Dynamic Analysis of a Hybrid Squeeze Film Damper Mounted Rub-Impact Rotor-Stator System

<table>Bifurcation diagram of <svg height="15.0875" id="M101" style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 45.200001 15.0875" width="45.200001" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><path d="M775 650l-6 -28q-60 -6 -81.5 -16t-61.5 -54l-175 -191l125 -243q30 -58 48.5 -71t82.5 -19l-5 -28h-275l7 28l35 4q31 4 37 12t-6 34l-108 216q-140 -165 -177 -219q-16 -22 -10.5 -30.5t41.5 -13.5l22 -3l-7 -28h-244l8 28q52 4 75 15.5t67 52.5q48 46 206 231
l-110 215q-26 51 -44 63t-72 17l6 28h250l-6 -28l-27 -4q-30 -5 -35 -10t3 -27q17 -43 95 -190q70 78 154 185q15 21 10 29.5t-33 12.5l-30 4l5 28h236z" id="x1D44B"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,13.526,12.138)"><path d="M300 -147l-18 -23q-106 71 -159 185.5t-53 254.5v1q0 139 53 252.5t159 186.5l18 -24q-74 -62 -115.5 -173.5t-41.5 -242.5q0 -130 41.5 -242.5t115.5 -174.5z" id="x28"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,19.407,12.138)"><path d="M495 86q-46 -47 -87 -72.5t-63 -25.5q-43 0 -16 107l49 210q7 34 8 50.5t-3 21t-13 4.5q-35 0 -109.5 -72.5t-115.5 -140.5q-21 -75 -38 -159q-50 -10 -76 -21l-6 8l84 340q8 35 -4 35q-17 0 -67 -46l-15 26q44 44 85.5 70.5t64.5 26.5q35 0 10 -103l-24 -98h2
q42 56 97 103.5t96 71.5q46 26 74 26q9 0 16 -2.5t14 -11.5t9.5 -24.5t-1 -44t-13.5 -68.5q-30 -117 -47 -200q-4 -19 -3.5 -25t6.5 -6q21 0 70 48z" id="x1D45B"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,27.94,12.138)"><path d="M649 676l-22 -187l-33 -2q3 56 -12 94q-8 20 -31.5 26.5t-86.5 6.5h-74l-90 -491q-4 -23 -6 -36.5t1 -25t7 -16.5t18 -9t27 -5t41 -3l-6 -28h-286l4 28q68 5 84 18.5t28 76.5l94 491h-55q-74 0 -100.5 -6t-41.5 -23q-24 -29 -54 -98l-32 1q32 98 53 188h22q7 -18 15 -22
t37 -4h417q23 0 33.5 5t25.5 21h23z" id="x1D447"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,39.262,12.138)"><path d="M275 270q0 -296 -211 -440l-19 23q75 62 116.5 174t41.5 243t-42 243t-116 173l19 24q211 -144 211 -440z" id="x29"></path></g>
</svg> (a) and <svg height="15.0875" id="M102" style="vertical-align:-2.3205pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 43.287498 15.0875" width="43.287498" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.138)"><path d="M667 650l-9 -28q-53 -5 -76 -17t-64 -59q-51 -61 -175 -225q-21 -29 -27 -55l-27 -136q-13 -65 -0.5 -80t83.5 -22l-7 -28h-280l8 28q64 4 81 19t30 83l25 128q6 35 -7 65l-98 231q-17 41 -32.5 52t-68.5 16l8 28h252l-6 -28l-40 -4q-27 -3 -33 -12.5t2 -31.5
q8 -26 43 -107.5t61 -134.5q114 145 174 240q14 24 8 33t-37 13l-34 4l8 28h238z" id="x1D44C"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,11.605,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x28"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,17.486,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x1D45B"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,26.02,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x1D447"></use></g><g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,37.341,12.138)"><use xlink:href="#x29"></use></g>
</svg> (b) versus rotor speed <svg height="7.9499998" id="M103" style="vertical-align:-0.1638pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 6.5 7.9499998" width="6.5" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,7.675)"><path d="M352 391q0 -31 -27 -44q-14 -7 -24 6q-39 48 -84 48q-23 0 -39.5 -15t-16.5 -40q0 -43 73 -90q49 -32 70 -58t21 -57q0 -58 -62 -105.5t-129 -47.5q-40 0 -75.5 25t-35.5 52q0 28 32 46q7 4 15 3t11 -6q19 -31 48.5 -50.5t54.5 -19.5q34 0 54 19.5t20 42.5q0 43 -65 81
q-97 56 -97 123q0 50 51 96q19 17 58 32.5t62 15.5q37 0 61 -18t24 -39z" id="x1D460"></path></g>
</svg> (without rub-impact effect).</table>

Journal of Applied Mathematics

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: Dynamic Analysis of a Hybrid Squeeze Film Damper Mounted Rub-Impact Rotor-Stator System 