Research Article
Genetic Algorithm for Biobjective Urban Transit Routing Problem
Table 5
Computational results for method 1.
| Case | CPU time (sec) | Generation | Objective | Results | | | | | ATT | |
| I | 67.15 | 327 | Passenger | 89.84 | 9.80 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 10.75 | 131 | Operator | 67.68 | 28.13 | 4.16 | 0.03 | 13.83 | 67 |
| II | 101.00 | 473 | Passenger | 92.92 | 6.53 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 10.47 | 184 | Operator | 58.66 | 32.29 | 7.65 | 1.39 | 14.29 | 69 |
| III | 187.80 | 790 | Passenger | 92.02 | 7.58 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 10.51 | 194 | Operator | 52.10 | 27.48 | 14.32 | 6.10 | 15.58 | 66 |
| IV | 618.86 | 2361 | Passenger | 91.70 | 7.72 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 10.59 | 212 | Operator | 50.24 | 20.65 | 15.85 | 13.26 | 16.59 | 66 |
| Average | 243.70 | 988 | Passenger | 91.62 | 7.91 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 10.58 | 181 | Operator | 57.17 | 27.14 | 10.50 | 5.19 | 15.07 | 67 |
|
|