About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Aging Research
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 436251, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/436251
Review Article

Apathy as Marker of Frail Status

1Clinica Neurologica, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”, Via Montpellier, 00133 Rome, Italy
2IRCCS Santa Lucia, Via Ardeatina, 00179 Rome, Italy

Received 15 July 2011; Accepted 15 November 2011

Academic Editor: John Knight

Copyright © 2012 Roberta Semprini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Frailty is a complex and dynamic condition associated with aging. This condition is characterised by the difficult adaptation of an old subject to new challenges occurring during life. Frailty is supposed to be due to the progressive decrease of physiological reserves and multiorgan and multisystem change. It coincides with a reduced or absent resilience. In general comorbidities like hypertension, heart disease, inflammation and infectious diseases are potential risk factors for and psychophysical decline. The aim of this work is to highlight the importance of impaired cognition as factor predisposing to frailty. The authors are convinced and suggest that the presence of neurobehavioral disturbance like apathy associated to impaired executive function could be the major predisposing factor for frailty and unsuccessful aging. Unfortunately available literature largely underestimates the presence of these factors. Thus to better identify markers of frailty, a good neuropsychological assessment and the evaluation of behavioural disturbances are suggested.

1. Introduction

Aging is a complex phenomenon which features have recently gained interest. In general aging is characterised by the progressive accumulation of deficits taking place in different individuals and in different pathways (molecular, cellular, psychological, and psychosocial, etc.), and with a variety of rates proper of each individual, that may depend on the interplay between intrinsic and extrinsic factors [1, 2].

Associated to aging we recognise a nonspecific condition defined “frail-old” or “frailty syndrome”. This is a condition that has long been considered synonymous of disability and comorbidity since it is prevalent in old age. Frailty is a condition that expose an old subject to be vulnerable to many non threatening-illness conditions, although they are not recognised as precipitating factors [3, 4].

A good definition of normal aging, even in general terms [5], may be useful to better understand the concept of frailty and its features.

Normal aging is widely considered a physiological condition during which natural reserves progressively decrease, while still supporting an acceptable functioning of essential organs, in a steady state. Thus aging is considered a dynamic event in which a progressive dysregulation of homeostatic conditions makes the organs and systems less or nonresilient [6, 7].

Many variables (biologic, metabolic, psychosocial, etc.) may play a significant role in the evolution of aging process. The association of these variables, which are different among individuals, with comorbidities (hypertension, heart disease, diabetes, bone fractures, infectious diseases) are considered responsible for the quality and rate of aging. Thus, the absence of disabilities and unimpaired cognition might be considered the features of successful aging [8]. Conversely, unsuccessful aging could be the result of the association between disabilities and cognitive decline. Considerable evidence points to impairment of executive function as a key contributor to age-related declines in a range of cognitive tasks [9].

Therefore, frailty could be considered a dynamic condition set between successful and unsuccessful aging.

Following the “Frailty Task Force” of the American Geriatric Society frailty has been considered a clinical syndrome defined by the presence of 3 or more of the following symptoms: unintentional weight loss, self-reported exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed, and low physical activity. Clinical signs are represented by undernutrition, sarcopenia, balance and gait disorders, and osteopenia. These features are expected to hesitate in increased risk of falls, worsening mobility or reducing it.

Several conditions have been identified as possibly related to a frail status and thus responsible almost in part for decline of old person.

Aging itself is generally accepted to be accompanied by altered metabolic processes like increased free radicals production, telomere shortening, and mitochondrial dysfunction; changes associated to extrinsic conditions like inflammatory status (IL-6, TNF; CRP) and common comorbidities (chronic illness like diabetes, hypertension, coronary heart disease, obesity, malignancies) may be responsible for frailty and life-shortening [1014]. In this view, frailty may be considered as a condition which precedes in a subclinical manner, such that when resilience is overwhelmed it becomes manifest concomitantly with the appearance of chronic illness. At the same time altered resilience could be the result of altered volition and motor planning, thus the result of impaired executive functions. This in turn could be responsible for hypomobility and reduced autonomy and as a consequence might render someone frail that successfully aged. In this view impaired cognition may be a precipitating factor that shifts a subject from the prefrail to the frail status [15].

The aim of this work is to discuss the role of altered cognitive conditions of aged person and in particular we will focus on executive functions and apathy in aging.

2. Executive Functions

Cognitive impairment is the primary determinant of disability in late life, and at all ages, cognitive function is the foundation of individual capacity to meet the challenges of any disabling condition [16].

Executive functions refer to a variety of higher cognitive processes that are related to the function of frontal lobes. In general this area of the brain is able to integrate the formation flow arising from many sensory systems set in both anterior and posterior brain, necessary for goal-directed action and also for the control of attentional resources which are considered basic for daily living activities [17]. In general anterior parts of frontal lobes are involved in aspects of self-regulation (inhibition or self-awareness) while posterior parts are involved in reasoning process [18].

PFC and striatum are the main regions of the frontal lobe involved in the control of executive functions [19, 20]. In both regions dopaminergic system plays an essential role as a modulator of cortico-striatal functions, acting through its receptors, namely, D1-like and D2-like [2123]. Changes of the dorsolateral prefrontal-caudate circuits are considered responsible for disexecutive function, which lead mainly to a subcortical dysfunction. Frontal lobes are involved in the pathophysiology of many neurological and psychiatric disorders and are also highly susceptible to changes of aging [15, 24, 25].

During normal aging synaptic changes of frontal cortex and associated to changes of the striatum (like altered dendritic pruning, decrease of neurotransmitters efficiency, in particular of dopaminergic system, and also the presence of diffuse white matter lesions) [26] are considered responsible for poor performance on executive tasks in healthy old subjects, as demonstrated in neuropsychological studies. Moreover executive functions contribute also to motor planning and therefore to maintain gait stability. As a consequence an impairment of pre-frontal-striatal circuit could be also responsible of gait instability and slow walking speed observed in healthy old subjects.

Gait instability and slow speed during walking are considered risk factors for falls and disability.

Thus it is conceivable to suggest that, as depicted previously about the features of frail patient, impairment of executive functions during normal aging could represent the marker to distinguish a successful aging from a prefrail status, however not sufficient to determine frailty of a subject.

Our suggestion is that, more importantly, the presence of apathetic behavior could represent reasonably a precipitating factor for frailty.

3. Apathy and Aging

Apathy is a behavioural syndrome common in normal physiological aging and is also part of the psychiatric spectrum of mental illness, and of many neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer’s disease Apathy is an observable behavioural syndrome consisting in a quantitative reduction of voluntary (or goal-directed) behaviours [27]. Therefore, apathy occurs when the systems that generate and control voluntary actions are altered. In this view apathy can be defined as the quantitative reduction of self-generated voluntary and purposeful behaviour and necessarily has not to be considered a clinical aspect of depression (see [28, 29]).

In general the basal ganglia and their connection with the prefrontal cortex are deputed to decision making. Hence, any dysfunction of this frontostriatal circuit may be responsible for apathetic behaviour.

Anatomical circuits of apathy are represented by cortical areas like the prefrontal cortex (neo-, paleo-, and archeo-cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus) and the ventral basal ganglia (limbic striatum or better the nucleus accumbens, midbrain ventral tegmental area, medial tip of subthalamic nucleus, centromedian, and parafascicular nuclei of the thalamus) [19, 3032]. The roles played by prefrontal cortex (PFC) and by nucleus accumbens (NAcc) render these structures as the most involved in the appearance of apathy [33, 34].

PFC has an essential role in cognitive and executive processes that involve motivation, emotion learning, and memory. PFC integrates sensory and limbic information and promotes goal-directed behavior through efferent projections to the NAcc. In addition, PFC sends outputs to other limbic areas such as the hippocampus and amygdale, which in turn modulate the activity of the NAcc through excitatory-glutamatergic projections.

NAcc receives inputs from cortical areas (neocortex, hippocampus, amygdala) and envy inputs to the ventral pallidum, which represents the output nuclei of the ventral basal ganglia system. This is a region that through its connection with the thalamic nuclei transfers information back to the cortex. This arrangement is made to select relevant signals from background noise arising from multiple inputs and to transfer it back to the cortex in order to generate output signal to target nuclei. Put in this frame NAcc has been proposed to play a role in emotion, and more generally in limbic-motor integration (see Figure 1). This hypothesis has been based on the anatomical organization of the NAcc which suggests that this nucleus is an interface through which limbic (glutamatergic) structures influence motor activity, and that these limbic influences on behavior could in part be controlled by mesolimbic (dopaminergic structures) system. Ideally any morphologic alteration in these brain regions can potentially induce apathetic symptoms.

436251.fig.001
Figure 1: Schematic representation of basal ganglia circuit. In this scheme the nucleus accumbens (NAcc) is an interface through which limbic (glutamatergic) structures influence motor activity, in a way that limbic structures can influence behavior, under control of meso-limbic (dopaminergic structures) system (Ventral Tegmental Area neurons).

Following Levy and Dubois’s work [27], apathy has to be considered heterogeneous disorder that may be ascribed at least to three different phenomena, each related to a specific topography in basal ganglia. The first involves the affective-emotional processing, thus the medial PFC connection with amygdala and NAcc, the second involves the cognitive processing, thus the lateral PFC and caudate nucleus connection, and the third involves the so-called “auto-activation” processing, which is observed in the severe cases of apathy. In these cases a link with pallidal dysfunction o extensive cortical lesions was supposed.

During normal aging it is conceivable to suppose that due to morphological and metabolic changes of cortical neurons as well as of subcortical nuclei, disorder of emotional-affective processing may appear. PFC and hippocampus have been demonstrated to show particular vulnerability during normal aging. Subtle regional changes of dendritic branching or altered mechanisms of neural plasticity have been experimentally demonstrated in lab animals and also in humans [3539]. These changes are also associated with reduced levels of neurotransmitters like acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, and dopamine decrease with age (Chen et al. [40]). Such alterations may reasonably be responsible for appearance of apathetic behavior in old subject. In this view, several reports showed that dopamine transmission is particularly vulnerable with age, in particular reduction of the accumbal dopamine transporter and of cortical dopamine receptors (both D1-like and D2-like, where D2-like seems to be prevalent) in aged subjects ([41], Volkow et al. [42]; Ishibashi et al. [43]; and Bäckman et al. [44]). These changes were related to PFC cognitive deficits and in particular were related to executive function impairment [45]. Even reward processing which has been demonstrated to be tuned by dopamine is altered in aged subjects [44, 46, 47]. Thus, dopamine appears particularly as vulnerable to aging. Given the particular deficits of dopamine transmission and the role played by this transmitter in the control of PFC-basal ganglia circuit, it is conceivable to suppose that such changes could be responsible for apathetic behavior in old subject. Moreover, apathy increases with age in healthy old population [48], and its presence is considered an early sign of cognitive decline [49].

4. The Apathy as Marker of Frail Status

Prefrail or frailty syndrome is considered dynamic conditions where the reduced resilience of a subject might induce changes responsible for disability, hypomobility, and even death.

Certainly the absence of disabilities and also preserved cognition, as mentioned previously, represent the target for a good aging.

Population-based studies performed in old healthy adults demonstrated that only 30% of population examined can be defined as successfully aged [8]. About 70% of subjects unfortunately suffer from several disabilities that may shorten their life.

Certainly disabilities like diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease of infections are easily identified and often patient’s history shows how these were able to interfere with aging compromising the possible recovery. Sarcopenia, undernutrition, and inflammatory status are conditions that may be easily measured [3, 4].

Conversely cognition and neuropsychiatric disturbances in healthy old subjects are infrequently evaluated among old healthy subjects [5052]. They are considered typical disturbances of patients with frank cognitive decline and thus evaluated among cognitively impaired patients, and rarely among normally aged subjects [53]. Such condition renders the weight of impaired cognition and of apathy on nondemented healthy subjects underestimated.

Recently few studies [25, 54, 55] outlined the necessity for measures of cognitive abilities and of neuropsychiatric inventory among aged subject. Indeed, the presence of apathy during aging might be responsible for hypomobility and reduced volition on one hand; on the other hand it may be the principal cause of carelessness and as a consequence of progressive worsening of comorbidities.

In this view, the presence of apathy, which we are strongly convinced that it is underestimated among aged adults, could represent the marker of a prefrail status predisposing a subject to become frail.

From our consideration emerges the need for further studies to better identify the real impact of apathy and impaired executive functions on frailty syndrome.

Conflict of Interests

The authors have no conflict of interests to disclosure.

References

  1. A. B. Mitnitski, A. J. Mogilner, and K. Rockwood, “Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 1, pp. 323–336, 2001.
  2. T. B. L. Kirkwood, “Time of our lives. What controls the length of life?” EMBO Reports, vol. 6, supplement 1, pp. S4–S8, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. T. Fulop, A. Larbi, J. M. Witkowski et al., “Aging, frailty and age-related diseases,” Biogerontology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 547–563, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  4. P. O. Lang, J. P. Michel, and D. Zekry, “Frailty syndrome: a transitional state in a dynamic process,” Gerontology, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 539–549, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  5. H. Bergman, L. Ferrucci, J. Guralnik et al., “Frailty: an emerging research and clinical paradigm—issues and controversies,” Journals of Gerontology A, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 731–737, 2007. View at Scopus
  6. F. E. Yates, “Complexity of a human being: changes with age,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 17–19, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. L. A. Lipsitz, “Physiological complexity, aging, and the path to frailty,” Science of Aging Knowledge Environment, vol. 2004, no. 16, article pe16, 2004.
  8. C. A. Depp and D. V. Jeste, “Definitions and predictors of successful aging: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies,” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 6–20, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. E. L. Glisky, “Changes in cognitive function in human aging,” in Brain Aging: Models, Methods, and Mechanisms, D. R. Riddle, Ed., Frontiers in Neuroscience, chapter 1, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2007.
  10. D. J. Gunnell, M. Okasha, G. D. Smith, S. E. Oliver, J. Sandhu, and J. M. P. Holly, “Gender gap in longevity and disability in older persons,” Epidemiologic Reviews, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 343–350, 2001.
  11. L. P. Fried, “Establishing benchmarks for quality care for an aging population: caring for vulnerable older adults,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 139, no. 9, pp. 784–786, 2003.
  12. R. Klein, B. E. K. Klein, and M. D. Knudtson, “Frailty and age-related macular degeneration: the beaver dam eye study,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 129–131, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  13. K. Bandeen-Roche, Q. L. Xue, L. Ferrucci et al., “Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the Women's Health and Aging Studies,” Journals of Gerontology A, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 262–266, 2006.
  14. M. D. Rothman, L. Leo-Summers, and T. M. Gill, “Prognostic significance of potential frailty criteria,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2211–2216, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. J. K. Johnson, L. Y. Lui, and K. Yaffe, “Executive function, more than global cognition, predicts functional decline and mortality in elderly women,” Journals of Gerontology A, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1134–1141, 2007.
  16. F. Malouin, C. L. Richards, and A. Durand, “Normal aging and motor imagery vividness: implications for mental practice training in rehabilitation,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 1122–1127, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  17. J. R. Hollerman, L. Tremblay, and W. Schultz, “Involvement of basal ganglia and orbitofrontal cortex in goal-directed behavior,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 126, pp. 193–215, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. V. Elderkin-Thompson, G. Hellemann, D. Pham, and A. Kumar, “Prefrontal brain morphology and executive function in healthy and depressed elderly,” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 459–468, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  19. S. N. Haber and J. L. Fudge, “The primate substantia nigra and VTA: integrative circuitry and function,” Critical Reviews in Neurobiology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 323–342, 1997.
  20. S. Tekin and J. L. Cummings, “Frontal-subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update,” Journal of Psychosomatic Research, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 647–654, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. D. M. Haluk and S. B. Floresco, “Ventral striatal dopamine modulation of different forms of behavioral flexibility,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 2041–2052, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  22. S. B. Floresco and O. Magyar, “Mesocortical dopamine modulation of executive functions: beyond working memory,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 188, no. 4, pp. 567–585, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  23. S. B. Floresco, O. Magyar, S. Ghods-Sharifi, C. Vexelman, and M. T. L. Tse, “Multiple dopamine receptor subtypes in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat regulate set-shifting,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 297–309, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  24. Y. Braw, S. Aviram, Y. Bloch, and Y. Levkovitz, “The effect of age on frontal lobe related cognitive functions of unmedicated depressed patients,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 129, no. 1–3, pp. 342–347, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  25. G. Allali, F. Assal, R. W. Kressig, V. Dubost, F. R. Herrmann, and O. Beauchet, “Impact of impaired executive function on gait stability,” Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 364–369, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  26. E. C. Klostermann, M. N. Braskie, S. M. Landau, J. P. O'Neil, and W. J. Jagust, “Dopamine and frontostriatal networks in cognitive aging,” Neurobiology of Aging. In press. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  27. R. Levy and B. Dubois, “Apathy and the functional anatomy of the prefrontal cortex-basal ganglia circuits,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 916–928, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  28. R. S. Marin, S. Firinciogullari, and R. C. Biedrzycki, “The sources of convergence between measures of apathy and depression,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 117–124, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. R. S. Marin, S. Firinciogullari, and R. C. Biedrzycki, “Group differences in the relationship between apathy and depression,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, vol. 182, no. 4, pp. 235–239, 1994.
  30. M. Amalric and G. F. Koob, “Functionally selective neurochemical afferents and efferents of the mesocorticolimbic and nigrostriatal dopamine system,” Progress in Brain Research, vol. 99, pp. 209–226, 1993.
  31. S. N. Haber, K. Kunishio, M. Mizobuchi, and E. Lynd-Balta, “The orbital and medial prefrontal circuit through the primate basal ganglia,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 4851–4867, 1995.
  32. S. N. Haber and B. Knutson, “The reward circuit: Linking primate anatomy and human imaging,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 4–26, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  33. J. L. Cummings, “Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 873–880, 1993.
  34. R. S. Marin, B. S. Fogel, J. Hawkins, J. Duffy, and B. Krupp, “Apathy: a treatable syndrome,” Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 1995.
  35. P. R. Hof and J. H. Morrison, “The aging brain: morphomolecular senescence of cortical circuits,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 607–613, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  36. Z. Petanjek, M. Judaš, I. Kostović, and H. B. M. Uylings, “Lifespan alterations of basal dendritic trees of pyramidal neurons in the human prefrontal cortex: a layer-specific pattern,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 915–929, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  37. E. B. Bloss, W. G. Janssen, B. S. McEwen, and J. H. Morrison, “Interactive effects of stress and aging on structural plasticity in the prefrontal cortex,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 19, pp. 6726–6731, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  38. J. M. Juraska and N. C. Lowry, “Neuroanatomical changes associated with cognitive aging,” Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. In press.
  39. G. Kalpouzos, J. Persson, and L. Nyberg, “Local brain atrophy accounts for functional activity differences in normal aging,” Neurobiology of Aging, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 623.e1–623.e13, 2012.
  40. K. H. Chen, E. A. Reese, H. W. Kim, S. I. Rapoport, and J. S. Rao, “Disturbed neurotransmitter transporter expression in Alzheimer's disease brain,” Journal of Alzheimer's disease, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 755–766, 2011.
  41. T. H. McNeill, L. L. Koek, and J. W. Haycock, “The nigrostriatal system and aging,” Peptides, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 263–268, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. N. D. Volkow, J. S. Fowler, G. J. Wang et al., “Decreased dopamine transporters with age in health human subjects,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 237–239, 1994.
  43. K. Ishibashi, K. Ishibashi, K. Ishii et al., “Regional analysis of age-related decline in dopamine transporters and dopamine D2-like receptors in human striatum,” Synapse, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 282–290, 2009.
  44. L. Bäckman, U. Lindenberger, S. C. Li, and L. Nyberg, “Linking cognitive aging to alterations in dopamine neurotransmitter functioning: recent data and future avenues,” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 670–677, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  45. K. Mizoguchi, H. Shoji, Y. Tanaka, W. Maruyama, and T. Tabira, “Age-related spatial working memory impairment is caused by prefrontal cortical dopaminergic dysfunction in rats,” Neuroscience, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 1192–1201, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  46. J. C. Dreher, A. Meyer-Lindenberg, P. Kohn, and K. F. Berman, “Age-related changes in midbrain dopaminergic regulation of the human reward system,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 39, pp. 15106–15111, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  47. T. M. Gill, P. J. Castaneda, and P. H. Janak, “Dissociable roles of the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens core in goal-directed actions for differential reward magnitude,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 2884–2899, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  48. H. Brodaty, A. Altendorf, A. Withall, and P. Sachdev, “Do people become more apathetic as they grow older? A longitudinal study in healthy individuals,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 426–436, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  49. C. U. Onyike, J. M. E. Sheppard, J. T. Tschanz et al., “Epidemiology of apathy in older adults: the cache county study,” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 365–375, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  50. Y. E. Geda, R. O. Roberts, D. S. Knopman et al., “Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms in mild cognitive impairment and normal cognitive aging: population-based study,” Archives of General Psychiatry, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 1193–1198, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  51. D. Seitz, N. Purandare, and D. Conn, “Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among older adults in long-term care homes: a systematic review,” International Psychogeriatrics, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1025–1039, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  52. T. Okura, B. L. Plassman, D. C. Steffens, D. J. Llewellyn, G. G. Potter, and K. M. Langa, “Prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms and their association with functional limitations in older adults in the United States: The aging, demographics, and memory study,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 330–337, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  53. C. De Jager, A. D. Blackwell, M. M. Budge, and B. J. Sahakian, “Predicting cognitive decline in healthy older adults,” American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 735–740, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  54. D. A. Cahn-Weiner, P. F. Malloy, P. A. Boyle, M. Marran, and S. Salloway, “Prediction of functional status from neuropsychological tests in community-dwelling elderly individuals,” Clinical Neuropsychologist, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 187–195, 2000.
  55. S. Borson, “Cognition, aging, and disabilities: conceptual issues,” Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 375–382, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed