Research Article
Generalised Adaptive Harmony Search: A Comparative Analysis of Modern Harmony Search
Table 3
Average scores and standard deviations over 50 runs for 100-dimensional problems. The optimisers were allowed to run for 500,000 function evaluations.
| | Ackley | Griewank | Rosenbrock | Rastrigin |
| HS | | | | | Best | 0.0142 | 0.0050 | 162.5829 | 0.2280 | Standard deviation | 0.0004 | 0.0080 | 49.5829 | 0.0130 | Hits | 50 | 34 | 0 | 0 | DLHS | | | | | Best | 0.2281 | 0.0004 | 142.4515 | 1.3140 | Standard deviation | 0.0130 | 0.0070 | 39.5126 | 3.1364 | Hits | 50 | 50 | 0 | 32 | EHS | | | | | Best | 0.0009 | 0.0001 | 97.2555 | 388.2894 | Standard deviation | 0.0006 | 0.0007 | 7.4711 | 20.5949 | Hits | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | AHS | | | | | Best | 0.0003 | 0 | 96.4333 | 6.7471 | Standard deviation | 0.0006 | 0 | 0.2943 | 2.3279 | Hits | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
The accuracy tolerance for awarding a successful hit on the global minimum was decreased to 0.1 for 100-dimensional Rastrigin’s function.
|