Integration of Lot Sizing and Flow Shop Scheduling with Lot Streaming

Table 5

Results of these eight different lot streaming problems.

Classification	Optimal sequence	Makespan	Objective function (z)	Comparison of total cost (z)	Comparison of makespan
Consistent sublots with intermingling	11-12-13-21-22-23-31-33-32	170	3570	—	—
Consistent sublots without intermingling	2-3-1	189	3665	2/66%	11%
Equal sublots with intermingling	12-13-11-22-21-31-32-23-33	182	3737	4/67%	7%
Equal sublots without intermingling	2-3-1	205	3852	7/9%	20%
No-wait consistent sublots with intermingling	11-21-31-12-13-22-23-32-33	178	3610	1/12%	4/7%
No-wait equal sublots with intermingling	12-13-11-21-23-22-33-31-32	202	3837	7/47%	18/8%
No-wait consistent sublots without intermingling	1-2-3	199	3715	4/06%	17%
No-wait equal sublots without intermingling	3-1-2	214	3897	9/15%	25/8%