Research Article
Optimal Approaches for Measuring Tongue-Pressure Functional Reserve
Table 1
Pearson’s correlations between different measures of functional reserve: maximum isometric pressure and age.
| Functional reserve measure | Unit of measurement | Maximum isometric pressure (MIP) | Age | Pearson’s correlation | Significance (2-tailed) | Pearson’s correlation | Significance (2-tailed) |
| MIP minus maximum water swallow pressures | mm Hg | .814 | .000 |
−.304
| .007 | % MIP | .314 | .005 | −.104 | .368 | MIP minus mean water swallow pressures | mm Hg | .910 | .000 |
−.359
| .001 | % MIP | .320 | .005 |
−.107 | .354 | MIP minus maximum regular effort saliva swallow pressures | mm Hg | .796 | .000 |
−.250 | .031 | % MIP | .453 | .000 |
−.042 | .716 | MIP minus mean regular effort saliva swallow pressures | mm Hg | .899 | .000 |
−.312
| .006 | % MIP | .493 | .000 |
−.078 | .500 | Maximum effortful minus maximum regular effort saliva swallow pressures | mm Hg | .285 | .013 | n/a | n/a | Maximum effortful minus mean regular effort saliva swallow pressures | mm Hg | .325 | .004 | n/a | n/a |
|
|
Correlations with > 0.4 are shown in bold.
|