A Comparison of Generalized Hyperbolic Distribution Models for Equity Returns

<table>Daily variation of <svg height="12.4375" id="M167" style="vertical-align:-0.20064pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 9.5124998 12.4375" width="9.5124998" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,12.162)"><path d="M529 97q-70 -109 -136 -109q-41 0 -56 94q-23 144 -37 284q-38 -88 -99 -202.5t-93 -156.5q-26 -8 -76 -19l-9 21q71 78 145.5 193t124.5 232q-5 84 -15 128q-12 55 -29.5 75.5t-42.5 20.5q-21 0 -45 -13l-8 24q16 17 46 30t55 13q43 0 70 -46.5t40 -169.5
q27 -249 51 -392q7 -46 23 -46q24 0 70 60z" id="x1D706"></path></g>
</svg>, <svg height="8.3000002" id="M168" style="vertical-align:-0.13794pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 9.7250004 8.3000002" width="9.7250004" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,8.038)"><path d="M548 455q-32 -77 -74 -77q-37 0 -103 10l-3 -2q36 -30 48.5 -62t12.5 -80q0 -103 -75 -179.5t-175 -76.5q-70 0 -113 45t-43 128q0 115 83.5 200.5t209.5 85.5q31 0 77.5 -4t67.5 -4q36 0 62 30zM350 274q0 54 -17 86q-19 35 -57 35q-50 0 -90 -37.5t-59 -91.5t-19 -109
q0 -61 24.5 -96.5t65.5 -35.5q51 0 87.5 46.5t50.5 100.5t14 102z" id="x1D70E"></path></g>
</svg>, <svg height="13.225" id="M169" style="vertical-align:-2.29482pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 11.2375 13.225" width="11.2375" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,8.737)"><path d="M642 419q-50 -36 -71 -94q-28 -78 -68 -170q-39 -89 -114 -135q-34 -21 -83 -31l-45 -219l-31 -31q-8 7 -15 29.5t-2 45.5l35 172q-153 10 -153 169q0 28 6 84q7 68 7 88q0 48 -27 48q-18 0 -51 -28l-7 26q62 75 118 75q49 0 49 -90q0 -47 -5 -81q-10 -72 -10 -108
q0 -117 82 -133l87 455l62 19l7 -2l-99 -478q91 12 131 120q34 93 51 154q20 73 36 88q42 40 103 56z" id="x1D713"></path></g>
</svg>, and <svg height="12.175" id="M170" style="vertical-align:-2.34499pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 8.6374998 12.175" width="8.6374998" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<g transform="matrix(.017,-0,0,-.017,.062,7.675)"><path d="M478 372q0 -39 -31 -97t-61 -98t-78 -98q-45 -55 -73 -102q-13 -79 -13 -197q-11 -11 -43.5 -25.5t-53.5 -15.5l-15 17q5 35 26 101.5t47 123.5q8 72 -1.5 174.5t-37.5 178.5q-14 37 -29 37q-20 0 -67 -65l-25 21q37 60 73 90.5t63 30.5q47 0 72 -112q13 -56 17.5 -141.5
t0.5 -143.5h2q155 193 155 297q0 26 -12 47q-5 8 -5 15q0 16 12.5 27t29.5 11q21 0 34 -21t13 -55z" id="x1D6FE"></path></g>
</svg> for AGL with VG.</table>

Journal of Applied Mathematics

fig3

Figure 3

Figure 3: A Comparison of Generalized Hyperbolic Distribution Models for Equity Returns 