Fare Design in Urban Transit Network considering Elastic Demand and Adverse Weather’s Impact

Table 9

The changes of transit route flows considering different scenarios (𝛼=5).

Scenario	OD pair	Transit route flows changes
		Route 1	Route 2	Route 3	Route 4	Route 5	Route 6	Route 7	Route 8
2−1	1, 2	−10.61	−5.97	4.72	2.35	2.32	−5.90	3.23	1.30
3−2		23.16	−20.96	14.40	−1.95	10.49	−28.13	−3.04	−13.01
4−3		−10.51	−14.93	2.05	−6.19	4.13	−9.66	2.45	−3.28
5−4		−40.43	−24.17	19.32	−1.83	17.05	−22	−6.66	−12.97
2−1	1, 3	−4.32	2.83	−1.57	−1.61	0.77	−2.77
3−2		−12.91	24.01	−8.46	16.71	−10.38	−30.07
4−3		−15.82	−4.55	−18.08	1.06	−0.78	−10.37
5−4		−32.96	14.22	−16.98	11.58	−25.65	−32.06
2−1	4, 2	−1.19	−14.10	5.83	1.76	1.72
3−2		−30.53	−35.74	29.43	−0.96	22.03
4−3		−37.55	−20.74	16.41	−2.50	19.75
5−4		−62.42	−48.84	33.32	−6.58	29.11
2−1	4, 3	−7.14	−2.63	−2.08	4.92	1.00	0.96
3−2		−50.77	−25.03	−4.98	33.26	2.15	25.41
4−3		−39.07	−35.90	−4.98	18.60	−1.04	21.98
5−4		−56.12	−60.75	−28.03	40.85	−3.23	−56.12

Note: the number of the first column, for example, 2−1, means the transit route flows for scenario 2 minus the transit route flows for scenario 1.