Research Article

Clinical Correlates of Awareness for Balance, Function, and Memory: Evidence for the Modality Specificity of Awareness

Table 1

Descriptive statistics for demographic, awareness, and clinical variables for each of the four diagnostic subgroups and for the overall sample.

AD
M (SD)
n
Non-AD
M (SD)
n
aMCI
M (SD)
n
Non-aMCI
M (SD)
n
Overall
M (SD)
n

Age75.81(7.51)
113
73.05 (10.15)
100
73.74 (8.87)
23
70.30 (11.06)
23
74.07 (9.18)a
259
Gender (% female)67%56%70%52%62%
Education10.16 (3.32)
108
10.57 (3.168)
87
11.13 (3.57)
23
11.05 (3.43)
23
10.48 (3.30)
240
Awareness of function 24.74 (3.53)
87
23.75 (3.91)
72
26.30 (3.06)
20
27.59 (3.02)
22
24.85 (3.76)b
201
Awareness of memory2.13 (0.99)
88
2.69 (1.20)
61
2.55 (1.10)
22
3.10 (1.18)
21
2.46 (1.14)c
192
Awareness of balance 4.07 (0.99)
43
3.81 (0.92)
27
4.00 (0.91)
13
4.42 (0.79)
12
4.03 (0.94)
95
CDR-SOB6.97 (3.45)
100
6.45 (3.58)
91
2.13 (1.310)
20
2.27 (1.22)
22
5.90 (3.66)b
233
IADL-patient21.64 (5.05)
99
20.11 (5.47)
82
24.68 (2.71)
22
25.32 (2.73)
22
21.74 (5.14)b
225
FAQ-caregiver15.52 (8.11)
109
15.36 (8.29)
94
7.82 (4.81)
22
6.65 (6.33)
23
13.96 (8.38)b
248
Bristol ADL-caregiver8.90 (7.50)
102
10.97 (9.78)
89
2.96 (2.06)
23
4.04 (5.30)
23
8.63 (8.37)b
237
CESD overall11.85 (9.46)
93
13.31 (9.10)
72
15.00 (8.54)
23
14.05 (7.86)
22
12.92 (9.08)
210
CESD depressed affect2.91 (3.30)
93
2.89 (3.21)
72
3.70 (3.43)
23
2.68 (2.38)
22
2.97 (3.19)
210
CESD Lack of positive affect2.75 (2.86)
93
3.35 (2.74)
72
4.00 (3.44)
23
3.41 (2.61)
22
3.16 (2.87)
210
CESD somatic/vegetative5.08 (3.92)
93
5.96 (3.97)
72
5.96 (3.78)
23
6.73 (4.20)
22
5.65 (3.96)
210
CESD interpersonal1.11 (1.77)
93
1.11 (1.44)
72
1.35 (1.90)
23
1.23 (1.66)
22
1.15 (1.65)
210
NPI-severity8.70 (6.49)
103
9.24 (5.81)
84
15.50 (41.27)* 
20
7.44 (8.03)
16
9.42 (13.64)
223
NPI-distress10.08 (10.02)
103
10.57 (8.74)
82
14.45 (39.23)*  
22
7.00 (11.96)
20
10.41 (15.18)
227
ZBI13.76 (8.97)
107
14.25 (8.35)
89
11.73 (9.35)
22
10.35 (9.56)
23
13.43 (8.86)
241
BSI global severity50.35 (10.05)
99
52.03 (9.30)
86
51.24 (10.51)
21
53.22 (11.34)
23
51.35 (9.93)
229
Fall history in past 6 months
(no/yes)
65/25
90
45/36
81
12/8
20
10/12
22
132/81
213
Probability of falling (%)38.00 (35.06)
76
56.02 (33.87)
63
32.84 (32.48)
17
39.45 (37.13)
14
44.28 (35.44)
170
ABC80.95 (16.99)
44
74.40 (24.87)
29
86.15 (11.09)
13
72.92 (16.46)
12
78.72 (19.28)
98
BBS46.44 (8.57)
77
41.97 (11.48)
64
49.53 (5.03)
17
49.14 (7.23)
14
45.30 (9.76)d
172
POMA22.25 (4.85)
32
20.38 (5.54)
26
21.88 (4.70)
8
23.50 (4.09)
6
21.64 (5.05)
72
Stroop-interference−0.90 (1.55)
79
−1.19 (1.64)
54
−0.43 (1.44)
21
0.21 (0.86)
18
−0.82 (1.55)e
172
TMT-B−2.10 (1.26)
62
−2.32 (1.15)
48
−0.92 (1.00)
20
−1.68 (1.43)
17
−1.96 (1.29)f
147
Clock drawing16.30 (4.28)
100
15.85 (4.79)
79
18.98 (1.86)
23
17.71 (4.43)
21
16.55 (4.39)b
223
Phonemic fluency−1.38 (1.00)
98
−1.93 (1.05)
75
−0.81 (1.05)
23
−1.52 (0.98)
22
−1.52 (1.07)d
218
Animal naming−1.99 (0.78)
98
−2.01 (0.84)
77
−1.27 (1.02)
23
−1.26 (1.03)
22
−1.85 (0.90)b
220
DS-B−1.04 (0.87)
98
−1.14 (0.82)
76
−0.31 (1.00)
23
−0.82 (0.81)
22
−0.98 (0.89)b
219
RBANS immed memory57.47 (13.65)
98
65.59 (16.66)
73
75.48 (11.95)
23
82.95 (15.04)
22
64.73 (16.87)g
216
RBANS delayed memory48.68 (9.35)
95
63.01 (19.13)
70
61.77 (16.89)
22
73.24 (22.74)
21
57.37 (17.71)h
208
RBANS language78.00 (14.81)
98
78.96 (15.72)
74
94.30 (10.07)
23
94.29 (7.98)
21
81.65 (15.51)b
216
RBANS attention74.98 (16.39)
91
70.20 (14.85)
64
86.68 (10.79)
22
77.15 (15.58)
20
74.95 (15.92)i
197
RBANS visuospatial/constructional 77.37 (17.60)
93
76.81 (15.83)
67
96.57 (14.83)
21
86.71 (12.79)
21
80.15 (17.38)i
202
RBANS total scale61.16 (10.09)
83
66.03 (13.73)
59
77.41 (7.67)
22
78.79 (12.26)
19
66.51 (13.07)b
183

AD group significantly older than non-aMCI group. bAD and non-AD dementia group similar, but significantly more impaired than the similar aMCI and non-MCI groups. cAD group similar to aMCI group, but more impaired than non-AD and non-aMCI groups. dNon-AD group more impaired than other groups. enon-aMCI group less impaired. faMCI group less impaired. gAD group significantly more impaired than non-AD group and both more impaired than either MCI group. hAD group significantly more impaired than other groups. iAD group significantly lower than aMCI group. *outliers in these small samples.