Clinical Correlates of Awareness for Balance, Function, and Memory: Evidence for the Modality Specificity of Awareness
Table 1
Descriptive statistics for demographic, awareness, and clinical variables for each of the four diagnostic subgroups and for the overall sample.
AD M (SD) n
Non-AD M (SD) n
aMCI M (SD) n
Non-aMCI M (SD) n
Overall M (SD) n
Age
75.81(7.51) 113
73.05 (10.15) 100
73.74 (8.87) 23
70.30 (11.06) 23
74.07 (9.18)a 259
Gender (% female)
67%
56%
70%
52%
62%
Education
10.16 (3.32) 108
10.57 (3.168) 87
11.13 (3.57) 23
11.05 (3.43) 23
10.48 (3.30) 240
Awareness of function
24.74 (3.53) 87
23.75 (3.91) 72
26.30 (3.06) 20
27.59 (3.02) 22
24.85 (3.76)b 201
Awareness of memory
2.13 (0.99) 88
2.69 (1.20) 61
2.55 (1.10) 22
3.10 (1.18) 21
2.46 (1.14)c 192
Awareness of balance
4.07 (0.99) 43
3.81 (0.92) 27
4.00 (0.91) 13
4.42 (0.79) 12
4.03 (0.94) 95
CDR-SOB
6.97 (3.45) 100
6.45 (3.58) 91
2.13 (1.310) 20
2.27 (1.22) 22
5.90 (3.66)b 233
IADL-patient
21.64 (5.05) 99
20.11 (5.47) 82
24.68 (2.71) 22
25.32 (2.73) 22
21.74 (5.14)b 225
FAQ-caregiver
15.52 (8.11) 109
15.36 (8.29) 94
7.82 (4.81) 22
6.65 (6.33) 23
13.96 (8.38)b 248
Bristol ADL-caregiver
8.90 (7.50) 102
10.97 (9.78) 89
2.96 (2.06) 23
4.04 (5.30) 23
8.63 (8.37)b 237
CESD overall
11.85 (9.46) 93
13.31 (9.10) 72
15.00 (8.54) 23
14.05 (7.86) 22
12.92 (9.08) 210
CESD depressed affect
2.91 (3.30) 93
2.89 (3.21) 72
3.70 (3.43) 23
2.68 (2.38) 22
2.97 (3.19) 210
CESD Lack of positive affect
2.75 (2.86) 93
3.35 (2.74) 72
4.00 (3.44) 23
3.41 (2.61) 22
3.16 (2.87) 210
CESD somatic/vegetative
5.08 (3.92) 93
5.96 (3.97) 72
5.96 (3.78) 23
6.73 (4.20) 22
5.65 (3.96) 210
CESD interpersonal
1.11 (1.77) 93
1.11 (1.44) 72
1.35 (1.90) 23
1.23 (1.66) 22
1.15 (1.65) 210
NPI-severity
8.70 (6.49) 103
9.24 (5.81) 84
15.50 (41.27)* 20
7.44 (8.03) 16
9.42 (13.64) 223
NPI-distress
10.08 (10.02) 103
10.57 (8.74) 82
14.45 (39.23)* 22
7.00 (11.96) 20
10.41 (15.18) 227
ZBI
13.76 (8.97) 107
14.25 (8.35) 89
11.73 (9.35) 22
10.35 (9.56) 23
13.43 (8.86) 241
BSI global severity
50.35 (10.05) 99
52.03 (9.30) 86
51.24 (10.51) 21
53.22 (11.34) 23
51.35 (9.93) 229
Fall history in past 6 months (no/yes)
65/25 90
45/36 81
12/8 20
10/12 22
132/81 213
Probability of falling (%)
38.00 (35.06) 76
56.02 (33.87) 63
32.84 (32.48) 17
39.45 (37.13) 14
44.28 (35.44) 170
ABC
80.95 (16.99) 44
74.40 (24.87) 29
86.15 (11.09) 13
72.92 (16.46) 12
78.72 (19.28) 98
BBS
46.44 (8.57) 77
41.97 (11.48) 64
49.53 (5.03) 17
49.14 (7.23) 14
45.30 (9.76)d 172
POMA
22.25 (4.85) 32
20.38 (5.54) 26
21.88 (4.70) 8
23.50 (4.09) 6
21.64 (5.05) 72
Stroop-interference
−0.90 (1.55) 79
−1.19 (1.64) 54
−0.43 (1.44) 21
0.21 (0.86) 18
−0.82 (1.55)e 172
TMT-B
−2.10 (1.26) 62
−2.32 (1.15) 48
−0.92 (1.00) 20
−1.68 (1.43) 17
−1.96 (1.29)f 147
Clock drawing
16.30 (4.28) 100
15.85 (4.79) 79
18.98 (1.86) 23
17.71 (4.43) 21
16.55 (4.39)b 223
Phonemic fluency
−1.38 (1.00) 98
−1.93 (1.05) 75
−0.81 (1.05) 23
−1.52 (0.98) 22
−1.52 (1.07)d 218
Animal naming
−1.99 (0.78) 98
−2.01 (0.84) 77
−1.27 (1.02) 23
−1.26 (1.03) 22
−1.85 (0.90)b 220
DS-B
−1.04 (0.87) 98
−1.14 (0.82) 76
−0.31 (1.00) 23
−0.82 (0.81) 22
−0.98 (0.89)b 219
RBANS immed memory
57.47 (13.65) 98
65.59 (16.66) 73
75.48 (11.95) 23
82.95 (15.04) 22
64.73 (16.87)g 216
RBANS delayed memory
48.68 (9.35) 95
63.01 (19.13) 70
61.77 (16.89) 22
73.24 (22.74) 21
57.37 (17.71)h 208
RBANS language
78.00 (14.81) 98
78.96 (15.72) 74
94.30 (10.07) 23
94.29 (7.98) 21
81.65 (15.51)b 216
RBANS attention
74.98 (16.39) 91
70.20 (14.85) 64
86.68 (10.79) 22
77.15 (15.58) 20
74.95 (15.92)i 197
RBANS visuospatial/constructional
77.37 (17.60) 93
76.81 (15.83) 67
96.57 (14.83) 21
86.71 (12.79) 21
80.15 (17.38)i 202
RBANS total scale
61.16 (10.09) 83
66.03 (13.73) 59
77.41 (7.67) 22
78.79 (12.26) 19
66.51 (13.07)b 183
AD group significantly older than non-aMCI group. bAD and non-AD dementia group similar, but significantly more impaired than the similar aMCI and non-MCI groups. cAD group similar to aMCI group, but more impaired than non-AD and non-aMCI groups. dNon-AD group more impaired than other groups. enon-aMCI group less impaired. faMCI group less impaired. gAD group significantly more impaired than non-AD group and both more impaired than either MCI group. hAD group significantly more impaired than other groups. iAD group significantly lower than aMCI group. *outliers in these small samples.