Journal of Applied Mathematics
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 316850, 19 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/316850
Research Article

## Existence Results of Nondensely Defined Fractional Evolution Differential Inclusions

1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Hubei, Wuhan 430074, China
2School of Mathematics and Statistics, Suzhou University, Anhui, Suzhou 234000, China

Received 26 March 2012; Accepted 20 April 2012

Copyright © 2012 Zufeng Zhang and Bin Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

This paper deals with the existence results of integral solutions for nondensely defined fractional evolution differential inclusions. Our approach is based on integrated semigroup theory and a fixed point theorem for condensing map due to Martelli. An example is also given to illustrate our results.

#### 1. Introduction

In the past decades, the theory of fractional differential equations and inclusions has become an important area of investigation because of its wide applicability in many branches of physics, economics, and technical sciences [110].

Our aim in this paper is to study the existence of the integral solutions for the fractional semilinear differential inclusions, of the form where is the Caputo fractional derivative of order , . is a nondensely closed linear operator on , is a real Banach space with the norm . is a nonempty, bounded, closed, and convex multivalued map, and denotes the family of all nonempty subsets of .

It is well known that one important way to introduce the concepts of mild solutions for fractional evolution equations is based on some probability densities and Laplace transform. This method was initialed by El-Borai [11] and developed by Zhou and Jiao [12]. Since then, many interesting existence results of mild solutions for fractional evolution equations appeared [1316]. We will point out that the unbounded operators in their papers were assumed to be densely defined and generate a strongly continuous semigroup.

However, as indicated in [17], we sometimes need to deal with nondensely defined operators and there are extensive work on this subject when equations involve the integral-order derivative, see monograph [1823] and references therein. Very recently, Wang and Zhou [24] considered problem (1.1) in the case when is densely defined and generates a strongly continuous semigroup. As far as we know, there are few papers dealing with semilinear fractional differential systems with nondense domain. Motivated by this, we discuss the integral solution to problem (1.1) by using probability densities and integral semigroup. We turn the integral solutions of problem (1.1) to a new formula something like the mild solutions. This new formula of integral solutions is firstly introduced even in fractional evolution equations. Thus, our work can be seen as a supplement to work [24] and a contribution to this emerging field of fractional differential equations with nondense domain.

This paper will be organized as follows. In Section 2, we recall some basic definitions and preliminary facts for integrated semigroup, fractional calculus, and multivalued map which will be used later. Section 3 is devoted to the existence results of integral solutions for problem (1.1). We will present in Section 4 an example which illustrates our main theorem.

#### 2. Preliminaries

In this section, we introduce notations, definitions, and preliminary results which are used in the rest of the paper.

We denote by the Banach space of all continuous functions from into with the norm denotes the Banach space of bounded linear operators from into , with the norm where and .

Assume that and . For a measurable function , define the norm where is the Lebesgue measure on . Let be the Banach space of all Lebesgue measurable functions with .

Lemma 2.1 (HöLder inequality). Assume that and . If , , then for , and

Lemma 2.2 (Bochner theorem). A measurable function is Bochner’s integrable if is Lebesgue integrable.

Definition 2.3 (see [25]). Let be a Banach space; an integrated semigroup is a family of operators of bounded linear operators on with the following properties:; is strongly continuous; for all .

Definition 2.4 (see [26]). An operator is called a generator of an integrated semigroup, if there exists such that and there exists a strongly continuous exponentially bounded family of linear bounded operators such that and for all .

Proposition 2.5 (see [25]). Let be the generator of an integrated semigroup . Then for all and ,

Definition 2.6 (see [26]). We say that linear operator satisfies the Hille-Yosida condition if there exist and such that and

Here and hereafter, we assume that satisfies the Hille-Yosida condition. Let us introduce the part of in on . Let be the integrated semigroup generated by . We note that is a -semigroup on generated by and , , where and are the constants considered in the Hille-Yosida condition ([19, 27]).

Let ; then for all , as . Also from the Hille-Yosida condition it is easy to see that .

For more properties on integral semigroup theory the interested readers may refer to [18, 27].

Definition 2.7 (see [3]). The Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of order of a function is defined by provided the right-hand side is pointwise defined on , where is the gamma function.

Remark 2.8. According to [3], holds for all , .

Definition 2.9 (see [3]). The Caputo fractional derivative of order of a function is defined by We will remark that integrals which appear in Definitions 2.7 and 2.9 are taken in Bochner’s sense.

Lemma 2.10 (see [28]). Suppose , is a nonnegative, function locally integrable on and is a nonnegative, nondecreasing continuous function defined on , (constant), and suppose is nonnegative and locally integrable on with on this interval. Then

Corollary 2.11 (see [28]). Under the hypothesis of Lemma 2.10, let be a nondecreasing function on . Then where is the Mittag-Leffler function defined by .

We also introduce some basic definitions and results of multivalued maps. See [29] for more details.

Let be a metric space; denotes the family for all nonempty subsets of . We use the following notations:

A multivalued map is convex (closed) valued if is convex (closed) for all and is bounded on bounded sets if is bounded in for all , that is, . is called upper semicontinuous (u.s.c. for short) on if for each the set is nonempty, closed subset of , and for each open set of containing , there exists an open neighborhood of such that . is said to be completely continuous if is relatively compact for every .

If the multivalued map is completely continuous with nonempty compact valued, the is u.s.c. if and only if has closed graph, that is, , , imply .

Definition 2.12 (see [30]). An upper semicontinuous map is said to be condensing if for any bounded subset with , one has , where denotes the Kuratowski measure of noncompactness.

We remark that a completely continuous multivalued map is the easiest example of a condensing map.

Theorem 2.13 (see [30]). Let be a compact interval and a Banach space. Let , be measurable with respect to for each , upper semicontinuous with respect to for each . Moreover, for each fixed the set is nonempty. Also let be a linear continuous mapping from to ; then the operator is a closed graph operator in .

Theorem 2.14 . (Martelli, [31]). Let be a Banach space and a condensing map. If the set is bounded, then has a fixed point.

#### 3. Existence of Integral Solutions

In this section we will establish the existence results for problem (1.1). Let us consider the following problem: where is a given function and is the same as that in problem (1.1).

Definition 3.1. One says that a continuous function is an integral solution of problem (3.1) if(i) for ,(ii), .

Lemma 3.2. If is an integral solution of (1.1), then for all , . In particular, .

Proof. By Remark 2.8 and , for each , we get that . From we have for , . Hence, we deduce that The proof is completed.

Lemma 3.3 (see [32]). Let , ; then is a one-sided stable probability density function and its Laplace transform is given by

Lemma 3.4. The integral solution in Definition 3.1 is given by where is the probability density function defined on .

Proof. From the definition, we have Consider the Laplace transform Note that for each , , then we have . Applying (3.6) to (3.5) yields where is the identity operator defined on .
From (3.3), we get According to (3.7), (3.8), and (3.9), we have Inverting the last Laplace transform, we obtain In view of for and Lemma 3.2, we have The proof is completed.

Remark 3.5. According to [32], one can easily check that Based on the Lemma 3.4, we will define the concept of integral solution of (1.1) as follows.

Definition 3.6. One says that a continuous function is an integral solution of problem (1.1) if(i) for ,(ii) and there exists such that for a.e. and
We are now in a position to state and prove our main results of the existence of solutions for problem (1.1).
Let us list the following hypotheses:
satisfies the Hille-Yosida condition; the operator is compact in whenever and satisfies , where is a constant;, for each , is measurable and for each , is upper semicontinuous; for each fixed , the set = is not empty; for each , there exist and such that where .

Theorem 3.7. Assume that hypotheses (H1)–(H4) hold; then problem (1.1) has an integral solution .

Proof. Denote , which is a closed subset of . Obviously, with the same norm in is also a Banach space. Transform the problem (1.1) into a fixed point problem. Consider the multivalued operator defined by where . Obviously, the fixed points of the operator are integral solutions of problem (1.1). Now we will show that satisfies all conditions of Theorem 2.14. The proof would be divided into the following steps.Step 1 ( is convex for each ). Indeed, if and belong to , then there exist , such that for each , we have
Let ; then for each , we have Since is convex, we have .
Step 2 ( maps bounded sets into bounded sets in ). Indeed, it is enough to show that there exists a positive constant such that for each , one has .
Let ; then there exists such that for , we have From (H2) and the fact that , for we have From Lemma 2.1 and (H4), for we have where , , .
Then from (3.20) and (3.21), we get that
Step 3 ( maps bounded sets into equicontinuous sets of ). Let , , , and be a bounded set of . For each and , there exists such that Then, where By using analogous argument performed in (3.20) and (3.21), we can conclude that Hence and .
On the other hand, (H2) implies that for is continuous in the uniform operator topology; then from the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem, we get and Consequently, independently of as , which means that is equicontinuous.
Step 4 (For each , is relatively compact in ). Obviously, is relatively compact in . Let be fixed. For and , there exists such that
For arbitrary and , define an operator on by Then from the compactness of , , we get that the set is relatively compact in for each and . Moreover, for every , we have In view of (3.21), we have From and , we get that there are relatively compact sets arbitrarily close to the set , . Hence the set , , is also relatively compact in .
Step 5 ( has a closed graph). Let , , and as ; we will prove that . means that there exists such that
We must prove that there exists such that Consider the linear continuous operator defined by We can easily see that is continuous. On the other hand, From Theorem 2.13, it follows that is a closed graph operator. Moreover, we have that Since , it follows from Theorem 2.13 that there exists such that Thus, This implies that .
Therefore is a completely continuous multivalued map, u.s.c. with convex closed values. In order to prove that has a fixed point, we need one more step.
Step 6 (The set is bounded). Let ; then for some . Thus there exists such that for , From (H4), for each we have where , .
Then from Corollary 2.11, we have Therefore, we obtain that This shows that is bounded.
As a consequence of Theorem 2.14, we conclude that has a fixed point which is the integral solution of problem (1.1). This completes the proof.

#### 4. An Example

As an application of our results we consider the following fractional differential inclusions of the form where , satisfies semi-continuous assumptions (H3) and (H4).

Consider endowed with the supnorm and the operator defined by

Now, we have . As we know from [17] that satisfies the Hille-Yosida condition with and , . Hence, operator satisfies (H1), (H2), and .

Then the system (4.1) can be reformulated as where , .

If we assume that satisfies (H3) and (H4), then all conditions of Theorem 3.7 are satisfied and we deduce (4.1) has at least one integral solution.

#### Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11171122) and Anhui Province College Natural Science Foundation (KJ2012A265, KJ2012B187, KJ2011B176).

#### References

1. K. B. Oldham and J. Spanier, The Fractional Calculus, vol. 111, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1974, Theory and applications of differentiation and integration to arbitrary order, With an annotated chronological bibliography by Bertram Ross, Mathematics in Science and Engineering.
2. K. S. Miller and B. Ross, An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equations, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
3. I. Podlubny, Fractional Differential Equations, vol. 198 of Mathematics in Science and Engineering, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 1999, An introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications.
4. D. Delbosco and L. Rodino, “Existence and uniqueness for a nonlinear fractional differential equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 204, no. 2, pp. 609–625, 1996.
5. S. Aizicovici and M. McKibben, “Existence results for a class of abstract nonlocal Cauchy problems,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 649–668, 2000.
6. K. Diethelm and N. J. Ford, “Analysis of fractional differential equations,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 265, no. 2, pp. 229–248, 2002.
7. S. D. Eidelman and A. N. Kochubei, “Cauchy problem for fractional diffusion equations,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 199, no. 2, pp. 211–255, 2004.
8. V. Daftardar-Gejji and H. Jafari, “Analysis of a system of nonautonomous fractional differential equations involving Caputo derivatives,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 1026–1033, 2007.
9. Y.-K. Chang and J. J. Nieto, “Some new existence results for fractional differential inclusions with boundary conditions,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 49, no. 3-4, pp. 605–609, 2009.
10. R. P. Agarwal, M. Benchohra, and S. Hamani, “A survey on existence results for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations and inclusions,” Acta Applicandae Mathematicae, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 973–1033, 2010.
11. M. M. El-Borai, “Some probability densities and fundamental solutions of fractional evolution equations,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 433–440, 2002.
12. Y. Zhou and F. Jiao, “Existence of mild solutions for fractional neutral evolution equations,” Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 1063–1077, 2010.
13. Y. Zhou and F. Jiao, “Nonlocal Cauchy problem for fractional evolution equations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 4465–4475, 2010.
14. J. Wang and Y. Zhou, “A class of fractional evolution equations and optimal controls,” Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 262–272, 2011.
15. J. Cao, Q. Yang, and Z. Huang, “Optimal mild solutions and weighted pseudo-almost periodic classical solutions of fractional integro-differential equations,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 224–234, 2011.
16. Z. Yan, “Controllability of fractional-order partial neutral functional integrodifferential inclusions with infinite delay,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 348, no. 8, pp. 2156–2173, 2011.
17. G. Da Prato and E. Sinestrari, “Differential operators with nondense domain,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Scienze, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 285–344, 1987.
18. H. R. Thieme, ““Integrated semigroups” and integrated solutions to abstract Cauchy problems,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 416–447, 1990.
19. H. R. Thieme, “Semiflows generated by Lipschitz perturbations of non-densely defined operators,” Differential and Integral Equations, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1035–1066, 1990.
20. M. Adimy, H. Bouzahir, and K. Ezzinbi, “Existence for a class of partial functional differential equations with infinite delay,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 91–112, 2001.
21. K. Ezzinbi and J. H. Liu, “Nondensely defined evolution equations with nonlocal conditions,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 36, no. 9-10, pp. 1027–1038, 2002.
22. M. Benchohra, E. P. Gatsori, J. Henderson, and S. K. Ntouyas, “Nondensely defined evolution impulsive differential inclusions with nonlocal conditions,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 286, no. 1, pp. 307–325, 2003.
23. N. Abada, M. Benchohra, and H. Hammouche, “Existence and controllability results for nondensely defined impulsive semilinear functional differential inclusions,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol. 246, no. 10, pp. 3834–3863, 2009.
24. J. Wang and Y. Zhou, “Existence and controllability results for fractional semilinear differential inclusions,” Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 3642–3653, 2011.
25. W. Arendt, “Vector-valued Laplace transforms and Cauchy problems,” Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 327–352, 1987.
26. H. Kellerman and M. Hieber, “Integrated semigroups,” Journal of Functional Analysis, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 160–180, 1989.
27. W. Arendt, “Resolvent positive operators,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 321–349, 1987.
28. H. Ye, J. Gao, and Y. Ding, “A generalized Gronwall inequality and its application to a fractional differential equation,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 328, no. 2, pp. 1075–1081, 2007.
29. K. Deimling, Multivalued Differential Equations, vol. 1 of de Gruyter Series in Nonlinear Analysis and Applications, Walter de Gruyter &, Berlin, Germany, 1992.
30. A. Lasota and Z. Opial, “An application of the Kakutani-Ky-Fan theorem in the theory of ordinary differential equations,” Bulletin de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences, Série des Sciences Mathématiques, Astronomiques et Physiques, vol. 13, pp. 781–786, 1965.
31. M. Martelli, “A Rothe's type theorem for non-compact acyclic-valued maps,” Bollettino della Unione Matematica Italiana, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 70–76, 1975.
32. F. Mainardi, P. Paradisi, and R. Gorenflo, “Probability distributions generated by fractional diffusion equations,” in Econophysics: An Emerging Science, J. Kertesz and I. Kondor, Eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000.