Research Article
Comparability of a Three-Dimensional Structure in Biopharmaceuticals Using Spectroscopic Methods
Table 1
Validation results for DTNB and DLM methods.
| Validation test | Acceptance criteria |
Method result | DTNB | DyLight 488 |
| Precision (repeatability) | <20% | RSD: 2.52% (denaturing-reducing conditions). RSD: 17.3% (native conditions). | RSD: NT% (denaturing-reducing conditions). RSD: 13.3% (native conditions). |
| Accuracy | Total recovery between 95 and 105% in respect to theoretical value. | 99.5% recovery using Somatropin (Cys/Protein ratio 3.98) | 101.0% recovery using HSA (Cys/Protein ratio 1.01) |
| Intermediate precision | RSD < 10% | RSD: 3.8% | RSD: 0.66% |
| Linearity | ≥ 0.980 Ordinate = 0 | = 0.999 native and denaturing-reducing conditions. Slope = 0.01285 M−1 = 0.983 denaturing conditions. Slope = 0.0093 M−1 Forced through zero. | = 0.990 native and denaturing conditions. Slope = 465,834 M−1 Forced through zero. |
| Quantification limit | Report value | 5 M | 0.1 M |
| Selectivity | Cysteine-free protein has the same signal of placebo. | GA: 0.0010 Placebo: 0.0005 | PM: 0.0005 Placebo: 0.0005 |
|
|
NT%: not tested.
|