotungstic acid as phase transfer catalyst,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 1133–1138, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Al-Shahrani, T. Xiao, S. A. Llewellyn et al., “Desulfurization of diesel via the H2O2 oxidation of aromatic sulfides to sulfones using a tungstate catalyst,” Applied Catalysis B, vol. 73, no. 3-4, pp. 311–316, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. H. Firouzabadi, N. Iranpoor, F. Nowrouzi, and K. Amani, “Aluminium dodecatungstophosphate (AlPW12O40) as a highly efficient catalyst for the selective acetylation of -OH, -SH and -NH2functional groups in the absence of solvent at room temperature,” Chemical Communications, no. 6, pp. 764–765, 2003. View at Scopus
  17. F. Cavani, “Heteropolycompound-based catalysts: a blend of acid and oxidizing properties,” Catalysis Today, vol. 41, no. 1–3, pp. 73–86, 1998. View at Scopus
  18. D. S. Mansilla, M. R. Torviso, E. N. Alesso, P. G. Vazquez, and C. V. Cáceres, “Synthesis and characterization of copper and aluminum salts of H3PMo12O40 for their use as catalysts in the eco-friendly synthesis of chromanes,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 375, no. 2, pp. 196–204, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. V. Brahmkhatri and A. Patel, “12-Tungstophosphoric acid anchored to SBA-15: an efficient, environmentally benign reusable catalysts for biodiesel production by esterification of free fatty acids,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 403, no. 1-2, pp. 161–172, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. C. L. Deltcheff, M. Fournier, R. Franck, and R. Thouvenot, “Vibrational investigations of polyoxometalates. 2. Evidence for anion-anion interactions in molybdenum(VI) and tungsten(VI) compounds related to the keggin structure,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 207–216, 1983. View at Scopus
  21. D. Zhao, H. Ren, J. Wang, Y. Yang, and Y. Zhao, “Kinetics and mechanism of quaternary ammonium salts as phase-transfer catalysts in the liquid−liquid phase for oxidation of thiophene,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 2543–2547, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. M. Te, C. Fairbridge, and Z. Ring, “Oxidation reactivities of dibenzothiophenes in polyoxometalate/H2O2 and formic acid/H2O2 systems,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 219, no. 1-2, pp. 267–280, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. W. Trakarnpruk and K. Rujiraworawut, “Oxidative desulfurization of Gas oil by polyoxometalates catalysts,” Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 411–414, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. de Angelis, P. Pollesel, D. Molinari et al., “Heteropolyacids as effective catalysts to obtain zero sulfur diesel,” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 11, pp. 1887–1894, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. M. Collins, A. R. Lucy, and C. Sharp, “Oxidative desulphurisation of oils via hydrogen peroxide and heteropolyanion catalysis,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 117, no. 1–3, pp. 397–403, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. J. L. Garcıa-Gutierrez, G. A. Fuentes, M. E. Hernandez-Teran, P. Garcıa, F. Murrieta-Guevara, and F. Jimenez-Cruz, “Ultra-deep oxidative desulfurization of diesel fuel by the Mo/Al2O3-H2O2 system: the effect of system parameters on catalytic activity,” Applied Catalysis A, vol. 334, no. 1-2, pp. 366–373, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. J. Penzien, C. Haesner, A. Jentys, K. Kohler, T. E. Muller, and J. A. Lercher, “Heterogeneous catalysts for hydroamination reactions: structure-activity relationship,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 221, no. 2, pp. 302–312, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. K.-I. Tanaka and A. Ozaki, “Acid-base properties and catalytic activity of solid surfaces,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. C. Venturello, R. D'Aloiso, J. C. Bart, and M. Ricci, “A new peroxotungsten heteropoly anion with special oxidizing properties: synthesis and structure of tetrahexylammonium tetra(diperoxotungsto)phosphate(3-),” Journal of Molecular Catalysis, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 107–110, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. G. Wahl, D. Kleinhenz, A. Schorm et al., “Peroxomolybdenum complexes as epoxidation catalysts in biphasic hydrogen peroxide activation: raman spectroscopic studies and density functional calculations,” Chemistry, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 3237–3251, 1999. View at Scopus
  31. P. Vazquez, M. Blanco, and C. Caceres, “Catalysts based on supported 12-molybdophosphoric acid,” Catalysis Letters, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 205–215, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. M. C. Capel-Sanchez, P. Perez-Presas, J. M. Campos-Martin, and J. L. G. Fierro, “Highly efficient deep desulfurization of fuels by chemical oxidation,” Catalysis Today, vol. 157, no. 1–4, pp. 390–396, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. V. P. Sazonov, D. G. Shaw, N. V. Sazonov, et al., “IUPAC-NIST solubility data series. 77. C2+ nitroalkanes with water or organic solvents: binary and multicomponent systems,” Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, vol. 31, no. 1, p. 1, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar