- About this Journal ·
- Abstracting and Indexing ·
- Advance Access ·
- Aims and Scope ·
- Annual Issues ·
- Article Processing Charges ·
- Articles in Press ·
- Author Guidelines ·
- Bibliographic Information ·
- Citations to this Journal ·
- Contact Information ·
- Editorial Board ·
- Editorial Workflow ·
- Free eTOC Alerts ·
- Publication Ethics ·
- Reviewers Acknowledgment ·
- Submit a Manuscript ·
- Subscription Information ·
- Table of Contents

Journal of Applied Mathematics

Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 327434, 17 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/327434

## Common Fixed Points for Asymptotic Pointwise Nonexpansive Mappings in Metric and Banach Spaces

^{1}Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand^{2}Centre of Excellence in Mathematics, CHE, Si Ayutthaya Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand

Received 26 October 2011; Accepted 8 December 2011

Academic Editor: Rudong Chen

Copyright © 2012 P. Pasom and B. Panyanak. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

Let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space . We prove that the common fixed point set of any commuting family of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings on is nonempty closed and convex. We also show that, under some suitable conditions, the sequence defined by , converges to a common fixed point of where they are asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings on , are sequences in for all and is an increasing sequence of natural numbers. The related results for uniformly convex Banach spaces are also included.

#### 1. Introduction

A mapping on a subset of a Banach space is said to be asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive if there exists a sequence of mappings such that where , for all . This class of mappings was introduced by Kirk and Xu [1], where it was shown that if is a bounded closed convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space , then every asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping always has a fixed point. In 2009, Hussain and Khamsi [2] extended Kirk-Xu's result to the case of metric spaces, specifically to the so-called CAT(0) spaces. Recently, Kozlowski [3] defined an iterative sequence for an asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping by and where and are sequences in and is an increasing sequence of natural numbers. He proved, under some suitable assumptions, that the sequence defined by (1.2) converges weakly to a fixed point of where is a uniformly convex Banach space which satisfies the Opial condition and converges strongly to a fixed point of provided is a compact mapping for some . On the other hand, Khan et al. [4] studied the iterative process defined by where are asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings on and are sequences in for all .

In this paper, motivated by the results mentioned above, we ensure the existence of common fixed points for a family of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings in a CAT(0) space. Furthermore, we obtain and strong convergence theorems of a sequence defined by where are asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings on a subset of a complete CAT(0) space and are sequences in for all , and is an increasing sequence of natural numbers. We also note that our method can be used to prove the analogous results for uniformly convex Banach spaces.

#### 2. Preliminaries

A metric space is a CAT(0) space if it is geodesically connected and if every geodesic triangle in is at least as “thin” as its comparison triangle in the Euclidean plane. It is well-known that any complete, simply connected Riemannian manifold having nonpositive sectional curvature is a CAT(0) space. Other examples include Pre-Hilbert spaces (see [5]), -trees (see [6]), Euclidean buildings (see [7]), and the complex Hilbert ball with a hyperbolic metric (see [8]). For a thorough discussion of these spaces and of the fundamental role they play in geometry, we refer the reader to Bridson and Haefliger [5].

Fixed point theory in CAT(0) spaces was first studied by Kirk (see [9, 10]). He showed that every nonexpansive (single-valued) mapping defined on a bounded closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space always has a fixed point. Since then the fixed point theory for single-valued and multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces has been rapidly developed, and many papers have appeared (see, e.g., [2, 11–22] and the references therein). It is worth mentioning that fixed point theorems in CAT(0) spaces (specially in -trees) can be applied to graph theory, biology, and computer science (see, e.g., [6, 23–26]).

Let be a metric space. A *geodesic path* joining to (or, more briefly, a *geodesic* from to ) is a map from a closed interval to such that , and for all . In particular, is an isometry and . The image of is called a *geodesic* (or *metric*) *segment* joining and . When it is unique, this geodesic is denoted by . The space is said to be a *geodesic space* if every two points of are joined by a geodesic, and is said to be *uniquely geodesic* if there is exactly one geodesic joining and for each . A subset is said to be *convex* if includes every geodesic segment joining any two of its points.

A *geodesic triangle * in a geodesic space consists of three points in (the* vertices* of ) and a geodesic segment between each pair of vertices (the *edges* of ). A *comparison triangle* for geodesic triangle in is a triangle in the Euclidean plane such that for .

A geodesic space is said to be a CAT(0) space if all geodesic triangles satisfy the following comparison axiom.

CAT(0): Let be a geodesic triangle in , and let be a comparison triangle for . Then, is said to satisfy the CAT(0) *inequality* if for all and all comparison points ,

Let , by Lemma 2.1(iv) of [14] for each , there exists a unique point such that We will use the notation for the unique point satisfying (2.2). We now collect some elementary facts about CAT(0) spaces.

Lemma 2.1. *Let be a complete CAT(0) space.**[5, Proposition 2.4] If is a nonempty closed convex subset of , then, for every , there exists a unique point such that . Moreover, the map is a nonexpansive retract from onto .**[14, Lemma 2.4] For and , we have
**[14, Lemma 2.5] For and , we have
*

We now give the concept of -convergence and collect some of its basic properties. Let be a bounded sequence in a CAT(0) space . For , we set
The *asymptotic radius * of is given by
and the *asymptotic center * of is the set

It is known from Proposition 7 of [27] that, in a CAT(0) space, consists of exactly one point.

*Definition 2.2 (see [28, 29]). *A sequence in a CAT(0) space is said to -*converge* to if is the unique asymptotic center of for every subsequence of . In this case, we write and call the -*limit* of .

Lemma 2.3. *Let be a complete CAT(0) space.*(i)*[28, page 3690] Every bounded sequence in has a -convergent subsequence.*(ii)*[30, Proposition 2.1] If is a closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space and if is a bounded sequence in , then the asymptotic center of is in .*(iii)*[14, Lemma 2.8] If is a bounded sequence in a complete CAT(0) space with and is a subsequence of with and the sequence converges, then .*

Recall that a mapping is said to be *nonexpansive* [31] if
where is called *asymptotically nonexpansive* [32] if there is a sequence of positive numbers with the property and such thatwhere is called an *asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping* [1] if there exists a sequence of functions such that
where . The following implications hold.
A point is called a fixed point of if . We shall denote by the set of fixed points of . The existence of fixed points for asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings in CAT(0) spaces was proved by Hussain and Khamsi [2] as the following result.

Theorem 2.4. *Let be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space . Suppose that is an asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping. Then, is nonempty closed and convex.*

#### 3. Existence Theorems

Let be a metric space and a family of subsets of . Then, we say that defines a *convexity structure* on if it contains the closed balls and is stable by intersection.

*Definition 3.1 (see [2]). *Let be a convexity structure on . We will say that is *compact* if any family of elements of has a nonempty intersection provided for any finite subset .

Let be a complete CAT(0) space. We denote by the family of all closed convex subsets of . Then, is a compact convexity structure on (see, e.g., [2]).

The following theorem is an extension of Theorem 4.3 in [33]. For an analog of this result in uniformly convex Banach spaces, see [34].

Theorem 3.2. *Let be a nonempty bounded closed and convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space . Then, for any commuting family of asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings on , the set of common fixed points of is nonempty closed and convex.*

*Proof. *Let be the family of all finite intersections of the fixed point sets of mappings in the commutative family . We first show that has the finite intersection property. Let . By Theorem 2.4, is a nonempty closed and convex subset of . We assume that is nonempty closed and convex for some with . For and with , we have
Thus, is a fixed point of , which implies that ; therefore, is invariant under . Again, by Theorem 2.4, has a fixed point in , that is,
By induction, . Hence, has the finite intersection property. Since is compact,
Obviously, the set is closed and convex.

As a consequence of Lemma 2.1(i) and Theorem 3.2, we obtain an analog of Bruck's theorem [35].

Corollary 3.3. *Let be a nonempty bounded closed and convex subset of a complete CAT(0) space . Then, for any commuting family of nonexpansive mappings on , the set of common fixed points of is a nonempty nonexpansive retract of .*

#### 4. Convergence Theorems

Throughout this section, stands for a complete CAT(0) space. Let be a closed convex subset of . We shall denote by the class of all asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings from into . Let , without loss of generality, we can assume that there exists a sequence of mappings such that for all , , and , we have Let . Again, without loss of generality, we can assume that for all , and . We define , then, for each , we have .

The following definition is a mild modification of [3, Definition 2.3].

*Definition 4.1. *Define as a class of all such that
.

Let , and let be bounded away from 0 and 1 for all , and an increasing sequence of natural numbers. Let , and define a sequence in as

We say that the sequence in (4.4) is well defined if . As in [3], we observe that for every . Hence, we can always choose a subsequence which makes well defined.

Lemma 4.2 (see [36, Lemma 2.2]). *Let and be sequences of nonnegative real numbers satisfying
**
Then, (i) exists, (ii) if , then .*

Lemma 4.3 (see [37, 38]). *Suppose is a sequence in for some and , are sequences in such that , , and for some . Then,
*

Lemma 4.4. *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Assume that . Then,*(a)*there exists a sequence in such that and , for all and all ,*(b)*there exists a constant such that , for all and .*

*Proof. *(a) Let and for all . Since , we have . Now,
Suppose that holds for some . Then,
By induction, we have
This implies
This completes the proof of (a).

(b) We observe that holds for all and . Thus, by (a), for , we have
The proof is complete by setting .

Theorem 4.5. *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Assume that . Then, converges to some point in if and only if , where .*

*Proof. *The necessity is obvious. Now, we prove the sufficiency. From Lemma 4.4(a), we have
This implies
Since , then . By Lemma 4.2(ii), we get . Next, we show that is a Cauchy sequence. From Lemma 4.4(b), there exists such that
Since , for each , there exists such that
Hence, there exists such that
By (4.14) and (4.16), for , we have
This shows that is a Cauchy sequence and so converges to some . We next show that . Let . Then, for each , there exists such that
Since , there exists such that
Thus, there exists such that
By (4.18) and (4.20), for each , we have
Since is arbitrary, we have for all . Hence, .

As an immediate consequence of Theorem 4.5, we obtain the following.

Corollary 4.6. *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Assume that . Then, converges to a point if and only if there exists a subsequence of which converges to .*

*Definition 4.7. *A strictly increasing sequence is called *quasiperiodic* [39] if the sequence is bounded or equivalently if there exists a number such that any block of consecutive natural numbers must contain a term of the sequence . The smallest of such numbers will be called a quasiperiod of .

Lemma 4.8. *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let for some and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Then,*(i)* exists for all ,*(ii)*, for all ,*(iii)* if the set is quasiperiodic, then , for all .*

*Proof. *(i) Follows from Lemmas 4.2(i) and 4.4(a).

(ii) Let , then, by (i), we have exists. Let
By (4.9) and (4.22), we get that
Note that
Thus,
so that
From (4.23) and (4.26), we have
That is
for each .

We also obtain from (4.23) that
By Lemma 4.3, we get that
For the case , by (4.1), we have
But since , then
Moreover,
Again, by Lemma 4.3, we get that
Thus, (4.30) and (4.34) imply that
For , from (ii), we have
If , then we have
By (ii) and , we get
By (4.36) and (4.38), we have
By the construction of the sequence , we have from (4.35) that
Next, we show that
It is enough to prove that as though . Indeed, let be a quasiperiod of , and let be given. Then, there exists such that
By the quasiperiodicity of , for each , there exists such that . Without loss of generality, we can assume that (the proof for the other case is identical). Let . Then, . Since by (4.40), there exists such that
This implies that
By the definition of , we have

Let . Then, for , we have from (4.42), (4.44), and (4.45) that
To prove that as though . Since is quasiperiodic, for each , we have
From this, together with (4.39) and (4.40), we can obtain that as through .

The following lemmas can be found in [3] (see also [2]).

Lemma 4.9. *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of , and let . If , then for every .*

Lemma 4.10. *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of , and let . Suppose is a bounded sequence in such that and -. Then, .*

By using Lemmas 2.3 and 4.10, we can obtain the following result. We omit the proof because it is similar to the one given in [38].

Lemma 4.11. *Let be a closed convex subset of , and let be an asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mapping. Suppose is a bounded sequence in such that and converges for each , then . Here, where the union is taken over all subsequences of . Moreover, consists of exactly one point.*

Now, we are ready to prove our -convergence theorem.

Theorem 4.12. *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and . Let for some and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Suppose that and the set is quasiperiodic. Then, -converges to a common fixed point of the family .*

*Proof. *Let , by Lemma 4.8, existsm and hence is bounded. Since for all , then by Lemma 4.11 for all , and hence . Since consists of exactly one point, then -converges to an element of .

Before proving our strong convergence theorem, we recall that a mapping is said to be *semicompact* if is closed and, for any bounded sequence in with , there exists a subsequence of and such that .

Theorem 4.13. *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of and such that is semicompact for some and . Let for some and be such that in (4.4) is well defined. Suppose that and the set is quasiperiodic. Then, converges to a common fixed point of the family .*

*Proof. *By Lemma 4.8, we have
Let be such that is semicompact. Thus, by Lemma 4.9,
We can also find a subsequence of such that . Hence, from (4.48), we have
Thus, , and, by Corollary 4.6, converges to . This completes the proof.

#### 5. Concluding Remarks

One may observe that our method can be used to obtain the analogous results for uniformly convex Banach spaces. Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Banach space and fix . Define a sequence in as where , are sequences in for all , and is an increasing sequence of natural numbers.

Theorem 5.1. *Let be a uniformly convex Banach space with the Opial property, and let be a nonempty closed convex subset of . Let , for some , and let be such that in (5.1) is well defined. Suppose that and the set is quasiperiodic. Then, converges weakly to a common fixed point of the family .*

Theorem 5.2. *Let be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space and such that is semicompact for some and . Let for some , and let be such that in (5.1) is well defined. Suppose that and the set is quasiperiodic. Then, converges strongly to a common fixed point of the family .*

#### Acknowledgments

This research is (partially) supported by the Centre of Excellence in Mathematics, the Commission on Higher Education, Thailand. The first author also thanks the Graduate School of Chiang Mai University, Thailand.

#### References

- W. A. Kirk and H.-K. Xu, “Asymptotic pointwise contractions,”
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 4706–4712, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - N. Hussain and M. A. Khamsi, “On asymptotic pointwise contractions in metric spaces,”
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 71, no. 10, pp. 4423–4429, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - W. M. Kozlowski, “Fixed point iteration processes for asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 377, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - A. R. Khan, A.-A. Domlo, and H. Fukhar-ud-din, “Common fixed points Noor iteration for a finite family of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 341, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - M. R. Bridson and A. Haefliger,
*Metric Spaces of Non-Positive Curvature*, vol. 319 of*Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften*, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1999. - W. A. Kirk, “Fixed point theorems in CAT(0) spaces and $\mathbb{R}$-trees,”
*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, no. 4, pp. 309–316, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - K. S. Brown,
*Buildings*, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1989. - K. Goebel and S. Reich,
*Uniform Convexity, Hyperbolic Geometry, and Nonexpansive Mappings*, vol. 83 of*Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics*, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1984. - W. A. Kirk, “Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory,” in
*Seminar of Mathematical Analysis*, vol. 64 of*Colecc. Abierta*, pp. 195–225, Universidad de Sevilla Secr. Publ., Seville, Spain, 2003. View at Zentralblatt MATH - W. A. Kirk, “Geodesic geometry and fixed point theory. II,” in
*International Conference on Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, pp. 113–142, Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama, Japan, 2004. View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Dhompongsa, A. Kaewkhao, and B. Panyanak, “Lim's theorems for multivalued mappings in CAT(0) spaces,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 312, no. 2, pp. 478–487, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - P. Chaoha and A. Phon-on, “A note on fixed point sets in CAT(0) spaces,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 320, no. 2, pp. 983–987, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - L. Leustean, “A quadratic rate of asymptotic regularity for CAT(0)-spaces,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 325, no. 1, pp. 386–399, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Dhompongsa and B. Panyanak, “On $\mathrm{\Delta}$-convergence theorems in CAT(0) spaces,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 2572–2579, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - N. Shahzad and J. Markin, “Invariant approximations for commuting mappings in CAT(0) and hyperconvex spaces,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 337, no. 2, pp. 1457–1464, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - N. Shahzad, “Fixed point results for multimaps in CAT(0) spaces,”
*Topology and Its Applications*, vol. 156, no. 5, pp. 997–1001, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - R. Espínola and A. Fernández-León, “CAT(k)-spaces, weak convergence and fixed points,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 353, no. 1, pp. 410–427, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - A. Razani and H. Salahifard, “Invariant approximation for CAT(0) spaces,”
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 2421–2425, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Saejung, “Halpern's iteration in CAT(0) spaces,”
*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2010, Article ID 471781, 13 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - A. R. Khan, M. A. Khamsi, and H. Fukhar-ud-din, “Strong convergence of a general iteration scheme in CAT(0) spaces,”
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 783–791, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. H. Khan and M. Abbas, “Strong and $\mathrm{\Delta}$-convergence of some iterative schemes in CAT(0) spaces,”
*Computers & Mathematics with Applications*, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - A. Abkar and M. Eslamian, “Common fixed point results in CAT(0) spaces,”
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 1835–1840, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - M. Bestvina, “$\mathbb{R}$-trees in topology, geometry, and group theory,” in
*Handbook of Geometric Topology*, pp. 55–91, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002. View at Zentralblatt MATH - C. Semple and M. Steel,
*Phylogenetics*, vol. 24 of*Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and Its Applications*, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2003. - R. Espínola and W. A. Kirk, “Fixed point theorems in $\mathbb{R}$-trees with applications to graph theory,”
*Topology and Its Applications*, vol. 153, no. 7, pp. 1046–1055, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - W. A. Kirk, “Some recent results in metric fixed point theory,”
*Journal of Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 195–207, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - S. Dhompongsa, W. A. Kirk, and B. Sims, “Fixed points of uniformly Lipschitzian mappings,”
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 762–772, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - W. A. Kirk and B. Panyanak, “A concept of convergence in geodesic spaces,”
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 3689–3696, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - T. C. Lim, “Remarks on some fixed point theorems,”
*Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*, vol. 60, pp. 179–182, 1976. - S. Dhompongsa, W. A. Kirk, and B. Panyanak, “Nonexpansive set-valued mappings in metric and Banach spaces,”
*Journal of Nonlinear and Convex Analysis*, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 35–45, 2007. View at Zentralblatt MATH - W. A. Kirk, “A fixed point theorem for mappings which do not increase distances,”
*The American Mathematical Monthly*, vol. 72, pp. 1004–1006, 1965. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - K. Goebel and W. A. Kirk, “A fixed point theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings,”
*Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society*, vol. 35, pp. 171–174, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - R. Espínola and N. Hussain, “Common fixed points for multimaps in metric spaces,”
*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2010, Article ID 204981, 14 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - P. Pasom and B. Panyanak, “Common fixed points for asymptotic pointwise nonexpansive mappings,”
*Fixed Point Theory*. to appear. - R. E. Bruck, Jr., “A common fixed point theorem for a commuting family of nonexpansive mappings,”
*Pacific Journal of Mathematics*, vol. 53, pp. 59–71, 1974. View at Zentralblatt MATH - Z.-H. Sun, “Strong convergence of an implicit iteration process for a finite family of asymptotically quasi-nonexpansive mappings,”
*Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications*, vol. 286, no. 1, pp. 351–358, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - M. A. Khamsi and A. R. Khan, “Inequalities in metric spaces with applications,”
*Nonlinear Analysis*, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 4036–4045, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar - B. Nanjaras and B. Panyanak, “Demiclosed principle for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in CAT(0) spaces,”
*Fixed Point Theory and Applications*, vol. 2010, Article ID 268780, 14 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH - R. Bruck, T. Kuczumow, and S. Reich, “Convergence of iterates of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces with the uniform Opial property,”
*Colloquium Mathematicum*, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 169–179, 1993. View at Zentralblatt MATH