About this Journal Submit a Manuscript Table of Contents
Journal of Aging Research
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 324624, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/324624
Review Article

Universal Design: A Step toward Successful Aging

1Department of Kinesiology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4
2Dory Azar Architect, 870 Revland Drive, Tecumseh, ON, Canada N8N 5B2

Received 27 September 2012; Revised 7 December 2012; Accepted 11 December 2012

Academic Editor: Ioannis Trougakos

Copyright © 2013 Kelly Carr et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. G. F. Anderson and P. S. Hussey, “Population aging: a comparison among industrialized countries,” Health Affairs, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 191–203, 2000. View at Scopus
  2. P. Lloyd-Sherlock, “Population ageing in developed and developing regions: implications for health policy,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 887–895, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Statistics Canada, “The Canadian population in 2011: age and sex,” Catalogue 98-311-X2011001, Statistics Canada Minister of Industry, Ottawa, Canada, 2012.
  4. Statistics Canada, “Population projections: Canada, the provinces and territories,” The Daily, pp. 6–7, 2010.
  5. K. A. Lowry, A. N. Vallejo, and S. A. Studenski, “Successful aging as a continuum of functional independence: lessons from physical disability models of aging,” Aging and Disease, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 2012.
  6. J. W. Rowe and R. L. Kahn, “Human aging: usual and successful,” Science, vol. 237, no. 4811, pp. 143–149, 1987. View at Scopus
  7. J. W. Rowe and R. L. Kahn, “Successful aging,” The Gerontologist, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 433–440, 1997. View at Scopus
  8. R. B. Tate, L. Lah, and T. E. Cuddy, “Definition of successful aging by elderly canadian males: the Manitoba Follow-Up Study,” The Gerontologist, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 735–744, 2003. View at Scopus
  9. E. Del Bono, E. Sala, R. Hancock, C. Gunnell, and L. Parisi, Gender, Older People and Social Exclusion. A Gendered Review and Secondary Analysis of the Data, Institute for Social and Economic Research, Essex, UK, 2007.
  10. M. V. Zunzunegui, A. Koné, M. Johri, F. Béland, C. Wolfson, and H. Bergman, “Social networks and self-rated health in two French-speaking Canadian community dwelling populations over 65,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2069–2081, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Levasseur, L. Richard, L. Gauvin, and E. Raymond, “Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 2141–2149, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. M. Guralnik, L. P. Fried, and M. E. Salive, “Disability as a public health outcome in the aging population,” Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 17, pp. 25–46, 1996. View at Scopus
  13. J. E. Hertz and C. A. Anschutz, “Relationships among perceived enactment of autonomy, self-care, and holistic health in community-dwelling older adults,” Journal of Holistic Nursing, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 166–186, 2002. View at Scopus
  14. K. E. Thorpe and M. Philyaw, “The medicalization of chronic disease and costs,” Annual Review of Public Health, vol. 33, pp. 409–423, 2012.
  15. M. P. Lawton, “Environment and other determinants of well-being in older people,” The Gerontologist, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 349–357, 1983. View at Scopus
  16. M. F. Story, “Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design,” Assistive Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 4–12, 1998. View at Scopus
  17. Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services, “About the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), 2005,” Catalogue 7710-AODA-B01, Queen’s Printer for Ontario, Toronto, Canada, 2008.
  18. H. Demirkan, “Housing for the aging population,” European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. D. E. Crews and S. Zavotka, “Aging, disability, and frailty: implications for universal design,” Journal of Physiological Anthropology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 113–118, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. A. DeMerchant and J. O. Beamish, “Universal design in residential spaces,” Housing and Society, vol. 22, no. 1-2, pp. 77–91, 1995.
  21. C. F. Mendes de Leon, “Social engagement and successful aging,” European Journal of Ageing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 64–66, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Bowling and P. Dieppe, “What is successful ageing and who should define it?” British Medical Journal, vol. 331, no. 7531, pp. 1548–1551, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. L. Charbonneau-Lyons, P. M. Mosher-Ashley, and M. Stanford-Pollock, “Opinions of college students and independent-living adults regarding successful aging,” Educational Gerontology, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 823–833, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. A. Phelan, L. A. Anderson, A. Z. LaCroix, and E. B. Larson, “Older adults' views of “successful aging”—how do they compare with researchers' definitions?” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 211–216, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. W. Guse and M. A. Masesar, “Quality of life and successful aging in long-term care: perceptions of residents,” Issues in Mental Health Nursing, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 527–539, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. J. Fisher and D. K. Specht, “Successful aging and creativity in later life,” Journal of Aging Studies, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 457–472, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Knight and L. A. Ricciardelli, “Successful aging: perceptions of adults aged between 70 and 101 years,” International Journal of Aging and Human Development, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 223–245, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. J. A, Liffiton, S. Horton, J. Baker, and P. L. Weir, “Successful aging: how does physical activity influence engagement with life?” European Review of Aging and Physical Activity, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 103–108, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. S. Fone and B. Lundgren-Lindquist, “Health status and functional capacity in a group of successfully ageing 65–85 years olds,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 18, pp. 1044–1051, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Silverstein and M. G. Parker, “Leisure activities and quality of life among the oldest old in Sweden,” Research on Aging, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 528–547, 2002. View at Scopus
  31. M. J. Bergstrom and M. E. Holmes, “Lay theories of successful aging after the death of a spouse: a network text analysis of bereavement advice,” Health Communication, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 377–406, 2000. View at Scopus
  32. C. A. Brown, F. A. McGuire, and J. Voelkl, “The link between successful aging and serious leisure,” International Journal of Aging and Human Development, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 73–95, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. W. J. Strawbridge, M. I. Wallhagen, and R. D. Cohen, “Successful aging and well-being: self-rated compared with Rowe and Kahn,” The Gerontologist, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 727–733, 2002. View at Scopus
  34. P. A. Bath and A. Gardiner, “Social engagement and health and social care use and medication use among older people,” European Journal of Ageing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–63, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. M. Bennett, “Social engagement as a longitudinal predictor of objective and subjective health,” European Journal of Ageing, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 48–55, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. A. Glass, C. Mendes de Leon, R. A. Marottoli, and L. F. Berkman, “Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans,” British Medical Journal, vol. 319, no. 7208, pp. 478–483, 1999. View at Scopus
  37. E. Grundy and A. Bowling, “Enhancing the quality of extended life years. Identification of the oldest old with a very good and very poor quality of life,” Aging and Mental Health, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 199–212, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. T. Hedden and J. D. E. Gabrieli, “Insights into the ageing mind: a view from cognitive neuroscience,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 87–96, 2004. View at Scopus
  39. T. Lang, T. Streeper, P. Cawthon, K. Baldwin, D. R. Taaffe, and T. B. Harris, “Sarcopenia: etiology, clinical consequences, intervention, and assessment,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 543–559, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. U. Lindenberger and P. Ghisletta, “Cognitive and sensory declines in old age: gauging the evidence for a common cause,” Psychology and Aging, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. D. C. Park and P. Reuter-Lorenz, “The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 60, pp. 173–196, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. H. W. Wahl, A. Fänge, F. Oswald, L. N. Gitlin, and S. Iwarsson, “The home environment and disability-related outcomes in aging individuals: what is the empirical evidence?” The Gerontologist, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 355–367, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Y. Liu and K. L. Lapane, “Residential modifications and decline in physical function among community-dwelling older adults,” The Gerontologist, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 344–354, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. L. M. Verbrugge and A. M. Jette, “The disablement process,” Social Science and Medicine, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. O. Demirbilek and H. Demirkan, “Universal product design involving elderly users: a participatory design model,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 361–370, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. Centre for Universal Design, “Definitions: Accessible, Adaptable, and Universal Design,” 2006, http://www.ncsu.edu/www/ncsu/design/sod5/cud/pubs_p/phousing.htm.
  47. Building Code Act, “Ontario Regulation 350/06, Sentence 3. 8. 3. 3.(4),” 1992, http://www.search.e-laws.gov.on.ca/en/isysquery/cbd0d22c-40df-4754-b58e-e261ddd42ecb/4/doc/?search=browseStatutes&context=#hit1.
  48. J. J. Pirkl, “Transgenerational design: prolonging the American dream,” Generations, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 32–36, 1995.
  49. E. Steinfeld and G. S. Danford, “Automated Doors: Towards Universal Design,” Buffalo, The Center for Inclusive Design and Environmental Access, School of Architecture and Planning SUNY/Buffalo, 1993, http://www.ap.buffalo.edu/idea/publications/automateddoors.htm.
  50. L. K. Weisman, “Creating the universal designed city: prospects for the new century,” Architectural Theory Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 156–173, 2000.
  51. C. Leibrock and S. Behar, Beautiful Barrier-Free: A Visual Guide to Accessibility, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, USA, 1993.
  52. J. P. Marsden, R. A. Meehan, and M. P. Calkins, “Therapeutic kitchens for residents with dementia,” American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and other Dementias, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 303–311, 2001. View at Scopus
  53. Y. Afacan and H. Demirkan, “A priority-based approach for satisfying the diverse users' needs, capabilities and expectations: a universal kitchen design case,” Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 21, no. 2-3, pp. 315–343, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. K. Bajaj, G. A. Mirka, C. M. Sommerich, and H. Khachatoorian, “Evaluation of a redesigned self-checkout station for wheelchair users,” Assistive Technology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. C. F. Kaufman, “Shop 'til you drop: tales from a physically challenged shopper,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 39–55, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. M. F. Story, J. L. Mueller, and R. L. Mace, “The universal design file: designing for people of all ages and abilities,” 1998, http://design-dev.ncsu.edu/openjournal/index.php/redlab/article/view/102.
  57. E. Dumbaugh, “Designing communities to enhance the safety and mobility of older adults: a universal approach,” Journal of Planning Literature, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 17–36, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. American Association of Retired Persons, Home and Community Preferences of the 45+ Population, Keenan, T. A, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
  59. C. J. Deardorff and C. Birdsong, “Universal design: clarifying a common vocabulary,” Housing and Society, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 119–138, 2003.
  60. I. Audirac, “Accessing transit as universal design,” Journal of Planning Literature, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 4–16, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. A. Farage, K. W. Miller, F. Ajayi, and D. Hutchins, “Design principles to accommodate older adults,” Global Journal of Health Science, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 2–25, 2012.
  62. S. Keates, P. J. Clarkson, L. A. Harrison, and P. Robinson, “Towards a practical inclusive design approach,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Universal Usability, pp. 45–52, New York, NY, USA, November 2000. View at Scopus
  63. S. Iwarsson and A. Ståhl, “Accessibility, usability and universal design—positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 57–66, 2003. View at Scopus
  64. Center for Universal Design, “Universal design. Housing for the lifespan of all people,” 2000, http://design-dev.ncsu.edu/openjournal/index.php/redlab/article/view/101.
  65. Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment, Inclusion By Design: Equality, Diversity and the Built Environment, Seacout, London, UK, 2008.
  66. H. Froyen, E. Verdonck, D. De Meester, and A. Heylighen, “Documenting handicap situations and eliminations through universal design patterns,” Australasian Medical Journal, vol. 1, no. 12, pp. 199–203, 2009.
  67. S. Kose, “From barrier-free to universal design: an international perspective,” Assistive Technology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 44–50, 1998. View at Scopus
  68. G. S. Danford, “Universal design people with vision, hearing, and mobility impairments evaluate a model building,” Generations, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 91–94, 2003. View at Scopus
  69. G. Trost, “State of affairs in universal design in Europe,” Fujitsu Scientific and Technical Journal, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2005. View at Scopus
  70. J. Fricke, “Activities of Daily Living,” International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation, 2010, http://hdl.handle.net/1959.9/160364.
  71. S. Katz, “Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 721–727, 1983. View at Scopus
  72. M. P. Lawton and E. M. Brody, “Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living,” The Gerontologist, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 179–186, 1969. View at Scopus
  73. F. Aslaksen, S. Bergh, O. R. Bringa, and E. K. Heggem, Universal Design: Planning and Design for All, Norwegian State Council on Disability, Oslo, Norway, 1997.
  74. P. Hall and R. Imrie, “Architectural practices and disabling design in the built environment,” Environment and Planning B, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 409–425, 1999. View at Scopus
  75. R. Luck, H. Haenlein, and K. Bright, “Project briefing for accessible design,” Design Studies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 297–315, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus