Fare Design in Urban Transit Network considering Elastic Demand and Adverse Weather’s Impact

Table 7

The changes of transit route flows considering scenario 1 with different value of time.

𝛼	OD pair	Changes of transit route flow
		Route 1	Route 2	Route 3	Route 4	Route 5	Route 6	Route 7	Route 8
10−5	1, 2	−83.77	−24.71	13.06	4.83	9.41	−23.59	7.58	1.54
15−10		−88.15	2.16	−5.75	−5.49	−0.56	9.94	4.95	3.85
20−15		−69.49	−4.27	1.27	−1.50	2.88	−1.90	3.70	0.65
25−20		−40.84	−13.53	7.18	2.43	7.28	−18.20	−2.37	−5.10
30−25		−20.39	−12.62	4.43	2.27	6.72	−14.73	−5.20	−5.14
10−5	1, 3	−19.40	−8.83	−21.15	−13.03	−13.70	−22.68
15−10		−46.07	−18.61	−17.00	−9.23	0.84	0.01
20−15		−34.90	−9.54	−12.10	−6.53	−4.94	−8.01
25−20		−14.70	−3.73	−7.79	−2.98	−16.35	−17.59
30−25		−2.13	−4.73	−5.25	−1.44	−15.62	−13.53
10−5	4, 2	−32.67	−60.33	4.85	−7.59	−0.14
15−10		−29.98	−4.29	−18.91	−16.86	−9.69
20−15		−33.00	−13.90	−7.47	−10.02	−4.74
25−20		−33.46	−25.34	0.13	−4.50	0.49
30−25		−32.19	−18.70	1.46	−0.45	4.44
10−5	4, 3	−43.31	−39.25	−11.70	0.72	−11.28	−4.08
15−10		−65.90	−2.56	−35.87	−0.80	−1.64	7.06
20−15		−56.79	−14.39	−33.05	7.81	2.14	10.34
25−20		−23.91	−35.53	−16.51	4.84	−1.75	5.32
30−25		−2.96	−42.11	−2.55	−0.15	−2.07	3.67

Note: the number of the first column, for example, 10−5, means the transit route flow with value of time 10 minus the transit route flow with value of time 5.